Tag: Pradyuman Maheshwari

  • The Mediaah! Dubious Achievement Awards 2015

     

    Here they are again: our awards for the most outstanding, albeit dubious, achievements in the year. Please do remember this is a fun feature that MxMIndia carries annually and the objective is to enjoy at the expense of others and ourselves.

     

    The Let’s Get This as Wrong as We Can Award: To Dr Prannoy Roy of NDTV for heading the panel that called the Bihar Assembly elections in favour of the BJP. For those who remember, the BJP lost and the Grand Alliance of RJD-JD(U) and Congress won.

    The Let’s Get This Wrong By Saying One Thing and Then the Opposite Without Blinkng Award goes to Shekhar Gupta, for blaming Nitish Kumar for losing the Bihar elections and then immediately changing his tack when it turned out that Nitish Kumar had won.

    The How To Protect Your Friends at the Cost of Your Professional Integrity Award to all senior editors who have tried to protect Arun Jaitley from the onslaught of Arvind Kejriwal and Kirti Azad in the allegations of corruption against the Delhi cricket administration.

    The Noble Peace Prize for bring in harmony and peace in Bollywood to Salman Khan and Shah Rukh Khan for coming together in a Bigg Boss mega-epsiode on Colors and professing enormous love for each other

    The Nirupa Roy Award for younger sibling gaining over older, bigger one to Zee Entertainment with Zee Anmol marching ahead of Zee in the BARC urban+rural ratings

    The Mera Gaon Mera Desh award to Zee Anmol… how rural ratings just turned things on its head in the broadcast industry

    The What Do You Mean The BJP Lost Award To all Indian News Channels who could not believe the evidence in front of them which went against their exit polls for the Bihar elections.

    The Big Moose Big Bully Award to the broadcasters and newspapers who attempted to bully the measurement agency – BARC and MRUC – on data release

    The Surf Excel Wash in Linen Award to The Times of India and Hindustan Times for washing dirty linen on the IRS issue. Thankfully, better sense prevailed.

    The Roger Federer now I am No 1, Now I am Not Award to:  It’s the leader alright, but 2015 has seen its lead over rivals diminishing and there are weeks when it’s No 2, now post-Anmol, even No!

     

    The Arvind Kejriwal Odd-Even award: To Star Plus and Colors for alternating leadership… Star Plus is no longer the clear leader and has been facing heat in the last six months

     

    The Swachh Bharat Award for Clean-up-in-Waiting Award: FCB Ulka. With Rohit Ohri set to join, even though the agency is doing rather well, there is much talk about a clean-up of operations and the top deck

     

    The Hum Honge Kaamyaab Award:  To Ashish Bhasin and the Dentsu Aegis Network in India for his goal to make his network the No 2. In this case though, it’s Hum Honge Kaamyaab not ek din, but Bhasin wants it happening by 2017.

     

    The Let’s Not Use the One Exit Poll That Actually Got It Right Award to CNN-IBN for not using the one exit poll that got it right.

     

    The Who Needs to Be An Objective Journalist When You Can Gain So Much More by Being a Sycophant Award to all of Delhi’s journalists who spent an entire press briefing with the prime minister taking selfies with the prime minister instead of asking questions.

     

    Also: The iPhone 6S Selfies Unlimited Award to journos wanting selfies

     

    The Threatening to Quit Before Appraisals Award to Kapil Sharma to always threaten to quit Colors whenever questions are raised about the ratings of his popular weekend show

     

    The How to Upset the Management and Government In Spite of Being Ultra-Pro Government Award to firstpost.com for carrying a mildly critical piece on Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitely and then promptly taking it down.

     

    The Bumper Diwali Sale Award not to the usual contenders like Amazon, Snapdeal or Flipkart but The Times of India. All the e-com biggies fought full0page wars against each other and TOI was laughing all the way to the bank

     

    The Aamir Khan Intolerance Award to Arnab Goswani. Everyone claims they can’t tolerate him, yet they can’t stop watching him

     

    The Virat Kohli #$$&#@ Award  to AIB.  Why #$$&#@? Well,  %#$^#$&%$&%$&! J

     

    The Mr  India Award to Sony Entertainment… the channel has disappeared from the radar. Even when it didn’t muster top ratings, the buzz levels have always been high… KBC, Indian Idol, etc. Now it appears to have lost its mojo

     

    The Nishaan-E-Pakistan Award to Barkha Dutt, for her coverage on India-Pakistan issues. Pakistan couldn’t have asked for a better ambassador (and friend) in the media

     

    The Nishaan-E-Pakistan Award to Arnab Goswami for how he loves to attack the country even there is good news like Narendra Modi dropping by for chai at Nawaz Sharif residence.

     

    The Kores Carbon Paper Award to the Reliance Jio celebrity management and social media agency for messing up big time on tweets from celebs on the Reliance Jio soft launch

     

    And finally:

    The ShekChilli Award  to MxMIndia. Have you seen any other media website taking on the big and mighty?

     

    Contributed by Ranjona Banerji, Pradyuman Maheshwari and a few readers who have requested anonymity

     

  • Mediaah! Why is ASCI mum on CNBCTV18-ET Now issue?

    By Pradyuman Maheshwari

    The stakes are high in the news television business. The winner – in this the leader of the pack – generally takes it all – and given that it’s not an easy business to run, there are just too many claims on counter-claims on which is the #1 channel.

    Earlier this month, ET Now released large ads in The Times of India claiming it’s the No 1.

    On Monday, June 15, we received a mail from a PR agency claiming to represent CNBC-TV18 that ASCI asks ET Now to withdraw the misleading ads.

    Quality journalism requires some no-brainer rigour. You don’t trust the source even it may otherwise be credible. If Company X says it has won a case in the courts, you want to see the Court Order. Ditto with an FIR with the cops.

    But for some, publishing is pure commerce. Like that phrase we’ve been hearing in the ongoing political drama: quid pro quo! This is not the time to shout out loud about the rigour we follow. On to the case…

    So I called the ASCI secretariat on Monday and asked if the advertising self-regulator ever gave out individual dispute orders. The person taking my call said “No”, and was surprised that the channel had done so because ASCI normally discourages the winning party from going to the media about winning a certain dispute.

    In fact the outcomes of each complaint is made public only after allowing enough time for a review request by the losing party.

    I thought it was fair.

    What this basically meant is that while CNBC-TV18 may have had its complaint upheld, the order was conveyed officially but privately to both parties (CNBC-TV18 and ET Now) and not expected to go public… ASCi would do that after two months (on June 2, we received info on upheld complaints of March 2015).

    I asked ASCI if it had indeed issued the order restraining ET Now. I got no comment. I could approach either CNBC TV18 or ET Now for more, I was told. I thought that it was a strange reaction, but then ASCI is esteemed Self-Regulator.

    We dug into ASCI’s CCC reports over the last six months and did not find any complaints against both channels.

    The story was simple until Tuesday evening. Yesterday, that’s Wednesday, June 17, The Times of India’s Mumbai edition had an ET Now ad under the paper’s masthead (on Page1) claiming the channel is #1. It was similar to the earlier one which was contested by ASCI. Now. while technically, ET Now is required to withdraw ads by June 22, the operative word is ‘by’ and not ‘after’.  In all fairness, after hearing of the ASCI order, it should have stopped carrying the dispute ad.

    My immediate response was to write to ASCI, the Advertising Standards Council of India.

    My questions:

    1. What steps does ASCI take if and when an advertiser violates its advisory and continues with its advertisements even after the advisory has been issued to the advertiser?

    2. Has ET Now contested the ASCI advisory/order on withdraw advertising that was found to be misleading.

    I waited all day only to be told by the Secretary General late evening by mail that I will not get the answers. The reason: “In our last conversation I have very clearly indicated that as a policy, ASCI does not comment on individual cases. Your query below not being generic, it would not be right to comment on the same. Our request would be to not quote ASCI since this news has not been issued by ASCI.”

    Needless to say, I was surprised with the ASCI response. At MxMIndia, our intent in approaching ASCI was simply this: “If CNBC-TV18 made a false claim on Monday, it must be exposed and if ET Now has mocked at an ASCI advisory and gone ahead with an ad, then it must be exposed too.”

    By not responding to our query, and possibly because it doesn’t want its name dragged into a controversy between two powerful media groups, we are being compelled to look at motives behind ASCI not being transparent on the incident, even if there aren’t any. As my namesake ACP Pradyuman would say in the serial CID: Kuchh toh gadbad hai!

    Also, clearly, ASCI – as a body needs to be vigilant in its attempt to lay standards in the business and craft of advertising. Perhaps it makes sense for ASCI to have in its fold some non-advertising/media industry biggies who would not be soft on erring members of the fraternity. And be strong and aggressive with advertisers who are incorrect and do not honour the ASCI code in letter and spirit.

    By not doing so, it’s only doing great disservice to the industry that has set it up.

    Remember, it was not very long ago that a minister of the central government had raised questions on ASCI’s efficacy. Some industry commentators had even raised questions about whether ASCI can deliver.

    We believe it can, but not if chooses to stay mum on key decisions such as these.

     

    Here’s the press release we received from a PR agency representing CNBC-TV18:

    ASCI asks ET NOW to withdraw misleading ads

    June 15, 2015, Mumbai:

    The Advertising Standards Council of India, (ASCI) has upheld CNBC-TV18’s complaints against the advertising campaign released by ET NOW news channel on May 31. ASCI has advised ET NOW to withdraw or modify appropriately the said ads by 22nd June 2015.

    Their campaign, launched on 31st May, 2015, was declared to be based on BARC data and their ‘internal data’.  In its ruling, ASCI made the following observations:

    On ET NOW’s claim – “India’s No. 1 Business Channel.”

    ASCI has upheld the complaint against this claim. Firstly, the data provided by the Advertiser is for leadership among English Business channels only and it does not consider the other regional business channels. Hence it was concluded that this declaration is misleading by omission on the advertiser’s part and contravenes Chapter I.4 of the ASCI Code.
    Secondly, the source quoted is of BARC covers only two weeks of data. It refers to TV audience in the 10 to 75 lakh town class and this does not constitute the whole of India and this contravened Chapters IV.1 (b) & (d) of the ASCI Code.
    On ET NOW’s claim – “Built on Expertise. Monthly Positive Stock Calls: ET Now – 1044 CNBC TV18 -326”

    ASCI has upheld the complaint against this claim. The proprietary data source quoted for the claim, “Monthly Positive Stock Calls: ET Now – 1044 CNBC TV18 -326” was “Research – Consult Kraft | Period: Nov ’14 to Apr ’15 | Based on Avg.  Monthly Positive Stocks recommendations All Market Days, 7:30am to 3:30pm. This data period does not overlap with the viewership data period referred to in the advertisement.  The data provided therefore, was likely to mislead by implication and ambiguity and this contravenes Chapter I.4 of the ASCI Code.
    On ET NOW’s claim – “Built on Speed. 6 out of 10 Business Stories Break on ET Now”
    ASCI has upheld the complaint against this claim. This claim was not substantiated with evidence to prove that the Advertiser was indeed able to break more stories / break stories faster than others and was therefore misleading. This contravened Chapters I.1 and I.4 of the ASCI Code.

  • Mediaah! Was Brand Equity unfair in damning Goafest?

    By Pradyuman Maheshwari

     

    Last week, Brand Equity in The Economic Times did a hatchet job on Goafest. Unfair for a publication which comes from a group that ought to have lost all reason to point fingers at people. Remember it’s the same media conglomerate that pioneered the concept of paid content for brands and lifestyle companies and individuals in its publication. Economic Times is the same publication which published the leaked results of the Abby at two or three successive Goafests not too long ago. The Times of India is the same group which has been a major benefactor of the event and allowed its top executives to give the Ad Club quality time as its President.

     

    The Times of India’s television arm, Times Now, was the presenting sponsor of Goafest 2015 and the channel’s Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Director Arnab Goswami was allowed to defend his act at a leadership session. Goswami, being one of the most sought after names in Indian news media, was a huge hit.

     

    That it’s time to take Goa out of the Goafest has been discussed for a few years now, perhaps the author of the article – Priyanka Nair – would do well to ask her senior colleagues (albeit on the business side) why they put in such huge monies on the event and also sent their mascot Arnab Goswami to deliver a keynote. If the event is indeed a damp squib as the article tries to suggest, then why do all of this? Why unveil your channel’s new identity to a group of people who may seem uninterested in the content of the event.

     

    I agree that not all is well with Goafest. It needs an overhaul. There are several things going wrong with it. Regrettably, the bosses at the AAAI and Ad Club haven’t been able to think too laterally on this one. They fashion themselves as out-of-the-box ideawallahs, but have done precious little in the formatting. Adding on broadcast/ publisher and PR categories last year was of course an out-of-the-box idea.

     

    The 2015 edition was more efficient than the last one, and the Abby Awards have indeed been cleansed, but the format is predictable. Many speakers were great and Jaideep Gandhi put in his bestest. But organizers AAAI and Ad Club weren’t able to pull in all their members to attend.

     

    Ironically, Goafest head priest and organising committee chairman Nakul Chopra and some in his team may swear at Economic Times (and its glossy pull-out Brand Equity) for now, but they can’t do without the paper when it comes to giving leads on important news.

     

    There are some adpersons who are aware of this unpredictability of Brand Equity and have been at the receiving end of the frequent reverse sweeps.

     

    Trying to force-present an event’s ugly face often exposes your own, and this is what the Brand Equity report has done.

     

    As for the Goafest bosses, they should use this article to clean up their act. Professionalise the set up… if necessary bring in professionals to curate the event for you.

     

    PS: A tip for those who read the B’Equity story with glee: remember, the same weekly could do the same to you with a Bekaar!

     

  • Down with Times Now, #RejectArnab

     

     

    Time to #Reject Arnab

     

    By Pradyuman Maheshwari

     

    In 2008, well before 26/11 or the Mumbai terror attack, I had written that Arnab Goswami is a lot better than Rajdeep Sardesai and Barkha Dutt (and of course a host of other stars on NDTV). He asked the tough questions, he spoke for you and me. There were no holy cows in his book then.

     

    Around November 26, he did the smart thing of sticking around the studio and not getting out on the field. Whether it was because he feared for his life or whether it was by intent, it worked well for the channel because it had its best man in the studio helping in the packaging of the channel.

     

    Over the years though, the success has got him to turn arrogant on television. If you don’t agree with his line of thinking, even the gods won’t be able to save you. If we thought that Karan Thapar would heckle his guests and often speak more than the people he was quizzing, Arnab takes this art to an all-new level. He just doesn’t allow them to speak beyond half a sentence.

     

    He’s aggressive. He’s offensive. Sadly, he’s also repulsive.

     

    But all of that has worked for the channel and him. He attracts maximum ratings and political leaders love to be on his show because it gives them great visibility.

     

    Ad spots on his show are a few x times more expensive than those on some other English news channels. It’s all going right for the man. And his channel.

     

    But many of us find him crossing the limits for a few years now. The problem with Arnab is that he doesn’t believe in half-measures. He goes on the rampage. I would like to not offer any analogies with the behaviour of other beings, but anyone who comes in his way, is mauled.

     

    Bottomline: Arnab is getting obnoxious. And needs to be tamed soon. If the The Times of India group doesn’t do it, the law-enforcers could.

     

    Ideally of course he should be subjected his fate by viewers who could reject his channel and watch others. But, then, the alternatives aren’t energetic enough. So there are many who still consider him the best of the lot. Plus it’s entertainment. Since the next season of Bigg Boss is still some months away, Newshour is the show everyone loves to watch. There the inmates scream at each other, here the studio guests do that. And so does the master of ceremonies: Arnab Goswami.

     

    Now, as Ranjona Banerji writes alongside, even his lieutenants are doing it.

     

    On the evening after India was humbled by Australia in the semi finals of the 2015 World Cup Cricket, after various elements on social media had converted their dismay to jokes and jibes, one would’ve expected an Oxford-educated Arnab to put things in perspective and not fuel the cause of the lumpen elements.

     

    But what we saw was an unnecessary whipping up of nationalistic passion. Stuff that we can do without. Time to Reject Arnab. Let’s hashtag it, as he loves to do. #RejectArnab

     

     

    No longer any connection to journalism

     

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    Ding dong ding dong… hear that? It’s the death knell of journalism being rung in India thanks to Times Now. That Times Now is on a collision course with both good sense and reality is well known. But did the new channel reach the end game on Thursday, March 26, after India lost in the semi-final of the Cricket World Cup against Australia in Sydney? The answer could well be “yes”.I can safely say that I have never been as appalled with a pair of journalists in 30 years in the profession as I was with the display that Anand Narasimhan and Tina Sharma Tiwari put up on television after the semi-final. People reacted with so much anger to their “#ShamedAtSydney” hashtag running across the screen that #ShameonTimesNow was soon trending on Twitter and continued to do so up to Friday morning.

     

    Fans react with irrational anger when their favourite team or player loses. But for journalists to outdo badly behaved fans deserves the strongest condemnation. Not only were the two anchors foaming and frothing at the mouth but they seemed unable to distinguish between their roles and that of a fan ready to burn an effigy. It almost seemed as if they were egging fans on to misbehave; and suggesting that any such behaviour was justified.

     

    Some of the panellists on Times Now just after the loss, like Charu Sharma, Atul Wassan and later Zaheer Khan tried to inject reason and sense into the discussion. But neither the anchors nor Saad Bin Jung were having any of it. For them, India capitulated, Dhoni should have cried like AB De Villiers of South Africa, Kohli was distracted by Anushka Sharma’s presence and the team played like “stupid amateurs”.

     

    The trouble is that all these are believable as reactions from loony fans. Not from journalists who are either supposed to report on proceedings or, as in the case of TV, ask other people to analyse them. The spectacle of Narasimhan and Sharma-Tiwari screeching at the guests was unedifying and appalling. The two of them are supposed to be sports journalists but there was no semblance of any understanding of sport visible from them. Narasimhan had a mega tantrum over the rights of fans versus sense and Sharma-Tiwari had her own hissy fit about Dhoni’s apparent lack of emotion at the loss – as determined by her.

     

    What viewers might have wanted to see was some analysis of what went wrong. The panellists on the side of reason (the wrong side as far as Times Now was concerned) argued that the Indian team had played well so far, mentioned how well Australia had played, pointed out that there was no reason for the Indian players to purposely play badly. But the anchors were having none of it.

     

    The defining moment for me was Sharma-Tiwari questioning the lack of application by the Indian players. The irony was that neither she nor Narasimhan showed any application to the tenets of journalism. It is tempting to blame Times Now’s editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami for this behaviour. By manipulating The Newshour as his personal soapbox, he appears to have encouraged his staff to become rabble rousers and instigators. Even if he did not instruct either of them to behave in this manner, he has clearly inspired them. I did not watch Goswami himself on Thursday because I had had enough of the channel by then. But my colleague Pradyuman Maheshwari had his own share of heart attacks watching The Newshour.

     

    I have defended Times Now and Goswami before, if only because I felt he had a finger on the pulse. But I fear that I have to concede defeat. Times Now may provide entertainment of the lowest and basest kind but it no longer has any connection to journalism.

     

     

  • Very Premium. Very Alok Nanda

     

    There are creative professionals and creative professionals and then there’s Alok Nanda. Founder and CEO of Alok Nanda & Company (ANC), billed as India’s only brand and communications consultancy focused on the lifestyle and luxury space. Nanda started his career with the legendary creative agency Trikaya Advertising, where he rose to become  National Creative Director and then member of the Grey Asia-Pacific Creative Board. He left Trikaya (now Grey) to set up ANC in 1999 to bring together the worlds of advertising, design, experience design and branding under one roof. ANC has helped build brands like the Taj Hotels, Arrow, Wrangler, Sula wines, Lodha, Barista, Ambuja and Marico, to name a few.

     

    But, then creative design for Nanda extends beyond the advertising work. He sells art, runs a design lab as well as a brand engagement firm. Pradyuman Maheshwari had a freewheeling chat with Alok Nanda essentially on advertising, and a little more. Read on…

     

    You’ve been through the hyperactive days of Trikaya and are now part of the frenzied adworld of today. What according to you are the key differentiators between then and now? 

    It’s a huge sweep of time. At the time when I was just joining, clients were dictated by the advertising industry. Over the years, equations changed when agencies became suppliers to clients and there were these huge global manuals on following this and doing that. In the last couple of years, we have seen enough agencies and clients a communication partner can go to. From our perspective, the big change is you can choose to work for clients you love to work for and clients can choose agencies they love to work with.

     

    To an extent, it’s a bit of the old, right? There are people who have seen your work would want to come only to you. Or they would also want a Piyush Pandey or an R Balki…

    Very much. People know the kind of work they want and would come to you. Talking from a business relationship perspective, today we really only work with clients we want to work with. Ten or 15 years ago, you’d be driven by business imperatives. 25 years ago, it would’ve been the client chasing the agency. I’m seeing how the shifts have balanced out.

     

    How has the journey been for you over the last 15-odd years?

    It’s been pretty good. I wish I’d started earlier. Trikaya was where I learnt everything, I chose not to and I didn’t want to take any business from Trikaya when I left. Not sure, I could’ve easily taken business. There was the Grey part too, the global clients, they obviously wouldn’t consider me even if I wanted to consider them. Even though I had a good relationship with many clients, I was clear I was starting afresh. The drive was my fresh journey…

     

    What were your sentiments when the Trikaya brand name faded away from the agency?

     I’ve honestly lost touch with Grey, have no alignment with the rest of the industry. I don’t even have a clue what’s happening at Ogilvy. I don’t track it.

     

    Huh?

    It’s not out of arrogance. Our business lines are vastly different. Advertising is actually a fairly small portion of what we do. We’ve carved our own space and we’re very happy with it. What I did and learnt at Trikaya was all premium brands. I was never a part of FMCG, big mass brands, rural India. I’ve only done what I know the best. The market has come full circle. India has grown rich, there’s premiumisation happening.

     

    Did you intend ANC to be what it is today in terms of being a premium communication firm?

    In the broader sense, yes. When I set up ANC, I was clear India doesn’t need one more advertising agency.  I said we’ll be multi-disciplinary but without walls. We have multi-disciplinary people here, designers, retail designers, corporate communications people and advertising people. We all sit together, there is no centre. When a client comes, the answer is not advertising. Advertising may follow or may not even happen.

     

    Everyone in the advertising world talks about rural India, about being able to connect with the masses and making a difference and here you want to stick to the elite urban stuff? 

    We’ve no such ambitions. We’re very focused on the lifestyle, luxury and also because of my personal passion, the corporate brand business, all of this are very focused on the premium urban India.

     

    The advertising you said you want to do is has a different, premium feel. But your campaign for Lodha with the claim Wadala is the new Cuffe Parade, is typical of advertising. It’s hardsell? Isn’t calling Wadala the new Cuffe Parade outlandish? 

    Actually, there’s nothing new in it. If you study what happens worldwide, real estate is about creating destinations. If you go to New York, there’s a place called SoHo, created by the real estate industry. It didn’t actually exist. The city of London is about the size of a postage stamp. Every year they gobble up more villages and then they call it Greater London. Why? Why not give it the name of the village? When the government said they’re creating a new city the other side of the creek, didn’t they call it New Bombay? When the residents of York settled in America, they called it New York. There’s nothing new. I studied a lot of history of real estate when I entered the market. This emanates from there.

     

    So was the new Cuffe Parade your idea or that of your client?

     My idea and I’m extremely happy about it.

     

    While real estate is all about selling dreams, it’s finally about selling property.

    It’s about delivery at the end of the day.

     

    The delivery has to happen instantly. If an ad appears in today’s dna, they need to have the phones ringing from 7 or 8am onwards. Are you happy doing this kind of results-oriented advertising?

    Yes and No. Each client has its own requirement and needs. You need to balance out building a brand and business calls. What you’re referring to is the amount of direct response that has to be built into a campaign. Working with Lodha, we’ve arrived at a manner that works for them. To what degree do you build a brand and at what stage do you start ensuring the calls come? You can’t start getting calls if you don’t build a desirable brand.

     

    So, typically, after how many insertions do you expect the ad to make an impact to have the consumer to make a call?

    It varies from project to project. It also varies from the scarcity of demand. If you were going to launch a tower in South Bombay, given the scarcity of land, chances are, even before you release your first ad, they would have sold a large number. It really varies from what is your location, your play.

     

    Abhishek Lodha says you’re more than just an ad agency. You’ve partnered his projects. What is the degree of you involvement? Has this been out of the ordinary or is that the same with all your clients?

    It’s the same with all and I’ll come to Lodha specifically too. We don’t call ourselves an ad agency because of the nature of the multiple offerings we have. We call ourselves, for want of anything better; a communications consultancy. We deep dive into what a client wants. When we work with a Taj, we did their ads, we also designed the identities of all their famous restaurants. We’ve worked in immense detail, bringing design in to Taj, bringing advertising to launches of their properties worldwide…

     

    You have Lodhas, hardcore businessmen, and the folks at the Taj, who’ve earned their stripes in the hotel industry and understand their craft very well. Are they receptive to your kind of evolved communication practice?

    The Lodhas were in the real estate business for many years before they came to us.Their vision, pre-ANC was to be in the middle class department  in Thane and the suburbs. Abhishek came to us and we worked with him on re-envisioning the brand. I sat and worked with him and we were clear that Lodha is going to be playing a premium game, I said you can’t be seen as a builder. You need to become a lifestyle brand. That’s how my relationship started. One of the most powerful things we created for them is a brand architecture and brand identity. That’s how we grew and I go back to saying, life is too short to work with clients you don’t want to. One of the greatest joys of Lodha is to work with Abhishek!

     

    You have a mixed bag of clients.

    Real estate is visible because it’s visible in Mumbai. We do all corporate work for Gujarat Ambuja. We’ve managed their financial brand, we’re now managing their CSR brand. That’s my corporate financial side of work, not visible to the audience but to the investor audience.

     

    If a BJP were to come to you for branding, would you accept it as a client?

    I’d see if I were able to add value to the client, first. We’re in a situation where we don’t need to go back to business for business sake. I’d ask myself if I take them on, which is the other client I wouldn’t have to? At the end of the day, would I be successful for them and therefore would I have a case study for myself? That’s the only way I can grow. I can only grow by creating one case study after the other. Our vision is not to make 30 employees to 300. Our vision is actually margin driven, to put it from a different perspective. I’d seek higher margin business tan higher volume business. My clients know me that I’m expensive and they get value. If I was able to offer that to a political party, I have absolutely no problem. I prefer it that way. It’s not about ideology. That’s the other question you asked.

     

    It’s the flavour of the season to do something for the government, Swaccha Bharat… aren’t you looking at doing some?

    We devote almost 10 percent of our time on public service and charity. We work with hospitals, charities, do identities free for them. We’ve just finished doing one for a doctor who has pioneered free heart service for babies. He’s doing such wonderful work. We said we’ll support you in whatever communication we need. We’ll do our bit in that way.

     

    What are the other categories that interest you as a communicator?

    I’m really excited by education. The big thing about ANC and the joy is that we don’t just build brands, we build categories. We’ve transformed real estate, not just Lodha, in many ways. To me, the next big thing is education.

     

    You seem to have a likeness for businesses with many shades of grey?

    Education is getting corporatised. You’ll have chains with 500 schools. For the first time, they need branding. You need competitive positioning, schools competing for customers.

     

    I’ve never seen an ANC ad which is less than a half page in size and in education you have very small 10×2-sized ads.

    I think it will change when you see some of the things that hopefully will come out from us.

     

    How much of TVC work do you do?

    Very limited, lifestyle luxury is very limited on TV. Luxury certainly is the antithesis of television. Corporates also tends to not be on TV. We make films. For Lodha, for every project we make films that run on sites. We make corporate films…

     

    Advertising agencies typically make their money on TVCs, right?

    I’m sure, they do,  we don’t. Most of our business is fee-driven and we demand a premium fee, upfront.

     

    You say you don’t do much television and most of your advertising is done in English.

    99.9%.

     

    What about other languages? Has that come to you…

    We do a miniscule amount.

     

    You’ve never thought of creating a fair amount of advertising in languages. That’s where premium is going to extend to.

    You’re right, premium will extend in that space. That’s not where the immediate growth is going to be.

     

    You’re not aligned to any big network

    Yes, we aren’t.

     

    Don’t you intend doing that? There were some murmurs sometime back that you are looking to align

    I wouldn’t say we have no intention to. We’d want to find the right partner. That wouldn’t necessarily be an advertising network. It could be a more interesting entity that deals with design and graphics.

     

    WPP, for instance, has a Landor…

    Not that Landor is talking to us or we are talking to them. But, if we did, that would only fit in as far as our brand architecture business would go. What will then happen to my advertising business? We’ll need a free thinking organisation that fits for who we are. People who design their own products. We’ve ventured into arts, for instance in a very interesting way with a JV. It’s a different space.

     

    Is it a definite No to alignments or acquisitions in the near or distant future?

    Well, we are also interested in acquisitions. You never know what comes your way. Our focus, if it has been driven on higher margins, by definition, we have to go from specialization to super-specialization. Art is a direction. If we were to get into interiors, I’d get a quicker way to learn the business, to acquire an interiors business. Things like that is where I would look at acquisitions. Packaging, in a far deeper sense, where you get into material plays, morals etc. We’ve done a fabulous packaging for milk from Sarda Farms. That’s where we started getting into, it’s not just graphics, it’s weight, performance of glass etc. If you want to learn that at a more rapid space, a quicker way is to do an acquisition.

     

    Don’t you think this is the right time to align and grow?

    We are looking for people to partner with, but we’re in no hurry if we don’t find the right person. We’re unique from a pure physical construct of the work we do.

     

    Are you happy with the way advertising is going?

    Yes and No. It’s developed pretty well in certain areas. The craft and film is phenomenal. It’s really improved. If you ask me the rest of it, it really sucks. Our digital design sense is abysmal.

     

    A shorter version of this interview appeared in dna of brands dated February 2, 2015. And, btw, if you thought this 2500-word interview was long, the original transcript ran into some 6500 words.

     

  • The Mediaah! Dubious Achievement & Yearend Awards 2014

     

    So here we are: the MxMIndia Dubious Achievement and Yearend Awards. Remember, this is a fun feature that MxMIndia carries annually and the objective is to enjoy at the expense of others and ourselves.

     

    Here we are:

    The Congress under Rahul Gandhi Award for Loyalists Dumping the Party Award

    To CNN-IBN business executives and editors for exiting from the channel the moment the full acquisition by Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Industries

     

    The Lagaan Award for Extra-Long Ad Films Award

    To Pepsi-Kurkure Gharwali Diwali Ad which went on and on and on and on even as it was fun watching it

     

    The Cheerleader Pompom Award:

    To be shared by Barkha Dutt and Rahul Kanwal, for being most faithful to Narendra Modi.

     

    The How Cold is the Water Award:

    To The Week That Wasn’t for gently getting its collective toes wet in tentative attempts to make fun of the Prime Minister and the BJP.

     

    The Incredible Hulk Emeritus Award:

    To Arnab Goswami of Times Now for having the loudest voice in television – again!

     

    The Last Minute Most Insensitive Headline Award:

    To the Economic Times for this: “Damn! Malaysia Again. 162 Vanish. AirAsia this time.”

    (Wrong on most counts as well)

     

    The Bravery to the Reader Award:

    To Caravan for writing the longest stories in journalism filled with excruciatingly small irrelevant details.

     

    The No More Bosom Buddies Award:

    To The Times of India’s Twitter account for offending film star Deepika Padukone, women, men, people generally all over the world.

     

    The Extraneous Noise That I Have to Suffer Award:

    To Bachi Karkaria for dismissing social media with two cruel strikes and yet listening to what it had to say about disinviting Tarun Tejpal from the Times Literary Carnival.

     

    The I Wish I Was A Writer Award:

    To Priya Gupta of the Times Supplements and Medianet for writing the worst article in defence of the Times of India after the fracas with Deepika Padukone’s cleavage. Also, the How to Upset Purists, Feminists, Traditionalists, Analysts all in one Go Award.

     

    Also: The Archaeological Survey of India Award for Reaching New Depths In Journalism Award

    To Priya Gupta of Bombay/etc Times for her masterpiece (with pointed graphics) on Deepika Padukone and her cleavage appeal

     

    The Panvati Position Award

    To the Editor-in-Chief of the India Today group. MJ Akbar was hardly there, the offer was withdrawn to Siddharth Varadarajan at the 11th hour and Shekhar Gupta joined with much fanfare only to feel humbled. Hence the Panvati (bad luck in Bambaiyya) Position Award.

     

    The Ajay Devgn Award for ‘Aata Maazi Satakli’

    To Rajdeep Sardesai for giving one ‘kaan ke neechey’ to the NRI audience at Madison Square Garden in New York City

     

    The Hum Aapke Hain Koun Award

    To Delhi journalists who were the shown the finger by the new NDA government as we now have a PM who doesn’t taken then on overseas visits and prefers to bypass the very journos who propelled the BJP to winning position

     

    The Laut ke Buddhu Ghar Ko Aaya Award

    To Shekhar Gupta who switched from NDTV 24×7 to HeadlinesToday and now back at comfortable territory at NDTV 24×7

     

    The Bagpiper Award for Doing the Daaru while Discussing what India Wants to Know

    To Vinod Mehta for not shying from drinking through the extra-long News TV discussions. After all Khoob Jamegi News Jab Baithkar Peeyenge…

     

    The Most Misused Word in TV Debates Award:

    To “Should” for featuring in everyone: should people stand up, should people sit down but never, “Should TV anchors just shut up.”

     

    The Short Term Memory Loss Award:

    To election pollsters for getting it wrong and claiming they got it right.

     

    The 9X Award for a Non-Starter Channel

    To Sony’s new GEC, Pal. Ratings are sad, this channel aspired to be a Zee killer. Alas, it virtually killed itself doing so.

     

    The Most Promising Debut Awards

    To Rajesh Kejriwal and his Kyoorius Awards. Showed the world that even boring award shows can be made be snazzy

     

    The Old Is Gold Award

    To Big FM to turn some of its stations to retro and attain ratings and rankings

     

    The Award for organising several Award Shows

    To the Exchange4media group for organising innumerable awards and events through the year.

     

    The Aayega Aanewaala Award

    To BARC, the audience measurement body for broadcasters. One expected it to happen by end-2014, but it now appears it will happen only by April 2015

     

    The Milkha Singh Award for Promoting New Sports

    To Uday Shankar and Star India for bringing sports out of the closet and converting them to super-leagues. After Kabaddi, kho-kho, lagori (7 tiles), gilli-danda?

     

    The Down in the Dumps Award

    To the Indian Readership Survey. The industry bodies may have agreed to not dispute but that didn’t mean it would back it. Only one round is out of the 2013 edition, and life goes on. So do we need a readership survey, a research council….?

     

    Contributed by Ranjona Banerji and Pradyuman Maheshwari and various others

     

  • Letter from MxMIndia: A Year of Consolidation

    So how was 2014 for us at MxMIndia?

     

    The previous year was a horrible one for us. Annus Horribilis, we called it.

     

    Twenty-fifteen was pretty good in comparison. Even if the bucks hadn’t turned big, the mood was upbeat. We hate to admit it, but the ‘achche din aane waale hain’ slogan did change the mood of the nation.

     

    Many may not have forgiven those responsible for Gujarat 2002, but then there was Delhi 1984 and several other communal and civil unrests initiated by various political and community leaders. So even as it’s not right to condone the perpetrators of any riot, the blessed souls from across the spectrum are all the same.  It was the cry for rooting out corruption from the Narendra Modi and the BJP camp that caught the imagination of the nation.

     

    The news media was looking up. Their coffers -for many of them, if not all – were being filled legitimately and under the table. In my interaction with some politicians and newspaper biggies, I learnt how it was done. And how it was impossible to nail a publication. Unless and until one does something silly like this former chief minister…

     

    Twenty-fourteen saw the best and worst in the advertising business. Self-regulator ASCI has gotten hyperactive, Goafest, our version of the Cannes Lions, was saved from a no-show. An industry  association like the India chapter of the International Advertising Association was super-active. The Ad Club expanded its Abby Awards. And there was the birth of an all-new awards show  in the form of Kyoorius.

     

    There was some experimentation on the television scene even as the GECs went on their great ratings run. Zindagi, a channel with re-runs of Pakistani serials, may not have attracted GVTs in large numbers, but it was a winner idea. Sports television grew considerably with Star India putting its might behind the various leagues. Epic, the independent channel funded by Mukesh Ambani and Anand Mahindra, finally took off. Pal, the second Hindi GEC, didn’t take off very well despite the blitz.

     

    As for print, it isn’t dying. In fact it’s been proliferating. Not just in the regions (or the ‘unmetros’) and in Hindi, but in English too.  Radio is still waiting for its Phase III and news, but smart content strategy like BIG FM did with its retro-fication of some stations worked wonders.

     

    And what do we say for digital. It’s here, there and everywhere. A quarter of our billion-plus populace is connected with more than five million smartphones being added every month. Yet, digital is not going to the #1 media even in 2017, as per one study. And we don’t know what’s going to happen later.

     

    The big attraction in the media is integration. Along with BTL and social media, there is much focus on orchestrating an integrated campaign for maximum. Quite like the way Prime Minister Modi did in the run-up to the elections.

     

    The downer of the year has been the Indian Readers hip Survey. It’s sad to see otherwise outstanding professionals unable to come up with a measurement system that will be mutually acceptable. The new measurement regime under BARC is set to launch in April 2015, and one hopes that the television ecosystem handles it more maturely.

     

    As for MxM, we are happy that we are beign counted for our content. Regrettably, not as much for our business and sales. But that, we hope, will happen.

     

    We are looking forward to Twenty-fifteen. Warmest wishes for the year ahead.

     

    Pradyuman Maheshwari

    Editor-in-Chief and CEO

    MxMIndia

     

  • Mediaah! HuffPost and Times of India — Great Match or Mismatch?

    By Pradyuman Maheshwari

     

    I am personally delighted to see the launch of the India edition of Huffington Post. Two reasons: One, we hear from politicians and the TV channels that India’s stock is rising in the world order, but it’s another thing to have an international news vehicle like Huffington Post enter India. And, two: I take great pride in the fact the Editor-in-Chief Sruthijith KK (SK) has been a friend. He was out there helping raise public opinion about this blog when it was in an independent avatar and was being taken on by a leading news daily.

    He was part of my team at dna in 2006-07, although he didn’t report to me directly. I was in touch with him till around a couple of years back, but met him at his office a couple of weeks back when I was in Noida.

    I am not very sure whether I have helped shape his career, but it surely feels good to see someone rise up the ranks to one of the most coveted jobs in the country. He was a good colleague, excellent at his job and went on to do some great work at Mint, Economic Times and later as editor of Quartz.

    The reason for this piece is not about SK or the fact HuffPo has entered the country, it’s about:

    1. Do we think HuffPo India it has a future?

    2. Is the Times of India-HuffPo marriage the right match or a mismatch?

    Does HuffPo have a future? Of course it does. Am sure the spreadsheets would’ve been done, but a lot depends a lot on how long the two partners keep investing in it. And, more importantly, how much the flavour of the US edition is retained here.

    There are a few other players who are into similar ventures in India: FirstPost, Scroll, Daily O, TheNewsMinute and Quartz. The last of these is where SK worked until recently, so he is obviously clued in to the kind of work HuffPo India needs. The scale is different of course. From the first look, HuffingtonPost.in appears to promise several stories every day, some original and many curated. It will have its set of blogs, and I am sure many of these will make for a good read.

    When I heard about HuffPo choosing Times of India as its partner in India, I was unsure if it would work. The internet requires a different style of operations which large media companies in India haven’t been able to establish. That’s one of the reasons why most websites of mainstream media print entities aren’t any great shakes. But the choice of SK and the dozen-odd journalists he has hired is excellent and could well get the team to produce compelling content.

    And finally to the point of whether TOI was the right choice for HuffPo India? My view: I am not sure. This isn’t the first time HuffPo has aligned itself with the big fish. In France, it’s partner is Le Monde. So TOI is not a special case.

    But what happens when TOI does some disdainful stuff like the focus on Deepika’s cleavage. Will HuffPo India damn it? Will it carry a campaign on Paid Content or something around the Arnab Goswami brand of primetime television journalism?

    I remarked on this when I met SK recently but didn’t push for an answer and get him on the backfoot. He obviously knows that it’s not easy to have a mainstream player like The Times of India as one of your parents.

    It’s not that one Times group publication hasn’t damned another in the past. I remember an editorial in The Times of India and Maharashtra Times taking on Vinod Mehta’s case on a  story on Maharashtra strongman YB Chavan in 1989.

    An India Today report sums up what happened following the publication of the YB Chavan story in the Independent (a daily that the Times of India ran from 1989 until the mid-1990s):

    “Intriguingly, the most scathing criticism of the report came from the editorial columns of the paper’s own sesquicentenarian sister. After excoriating “juvenile zeal for sensationalism”, the Times of India concluded: “The hysterical self-righteousness of sections of the press is only a facade for perpetrating politically-motivated intellectual terrorism.”

    So, Ariannan Huffington and Sruthijith KK  need not feel intimidated by Big Brother Times of India. There’s precedence.

    In a  2865-word opener Ms Huffington, talks about her views on India and what her site will be doing here. She writes:

    “And while HuffPost India will be reporting on all the challenges India is facing and all that is dysfunctional and not working, we’ll also be relentlessly telling the stories of what is working. To start with, we are spotlighting organizations that are tapping into Indians’ collective creativity and compassion to improve the lives of individuals and communities.”

    Just the kind of stuff that works in India and the rest of the world.

    Back to where we started.

    1. Do we think HuffPo India it has a future? Yes, it does. Will it be a financial success? We aren’t sure, but if The Times of India group isn’t able to manage this, who can?

    2. Is the Times of India-HuffPo marriage the right match or a mismatch? This isn’t going to be run by the TOI bosses at Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, but the boys and girls at Times Internet headed by Satyan Gajwani. So, things could well be different. But what happens when someone screws up in the paper or the channels or there’s a negative story in one of the various events that the group organises? We hope that there is no reason for such an eventuality, but given that there’s just too much at stake for The Times of India group in India, if things get too uncomfortable, no marks for guessing what will be given a go-by.

    But it would be fair to give Ms Huffington, Mr Satyan Gajwani and Mr Sruthijith a fair chance with the India edition of Huffington Post. Best wishes to them!

     

  • Mediaah! Why the new I&B ministry rejig is disappointing

    By Pradyuman Maheshwari

     

    The near-midnight missive on Sunday that Arun Jaitley was to be the new information and broadcasting minister was disappointing.  To me it appeared more of a sop to the senior BJP leader in lieu of the defence ministry that was given away to former Goa Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar. It could of course also be because Olympic awardwinning sportsperson Colonel Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore is too much of a newbie to deal with a crucial ministry like I&B as Minister of State.

     

    But then defence was always an additional responsibility and even Mr Jaitley is reported to have said that soon after taking charge of finance in May 2014 . So there was no real need for a sop.

     

    My concern with the new I&B minister is his reputation of flexing muscles with the media (and editors) unkind to the BJP. Jaitley is smart and I hope he allays all fears… especially the one in some quarters that the regulators could be sent chasing media entities that take on the Bharatiya Janata Party and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

     

    The other reason for disappointment is that if Modi was really keen on a compact government, combining ministries that could be orchestrated together, he should’ve got Communications and Information Technology minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to hold additional charge of I&B. Technology and communications are the new drivers of the media and Prasad has led I&B in the past.

     

    And my last peeve: former I&B minister Prakash Javadekar made a statement that “ideologically” and “philosophically” he would work towards the abolition of his ministry. By virtue of this reshuffle-cum-expansion, not only has Modi rubbished Javadekar’s view, but has only added on one more caretaker for the portfolio.

     

    Sigh.

     

    Pradyuman Maheshwari can be reached via Twitter at @pmahesh. The views expressed here are his own.

     

  • One Minute View: Will Pal work for Sony?

    Multi Screen Media has had a mixed run with its entertainment television properties.

     

    While flagship Sony Entertainment Television (SET) has been top-of-mind ever since it launched in 1995 barring some early hiccups, the channel hasn’t had a fantastic run in the audience measurement charts in the recent past. What’s kept it going is endless re-runs and newer shows of the evergreen detective series, CID. Last year’s KBC and the ambitious Yudh with Amitabh Bachchan haven’t fared well either.

     

    However, it’s kept experimenting and a new season of KBC with Bachchan is on the anvil.

     

    But the rest of the network has had some superlative success stories. Sab, the light-hearted entertainment channel, has been a huge hit ever since it got to back to its own original easy humour format. The channel’s business head, Anooj Kapoor, has now been entrusted with the task of setting up Pal, an all-new Hindi GEC that’s going to be female-focused.

     

    Sony and SAB are perceived to be male-skewed and Pal, it is hoped, will change all of that.

     

    While the line-up of channel is from the regular crop of production houses,  Kapoor’s Sab success gives us the confidence that it can’t be dismissed as yet another channel.

     

    The buzz in the trade is that the format is quite like that of Zee TV, the Zee group’s flagship channel.

     

    In an interview some years back, Kapoor had said he would like Sab to beat Zee. While he hasn’t been able to do that yet, with Pal, he’s going to surely going to attempt to get closer.

     

    Starting September 1, we’ll watch and wait.

     

    Meanwhile, One Minute View makes a comeback on MxMIndia from today. Enjoy.

     

  • Mediaah! Will CNN-IBN survive without Rajdeep Sardesai?

     

    Mediaah! By Pradyuman Maheshwari

     

    Rajdeep Sardesai’s decision to quit CNN-IBN isn’t like that of an employee leaving any organisation. Had he not quit NDTV in 2005, he wouldn’t have not gone on to team up with Sameer Manchanda and Raghav Bahl and set up the channel.

     

    In Bahl, Rajdeep found an able ally and his teaming up with Manchanda, one of the sharpest brains in the business, ensured that the new channel started operations near-instantly. Rajdeep quit NDTV in April and CNN-IBN went on air in December 2005, and its instant success contributed much to Bahl’s fortunes as well as image of being a television news tycoon.

     

    Until early 2008, Rajdeep and his channel were the clear leaders. They had trounced NDTV early and the year 2006 and 2007 belonged to them. Rajdeep was voted ‘Impact Person of the Year’ in 2006 and was clearly the toast of town and the must-have guest in the capital’s political circuit.

     

    However, from 2008, after much fumbling and a really terrible take-off,  Times Now started gaining ground. This columnist, then writing on exchange4media.com, commented much to the annoyance of many how Arnab Goswami was a better, more aggressive, news anchor.  If Rajdeep would frown on his shows, Arnab would ask the tough questions. He was bratty, and often abrasive, and represented the mood of the viewing masses.

     

    The November 26 Mumbai terror strike changed things dramatically for Arnab and Times Now.  It was the undisputed leader. Simultaneously there was a sense of outrage against Barkha Dutt, though not as much against Rajdeep, who was equally shrill in his coverage from the terror zone. But then so were most other television journalists, including Times Now staffers.

     

    What emerged from Arnab’s show right then and the scene hasn’t changed dramatically ever since is that there’s little else other than the Newshour on Times Now. The other popular programme is Total Recall, but that’s Bollywood nostalgia.

     

    NDTV has established a huge second and third layer, though other than Prannoy Roy and Barkha Dutt, the rest of the cabin crew  – Vikram Chandra, Sonia Verma Singh and Sreenivasan Jain – pale in comparison even as they can hold fort for a month or two. Quite like CNN-IBN where Bhupendra Chaubey was an excellent stand-in for Rajdeep on the days he took off, but is he the man who can steer the channel to the top slot amongst English news offerings? Can his interviewing skills match those of Arnab?  The answer is a clear No. Read that in 200 points, all caps.

     

    So will CNN-IBN survive after Rajdeep Sardesai’s exit? Oh, yes, it will. Just as India not just survived but thrived after Indira, the Tatas after JRD, the Aditya Birla group after Aditya Birla etc etc. Also, remember, we have had channels which have meandered directionless for years. Headlines Today, for instance. Or even NewsX.

     

    Headlines Today has seen a fresh lease of life after the entry of Karan Thapar and it will gain more respectability with newly appointed vice chair and editor-in-chief  Shekhar Gupta on air.

     

    There were rumours that both Arnab Goswami and Barkha Dutt were approached by Reliance Industries for the top editorial job at CNN-IBN. Barkha is said to have spent a few days in Mumbai recently and even though she denied the news posted by Sahara Samay on its website last week, many believe she may well accept the job now that it’s clear that Rajdeep has exited. A well-known face like Barkha’s will ensure that Rajdeep’s absence is not felt by viewers.

     

    Meanwhile, a new top deck is reportedly assuming charge at Network18 and an announcement is likely to be made on who will lead the company in the absence of most biggies in the organisation.

     

    Will Rajdeep join the India Today group, as was speculated? Or is he taking time off to write a book? Since MxMIndia doesn’t revel in breaking news or carrying wild gossip , we recommend you look up other trade sites for that. What we would like to reinforce are three things.

     

    1. Had Rajdeep Sardesai not existed or not quit NDTV, CNN-IBN would’nt have been around or at least not happened as early as December 2005. Of the various news channels, CNN-IBN has an excellent reporting team, even though many were retrenched last year.

     

    2. The success of any leader is indicative by how it manages operations after he or she leaves. Prannoy Roy has ensured that. Arnab hasn’t. You don’t want to watch the 9pm bulletin when he’s not on air. Rajdeep has a good B and C team but none of them with the same profile has him

     

    3. CNN-IBN (and IBN7) will survive for sure. But it’ll need a new face soon.  Clearly, money is not going to be the constraining factor for this recruitment. For Mukesh Ambani and Reliance Industries Limited, that’s hardly a worry. What the master and his advisors have to convince the big and famous editors is that they will be allowed to operate in a free and frank manner.  That they will be allowed to carry news which may be negative on them. Now will that will be a tough ask?

     

    There are many who  believe news journalism is doomed with the active entry of Reliance Industries in news media. That, as I have written earlier, is an incorrect assumption. Most of our big publications were set up by business houses – large or small.  Moreover,  we do know of some well-known media conglomerates indulging in corrupt or incorrect practices.

     

    If in the true spirit of business, Mukeshbhai and Reliance Industries do not devalue the brand, there is no stopping CNN-IBN and the rest of the media empire from attaining greater heights. If considerations of the rest of their businesses impact the editorial policies, the Ambanis know what happened to TheSunday Observer and the Observer of Business and Politics in the 1990s.

     

    Interesting times ahead for sure.

     

  • Tale of Two Awards: Abby & Kyoorius

     

    By Pradyuman Maheshwari

     

    It’s perhaps unfair to write this comment after the Kyoorius Awards are held. For, one can’t help comparing the Abby awards which were held at Goafest 2014 earlier this month with Kyoorius which happened last Friday.

     

    To compare the Abby with Kyoorius would be as incorrect as comparing the experience of a multicuisine restaurant in the neighbourhood with that of a five star hotel.

     

    However, I was happy to see that Goafest 2014 happened. It proved all naysayers wrong. Given that the event had an all-new organising committee head as late as February, what we saw achieved was indeed a herculean task. And it required the collective charm of Srinivasan Swamy and all of the Goafest and Advertising Club biggies to pull it off.

     

    It speaks a lot about the solidarity and the desire to keep the Goafest flag flying high that many major and small agency heads were present.  Almost all media agency captains were in attendance, and they possibly ensured that the sponsorship monies came in.

     

    However,  as Goafest celebrates its tenth year of existence next year, it will need to do loads more to ensure it doesn’t lose relevance.

     

    One, get a better set of speakers.Curate the conference well. Ensure speakers don’t promote their own organisations/ brands/ work.

     

    Two, ensure all agencies participate. Iron out the differences, give in a bit if necessary but get everyone on board

     

    Three, consider organising it in a season that’s not so sunny and sweaty. Announce the dates well in advance

     

    Four, raise the bar on the awards production. It’s not going to be easy to match the standards set by Kyoorius, but it’s got to be done. Outsource the organising, professionalise it.

     

    And lastly, Five: Agreed advertising is not about Creatives any longer. But to see the absence of many (most?) creative whizkids was unfortunate. Puhleez get them back!

     

    But I think the most important thing is: Don’t live in denial. I have heard some unverified stories about agencies not participating in Kyoorius as they didn’t want to upset the AAAI. A few potential sponsors of Kyoorius reportedly said they were intimidated. One agency biggie is said to have even threatened to speak in the negative about Kyoorius to a pink paper if the dates weren’t moved.

     

    Advertising is about being edgy and stylish. But being cocky and arrogant will take Goafest and the Abby nowhere.

     

    As for Kyoorius, Friday’s event was not an awards show. It was an extravaganza. Rajesh and I were speaking about the need for a credible alternative to the Abby some months back. But buoyed by some active encouragement from various industry friends, he walked the talk and got D&AD to back the advertising and digital awards. I must confess I wasn’t too impressed by the design awards presentation last year.  Although the D&AD judging process was excellent, one of the emcees goofed awfully. The production values were very Abby-like, one could say.  In fact that was the only downer in an otherwise super Designyatra.

     

    So even as MxMIndia wrote about all the good stuff that was scheduled to happen at the awards night, I wasn’t sure about how it would be.  Rajesh gave me a sneak peek of what to expect, but no preview can capture the real thing.

     

    Of the various awards ceremonies I have attended over the years – especially in advertising and marketing, this was by far the best.

     

    But it was just not about slick production or good food and drink or taking care of lesser stuff like offering food to drivers and arranging for Meru cabs so that people can drink away. Or ensuring there is more veg than non-veg, as the non-veggies have the option to consume veg, but not the other way around. It was about the Awards itself. The process was excellent. I heard murmurs that there were certain scams here too, but there was much care taken to weed them out.

     

    Having produced a winner, here are five suggestions for Kyoorius and Rajesh for next year:

    1. Ensure the message is sent out to all and sundry in the creative world that they must participate. Lowe included.
    2. Factor in effectiveness and include more categories, but stick to the D&AD credo and values
    3. Announce dates for next year early
    4. Am sure there aren’t profits from Year 1, but it would be good to see some of the monies being ploughed back for the trade
    5. Just be yourself.  And start thinking of how you are going to better the show next year!

     

    But , of course, there’s a Designyatra (and Digiyatra) scheduled from September 11 to 13. For those who haven’t been there, and for those who’ve seen the Kyoorius extravaganza on Friday, it’s got the same style. And the good thing is that you wouldn’t want to head to the bar through the day. The content will ensure the high.