Category: MxM JOURNALISM REVIEW

  • First on MxM! : Its final. A K Bhattacharya to be Business Standard editor

    It was rumoured that he would take charge as editor and it’s now confirmed. In a mail sent by chairman and editorial director Mr T N Ninan earlier today, group managing editor Mr A K Bhattacharya has been appointed editor. He will take charge on November 1, 2011.

    AKB, as Mr Bhattacharya is known as, joined the paper in January 1996 as national editor. He later launched the paper’s Mumbai edition as resident editor.

     

    Mr Bhattacharya’s appointment follows Sanjaya Baru’s resignation as the editor, following his decision to join an international thinktank. I wish to place on record my thanks to Dr Baru for his editorial leadership of the last two years, and to wish him well in his future career, Mr Ninan’s mail said putting an end to all rumours.

  • When Arnab struggled, sputtered

    Ranjona Banerji

    It was quite painful to watch Arnab Goswami on Monday night, struggling with his own clear convictions about Team Anna. There was the winning candidate from Hisar, Kuldeep Bishnoi, making it clear that his victory had nothing to do with the anti-Congress campaign led by Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi. He won because of his father and the groundwork done by him. The Congress said Bhajan Lal’s son, supported in this election by the BJP, was never a contender. Further, he wanted to know what Team Anna would have done if Ajay Chautala of the Indian National Lok Dal had won — given the years of corruption charges against him and his family. There was no adequate answer from Medha Patkar, who was representing Team Anna on the panel. Vinod Mehta, editor of Outlook, wanted to know what Patkar was doing with Team Anna in the first place. And Arati Jerath, political editor of Crest, pointed out that the bigger story, than Team Anna’s role in the Hisar by-election, was the various losses suffered by the Congress.

     

    **

    The Times of India indeed led with the Congress’s 0-4 showing in four by-elections, as did the Hindu. Although each loss had its own specific reasons, the portents cannot be good for the struggling alliance in power at the Centre. Oddly, Hindustan Times carried the election results below the fold in Mumbai and as an adjunct story to its lead about the right to recall in Delhi.

    The Telegraph, Calcutta, interestingly and oddly, had Shah Rukh Khan as a half-page lead on the front page. The Deccan Chronicle in Hyderabad focused on the ongoing battle for AP launched by Jaganmohan Reddy. The TRS winning the by-poll was also prominent.

     

    **

    In spite of all the spankings which Indian news channels get, it is also necessary to thank them — particularly CNN-IBN and NDTV for focusing on less dramatic but equally important news like children dying in UP hospitals, child labour, female foeticide and so on. The documentary features which they run need some more focus than the anchor-generated hysteria.

    **

    At last, the Indian media has picked up on the ‘Occupy’ movement, especially since it has spread across the world. However, Syria remains low on the radar.

    **

    To end, let’s go back to the end of Goswami’s show on Times Now, where once again he was baffled by Gujarat policeman Sanjeev Bhatt, who obviously got bail, got out of jail and was then kidnapped by television. Bhatt openly accused the Narendra Modi government of not just the riots but also a hand in the death of Haren Pandya and various other intimidatory tactics. Goswami and the Gujarat government spokesperson Jainarayan Vyas, both sputtered, obviously unprepared for this odd kind of candour. Makes for good viewing.

  • Media under scanner for Telangana coverage

    By Viru Desai

    The coverage of the unrest in the Telangana region in Andhra Pradesh by the print and audio visual media, the vernacular media in particular, has come under the scanner for a number of reasons. Being an emotive issue, Telangana has become an explosive subject for the media in AP since the time the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS), the regional outfit headed by headed by K.Chandrasekhar Rao, came into being and is currently leading the movement for gaining statehood for the region. The oft-repeated complaint of Telangana activists, including the TRS, is that the statehood movement is not getting the due it deserves in the Telugu media because it is owned by media barons from Coastal Andhra. However, the perceived bias of these media organisations needs to be debated in detail.

    Just as every section of society in Andhra Pradesh is currently divided on regional lines — from the polity to the most mundane of organisations — so also is the media in Andhra Pradesh. With the vibrant media scene in Andhra Pradesh commanding an approximate readership (Telugu) of between seven and eight million, the Telangana issue has taken centrestage. The issue has also generated a lot of interest in TV channels. It can be said that the media too has not been untouched by the vitiated atmosphere of uncertainty and mistrust sweeping the state.

    The ownership and staffing pattern in the Telugu media is a mixed bag. Of late, a lot of professionals hailing from Telangana have joined Telugu media organisations, while the proprietors mainly belong to Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema. This has, however, not clouded the news selection and editorial coverage of the contentious Telangana issue in the Telugu media.

    To make a dispassionate observation, right from the largest selling Telugu daily, Eenadu, to Andhra Jyothi, Sakshi, (all owned by Seemandhra media houses), Vaartha and Surya, every Telugu publication is giving wide coverage to the Telangana movement. Day after day sees the ‘Sakala Janula Samme’ (general strike) which has continued for over 23 days and the RTC strike, getting wide coverage in the pages of these dailies. The myriad bandhs, rasta rokos and other forms of protest too have cornered a lot of space in these dailies.

    On the audio visual media front, the most popular TV channels, TV9, ETV (owned by the Eenadu group), Sakshi channel (owned by the Sakshi group), ABN Andhra Jyothi, NTV and TV5 are devoting a lot of prime time in the news section to the Telangana stir. On the other side of the line, the channels identified with the pro-statehood movement such as Zee 24, HMTV and T News are going overboard by highlighting the event.

    One interesting sidelight, though, is that the print media is refraining from examining the issue critically. Normal life has been affected substantially with public transport totally paralysed since the launch of the RTC bus strike, schools and colleges shut down since a month, medical services hit, increasing power cuts due to the coal miners joining the strike and so on. There is no sphere of public life that has not been affected adversely. Yet there are hardly any sharp reports that are bringing the agony of the common man to the fore. It is the poor and the lower middle classes who are at the receiving end. Whether it is the aggressive postures or even threats of the T-activists to some media houses, for this stance is the question.

    The writer is a media practitioner and commentator based in Hyderabad.

  • English channels slipped on Kejriwal attack

    By Ranjona Banerji

    Tuesday evening demonstrated just how far Indian television has to go when it comes to simple reporting. Around 6 pm, Arvind Kejriwal, key member of Team Anna, has a slipper thrown at him at a rally in Lucknow. The English news channels had to borrow the feed from others, fair enough. But instead of concentrating on what exactly happened – there was evident confusion at the site – they promptly started asking other members of Team Anna for their views. The Team members were as clueless as the poor viewers, since we were not told exactly what was going on. Switching to Hindi channels was a major relief since they decided on reporting first and comment later.

    Of course, it was not till the morning papers arrived that we had a clear picture. The who, what, why was set down in print and the comment was minimal. Also, having teased us with running text about cracks in Team Anna, the channels got carried away by the slipper-throwing and forgot all about that.

    **

     

    BS Yeddyurappa got the full scorn of the media as he rushed from hospital to hospital to avoid stepping into a prison cell. This is hardly surprising and it is interesting to see eminent panellists openly laughing at the antics of our high-up-theres. Either the channels have got tired of our permanently outraged usual “experts” or someone in the dial-an-expert department is looking for variety. I never heard Mohandas Pai say a word in the Times Now discussion on the former Karnataka chief minister’s health problems but he laughed constantly. Renuka Choudhury was her usual acerbic self.

    **

     

    The Occupy Wall Street movement is now getting good coverage in Indian newspapers and the business and corporate community in India is also responding. Of course that could be fear that they will feel a similar backlash. Ever ones to take responsibility, several felt that graft was a bigger problem that corporate greed in India. Yeah sure.

     

    **

     

    Publicity for the upcoming Formula 1 race in Delhi is one full swing and newspapers and TV channels tripped over themselves to show us exactly the same stuff as “exclusive”. Let’s watch a bit to see if F1 will overtake cricket in this country.

     

    **

     

     

    Brand Equity on Wednesday carried an interesting article on the new Levis (Go forth) and Nokia (Epic Dramas) ads, which look at the problems of being young with an edgy feel to them.

    **

     

    The news that the Maharashtra state Election Commission will be tracking paid news for the upcoming elections might serve a warning to media houses that they are being watched. Which in this instance is not a bad thing.

  • Express’s excellent expose of Kiran Bedi’s inflated bills

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    The prize for the day must go to the Indian Express and its expose of accounting fiddles by former IPS officer Kiran Bedi. This prominent member of Team Anna, according to the Express report, regularly overcharged NGOs and other organisations for her airfare by travelling cheap and submitting inflated bills.

    TV channels soon picked up and the story and it must be remembered that they have been at the vanguard of the cheerleading squad for Anna Hazare and his movement. By mid-day, Bedi was on air offering a plaintively-voiced explanation and claiming she had done no wrong. Bedi’s answer to the Indian Express follows, without comment as it speaks for itself: “We follow transparent methods of functioning and volunteer to be questioned or audited. Every penny in our work is accounted for and is for the facilitation of causes we espouse… We have been very conscientious of trust and responsibility… And hence punctual and meticulous in our systems.”

    **

    The media, it has to be remembered, flatters to deceive. Too much expectation should not be placed on endless support for any person or movement, no matter how glamorous or well-meaning. The Anna Hazare movement thought it was good PR to go out of its way to thank the media for its “support” – mainly the non-stop TV coverage of Hazare’s fast at Ramlila Maidan in August.

    Unfortunately for Hazare’s team – and unfortunately for the principles of journalism! – the positive one-sided coverage given to Team Anna could only last so long.

    Cynicism and scepticism will usually triumph over adulation – one must remember that the so-called adulation of celebrities is usually PR and marketing driven and will also go the way of all things one day. One suspects that the internet will push that change faster than our little media darlings realise.

    As for the rest of the world, some disgruntlement soon emerges. Poor Rahul Gandhi, who a few months ago was seen as a worthy heir apparent, is now pilloried all over the place and is often portrayed as the font of all problems. Extreme perhaps but inevitable.

    **

    One which note, I was quite happy that the baby shower party for Aishwariya and Abhishek Bachchan completely passed me by. I only got to hear of it through Twitter and haven’t stopped congratulating myself on my escape!

  • Don’t be scared of the Dolly Bindras in media: Shishir Joshi

    By Shishir Joshi

     

    This is not in defence of the media. As you read along, you may realize it. In fact, it is quite to the contrary.

    Foremost, let me lay down some of the allegations against the media and some of the prevailing perceptions;

    That the media is a king-maker. That it is corrupt. That it is far away from the realities impacting the society. And that it thrives on sensationalism.

    Partly, it is the media, itself, which is to blame. For the corruption. (Bhrasht-aachar; read, corrupt behaviour.) And for the perception.

    Let’s start with the most recent one. Media as the king-maker. Allegations which have shattered the holier than thou image. And as eminent journalist Arun Shourie put it in a TV show, “Time and again instances have come up where journalists themselves have been responsible for the betrayal.”

    Many, largely unrelated to media, strongly believe media is corrupt. Unfortunately, what they mean by ‘Media’, could really be a handful, but, those who get branded, are just any and everyone who is associated with ‘media’.

    So, to begin with, here’s a dekko to clarify some prevailing misconceptions.

    Very few people really know and understand how a news organization operates. In the fifty-odd people who work, in what is seen by the outside world as the ‘powerful’ editorial of any news organization, a little less than half, say twenty or so, are what everyone knows as Reporters (working Journalists in the real sense).

    They are the ones who have a contact with the ‘outside’ world. Or, that, the outside world really knows about. (The other non-reporter face known to the high and mighty could be the editor, but, increasingly, it is the CEO or the Marketing /sales head who is a far more ‘popular’ face.

    Within those twenty reporters, barely four or five such Journalists deal/interact with those in High places; by this, I mean, with Political heavyweights (by Reporters covering the political beat) film stars (mind you, not any film start, but only the big five of Hindi cinema) and Sports, again, here not just any sport or any sports heavyweight, but Cricket an d the mighty Sachin, no less.

    So now, of an approximate 50 odd, we have come down to the top five in any Editorial, who have the opportunity to rub shoulders with the Rajas (not to be mistaken with Spectrum Raja. And within that, on a rare occasion will one odd Journalist really mis-use his seat or position.

    All this also depends on the reach and impact that the Media house commands, in circulation or readership. (NDTV among policy makers and Hindustan Times in Delhi do count for being heavy weights…umm… what a coincidence). Needless to say, a fancy designation helps.

    So if a Managing Editor of one among many many many media organizations is found to step into grey area or is caught on tape, mediating or promising solutions, this could be just ONE he or she caught in the act isn’t it? Is it then fair to brand all of media as corrupt?

    It may be unfair. But the guilty, is the media itself. And some of these journos in power. And the perception that they have created.

    How often have we seen PRESS stickers adorning two wheelers and cars of media persons. Any self respecting journalist who holds a valid identity card from his organization will tell you that these stickers are not required. Not required unless you are using them to ensure the traffic cop does not stop you.

    Maybe those using these stickers do not know this, but the ‘public’ and the traffic police surely believe this is the reason.

    To say press stickers are by themselves to blame, would be highly unfair.

    We also have a mushrooming number of ‘king-maker’ journalists. Who throw names, host parties and ensure that the bigwigs attend their private dos.

    Rarely does the ‘King’ , either a big-ticket politician or a film star, not oblige. Graciously, he ensures that the journalist is addressed by his first name, and a few back slaps later, the powerful man is back in his den.

    Only a handful would cringe at the thought of a powerful and popular name walk into your living room and back-slap you, chat up your family and share a chai with you. What the action leaves behind is you, the journo beaming from ear to ear, like a fat cat having stolen a bowlful of cream, with the rest of your family, friends and neighbours in a daze.

    Mind you, there is nothing wrong in the high and mighty visiting you.

    But, where the hacks go wrong, is when they start believing that powerful are in love with you the person and not you the Journalist. I promise you, it can’t be further away from the truth, in most cases.

    And as you bathe in the halo of the big one calling you by your first name and your family and some friends gazing at you with renewed affection and respect, you fail to see the rest of the neighborhood, who see you as an ass-licker. That is perception, as it gets created.

    You, in fact are an ass with a big bloated ego, refusing to see the writing on the wall. “You are so dear to me,” says the politician and you glean with pride. What you don’t read between that line is he muttering under his breath that “I accept you only with your designation and organization.”

    The power of a journalist, in today’s age (unless his good deeds speak volumes) is like the hair on the head, the tooth in your gums and the nail on your fingers. It is valued only when it is in its place. Worthless when chopped.

    There was a time when Journalists wielded the power of the pen. The power, by what they wrote. Based on facts and fair play. That was power. Real power laced with absolute respect.

    Today, the power has corrupted. Absolute power (based on a belief that he is the king maker) has corrupted absolutely.

    The far and few, but absolutely corrupt journalist is powerful not by what he is capable of writing, but his ability to WITHHOLD information. The power to conceal a story, often at the cost of a favour, or as seems in the case of the Radia tapes, through an alleged TRADE-OFF makes the corrupt journalist in the lot nothing less than a white-collared extortionist.

    But you hate them, you call them names and yet, you do not speak out against them. What is it that scares people when it comes to speaking up? Or speaking out? Unless it is in hushed tones? Politicians have been hurling abuses at each other, taking names, in the spectrum scam. But no one has dared name the journalist(s) or media houses at all. Only after social media (and later a few magazines) began talking about it, have names begun cropping up. The role of the journalists is beginning to get scrutinized.

    While social media has been active in this case, mainstream media has been largely mute. Be kind to thy comrades for they may one day come and lord over us. Is that the reason why?

    But what stops the rest of the world from talking about these names in public? Two reasonings come to my mind.

    One, Industry captains do not wish to rub India’s much watched English channel(s) and powerful newspapers the wrong way. “I am seen on it, quoted by them and would continue wanting to be seen there” is what they believe. Any rubbishing of the network, or its key stake holders would mean, being blacked out.

    The second, and more real fear is of an unwarranted backlash. I call it the Dolly Bindra effect. Nobody wants to rub Media big-wigs the wrong way. However wrong they may be. They may be paper tigers, but tigers no doubt. Their byte is more poisonous than the (non existent) bite. They have a habit of bouncing back and, like the boxing cushion, slamming right into your nose.

    So, however much you dislike them, hate their guts, have evidence of their alleged wrongs or have taped conversations of political coziness, you would rather shut up and lead your life.

    After all, we all know what happened to Shweta Tiwari and Samir Soni on BiGG Boss season four when they took on Dolly Bindra, right? Shweta was stung in the face, Samir was ousted. And the one who got maximum press, was Dolly, who returned to the BiGG BOSS house with a bang.

    PS: Remaining quiet has never been a solution. Mute spectators to a crime too, are as much guilty as those perpetrating the crime.

    It is time you speak up against those, whom you believe are corrupt under the garb of being honest. It is important too. For others, Citizen Journalism, or social media, is a solution.

    For, isn’t it a commoner like you and me who exposed the Adarsh scam or the CWG or the initial lid of the various scams in recent times?

     

    Shishir Joshi is the co-founder of Journalism Mentor, and till recently was the Group Editorial Director of the Mid-Day group of publications.

  • Modi and Gujarati media: Two swords in one sheath

    By Urvish Kothari

    Blatant and vitriolic criticism of Narendra Modi seems to have become the norm for Gujarati dailies of late. Gone are the days when the Gujarati print media, with an average issue readership of more than 1 crore (according to IRS 2011-Q2), mostly adored the chief minister. It supported, or at least was non confrontational  about his publicity blitzkrieg and his self-projection as a tough, non-corrupt, pro-development, ‘No. 1’ leader with a subtle and not-so-subtle communal slant.

    As is evident from events of the last few months, Modi has been constantly at the receiving end in many issues — be it the arrest of Sanjeev Bhatt or his three-day Sadbhavana Fast. The prominence and the column space allotted to arrest and release of IPS officer Sanjeev Bhatt in the Gujarati media would have been unthinkable a couple of years back.

    While English dailies reported the whole episode with restraint, news and images of Sanjeev Bhatt were being highlighted on first and last pages of Gujarati dailies. Bhatt was made out to be a ‘singham’ — a hero.  The pro-Sanjeev Bhatt coverage was not just about appreciating the uprightness of the officer but was fuelled, to a large extent, by the anti-Modi ‘line’. Gujarati dailies had a field day when the late Haren Pandya’s wife vaguely pointed her finger towards the CM in her husband’s murder.

    Recent rhetoric against the Modi government, which was, in effect, against Modi himself, took off from very unusual point: the issue of cow slaughter. The issue was hardly discussed in the public forum. But suddenly the failure of the Modi government in protecting cows became the war cry in two major Gujarati newspapers.

    The purpose of the intensive news campaign that ran for days was to prove that Modi was un-Hindu, if not anti-Hindu. It was to falsify his deeply entrenched claim of being ‘the saviour of the Hindus’.

    Even the usual non-political Modi-baiters were baffled by the anti-cow slaughter campaign which gathered momentum so suddenly. The stage was set, and then came the burning issue of the appointment of the Lokayukta.

    Gujarati dailies grabbed the issue with both the hands, one daily even lowering its masthead with the news of the appointment of the Lokayukta by the Governor and the government’s legal challenge to it.

    When the Supreme Court referred the Gulbarg Society case back to the lower court and declined to monitor it further, Modi famously tweeted ‘God is Great’ and projected the SC’s decision as a ‘clean chit’. Many news channels echoed his view, but Gujarati dailies were more cautious and less jubilant.

    His three-day ‘Sadbhavana Fast’ was treated with scepticism and a pinch of sarcasm, due to the pomp and politics involved. There was criticism about the expenditure incurred during the fast and even the memory of Mahatma Gandhi was invoked for an uncharitable comparison.

     Gujarati dailies have been vocal in making allegations of corruption and in giving considerable weightage to the statements of Congress leaders in Gujarat recently. A Gujarati daily recently devoted a full page to CAG’s criticism of various departments of the Gujarat government. A clean image no longer remains Narendra Modi’s USP, at least for the Gujarati dailies.

    Mostly unfavourable and critical of Modi, for the reasons best known to them, Gujarati dailies have been conscious not to indulge in anything that may be perceived as ‘secular’ by a majority of their readership. During the Sadbhavna Fast, Modi’s advances towards the Muslim community were met with veiled criticism. One Gujarati daily even frowned at his attempted pro-Muslim approach in a eight column banner head line: ‘Allah-o-Akbar: Modi begins his fast’.

    The real irony is, Gujarati dailies with their massive reach have been successful in reflecting general sentiment but their capacity to generate or shape public opinion has diminished considerably — more so in the case of Modi’s criticism. Yet, there is a strange equilibrium between the anti-establishment stance adopted by the Gujarati dailies and Modi’s wide-spread popularity.

    There is a saying in Gujarati that two swords can’t stay together in one sheath, and that seems to be the case when one looks at the strange co-existence of flourishing Gujarati dailies as well as the sustaining popularity of Modi.

    The writer is a Gujarat-based senior journalist and columnist

  • Times Now finds itself in a bind as the heat’s on Team Anna

    By Ranjona Banerji

    After almost a year, I decided to watch We the People on NDTV. Ever since the Radia tapes were made public, I decided not to watch NDTV or read anything by Vir Sanghvi. This may be ridiculously self-indulgent but I did feel that they did journalism a disservice. However, since this We the People was about the demand for a ‘Right to Reject/Recall’ and featured Kiran Bedi, recently exposed for being a bit creative with her accounting habits, I thought it would be worthwhile to swallow my sanctimony and watch what happens.

    Of course, no one called out Bedi for her bill-making. But the discussion did display the naiveté of Team Anna when it comes to its demands to save the nation. Congress MP Navin Jindal had to point out to the highly decorated IPS officer that it was not the job of members of Parliament to build roads. This task was best taken up at the local level. One would have expected Bedi to know at least that much.

    Several objections over the ‘Right to Recall’ were raised by the audience, mainly to do with electoral expenses and the problem of having incessant elections. An annual audit of MPs was then called for — so that the voter could assess what his or her representative had done. Once again, Bedi  —  whose idea it was — could not provide a framework within which this report card would function.

    Dorab Sopariwalli pointed out that it was arrogance and an insult to the voters of this country if elected representatives were referred to as “galat” as in wrong or bad. He also said that many middle and upper class citizens do not exercise their franchise, which is also a problem.

    Several panellists — social activists, politicians, former bureaucrats — had divergent views on the right to recall/reject, which proves at least that the argumentative Indian is still alive.

    One only wishes that anchors on these shows would push their panellists a little harder and call them out on sophistry, obvious fuddling and ignorance.

    **

     If TV in India very often demonstrates how distance and scepticism are difficult for this brand of journalism, the sheer partisan nature of some of them is very amusing. Times Now, a constant champion of both Indian Against Corruption, Anna Hazare and the remaining core members of Hazare’s advisers, found itself in a bind when Swami Agnivesh alleged that the money donated to India Against Corruption had gone into a trust run by Arvind Kejriwal. As it turns out, Agnivesh’s contention was not denied by Team Anna. The explanation proffered, in a nutshell, was that they had not got down to doing it yet. Times Now reporters and anchors (not Arnab Goswami) went into victim-mode over the allegations and expressed pain that Agnivesh had made such remarks. The reporter pointed out that Team Anna feels that people are conspiring against them, which means that there is a conspiracy against them — the clarification in case, presumably, the viewer did not understand the first time. Why oh why did Agnivesh choose this time to make this allegation, asked an anguished anchor.

    At the risk of sounding like a fuddy-duddy lecturer, one cannot understand TV’s allegiance to ratings. But this looks like they’re monitoring who their viewers sympathise with and then doctoring the news to suit that constituency.

    Hmmm.

  • Herald editor refutes ‘paid news’ charge

    This is with reference to the complaint to the Press Council of India, by our esteemed and senior colleague in the profession for many years, Mayabhushan Nagvekar.

    Since the matter concerns issues of editorial and journalistic propriety even though the conversations and interactions Mayabhushan, posing as one Bernard, has with our marketing Manager Tulsidas Desai, I have chosen to respond to this.

    Firstly, I wish to emphatically deny that any editorial content which has appeared in the Herald, without the “advertorial” tag line has been paid for. In his complaint, the complainant has attached newspaper clippings of several interviews we have conducted as part of our kins and kinship series of prospective new candidates in the fray.

    The only exception was that of Somnath Zuwarkar, whose interview we carried after his return to politics. To even suggest that these interviews were part of a paid news package is hugely defamatory. Herald will respond to these allegations urgently and appropriately in a proper forum.

    I wish to emphasize that I have been informed by my management that Desai’s remarks, (as heard on the audio) file in relation to any assurances given to “Bernard” for disguised editorial favours is absolutely incorrect.

    As Editor, my stated position both within and outside the organisation has been that paid content cannot be disguised as news. Whenever politicians have sent out messages, statements of their achievements and other such information, through a paid route, we have prominently stated that they are advertorials. A case in point is the birthday of Deputy Speaker Mauvin Godinho where there were more than 2 pages of “news” items about Mauvin’s career and achievements.

    Recently there was a four page advertorial supplement Vision 2015 where the Chief Minister’s interview was carried along with information on other departments. However, Herald has not softened its attack on this government on several issues, making a clear distinction between advertisements/advertorials and editorial.

    Herald is the only newspaper which used the tag “advertorial” on top of their news pages so that the difference between editorial and advertorial is clearly established.

    Coming to the proposed interview of the fictitious “Bernard” in HCN, our marketing team confirms that that such interviews are conducted with clear supers entitled “SPONSORED, indicating that its an advertorial.

    The letter/email sent by Tulsidas Desai to the fictitious Bernard also clearly states that the rates were for advertising /advertorial rates. The marketing department is within its purview of seeking advertisements and advertorials with a clear understanding that they would be treated like any paid advertisement.

    Lastly and most significantly, Editorial was not in the know of any such negotiations or discussions the marketing had with any candidate or anyone else. The stray remark that “editos people” would be in the know of any interview to HCN is also incorrect.

    I am also clear that ultimately issues of newspaper ethics need to be addressed by the Editor directly since he is the custodian of content. At no given point of time have I allowed disguised and paid news to slip through as genuine editorial content.

    However, it is imperative to ask if the media in Goa has done a serious introspection on whether we try hard enough to eliminate the ghost of paid news slipping through as genuine news.

    In the present case, too, it is naive to expect that the said Bernard’s interview would have been carried in any form. The final decision to run a story or not rests with me and my senior editorial colleagues so a clear distinction needs to be made between news and advertorials. The two cannot and don’t mix in The Herald.

    If the complainant had indeed wanted to test Heralds mettle and transparency in these matters he should have tried paying the amount and getting his interview published as news and then taken us to task.

    However, I agree that with elections around the corner, we need to be more vigilant and watchful to ensure that the media continues to function as a neutral and independent watcher and not an interested part.

     

    Sujay Gupta, Editor, Herald

  • Goa journo’s sting to expose paid news. No wrongdoing, says Herald editor

    By A Correspondent

    The phenomenon of paid content masquerading as news has been around for a long time. But the issue of ‘political paid news’ came under spotlight especially during the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.

    On Tuesday, Mr Mayabhushan Nagvenkar, a journalist based in Goa, filed a complaint with the Press Council of India alleging that Herald, a leading newspaper in Goa, has been publishing “dubious ‘political’ interviews of aspiring candidates, ahead of the forthcoming assembly elections scheduled for early 2012”.

    With such instances being brought to light, a report compiled by the Press Council of India appointed sub-committee comprising Paranjoy Guha Thakurta and Kalimekolam Sreenivas Reddy “to examine the phenomenon of paid news in the Lok Sabha elections” gains more prominence.

    (The full report can be found at http://presscouncil.nic.in/reportPaidNews.htm.)

    The report states that in the area of political paid news, it is not easy to find evidence that pins responsibility for such corrupt practices on particular persons and organizations due to its illegal and clandestine nature.

    But Mr Nagvenkar has backed his claim with records of four telephonic conversations with Herald’s marketing manager Mr Tulsidas Desai, three of which were recorded on October 20 and one on October 22. The conversations, he says, indicate that the newspaper regularly indulges in such paid political news. He also alleges that the marketing manager of the paper could not have pushed a deal like this without the consent, “tacit or otherwise”, of the editorial leadership.

    The report also makes a note of Election Commission’s concern about the latest complaint  that some of the newspapers even offer packages at hefty sums, offering specific services such as projecting the image of a political party or a candidate in a positive manner or giving negative publicity to the rival party or candidate. The rates of such packages vary, depending upon the standing and circulation of the newspaper in the area covered by the constituency.

    Mr Nagvenkar gave credence to the Election Commission’s concerns recently when, posing as Bernard Costa, a fictitious person seeking to contest elections from the Velim assembly constituency in South Goa, contacted Mr Desai and asked about getting a political campaign interview published as news content.

    “Desai told me, (Bernard Costa), that I could get a political campaign interview (15 inches by eight news columns, to be exact) in the newspaper for Rs 86,400, and for an additional Rs 50,000, I could be interviewed on the Herald Cable Network (HCN), the local cable news channel operated by the same media group. None of the paid content will carry an ‘advertorial’ tag.”

    Mr Desai further explained to Mr Nagvenkar about the interview of a potential electoral candidate, Mr Raymond D’Sa, which was published in the Herald on October 20 and which had cost Mr D’Sa Rs 2 lakh.

    Asked about the repercussions he might face after publishing such an article, Mr Nagvenkar replied that he is no stranger to the media banning him. But he hopes that the Press Council will issue strictures against the newspaper as “it’s an open and shut case and the evidence is irrefutable.”

    (The full text of Mr Nagvenkar’s story can be found at www.paidnewsingoa.blogspot.com.)

    When asked to reply to Mr Nagvenkar’s allegations, Mr Sujay Gupta, Editor, Herald said: “I wish to emphatically deny that any editorial content which has appeared in the Herald, without the “advertorial” tag line has been paid for.”

    To Mr Nagvenkar’s claims of the editorial being in the know, Mr Gupta replied: “Editorial was not in the know of any such negotiations or discussions the marketing had with any candidate or anyone else. The stray remark that “editor people” would be in the know… is also incorrect”.

  • Ranjona Banerji: Giving with a twist

    Maybe Diwali is shining bright this year and maybe, well, there are a few dull spots here and there. Ads in newspapers over the past month certainly show that real estate and white goods are back in demand and jewellery it seems never goes out of fashion.

    But as journalists, you don’t have to count Diwali in terms of what you get (so how many media houses actually bother to give their employees anything for Diwali any more?) in material terms but what you get as, well, material.

    The top giver this year has to be Team Anna. Every day, all the members, former and current, work so hard to gift the media something substantial so that juicy stories and screaming debates can be organised. Tax evasions, slipper-chucking, chamber-bashing, endless fasts – which forced television to find every synonym for abstinence from food it could come up with across several Indian languages – dramatic exits, allegations, self-righteous sanctimony… sometimes you’re lucky as a journalist to get such a cornucopia of riches maybe once a year. Team Anna has been giving generously since April.

    The next most generous has to be the film industry (and I don’t mean press conference gifts or the air kisses some film star blows a young, impressionable film reporter who now thinks they’re BFF). Every other week a movie releases with such an enormous publicity blast that you need at least six months to recover. It is another matter that the film bombs before anyone sees it and is as same old same old as the last one. The publicity blitz is far more important than the film itself and generates so many stories. So what if most of them are fake? This season, it has been Shahrukh Khan who has been most kind. Now, anyone going to see the movie, errr, what’s it called?

    In most years, cricket would top the list but what started out as a great cricket year what with the World Cup and the IPL and then the England tour oops… um, what happened after that? My mind has gone a bit blank. There should have been stories galore but then I don’t know, whatever, cricket, yeah.

    The Sensex is usually good for some drama but this year, well, it’s behaved very badly, in a damp squib kind of way. Instead, rising higher and higher has been the inflation rate, so you know, you lose some and you lose some. Not quite a breezy Diwali story.

    Big thanks could go to our politicians who are usually ready with some fun stuff. Of course they never fail so there’s nothing new or unexpected here. We’re used to it. Sometimes, it’s like Diwali gifts every day.

    Now that Diwali is done and dusted, let’s see what kind of parties we get thrown for New Year.

    Have a good one.

  • Sukumar Ranganathan: Journos and media exec in a unique position

    Try as I may, I find myself unable to summon the enthusiasm inherent in the headline , so I am going to refine the topic a bit.

    It is an exciting time to be in media. A combination of circumstances — increased political and business activity, and a reduction in information asymmetry thanks to regulations such as the Right to Information Act and technology — has meant a significant increase in news flow. To resort to a cliche, there’s never a dull moment and that suits most journalists very well.
    Yet, it’s a challenging time as well.

    To stay relevant, newsrooms have to be proficient in multiple media and editors should understand print, video, the Internet, and social media. The business case for some of these is still being written, but that doesn’t mean they can be ignored. The good news for print journalists like me trying to cope with a whole new world is that print will continue to exist, even thrive in India.

    There’s also another challenge newsrooms face, one that many are just waking up to. The reduction in information asymmetry that gives them access to news they once wouldn’t have had access to, also gives readers and viewers access to information about how journalists work. Many newsrooms in India still work without a journalistic code and, over time, this will put off both readers (or viewers) and advertisers.

    Given all these, work is complex, interesting, hard, stressful, and sometimes fun.
    But great? I don’t really know.

    It is, at once, both exciting and frightening, to be in the middle of great change of the sort that the Indian media landscape is going through.

    I think I can safely say that journalists and media executives find themselves in a unique position.

     

    Sukumar Ranganathan is the Editor of Mint.