Category: PRINT MEDIA

  • One year celebration for Fortune India

    By A Correspondent

     

    Fortune India, which was launched in October 2010, has created a reputation for being one of the best global business magazines in India.  To celebrate its first anniversary, Fortune India has come out with a double issue.

     

    Mr Pavan Varshnei, President, Fortune India, said, “The response to Fortune India has been splendid, both in terms of readership and advertising. While we’re a monthly, we still command the highest advertising market share in the premium business magazine segment. Today, Fortune India is the preferred choice among business leaders and advertisers of high end products and services.”

     

    The anniversary edition promises to be an insightful and enriching read. The cover story ‘How we work’ focuses on the changing Indian work culture. Another interesting story, which is set to spark a new debate among marketers, is Grey Sells, focussing on the 80 million people aged 60 or above, who provide a great new business opportunity. The story on Taiwan’s largest, and the world’s second-largest, chipmaker, MediaTek, shows how it has revolutionized the cellphone market in India and China. Along with the anniversary issue is a Collector’s Edition featuring the best of Fortune India’s coverage of business thought, leadership and practice across India and the neighbouring countries.

     

    On the occasion, Mr Dibyendra Nath Mukerjea, Editor of Fortune India, said, “When we launched Fortune’s India edition a year ago, we wanted to bring out a publication that delivers depth and breadth in its journalism, giving Indian business leaders actionable intelligence to propel their businesses globally. And, I am happy to share that Fortune India has become the essential read for Industry leaders and influencers.”

     

    Fortune India has also received global recognition for its design and layout – photo, graphics etc.  It received two merit awards from the Society of Publication Designers, New York, and besides that, a bronze award for infographics at the IFRA Annual Competition, earlier this year. Fortune India 500, Business Person of the Decade, the Green issue and Business of Luxury special are some of the issues that have stood apart in last one year.

  • Conde Nast Traveller hits many highs

    By Akash Raha

     

    Conde Nast Traveller completed its first anniversary in the Indian market. The magazine was launched in India in October 2010. The anniversary issue of the magazine is on stands at a price point of Rs 100. Conde Nast Traveller is the third magazine from the group in India, after Vogue and GQ. Whereas Conde Nast Traveller is concerned, it is the sixth international edition of the brand.  Even though Traveller’s stay in India has been only for one year, it has been there for a long time in UK and US. MxM India got in touch with Divia Thani Daswani, Editor, Conde Nast Traveller to know more about the magazine’s year-long journey.

     

    Q: Conde Nast Traveller has completed one full year in the Indian market. How has the journey been so far?

    For my part, I can say this has been an incredible first year for Conde Nast Traveller! When we were launching it, we believed this would be a very niche magazine with a print run of about 15,000 copies. Our print run for the anniversary issue is 40,000 copies, just one year in.  It’s a wonderful reflection of the enormous passion for travel that we have in this country—and also the sophistication of the Indian traveller. But numbers aren’t the only thing that matter: the feedback has been tremendous.

     

    Q: How do you think Conde Nast Traveller has fared vis-à-vis its competitors in India?

    Readers follow us with an acute eye; they read us closely; they love the visuals; they take our recommendations seriously. More so than any other publication I know, Conde Nast Traveller is a magazine people save for years—it doesn’t become irrelevant or less interesting when the month ends. Finally, I’m very proud of the fact that some of the greatest writers and photographers in the world—from Suketu Mehta, Pico Iyer, Amitav Ghosh and William Dalrymple to Julien Capmeil and Prabuddha Dasgupta—have worked with us so enthusiastically. It’s the power of travel, really. It brings out the best.

     

    Q: What are the content and product innovations you have done for the anniversary issue?

    The anniversary issue is especially close to my heart because it’s our first India Special. This is an idea we’ve been working on for many months; in fact, ever since we started doing our research back in January 2010. We discovered that there’s a collective desire among discerning travellers to discover more of our own homeland. It seems the further away we go, the more we jet-set around the world, the greater the longing to explore India. So this anniversary issue is a tribute to our ‘incredible India’. It’s full of secrets and surprises from each corner of the country, from New Delhi to Tamil Nadu to Bihar to Mumbai. Even the international destinations we’ve covered have been captured by Indian voices. The lineup in this issue is superb; it’s been the collaboration of the great talent and hard work of dozens of people across the world, from Amitav Ghosh in China, Hari Kunzru in Los Angeles and Rashmi Uday Singh in Paris to Michel Figuet in Delhi, Julien Capmeil in Bihar and Ruskin Bond in Mussoorie. And of course, there’s a healthy dash of glamour, with Frieda Pinto, Tina Ambani and Rahul Khanna! Another favourite of mine is the photo essay featuring some of our favourite unseen images from the first year of Conde Nast Traveller—images so glorious we couldn’t help holding on to them. There are other innovations, of course, from a printing and production perspective, but to me, this issue is special because of the dozens of gems inside.

     

    Q: What are the other campaign initiatives you have undertaken around your product to highlight your brand among others in the space?

    I think the focus has been to create a magazine that appeals and talks to the affluent well travelled  Indian audience which is really been the biggest success story for us. Apart from this we have focussed on a targeted marketing plan via outdoor in key locations, targeted subscriptions program and of course working on the signature event which is the Conde Nast Traveller Reader Travel Awards. We also have a program to reach out to the key influencers in the industry by hosting small events.

     

    Q: What do you think about the travel magazine space? Do you see it growing in the years to come?

    As far as the travel industry is concerned, the future is India and China. Outbound travel from India is set to grow to 50 million people by 2020. Already we are among the top spenders in the world when it comes to hotels, shopping, food and nightlife—and of course, destination weddings!

     

    Q: What has been the response to your anniversary issue?

    The anniversary issue is already out and has received an extremely positive response on the newsstand. The cover price continues to be INR 100.

  • Dainik Jagran calls agency to handle its creative business

    By Shubhangi Mehta

    Dainik Jagran, the Hindi daily has invited agencies to handle its creative mandates, some of the agencies participating in the pitch are Grey, McCann, Percept H.

    Though no official confirmation could be attained at the time of writing this report, industry sources close to the development have confirmed the news to MxM India.

    Dainik Jagran was founded by Puranchandra Gupta in Jhansi in 1942. In 1947 Dainik Jagran shifted its headquarters to Kanpur, where it launched its second edition on 21 September 1947. The Rewa and Bhopal editions were added in 1953 and 1956. In 1975, publication of Gorakhpur edition started, followed by Varanasi, Allahabad and Lucknow in 1979. In 1984, Meerut edition was launched, followed by Agra in 1986, Bareilly in 1989 and Delhi in 1990. Between 1997 and 2006,

    Eighteen new editions were added, and through 2007-08, six new editions were launched.

    More than 55.7 million people read Dainik Jagran making it the largest read daily in India. Currently, Dainik Jagran’s 36 editions are published across eleven states of India.

  • HT celebrating 100 years of Delhi, all year long

    By Akash Raha

    This year Hindustan Times is celebrating ‘100 years of New Delhi’. It has launched several campaigns and initiatives to propel the celebrations further. The current campaign comes under HT’s already existing property named ‘I love Delhi’, which had launched extensive campaigns and initiatives last year, and the stress continues to grow. Currently, Hindustan Times is the largest English daily in Delhi, according to IRS.

    Speaking about this initiative Mr Diptakirti Chaudhuri, AVP – Marketing, Hindustan Times said, “Since we have continued to build our lead over our competitors in Delhi and NCR, we are also attempting to build up a close relationship to the city we cater to. Actually, we are inextricably linked to them… Therefore, each year we pick up a theme of relevance and deal with it holistically. Our main aim and idea is to get the consumers involved.”

    The campaigns and initiatives include Tshirt designing contest, mall activation, reader’s promo, movie screening, film festivals, school quizzes (amongst over 3000 odd kids), painting competition in schools etcetera. The response to these activations were phenomenal as they got over 1700 Tshirt designs, not to mention, 20-25 excellent 100 second movies for ‘Capture 100 years of magic in 100 seconds’. Also, 100 icons of New Delhi (from Rashtrapati Bhawan to India Gate to Karims) were recognized and profiled.

    When asked how this is the 100years of Delhi, Mr Chaudhuri explained, “even though Delhi is the capital of India, no one celebrates its anniversaries as it doesn’t have a specific date of creation like many other cities.” Yet, it is said that the foundation of the city was laid sometime in the year 1911 and planned by British architects Sir Edwin Lutyens and Sir Herbert Baker.

    The concept and campaign was developed internally. Mr Chaudhuri said that the marketing concept emanated from an editorial idea which was celebrating the ‘100 years of New Delhi’ and was thereafter transposed to their marketing sphere too.

  • With animals, what you see is what you get. With human beings, it’s more complicated


     

    Make no mistake about this: Lynn de Souza has a soft, warm, chilled out, happy exterior. But inside that resides a steely, tough, hard-edged professional. And she needed all that internal strength to survive and thrive in an industry notoriously dominated by what she calls the ‘Old Boys Club’. Lynn and I go a long way back, and this made our conversation frank, fun and, yes, highly argumentative. And we discussed many issues ranging from the dubious media research, the future of various media, her role in promoting gender equality, her formula for cleaning up the otherwise scandalous Goafest. And why she, er, chooses dogs over men.  

     

    By Anil Thakraney

     

    What’s your exact job portfolio at Lintas?

     

    I look after Lintas Media Group, and our subsidiaries Karishma Initiative, Aaren Initiative and Lin TV. LMG and Karishma are media agencies, Aaren Initiative is the largest OOH agency and Lin TV produces and distributes branded content. I am responsible for their overall financial and reputation, health, corporate governance, etc.

     

    Who do you report into?

     

    Michael Wall, the global CEO of Lowe Worldwide.

     

    Would you not like a global role now, having been there and done that in India?

     

    Have I been there and done that in India? I don’t think so. India’s potential story is not even the tip of the iceberg, and I haven’t even travelled the whole tip yet! I would love to have a global role that is based out of India, because this is where it’s all happening. I am fiercely proud of India and all things Indian and it’s our time to show the globe a thing or two. We don’t need to be sitting in Manhattan or London to do that, in fact, that could be counterproductive.

     

    Would it be correct to say you’ve reached the top of the Indian media peak?

     

    More like the bottom of the ocean, which has the most beautiful creatures and colours in the world. There are so many challenges ahead, so much to learn and so much to do. Our lives as consumers of media are being transformed so rapidly it’s really hard to keep pace, and this rate of change is even faster in an emerging market like ours. What we thought we knew yesterday is no longer relevant today, and what we think we know today will not be relevant tomorrow. The only people who can be on top of all of this are those who want to keep learning and keep evolving and keep travelling. There is no place for those who think they have arrived.

     

    What’s your goal for the next 10 years? What else would you like to achieve?

     

    Goals are for footballers and 20-year-olds. I don’t have any. I am just happy to be alive, to have a wonderful family, to work with some awesome people, to have a few good friends, and to do my little bit for my four legged friends. I take each day at a time, that’s all, and just try to do the best I can for that day, honestly. When I was young, I did have plans and was ambitious, too ambitious. My values have changed. It’s important to be good at what you do, but it’s also important not to be so good that you become bad for everything else around you.

     

    Key challenges ahead for the media buyers.

     

    Look beyond the colour of money to the colour of advertising and media content, and the kaleidoscope of consumer insights. Get away from the keyboard and play some real piano now and then. Visit places they have never been to, in reality, and not only on 3G. Meet and talk to people from all cultures including, especially including, our villages in the length and breadth of our country. Data will never be a substitute for reality and as long as we hold on to it for dear life, we will continue to reduce the value of the media, and the consumers they deliver, to the lowest common denominator – a CPRP.

     

    Are our creative people ready for the new media? And the clients?

     

    I think the younger ones are. I have been meeting a lot of independent digital agencies recently, and it’s always great fun to meet their founders – usually young creatives and techies who have left traditional agencies and employers to write their own dreams and ‘apps’! You would also be surprised how many clients are now taking to what you call ‘new’ media like fish to water. There are lot of questions and uncertainties and domain knowledge issues of course, but there is no dearth of desire to learn, because user technology has become so easy and enjoyable that once they use the digital spaces for themselves, they want to start using them for their brands.

     

    Was media unbundling a good thing? You pioneered it.

     

    It was the best thing to happen to the media function. Till then, media planners were languishing in the backrooms with their big red NRSs and estimates, always at the tail end of a presentation and often sent home without even presenting. Making the function profit seeking in its own right attracted the right kind of front-room talent, investment in tools and databases and the ability to then cope with a magnifying media world. Which industry has seen such an explosion of new offerings in such a short time – 600 TV channels, 70,000 print titles, 350 radio stations, and countless websites, all in 15 years or less? Unbundling has allowed us to specialize enough to cope with this growth, possibly even enable this growth.

     

    Predict the future of the print media in India. Newspapers are shutting down all over the world.

     

    You need to separate form from content. Newspapers abroad have digital versions that have a much larger following than the newsprint version. I read the NY Times every day because the reading experience is so enriching, it doesn’t matter that I don’t live in that city. As long as people have eyes, they will read, and as long as they read, there will be something delivering the news to them in a written form… in newsprint or cyberspace, or Kindles, how does it matter? About India, do you know that the highest read newspaper in the world is a Hindi daily? Regional language papers have trebled in readership in the last ten years. Tier two and three cities, where literacy is still not even 70% and growing, register the highest growth.

     

    And what about television?

     

    TV will be fully digitized very shortly and this means that the convergence of content across digital broadcast, web and telephony platforms is almost here. My agency is already producing content for television, re-purposed for mobile, and developing web apps to go along. As are many others. Consumers follow and lead content, so to track them and predict their behavior will be very important, our measurement systems will need to keep pace and adopt new technologies to capture, retrieve and analyze data.

     

    There are too many complaints about media research in India. What can be done to change things?

     

    There’s an overload of data in some aspects. We have different data sources for different media. And there’s no one single source available. That’s why many of the media agencies invest in their own studies. We have our own, for example. What worries me is that nobody’s looking at the future. So that we have future-ready research which is truly centered around the consumer. I told the IRS people that they need to think ahead. They have a 10-year-old way of collecting data and that has to change.

     

    Also TV viewership measurement.

     

    That’s why you can’t recommend media only on that basis. Which is why a lot of us have our own proprietary research which picks up a whole lot of other aspects. You cannot rely only on these data sources.

     

    That’s no solution. We need few but reliable research studies which the whole industry can follow.

     

    It’s not necessary for everything to be done at the industry level. You do things at an industry level when you want a currency. When you want a common parked research where both the buyer and the seller access it, so it becomes a currency. But if you want to do things that are genuinely good for the brand, you develop a whole lot of other proprietary studies, which many of us do.

     

    Lynn, frankly I am disappointed with you. You’ve spent a lifetime in the media industry, you’ve done it all, you’ve made your money. Isn’t it time for you to think of the industry and take on the challenge of reforming media research so that everyone benefits?

     

    If I did that, I wouldn’t say it to you. If I had any ambitions that I want to change something, I would quietly go about doing it my way. Three years ago, I didn’t want that there should be two research agencies, the IRS and the NRS. I was sitting on both the committees and I found both doing the same things, both saying the same things, so I said why can’t they be together. So quietly, at both meetings, I would suggest let’s have only one study. It took three years of doing this before the RSCI got formed. They’ve elected me as the first Chairman and we had our first meeting only last week. I am hoping we will change the readership agenda of this nation. Print is still the largest medium in India, and if the RSCI works out, we will make a big change. But I won’t thump my chest and say ‘Hum yeh kar rahe hain, hum woh kar rahe hain!’ (Laughs.)

     

    Not enough. You should take on media research full-time, and become the Queen B who made a huge difference.

     

    (Long pause.) I promise to give it a serious thought just to please you. (Laughs loudly.) But I will not commit to anything you wish me to commit to!

     

    You’ve cleaned up Goafest. There were no scandals this year. How did you do it?

     

    I am a great delegator. And I give a lot of respect to people I delegate to. So we had Shashi (Sinha) completely given the role of running the awards. I gave Sundar the role of running the conclave. I looked after the organizing and the venue. The most important thing I did for Goafest was to create an impression of being clean. I looked for a very clean looking place, I changed the venue itself. So it looked fresher, cleaner, greener. That had a very subtle effect. Then, I roped in the ASCI and the IAA with the responsibility agenda on the first one and the sustainability agenda on the second one. That gave the impression we are doing something good for the industry, and not just pampering creative egos.

     

    How did you handle the problem of self-voting?

     

    Shashi led that and he did a fantastic job. People were not allowed to self-vote. One or two individuals who were supposedly high on self-voting in the past were not included as judges this time.

    But Lintas still won’t take part in the awards…

     

    We do not have any confidence in the awards given by our peers. I was given a job to do, to chair Goafest. I was forced to do it, and I did it to the best of my ability. But that’s different. You know, I served at the Cannes media jury in 2009 and it was a fantastic experience. It was professionally run, it was technically advanced. I have served on the Indian juries as well, and it was nonsense, though am sure this time around they did a better job. I have seen the behaviour of our peers, the kind of lobbying and planning that goes on. As an agency we are not into chest-thumping. But when our agency wins awards because our clients have won, I value those because the consumers voted us.

     

    But now that you’ve cleaned up the place, will Balki take part next year?

     

    That you have to ask him. But it has to do with the value you place behind awards. Not everyone thinks awards are the best thing in life.

     

    Looks like you’ve fallen in line with Balki’s ideology.

     

    (Laughs.) On the contrary he may be falling in my line! We have our own independent reasons.

     

    What’s this about women’s rights you’ve been promoting?

     

    Internationally, diversity and inclusion is a big agenda. As a part of that agenda, two years back, IPG asked me to set up and lead the women’s leadership network. Initially I refused. I didn’t think there should be segregation of any kind. Later I studied the subject in detail, and I realized there’s a very powerful economic reason why you have to support women. There are three ‘Ws’ that will transform this century: Web, Weather and Women. And the power that women are exerting on this century is enormous. It’s said if women were empowered at Wall Street in 2009. things wouldn’t have been the way they were. In India we have 29 women heading banks and financial institutions. So there is an approach that women bring to the table that improves the productivity of a team. So it’s important to keep and retain women. At IPG, 30% of our staff are women, and when you come to the top, it’s just 11%.

     

    How do we change this inequality?

     

    We need hardcore practices in place. We can have a hiring quota set aside for women. I believe last month Hindustan Lever hired only women. We need to make everybody conscious we are not doing anything special for women. We have to make men and women understand that when you work together, you do well. For example, Coca Cola has something called the ‘Power of 3’. They believe that in any big team, the minute you have three women in the team, the group becomes far more productive. And if you have just one woman in the team, she gets eaten up.

     

    But Lynn, women falling out along the way is a social problem. Babies have to be looked after. How will you change that?

     

    You try and keep them engaged in the work orce. Some of the things we’ve done include giving them the option to work from home when they are pregnant. By giving them a desktop mirroring system at home. That’s literally like working in the office. There are lots of such ways in which you can keep women productive even if they have babies.

     

    Personally, I am quite cynical about this whole thing. You can’t change deeprooted beliefs and attitudes so simplistically.

     

    Anil, you are basically cynical about everything! Anil ‘bloody cynical’ Thakraney! (Laughs.)

     

    Why are all ad agencies headed by men?

     

    In the creative agencies there is a very strong old boy’s club. It’s very difficult for women to break through into that club. And if they don’t play by those rules, they will not break into it. Read my blog on this (link).

    Exactly why were the 3As of I guys giving you stress? Why didn’t they want you in?

     

    (Long pause.) Because I am clean.

     

     

    You found corrupt activities going on?

     

    (A longer pause this time.) No comment.

     

     

    One rival media chief you admire.

     

    Sam Balsara. He’s awesome. A hardcore desi boy with so much energy, he does so much.

     

     

    The best boss you’ve had.

     

    Ravi Gupta. And Steve Gatfield.

     

     

    One thing you learnt to do from Roda Mehta?

     

    Two things. Precision and integrity.

     

     

    One thing you learnt NOT to do from Roda.

     

    (Thinks.) Over-precision. Beyond a point you have to just let it go, you don’t need perfection.

     

     

    Roda didn’t just do the media job, she built the media planning and buying industry in India. None of you guys have been able to do that. She was a game changer.

     

    It’s not needed. You don’t need a crusader in today’s world. You need inventors and innovators. In today’s world we need enablers. Twenty years ago it was different, it was the licence era, there were strictures and rules. Today there’s far more freedom. No one wants a crusader. Everyone wants an enabler.

     

     

    Would it be correct to say you love dogs more than men?

     

    (Laughs.) Why only dogs, any animal. With animals, what you see is what you get. With human beings it’s more complicated.

     

     

    Is that the reason you are still single?

     

    No, it has nothing to do with that. I didn’t find anyone as intellectually stimulating as… my dog! (Laughs.) Are you happy to hear that?

     

     

    Have you watched Balki’s two films?

     

    I haven’t watched ‘Cheeni Kum’ yet. And Balki hasn’t forgiven me for that. But he sent me the ‘Paa’ DVD, and I really liked it. I didn’t watch the last five minutes of the film though. Because I wanted to make my own ending. I wanted the character to live. So I made him into a dog. (Laughs.)

  • Herald editor refutes ‘paid news’ charge

    This is with reference to the complaint to the Press Council of India, by our esteemed and senior colleague in the profession for many years, Mayabhushan Nagvekar.

    Since the matter concerns issues of editorial and journalistic propriety even though the conversations and interactions Mayabhushan, posing as one Bernard, has with our marketing Manager Tulsidas Desai, I have chosen to respond to this.

    Firstly, I wish to emphatically deny that any editorial content which has appeared in the Herald, without the “advertorial” tag line has been paid for. In his complaint, the complainant has attached newspaper clippings of several interviews we have conducted as part of our kins and kinship series of prospective new candidates in the fray.

    The only exception was that of Somnath Zuwarkar, whose interview we carried after his return to politics. To even suggest that these interviews were part of a paid news package is hugely defamatory. Herald will respond to these allegations urgently and appropriately in a proper forum.

    I wish to emphasize that I have been informed by my management that Desai’s remarks, (as heard on the audio) file in relation to any assurances given to “Bernard” for disguised editorial favours is absolutely incorrect.

    As Editor, my stated position both within and outside the organisation has been that paid content cannot be disguised as news. Whenever politicians have sent out messages, statements of their achievements and other such information, through a paid route, we have prominently stated that they are advertorials. A case in point is the birthday of Deputy Speaker Mauvin Godinho where there were more than 2 pages of “news” items about Mauvin’s career and achievements.

    Recently there was a four page advertorial supplement Vision 2015 where the Chief Minister’s interview was carried along with information on other departments. However, Herald has not softened its attack on this government on several issues, making a clear distinction between advertisements/advertorials and editorial.

    Herald is the only newspaper which used the tag “advertorial” on top of their news pages so that the difference between editorial and advertorial is clearly established.

    Coming to the proposed interview of the fictitious “Bernard” in HCN, our marketing team confirms that that such interviews are conducted with clear supers entitled “SPONSORED, indicating that its an advertorial.

    The letter/email sent by Tulsidas Desai to the fictitious Bernard also clearly states that the rates were for advertising /advertorial rates. The marketing department is within its purview of seeking advertisements and advertorials with a clear understanding that they would be treated like any paid advertisement.

    Lastly and most significantly, Editorial was not in the know of any such negotiations or discussions the marketing had with any candidate or anyone else. The stray remark that “editos people” would be in the know of any interview to HCN is also incorrect.

    I am also clear that ultimately issues of newspaper ethics need to be addressed by the Editor directly since he is the custodian of content. At no given point of time have I allowed disguised and paid news to slip through as genuine editorial content.

    However, it is imperative to ask if the media in Goa has done a serious introspection on whether we try hard enough to eliminate the ghost of paid news slipping through as genuine news.

    In the present case, too, it is naive to expect that the said Bernard’s interview would have been carried in any form. The final decision to run a story or not rests with me and my senior editorial colleagues so a clear distinction needs to be made between news and advertorials. The two cannot and don’t mix in The Herald.

    If the complainant had indeed wanted to test Heralds mettle and transparency in these matters he should have tried paying the amount and getting his interview published as news and then taken us to task.

    However, I agree that with elections around the corner, we need to be more vigilant and watchful to ensure that the media continues to function as a neutral and independent watcher and not an interested part.

     

    Sujay Gupta, Editor, Herald

  • Goa journo’s sting to expose paid news. No wrongdoing, says Herald editor

    By A Correspondent

    The phenomenon of paid content masquerading as news has been around for a long time. But the issue of ‘political paid news’ came under spotlight especially during the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.

    On Tuesday, Mr Mayabhushan Nagvenkar, a journalist based in Goa, filed a complaint with the Press Council of India alleging that Herald, a leading newspaper in Goa, has been publishing “dubious ‘political’ interviews of aspiring candidates, ahead of the forthcoming assembly elections scheduled for early 2012”.

    With such instances being brought to light, a report compiled by the Press Council of India appointed sub-committee comprising Paranjoy Guha Thakurta and Kalimekolam Sreenivas Reddy “to examine the phenomenon of paid news in the Lok Sabha elections” gains more prominence.

    (The full report can be found at http://presscouncil.nic.in/reportPaidNews.htm.)

    The report states that in the area of political paid news, it is not easy to find evidence that pins responsibility for such corrupt practices on particular persons and organizations due to its illegal and clandestine nature.

    But Mr Nagvenkar has backed his claim with records of four telephonic conversations with Herald’s marketing manager Mr Tulsidas Desai, three of which were recorded on October 20 and one on October 22. The conversations, he says, indicate that the newspaper regularly indulges in such paid political news. He also alleges that the marketing manager of the paper could not have pushed a deal like this without the consent, “tacit or otherwise”, of the editorial leadership.

    The report also makes a note of Election Commission’s concern about the latest complaint  that some of the newspapers even offer packages at hefty sums, offering specific services such as projecting the image of a political party or a candidate in a positive manner or giving negative publicity to the rival party or candidate. The rates of such packages vary, depending upon the standing and circulation of the newspaper in the area covered by the constituency.

    Mr Nagvenkar gave credence to the Election Commission’s concerns recently when, posing as Bernard Costa, a fictitious person seeking to contest elections from the Velim assembly constituency in South Goa, contacted Mr Desai and asked about getting a political campaign interview published as news content.

    “Desai told me, (Bernard Costa), that I could get a political campaign interview (15 inches by eight news columns, to be exact) in the newspaper for Rs 86,400, and for an additional Rs 50,000, I could be interviewed on the Herald Cable Network (HCN), the local cable news channel operated by the same media group. None of the paid content will carry an ‘advertorial’ tag.”

    Mr Desai further explained to Mr Nagvenkar about the interview of a potential electoral candidate, Mr Raymond D’Sa, which was published in the Herald on October 20 and which had cost Mr D’Sa Rs 2 lakh.

    Asked about the repercussions he might face after publishing such an article, Mr Nagvenkar replied that he is no stranger to the media banning him. But he hopes that the Press Council will issue strictures against the newspaper as “it’s an open and shut case and the evidence is irrefutable.”

    (The full text of Mr Nagvenkar’s story can be found at www.paidnewsingoa.blogspot.com.)

    When asked to reply to Mr Nagvenkar’s allegations, Mr Sujay Gupta, Editor, Herald said: “I wish to emphatically deny that any editorial content which has appeared in the Herald, without the “advertorial” tag line has been paid for.”

    To Mr Nagvenkar’s claims of the editorial being in the know, Mr Gupta replied: “Editorial was not in the know of any such negotiations or discussions the marketing had with any candidate or anyone else. The stray remark that “editor people” would be in the know… is also incorrect”.

  • Sukumar Ranganathan: Journos and media exec in a unique position

    Try as I may, I find myself unable to summon the enthusiasm inherent in the headline , so I am going to refine the topic a bit.

    It is an exciting time to be in media. A combination of circumstances — increased political and business activity, and a reduction in information asymmetry thanks to regulations such as the Right to Information Act and technology — has meant a significant increase in news flow. To resort to a cliche, there’s never a dull moment and that suits most journalists very well.
    Yet, it’s a challenging time as well.

    To stay relevant, newsrooms have to be proficient in multiple media and editors should understand print, video, the Internet, and social media. The business case for some of these is still being written, but that doesn’t mean they can be ignored. The good news for print journalists like me trying to cope with a whole new world is that print will continue to exist, even thrive in India.

    There’s also another challenge newsrooms face, one that many are just waking up to. The reduction in information asymmetry that gives them access to news they once wouldn’t have had access to, also gives readers and viewers access to information about how journalists work. Many newsrooms in India still work without a journalistic code and, over time, this will put off both readers (or viewers) and advertisers.

    Given all these, work is complex, interesting, hard, stressful, and sometimes fun.
    But great? I don’t really know.

    It is, at once, both exciting and frightening, to be in the middle of great change of the sort that the Indian media landscape is going through.

    I think I can safely say that journalists and media executives find themselves in a unique position.

     

    Sukumar Ranganathan is the Editor of Mint.

  • BBC Knowledge goes 3D

    By Akash Raha

     

    Come November BBC Knowledge is all set to bring out its first anniversary issue in 3D, priced at Rs 100 and due to be on stands from November 1. This is a ‘Space’ special with 22 pages of exclusive 3D images which can be enjoyed with 3D glasses available free with the magazine.

    Speaking about the anniversary issue Soela Joshi, Brand Publisher said, “BBC Knowledge for its first anniversary had to do something special for its readers. We wanted to use the power of interactivity to engage our readers and capture audiences. Coverage of Science & Technology in 3D has a high potential for disruption. Hence we have created ‘Space in 3D’ for our anniversary issue. The moment you put on the 3D glasses and look at the pages…the magazine comes to life. It is so exciting to create an environment where the readers can have a truly interactive experience.”

    The magazine has also come up with a 360-degree plan to engage with the young adults who are the main readers. The marketing activities for the issue will be carried out in areas which are popular with this age group. There will be print ads as well as key outdoors. “We will also run a social media campaign where this TG is most active, including our own Facebook page. In addition, in terms of onground, we have tie ups with organizations like science centres and nature groups to reach out to a new set of readers for this issue. We also have a tie-up with Imax Big Cinemas where we will promote this issue through on-ground branding and contests. Their 3D screen provides a perfect backdrop for our special issue,” said Komal Puri, Brand Manager, BBC Knowledge.

    The BBC Knowledge team has carefully handpicked the iconic stories for this issue – it contains a mix of breath-taking images of NASA’s space exploration as well as the exclusive inputs of Indian experts like Retd. Wing Commander Rakesh Sharma and spacecraft designer Susmita Mohanty among others.

    Preeti Singh, Editor, BBC Knowledge explains, “For our anniversary issue we have pulled out all stops. A first in India’s magazine history, BBC Knowledge brings a spectacular Space in 3D special with iconic NASA images, never seen this way before. With features from astronaut Rakesh Sharma to 35 biggest questions about the cosmos answered, this extraordinary issue is a perfect preview of what’s to come from us in the future.”

    BBC Knowledge was brought to India by Worldwide Media last year.  It is a magazine for young inquisitive minds where well-researched, handpicked stories are matched with breath-taking pictures and graphics to cover history, science and nature.

  • Tom Friedman in the IE Adda

    By A Correspondent

    Flat-world proponent Thomas Friedman was the special guest at the third Indian Express Adda on October 28. Mr Friedman, Foreign Affairs Columnist, The New York Times in New Delhi, is a three-time Pulitzer prize winner and author of several famous books including The World is Flat, From Beirut to Jerusalem and the most recent That used to be US.

    Every week he helps millions understand and interpret change in a way no other commentator does. Along Mr Shekhar Gupta, Editor in Chief, Indian Express Group, Mr Friedman debated and discussed several topics of international significance and discussed it with the enthusiastic crowd. Issues regarding global slowdown, economic issues in Europe and US, rise of China as a global force to reckon with, capitalism, neo-imperialism, the uprising in Middle East and North Africa etcetera were some of the topics discussed at length in what was an intriguing and thought-provoking evening.

    This is the third Adda hosted by the Indian Express.  Guests at previous Addas were Sir Martin Sorrell and Shahrukh Khan, in New Delhi and Mumbai respectively.

  • Mediaah! Katju ko bolo katli maaro, says NBA

    Pradyuman MaheshwariPardon the forced usage of Bambaiyya, but with a name like Katju and this being the season for mithai, one couldn’t help the play on Kaaju Katli. With apologies to the lovers of the Kaaju Katli. I am not too concerned about how Mr K reacts… in any case he finds journalists irresponsible and unintelligent.

    There’s been a lot of song and dance about the Press Council of India chief Markandey Katju’s outbursts to all and sundry. Yesterday, the News Broadcasters Association asked the Prime Minister to ask the Press Council of India to mind his own business and stop effing around with the news TV wallahs.

    The Prime Minister is in Cannes attending the G20 summit and I won’t be surprised if he does precious little about it.

    There have been various reports on the News Broadcasters Association asking the Prime Minister to restrain the Press Council of India chairman to not comment on areas that are beyond his jurisdiction. I found the one on former friend and benefactor Anil Wanvari’s Indiantelevision.com the most exhaustive. Here goes: http://www.indiantelevision.com/headlines/y2k11/nov/nov28.php

    But before you slam the man any further, as our editor-at-large Anil Thakraney writes, there is a point that Katju is making. There are scores of occasions when you do have our news channels transgressing all lines of decency. I have stopped some of the channels – especially a few in Hindi – because of the trashy content that’s there on them. Even on Big News Days, these guys don’t seem to get over their obsession with the Occult. And the Inane.

    Former Aaj Tak CEO and also bossman of a dozen industry associations G Krishnan would often argue for the trade about this with a “We are like this only refrain”.  Whoever says news has to be only current affairs. And whoever said current affairs shouldn’t include who Ranbir Kapoor was in bed with last night.

    (aside, these days channels could also do similar stories about mediapersons, but we’ll come to that some other time… or perhaps will never do it.!)

    (aside 2: the last time, Mediaah! tried to write on the private life of a mediaperson, we had to kill ourselves).

    I am not armed with the stats, but the fact of the matter is that all news broadcasters aren’t members of the NBA. And it’s impossible for the NBA to coerce channels to turn members. There’s nothing out of the ordinary about this. In other trade associations too, large players don’t become members.

    So, as the NBA has said, let its self-regulation policies rule over all news channels. In fact the uplinking and downlinking policies must make it mandatory for all news channels broadcasting out of India to subscribe to a self-regulation code of the NBA.

     

    Should the Press Council be made the Media Council?

     

    First, do we need a Press Council. The newspaperwallahs have their INS, the magazine guys have an AIM, internet and mobile dudes have IAMAI, the ad folk have their AAAI and ASCI, so why the Press Council.

    It’s a body with no teeth. It can’t do a thing to police newspapers. I remember receiving a few letters from the Council in the ‘90s asking my paper to apologise for some flimsy reason. I was advised by my publisher to ignore the notice, and when one realised there was no need for the paper to issue an apology, I trashed the missive. It’s not that the newspaper lost its licence or was penalised. We went about our business peacefully only to trash the next letter that came in.

    I am a little surprised that the Press Council didn’t have news channels under its jurisdiction all these years. When it was set up in 1966 (with the Press Council Act taking coming into existence only in 1978), we only had the government-owned Doordarshan and All India Radio so I guess no one found the need for policing the airwaves.

    Para 1 of the ‘about us’ section of its site says:

    The Press Council of India was first set up in the year 1966 by the Parliament on the recommendations of the First Press Commission with the object of preserving the freedom of the press and of maintaining and improving the standards of press in India. The present Council functions under the Press Council Act 1978. It is a statutory, quasi judicial body which acts as a watchdog of the press. It adjudicates the complaints against and by the press for violation of ethics and for violation of the freedom of the press respectively.

    There is a self-regulator for news and non-news television and advertising and there is none for print and digital media. So I guess there is merit for a self-regulator, but ideally it should be done by an industry body and not someone set up by the government. As for ensuring the freedom of the press, we surely don’t need a Press Council of India to police that.

    Our democratic set-up will ensure that governments can’t get away with stifling the press. As for media owners muzzling their own employees, I don’t think the Press Council or any minister or Parliamentarian can do anything about it. The owners almost always have the final say.

     

  • MxMIndia partners ‘Paid News’ event

    By A Correspondent

    MxMIndia has partnered the event ‘Paid News: Fooling People all the Time’ organised by Moneylife Foundation and Citizens Action Network with the support of industrialist Cyrus Guzder.

    To be held in Mumbai’s Madame Cama Hall (Opp Lion Gate, Kala Ghoda) on Friday, November 18, the evening will see the screening of the documentary ‘Brokering News’ followed by a panel discussion with senior journalists and the film-maker Umesh Aggarwal.

    About the film: The Delhi-based non-governmental, not-for-profit Public Service Broadcasting Trust (PSBT) recently released a documentary titled “Brokering News—the inside story of paid news”.

    The film by Umesh Aggarwal addresses a significant challenge facing Indian democracy today—which is the state of its media. The film looks at three aspects of paid news—how politicians are paying for positive coverage during elections, with the result that those who don’t pay are blanked out by the media; how the coverage and reviews of movies are orchestrated and paid for and of course, paid news about business and industry. It depicts in detail how journalists were forced to broker deals to offer editorial coverage to politicians.

    Details of the Event:

    Panelists: Umesh Aggarwal, Ayaz Memon, Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, Bhawana Somaaya, and Sucheta Dalal.

    Timings: 5.30-7.30pm (Registration and Tea starts at 5pm)

    Venue: Madame Cama Hall, KR Cama Hall Institute, Bombay Samachar Marg, Opp. Lion Gate, Kala Ghoda, Mumbai 400 023

    Admission: While admission is free, please register well in advance. Contact details: Call Judith/Seraphina on 022-24441058-60, or mail at mail@mlfoundation.in,or log on to www.mlfoundation.in

    While MxMIndia.com is Media Partner of the event, other media organisations (including trade media) are welcome to register and cover the event