Tag: shruti pushkarna

  • Is disability inclusion a far-fetched dream?

     

     

    By Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Shruti PushkarnaI enjoy driving, especially if it’s interstate. Road trips both liberate and invigorate me. But I avoid getting behind the wheel at night due to my nearsightedness. I wear high minus lenses, or what optometrists call a strong prescription, and that makes it difficult to focus on the road with lights flashing in my eyes from front and/or rear.

     

    Simply put, highway traffic is disabling for me. My eye condition in that sense is restrictive or even prohibitive. But in no way do I feel incapacitated or less than anyone else. And on several occasions, I have managed to steer towards my destination with lighting hiccups.

     

    Myopia or any corneal issue is hardly termed a disability in the conventional sense of the word. It’s an impairment but I don’t recall being addressed as a person with vision impairment so far. Even though I struggle to see without my glasses or contact lenses.

     

    For me, contacts solve two problems, one is cosmetic and the other is encountering people’s perception towards anyone with thick spectacles. They make the disability invisible. To another’s eye. For me, it stays tangible in every aspect of daily living.

     

    Last month, I slipped in the bathroom and severely injured my knee. I was grounded for three weeks before I could start limping around the house. Trying to walk with very little pressure on the knee, I ended up exerting the ankle. That’s problematic because I live with a sore ankle, weakened by tissue damage multiple times. To lead a normal life, I have to exercise regularly and strengthen other muscles in the leg. Else, I experience trouble in walking and driving, in addition to excruciating pain.

     

    But if I exercise, the said muscles for 15 minutes daily, I can cope. Doesn’t sound too complicated, right?

     

    Except after two long hauls of Covid-19, regular exercise has been out of question for me. It took a while to understand the changes my body experienced due to the virus and overmedication. Fatigue and persistent fever weakened my system. The gut was also hit, making it impossible to digest foods or medicines that could help. Every time I attempt at building a healthy routine, I falter as some symptom (re)surfaces.

     

    Are you already wondering what a mess I am? Or feel that I’m quite a ‘special’ case? Don’t worry you are not the only one thinking it. As frustrating as it maybe to live with a recurring series of problems, what’s worse is to be judged for it.

     

    Your family, friends, colleagues and employers project biased perceptions, disregarding difficulties you grapple with, to counter those very judgmental eyeballs. You often become the butt of distasteful jokes. You stop mentioning your health problems to your closest circle of people. You show up to work even on days you are physically unfit. You overperform to exceed expectations, in both personal and professional space. So that you are accepted.

     

    Yet the insensitivity disturbs and distresses.

     

    Globally, one in seven of us live with a disability. And of those, 80% are invisible. That’s 1 billion people living with a non-visible disability. 96% of people with chronic medical conditions live with an invisible illness. Covid has added to this count, with an increasing number of people experiencing a long-term disabling condition, like Crohn’s disease, Liver Cirrhosis, Diabetes, Anxiety, Neurological and Intestinal disorders, et cetera. People have also been battling severe allergies, loss of smell, altered taste, brain fog, depression, brittle bones and more, in the post-Covid world. Furthermore, people with chronic illness are mired in Catch-22 scenarios, making it impossible to treat one condition without a worsening side effect.

     

    According to Disability 100 Findings Report from May 2021, “No executives or senior managers at any of the FTSE 100 companies have disclosed they have a disability.” With no representation on the top, what is the probability of employees sharing their challenges at work?

     

    Acceptance precedes accommodation. If we don’t see, hear or understand it, how will we build an inclusive ecosystem for all?

     

    If you follow stories on disability or inclusion, you’d realise October is a month rife with awareness campaigns. Individuals and organisations working for disability rights have been busy sharing information and insights or curating events for World Cerebral Palsy Day (October 6), Blindness Awareness Month and Invisible Disabilities Week (October 16-22).

     

    These annual observances are an opportunity to educate as well as remind people of the challenges and the courage, the dreams and the hurdles, the limitations and the successes, and most importantly, the different aspects of the lives of millions living with some form of disability. It’s a celebration as well as an acknowledgment of the diversity that exists.

     

    But apart from niche accounts posting on Instagram or LinkedIn, there hasn’t been any significant mass coverage of the issues facing people living with cerebral palsy, blindness, mental and neurological disorders, chronic illnesses or other innumerous invisible disabilities. How come the Indian media remains oblivious to the prospect of sensitising the civil society towards a large and vulnerable section of the population?

     

    So why are we publishing this column on an A&M site? Well, we strongly feel that the media can dramatically transform the world of persons with disabilities And this series can help bring forth issues that the media must champion to create a truly inclusive and accessible India. To write this column, in late 2019, we invited Shruti Pushkarna, a former journalist who now works as Director, EnAble India where she heads North India operations as well as media and communications outreach. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal.

     

  • Shruti Pushkarna: Statistics Sans Substance: Are welfare schemes accessible and affordable for all?

    Shruti PushkarnaBy Shruti Pushkarna

     

    I enjoy my mornings this time of the year in the capital. A slight nip in the air, fresh breeze with lush green trees swaying gently, and my steaming cup of tea. And the most important ritual, skimming through the dailies. Yesterday, I came across a nearly full-page advert in The Indian Express which incited a flurry of emotions in me. Yet another self-aggrandising propaganda of our dear Prime Minister. Needless to say, the newspapers these days are filled with life-size pictures of Narendra Modi and his government’s pathbreaking (sarcasm alert) feats!

     

    The headline that caught my attention was: ‘Accessible and Affordable Healthcare Services Assured for All’. Now we all understand the term affordability especially in the backdrop of poverty facing a large section of the Indian population. As for accessibility, it includes access to the service from awareness of what it entails, how to avail and where from. I’m not even getting into the meaning of access or the lack of it, specific to persons with disabilities.

     

     

    The exact quote from the Prime Minister read: “Making the best treatment accessible to all is the country’s vision for a healthy India in the Azadi Ka Amrit Kaal. Today, India’s health policy revolves around health for all.”

     

    And this was followed by the usual number citing of modern and accessible health facilities for citizens. Of course, there was also the expected photo of a ‘needy’ man looking hopefully at the average Indian’s messiah (read Modi).

     

    As I said, it triggered multiple emotions inside me. Annoyance, at the unnecessarily rosy portrayal of reality. Frustration, at the indifferent usage of the word ‘accessible’. Disgust, at the never-ending convenient misconstrued usage of numbers.

     

    Data show-off is a favourite tactic of ruling parties, be it the current government or their predecessors. The advert in question states, “More than 50 crore poor can access free treatment up to 5 lakh rupees per family per year through Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana”. The number of health centres and additional medical colleges is reassuring (however misleading) to a naïve reader. But what’s the truth behind these out-of-context numbers?

     

    Last month, I was staring at the growing pile of clothes that sat in one corner of my room, because the ironing lady didn’t show up. My car was covered in dust for days as the car cleaner went missing. On asking around, I learned that the couple was reeling under their unexpected share of miseries. The guy fell down and ended up paralysed in a hospital, where the family couldn’t afford the necessary treatment. They had to rush to another hospital where he was operated, with a glimmer of hope for some sensation to return in his legs. For now, he is ‘disabled’, without an income and a handsome loan with no means to repay.

     

    When I asked his wife why they didn’t avail the Ayushman scheme, she said, “only if it were that easy”. That’s the naked truth. Simple and sharp. This woman is now working hard to run the house, look after her kids and ensure somehow that her husband receives treatment to spring back into action. She cannot afford the unforeseen yet unavoidable healthcare expense, and neither can she access the so-called welfare scheme.

     

    I wonder if this distraught woman believes in the PM’s vision of accessible and affordable healthcare for all.

     

    Meanwhile, residents like me have found a new guy who can iron clothes as well as clean cars. And I’m sure we sip our tea in peace, looking at the elaborate advertisements celebrating Azadi Ka Amrit Kaal.

     

    According to the National Health Accounts (NHA) estimate for 2014-15, the Government Health Expenditure (GHE) per person per year is only Rs 1,108 that comes to Rs 3 per day. Reports indicate that India’s public health spending is less than lower-income countries like Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Nepal. 0.38 million people committed suicide in India between 2001 and 2015 due to the lack of treatment facilities, as stated by the National Crime Records Bureau.

     

    After the pandemic, the healthcare needs have amplified and so has the spending but is it enough for every section of the population? What about the disabled community or those who have acquired disability after contracting Covid? This includes invisible disabilities like brain-fogging and loss of smell, both of which I have experienced personally.

     

    Speaking of persons with disabilities, during the pandemic, another social security scheme was promoted by the leadership and the news media. The famous Antyodaya Anna Yojana, under which every beneficiary could claim 35 kilos of ration, including 20 kilos of wheat and 15 kg rice. Handling the backend operations of a national helpline for blind and visually impaired people, I was faced with distressed accounts on a regular basis as Covid numbers were on the rise.

     

    When people called asking for ration, the helpline redirected them to district and village officials to avail the Antyodaya Yojana. But most callers reported denial of ration, on account of disability or incomplete paperwork. This when the central and state governments were heavily advertising the simplicity in access of the said welfare measure for ‘all’. True that a lot of people received free ration during the troubled times, but an equal (or more) number of folks faced brutal rejection at the hands of implementing agencies.

     

    Persons with disabilities were stranded without help, food, or medicines, and some even without proper shelter, during the lockdown. For them, fear emanated more from how they would be able to access healthcare in case they contracted Covid rather than how the disease would impact their physical being.

     

    Where is the data that speaks for the people? I can understand that it may not be in the best interest of governments to reveal such insights, but what is preventing the news media from doing so? Are the woes of an average citizen not glamorous enough to feature alongside blatant agitprop in newspapers, or on primetime television debates?

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as Director, EnAble India where she heads North India operations as well as media and communications outreach. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

  • Shruti Pushkarna | Deaf Awareness Month: What’s your deafness quotient?

    By Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Shruti PushkarnaDiversity, Equity and Inclusion, or DEI seems to be the latest fad. With no intention to offend those working hard to achieve inclusion in their respective areas of work, there are individuals and groups who use the term for a voguish propaganda as opposed to a sincere acceptance of differences.

     

    And there are people who advocate for inclusion of one community while discriminating against another. For instance, disability advocates might not necessarily support LGBTQIA+ rights. Or, feminists may be indifferent towards an equal status for Dalits or other underprivileged groups. This half-baked subscription to the idea of inclusion dilutes the very essence of equality for all.

     

    I must confess, that I align myself more to the cause of disability Inclusion but that’s more to do with my lack of awareness regarding other communities’ diverse needs. It isn’t willful or conscious discrimination. If I think back to my childhood, I was always scared of transgender people when they came to our colony to celebrate someone’s matrimony or birth. Fear emerged as a natural reaction to the different physical traits. But I recall frequently seeing a person with dwarfism who didn’t seem to petrify me.

     

    I wonder how we internalise and react to differences. If lessons in inclusion and exposure to diversity is available at an early age, there would be a lot less systemic societal stigmatisation.

     

    Doordarshan was the first to start a sign language bulletin for the deaf

    Growing up in the 1980s, I was allowed limited television time. One of the permitted indulgences included a feature film on Doordarshan on the weekend. It was preceded or followed by a news bulletin which had sign language interpretation. That acted as an effective tool of sensitisation for me, immediately helping me understand that there were more ways to communicate than what I was accustomed to.

    September is the Deaf Awareness Month, with World Day of the Deaf celebrated on the last Sunday of the month. This year it would be September 25. It is a way to highlight the importance of equal access to the deaf, hard of hearing or anyone experiencing hearing loss.

    Did you know that 5% of the world’s population is deaf?

    According to the World Health Organisation, one in every four individuals, or around 2.5 million people will experience mild to profound hearing loss by 2050. It is estimated that approximately 700 million people will have disabling hearing loss as against the current count of around 450 million.

     

    With 80% of this population in developing countries, India alone is home to 63 million people who are deaf and hard of hearing. If you find this number appalling, here’s the real shocker.

     

    In India, officially there are only 250 certified sign language interpreters, translating for a deaf population ranging anywhere between 1.8 million and 7 million (as per Census numbers).

     

    With challenges of communication, language barrier is the real disability and not deafness!

     

    As per a 2019 news report, only 1% of the total deaf population gets quality education in the country. Needless to say, it is harder for them to find jobs in comparison to the hearing people.

     

    What stops us from including deaf people into the mainstream?

     

    The optimist in me believes it is ignorance rather than apathy. So in the true spirit of Deaf Awareness Month, I’ve put together a quiz to quickly assess how little (or not) do you know about this community.

    1. What is deafness?

    a. When people can’t hear

    b. When people can’t speak

    c. When people can’t focus and get distracted

    d. When people can hear only loud sounds

    2. How do deaf people communicate?

    a. Writing

    b. Signing

    c. Lipreading

    d. All of the above

    3. Which country has the highest deaf population in the world?

    a. India

    b. Russia

    c. China

    d. United States

    4. According to the World Federation of the Deaf, how many sign languages are used worldwide?

    a. 19

    b. 327

    c. 200

    d. 53

    5. How can deaf people access education?

    a. Regular school

    b. Special school

    c. Home schooling

    d. All of the above

    6. Other than being born deaf, can you acquire deafness? If yes, how?

    a. Old age

    b. Exposure to loud sounds

    c. Accident

    d. All of the above

    7. What is the most acceptable term for deaf people?

    a. Deaf

    b. Deaf and Dumb

    c. Disabled

    d. Hearing Impaired

    8. Which of the following activities can’t be done by deaf people?

    a. Driving

    b. Using a phone

    c. Listening to music

    d. None of the above

    9. What is the most common cause of deafness according to WHO?

    a. Born deaf

    b. Untreated ear infections

    c. Accidents

    d. Old age

    10. When speaking to a deaf person, you should?

    a. Speak slowly

    b. Look away from the person

    c. Face the person

    d. Both a and c

     

    Answers: 1-a, 2-d, 3-b, 4-c, 5-d, 6-d, 7-a, 8-d, 9-b, 10-d

     

    Is your score indicative of someone who can champion the cause of deaf inclusion? Or are you at the lower end of the spectrum, mindless of the barriers in access for a whopping 63 million? It’s never too late to sensitise yourself and the others around you. This month, post one less selfie on Instagram, and replace it with some deaf trivia!

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as Director, EnAble India where she heads North India operations as well as media and communications outreach. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

  • Shruti Pushkarna: In the 75 years of Azadi, does the disabled population have access to independent living?

    Shruti PushkarnaBy Shruti Pushkarna

     

    August 15, 2022 saw the high point of the two-plus-year celebrations initiated as Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav by the government in March 2021. 75 years of progressive India!

     

    That’s quite a milestone. Except the glorious narrative seems to be a bit lopsided for the marginalised sections of the Indian population.

     

    The Narendra Modi=led government has a special inclination towards formulating mantras or slogans that build recall and popularise the leadership among the ignorant masses. The latest one ‘Har Ghar Tiranga’, saw proud Indians displaying selfies taken against the national flag. The other iconic ones include ‘Achche Din…’, ‘Minimum Government, Maximum Governance’, ‘Beti Bachao Beti Padhao’, ‘Make in India’, ‘Ab ki baar…’, et cetera. It’s a lengthy list of hollow promises.

     

    Seven years ago, professionals and organisations dedicated to the cause of including persons with disabilities into the mainstream society were also awestruck by one such rhetoric.

     

    On December 3, 2015, International Day of Persons with Disabilities, Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the ‘Accessible India’ campaign, also known as the ‘Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan’. The big idea was to ease the access to Built Environment, Transportation System as well as the Information and Communication Ecosystem, for persons with disabilities. Aimed at providing equal opportunities of access and growth to all citizens by 2017-2019, Sugamya Bharat was lauded by the disabled community and its advocates.  Until reality slapped us in the face, yet again.

     

    Accessibility audits conducted close to the 2019 deadline, reported major gaps in what was promised versus what existed on the ground. Deadlines were extended as a result. First it was March 2020. Then June 2022. But as per parliamentary responses and the correspondence between the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (DEPwD) and chief secretaries of states and Union Territories, a lot remains unaccomplished till date.

     

    Just to give you a better understanding of the objective of this nationwide campaign, and how critical it is to the 2.68 crore (severely underreported) disabled Indians. Here’s what the government set out to achieve by 2019 (or June 2022).

     

    The campaign was targeted to achieve universal accessibility for Persons with Disabilities (PwDs) under three verticals.

     

    1. Build Environment Accessibility

     

    The objective is to eliminate all barriers obstacles and barriers to indoor and outdoor facilities like schools, medical facilities, workplaces, government buildings etc. This also includes public spaces like parks, footpaths, roads and so on. An accessible building is one where there are no barriers in entry and exit or using any of the facilities housed in the premises. Such a building is equipped with ramps, elevators, walkways, accessible toilets, signage, lighting, alarms et cetera for ease of navigation for a person with disability.

     

    2. Transportation System Accessibility

     

    Like anyone else, PwDs rely on the transportation system to get around from one place to the other. It could be for work, education, leisure or health. This includes transportation via trains, buses, airplane and taxis. This means that bus stops, railway stations and airports should also be fully accessible for a disabled person traveling independently.

     

    3. Information and Communication (ICT) Ecosystem

     

    In the age of information overload, it is imperative that PwDs have access to information of all sorts. This includes ensuring access to content in the form of documents, website, mobile applications and all audio-video media. Under this vertical, the authorities will also work to enhance the available pool of sign language interpreters for the benefit of those with hearing and speech impairments.

     

    Sounds propitious and revolutionary, doesn’t it?  It is, on paper.

     

    Data reported by DEPwD cites several gaps in implementation. Only 585 of the 1030 central government buildings have been made barrier-free. Similarly, just 48.5% of the state government buildings have been made accessible. Public transport accessibility has a long way to go, with only 8.73% of buses made accessible. Access to information isn’t exactly easy to come by, either. Legal and other official documents in the public space, including health (Covid) notifications continue to be circulated/ published in inaccessible formats. A lot of websites, mobile applications and other digital services still don’t comply with the universal design and accessibility guidelines, denying information access to PwDs.

     

    75% of children with disabilities in India don’t attend school, lack of social inclusion, reasonable accommodation and shoddy implementation of laws and policies being some of the reasons. And of the almost 3 crore disabled population, 1.3 crore are employable between the age of 15 and 59. But only 34 lakh have been employed.

     

    Lifting the barriers of access in the physical and virtual infrastructure can open up opportunities of education and employment for millions of persons with disabilities.

     

    Unless and until the surrounding environment ceases to quash the ability in disability, how can the country’s disabled revel in Azadi ka Amrit Mahotsav?

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as Director, EnAble India where she heads North India operations as well as media and communications outreach. She was a part of the founding team of MxMIndia. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

     

  • Shruti Pushkarna: Five ways to make media offerings accessible

    Shruti PushkarnaBy Shruti Pushkarna

     

    They say charity begins at home. Well, so does inclusion. We all love to judge others, call out their mistakes, conveniently forgetting our own follies. Aren’t we all guilty of excluding people who don’t talk, walk or look like us?

     

    Most of us don’t even realise how and when we omit vulnerable communities from everyday conversations, business, politics, entertainment et cetera.

     

    Persons with disabilities struggle to navigate not only in a physically inaccessible environment, but also among people unconsciously wired to discriminate and dismiss.

     

    My journey of disability inclusion started with observing gaps in things that mattered to me personally.

     

    As a shopaholic, I realised how measly are the options of accessible clothing or footwear. If at all available, the prices are exorbitant. As if living with a disability is not expensive enough. As a foodie, I noticed getting in and out of restaurants was an obvious challenge for wheelchair users but the deaf and blind customers had limited ways of communicating with the servers.

     

    The next logical step was to implement small changes in my behaviour in the personal and professional space. Something others could easily emulate. Obsessed with capturing moments on camera to share with my social media audience, I discovered how using ‘image description’ can help blind people enjoy and participate in the pictorial narrative.

     

    In a largely visual world, fueled by Instagram stories, including persons with disability on social media is a possibility, thanks to technology. A revelation to the television producer in me!

     

    It’s amazing how much we assume and take for granted as creatures of habit.

     

    Various stakeholders as well as individuals can break the cycle of ignorance by introducing little changes in their respective domains.

     

    What can mediapersons/ journalists do differently, to include persons with disabilities in their offerings?

     

    Here are five easy-to-do things to reach a wider audience irrespective of (dis)ability.

    1. Make video content accessible for everyone

    While adding subtitles can make the audio portions accessible to the deaf, overlaying a separate track of audio description can help the blind make sense of the silent parts in a video.

    2. Add sign language interpretation

    Recorded or live programming on television can be interlaced with sign language which can help persons with hearing impairment interpret the content easily. This is also true for conferences and award ceremonies.

    3. Read out graphic content

    Television news and sports coverage is a mix of audio, video and graphic content. A news bulletin has several sections of information displayed graphically, like statistics, forecasts, trends and so on. If the anchor reads out the graphic content on air, it immediately becomes accessible to persons with vision impairment. This is critical for disaster relief broadcasts, where contact and other info is flashing on TV screens continuously.

    4. Make websites and apps accessible

    Today, more than television, people consume news online. And that’s why it is important to make news websites and mobile applications disabled-friendly. The platforms should be built in compliance to the web accessibility guidelines and all software updates thereafter, should go through the same checks. Some usual suspects include pop-up advertisements, unlabelled images, colour contrast and drop-down menus.

    5. Use correct terminology

    Media teams should go through a thorough sensitisation and awareness programme to ensure they understand respectful, dignified and politically correct ways of addressing persons with disabilities. For instance, there is nothing wrong with calling someone blind given their loss of sight, but it’s not appropriate to call a speech-impaired person, dumb. Similarly, battling with disability might be challenging, but it doesn’t make the disabled ‘special’ or ‘gifted’. It is a physical/ mental condition and therefore, using the word ‘impairment’ or ‘disability’ is befitting.

     

    The key to inclusion is to accept there is an audience with diverse needs and ask what ways or solutions can reduce the existing gaps. Needless to say, that the media needs to ramp up its coverage on issues facing the large disabled population.

     

    Amidst the increased bellowing for Diversity Equity & Inclusion, does the media contribute anything apart from an incongruous rant for equality?

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as Director, EnAble India where she heads North India operations as well as media and communications outreach. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

  • ‘Outside India, people see disabled as humans first’

     

     

    By Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Shruti PushkarnaI was fifteen, when I first traveled outside the country, across the Pacific. The trip was an eye-opener, educative and liberating. It exposed me to different people, culture, food, places and more. Something that shaped me in different ways in the following years.

     

    To me travel means independence. I wonder what it means to a person with disability who is written off as ‘dependent’. Do disabled people like to travel? Do they have the freedom to travel given the inaccessible (physical) environment and limiting societal perceptions?

     

    To get a sense of their desires, challenges, and the scope of travel in and outside India, I spoke with Neha Arora, the Founder of Planet Abled. An organisation that makes travel accessible and inclusive for persons with all types of disabilities and the elderly. Neha worked with companies like HCL, Nokia and Adobe before launching Planet Abled.

     

    Neha Arora, Founder, Planet Abled
    Neha Arora, Founder, Planet Abled

    Question: Tell us a bit about yourself, Neha.

    Answer: I was born to parents with disability. My father is blind and my mother is a wheelchair user. I have lived all my life with disability and challenges. Growing up, we never went for a holiday. I assumed money was the problem, so when I started earning, I saved up to plan a holiday. That’s when I realised my naiveté, it wasn’t the money, it was about the lack of accessibility and the prevalent insensitivity in the society. Most disabled people, especially in a country like India, are conditioned that travel is not for them. I refused to accept it, picking fights everywhere. There came a tipping point after a mob fight, when I decided to look for solutions. Unable to find any comprehensive solution for all disabilities, I decided to do something about it myself.

     

    Q: So, you left your corporate job to start something of your own. How did things go from there?

    A: I had a few lessons in entrepreneurship because I was a hustler with my job as well. But this time I wanted to succeed, so I did proper homework for the next two to three years. I sat at airports, counting the number of people traveling from different cities, because there was no official data. I talked to staff at hotels and airports, asking about the number of disabled folks coming in. When I couldn’t find any data still, I thought there was something seriously wrong. I decided to take it up as an opportunity, which was hidden in plain sight. In the final year of my groundwork, I tried to understand the disabled community’s challenges and the solutions that could work.

     

    Q: How did you come up with the name, ‘Planet Abled’?

    A: Planet Abled because it’s not the disability that stops people from exploring the world. It’s the environment and establishments that are inaccessible. It’s the stigma that exists around disability. So, in a way we have to make the planet ‘abled’ for everyone to travel and have the freedom of choice to do so.

     

    Q: You mentioned that India doesn’t have any data on disabled travelers. In your experience, how do other countries fare on this?

    A: Other countries have specific numbers. US, Germany and Australia track not only the number of disabled people traveling but also the total spends. In 2019, US citizens spent $ 58 billion on disabled travel, that’s a huge market. In India, we don’t even have the exact count of persons with disabilities. But other countries have specific data based on which they create facilities.

     

    Q: So, you are saying there is a business case for disabled travel, but India is far behind?

    A: Yes. I also think that people with disabilities are at fault. In my experience, many of them don’t want to spend the money even if they have it. They expect to receive services for free on grounds of disability. As a result of this sense of entitlement, businesses won’t consider them a paying customer or market. Only a handful of Indians want to spend money on service and access. If you don’t want to pay for a value-driven service, you won’t have enough services that value you as a customer. It’s a two-way street.

     

    Q: I have had a lot of ‘able-bodied’ people react strangely to the idea of a blind or a deaf person wanting to travel. They simply don’t understand why would a disabled person want to travel.

    A: I think people who have no exposure to disability, should join one inclusive group trip because it makes them realise that this person with disability is just like me. And they are also looking for travel experiences where they can enjoy and have fun. The way they perceive or experience things, might be different. For example, a wheelchair user might need to follow a route which is step free, and they might need an accommodation which is suitable to their accessibility needs, which is rare and expensive in our country. Let’s say you visit a historical monument, you see it and probably have a guide sharing information about it. How would a blind person perceive it? To make it inclusive and accessible, we print 3D models of monuments to have them touch and feel. Similarly, for a deaf person you can make it engaging in sign language or easy language. Reading complicated text is difficult for deaf people. Unlike India, other countries have deaf guides commonly available.

     

    Q: Travel was severely hit during the pandemic years, and to some extent it still is. But now I hear people itching to travel, pull out of their confines, they are going for something called ‘revenge travel’. How do you see a disabled person in this context, who has been confined for so many years together?

    A: Like you said, it’s not new for a disabled person to not be out. They are conditioned in a way to stay indoors. But what I see a lot of desperation in them as well, to go out. I receive urgent requests from people wanting to travel day after! In the second wave also, I had people calling me to plan a trip. Because whatever little social life they had, also disappeared. So, there is revenge travel happening in the context of disability as well. I have a client in the US who retired from her government job, to travel. She wants to indulge herself, travel and experience the world for as she long as she lives. She and her husband both have a disability, they don’t have any kids.

     

    Q: What are the differentiating factors you have noticed in your travel within the country and abroad, in terms of ease of travel for a person with disability? Do empathy levels vary in societies and cultures?

    A: Specific to the type of disability, access needs vary. In terms of physical infrastructure, metro city hotels fare better, especially 4-star and above, because of compliance. They don’t do it from the goodness of their heart or as a business need, but only to get a star-rating. I have had some horrible experiences with some of the biggest chains in the country despite their tags of being compassionate and disabled-friendly. In fact, I find local/regional chains to be more sensitive and empathetic to the needs of disabled customers. Outside India, people are more sensitive. They see you as humans first. Of course, having a strong legislation helps, as in the case of US. Some countries have a culture of inclusion. In Australia, there are legal setups for disabled people being paid to travel with a caregiver because it is important for the well-being and health. They have organizations who look after the rights of caregivers.

     

    Q: Travel brings exposure to new places, people, environments et cetera. How important do you think travel is in the process of empowerment of persons with disabilities? Have you seen any transformation in your clients?

    A: Travel makes you realise what a tiny part of the world you are. And there are so many diverse people you come across that prejudices go away. Travel has the ability to resolve the radicalisation and intolerance that we see around us. People have told us that you gave us the best day of our life because we never even thought this was possible. Some even complain about turning into travel addicts! Some have gone back and taken up driving lessons, or joined a gym, or picked up a hobby, thinking no barrier is impossible to overcome. Some special friendships have emerged from our inclusive travel groups, bringing down the apprehensions around disability.

     

    Q: Do you think the Indian media can contribute in any way towards making travel a natural choice for a person with disability as much as it is for any other citizen?

    A: Of course. It’s all about correct representation. If the media talks about it, people can see the human side of things. It’s important to make a film, music video or an advertisement inclusive in representation. Media companies have to make their own content accessible, they have to walk the talk. It has to start with seeing disabled people as ‘people’ first. Inclusion has to be part of the leadership’s agenda, for any section of society that is underrepresented.

     

  • Shruti Pushkarna: Busted: 10 Myths & Clichés about Disability

    Shruti PushkarnaBy Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Have you mindlessly indulged in stereotyping because that’s what you have seen or heard thus far? Let me tell you, this oversight is equivalent to promoting those clichés. You are just as guilty.

     

    Here are 10 myths that have grown into commonly accepted facts over the years.

     

    1. Disabled people have a sixth sense

    No, this is no M Night Shyamalan movie. God doesn’t compensate for the loss of one sense, by giving the disabled a superpower. There is no ‘divine ability’, really. There are abilities and talents which are cultivated by the person, nothing ‘divyaang’ about them. Sorry, Modi ji.

     

    2. Disability is a result of bad karma

    ‘Pichchle janam ke karam’! Honestly, why are we so dramatic about a condition that can be explained easily in clinical terms? Someone born with a locomotor disability is ridiculed and excluded because of a supposedly bad karmic connection. Only yesterday I heard the latest mandate on radio, by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, for carmakers to provide six air bags in eight-seater vehicles. If you haven’t already made the connection: there are around 1.5 lakh people killed in five lakh accidents across the country. A sizeable number gets injured, some even left disabled. Is this tragedy attributed to past life or this one, how does it work? Because if it’s past karma, then let’s not hold automobile manufacturers or the government responsible for anything.

     

    3. Visually impaired people are hard of hearing too

    Often, I have seen people talk loudly to a blind person, almost yelling at them. Even better, they address the person accompanying them, assuming the person is not only blind but deaf also. What’s worse is that sometimes people question the overall ability of blind people to decide for themselves. Huh. I was once on a flight with my ex-boss who is visually impaired, and the airhostess refused to give him coffee, stating that serving a hot beverage mid-air is dangerous for him. Not only was I appalled at the supposition, but irked because she won’t communicate it directly to him! Is it really so hard to accept the loss of one sense without doubting the remaining four?

     

    4. Disabled people are asexual

    The inability to have sex in the usual style as we understand it, does not make disabled folk bereft of human desire or biological needs. There are tools and aids available to help them enjoy coitus in their own adaptive way. Doesn’t sex help release stress, allowing you to let go et cetera? Who needs it more than somebody confined and underestimated because of the lack of access and imagination of the so-called normal society? There’s a market for accessible sex toys for persons with disabilities, clearly someone worked out the economics of demand and supply.

     

    5. Persons with hearing impairment can read lips

    If this were true, what was the need for sign language? Also, every time a hearing impaired person needs to be included in a conversation, they have to be in visible distance from the person ‘talking’. Do you really want me to spell out the numerous times that is not possible? And what about during the pandemic or in the post-Covid world, when masking is common practice? Yes, there are transparent or clear masks available, but there are also a lot of hearing disabled individuals who cannot read lips. And those who gain proficiency with practice, lose out on chunks of conversations due to the variations in the pace and manner of speaking.

     

    6. Persons with disability are anti-social

    I mean even it were true, it would seem logical. Years of isolation and stigmatisation is bound to make them feel unwanted. Socializing is again a function of access to people and environments. Whether a person is introvert or not, can be determined only after giving them a fair chance to engage. A lot of disabled people who manage to step out, go from special schools to vocational programmes. They follow set routines because of limited access to physical spaces and dependency on the caregiver. I know some gregarious folk who have the ability and choice to navigate the physical or digital space independently.

     

    7. God will help us if we help a person with disability

    Charity done with the supreme objective of self-gratification. Ugh. We all know of people who donate items on their birth anniversaries, don’t we? An annual ritual to help acquire some good karma so you are not born with a disability in the next life. I’ve seen people insist on feeding 13 blind children at 10.17 am on Monday just to placate the angry ‘nakshatras’. Interesting how we never think of the receiver of these offerings, however sacred they may be.

     

    8. Disabled people only feel pain or sorrow

    Emotions are not simplistic. Neither are human beings. And disabled folk are also people who experience varied emotions at different times. Some of them may be in pain a lot, so frustrated easily. But they are equally capable of laughing at a joke, experiencing joy and don’t always dwell on their disability. Life is as colourful or complicated for them as it might be for you and me.

     

    9. Disabled people don’t like venturing out

    If you have enough money, you can plan trips and adventures. I know foodies who eat up their entire salary, savouring sumptuous meals. Not that you always need money to indulge in excursions, but it helps. Persons with disability in addition need access to the physical environment they want to explore and help with communication in that setup. There are several solutions available for that, some at a price, some not so much. The only reason you don’t imagine them to take off on a holiday at the drop of a hat, is because they are limited by the surrounding ecosystem. Not by their disability, always.

     

    10. Persons with mental illness are violent

    Yes, we have all seen many Hollywood and Bollywood depictions. Characters with mental health disorders have tangled hair, beady eyes and shabby clothes. They are dressed up to frighten and shock the audience. My all-time favourite is the 1980 classic ‘The Shining’, one of the many psychological thrillers that exaggerate and misrepresent ‘madness’.

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as Director, EnAble India where she heads North India operations as well as media and communications outreach. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

     

  • Shruti Pushkarna: Is barrier-free access to physical spaces not a newsworthy agenda?

    Shruti PushkarnaBy Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Last month, Delhi hit a record temperature of 49.2 degree Celsius, the hottest I have witnessed in nearly four decades of living in the capital. The sweltering heat from April to July leaves you dehydrated, drained and demotivated. The only respite from the incinerator is an air-conditioned environment.

     

    From your home to the car, to the office, and back. All controlled air-conditioning. And the fun activities are also limited to indoor spaces, like, restaurants, cinema theatre, shopping malls et cetera.

     

    One could argue why step out and suffer the heatwave, especially if it’s not for work. True. But forced internment due to the protracted spread of Covid-19 has driven most of us to our saturation point. Now we seek the tiniest excuse to mingle with the external world, happily battling dust storms, soaring temperatures or pouring rain. Nothing can stop us.

     

    Except something does stop some of us from going out to shop, eat, watch a film, see a doctor, or have a business meeting. Not everyone is fortunate to experience carefree excursions.

     

    I’m hinting at the largeish section of the population comprising persons with disabilities and the elderly. Often simple things in physical environments that we may overlook or dismiss, turn out to be serious barriers in movement for senior citizens and the disabled folk.

     

    Here’s a picture I took of the entry point of a shopping arcade in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, which also happens to house a lot of doctors’ clinics as well as pathology labs.

     

     

    Interestingly, you can spot a ramp for wheelchair users but it has been permanently blocked with iron bars. The escalator is broken and functions more like a steep staircase. When I went to see my gastroenterologist for acute abdominal pain, the climb up to the first floor was an unnecessary excruciating exercise. I could have taken the elevator but it was small, stinky and crowded. On another visit, the assistant barged in to inform my doctor of a patient who couldn’t be transported upstairs. As he stepped down to examine her in the car, I stared at the (token) wheelchair parked in one corner of the clinic.

     

    Some time ago, I was accompanying my CEO for an official meeting to a coffee shop in a popular Delhi mall. Instead of going down to the basement parking, we chose to be dropped off at the mall entrance with steps leading up. Used to guiding him to the hand rail so he can climb the stairs on his own despite vision impairment, I was deterred by the huge flower pots placed on both sides of the staircase. He had to stick to my elbow for navigation.

     

    I wondered what if he were not accompanied by a sighted person? I also thought about children and their grandparents who need handrails for essential support. Why block a utility in the name of aesthetics? Needless to mention, that the flower pot phenomenon is commonly seen in many buildings, including schools, hospitals, government offices and so on.

     

    I reached out to the mall authorities by posting a tweet, citing the concern and hoping to raise the general awareness levels. Here’s a link to the Twitter thread that managed to initiate a conversation, engage some and incite some, if not resolve the problem.

     

    But I must confess I have also encountered a few positive initiatives ensuring ease of access in the city. And I find it equally important to highlight and laud such interventions. I have been visiting the famous Priya cinema complex in Vasant Vihar, Delhi since my school days. But on a more recent trip, I noticed the welcome addition of a well-lit rampway on the way to the parking lot.

     

     

    There are at least two shopping malls where a small wheelchair lift is installed adjacent to a short flight of stairs. One is shown in the picture below. The India Habitat Centre also has a stairlift, a mechanical device lifting people up and down from their basement halls.

     

     

    I was also pleased to see an aged woman using a specially designed wheelchair, enjoying a hearty meal with her entire family in an accessible (read roomy and barrier-free) restaurant. In fact, some tables in another restaurant were reserved for such guests.

     

     

    Very often all it takes to accommodate people with different needs is an open mind, right attitude and awareness. Informative engagements with various stakeholders can prove effective in countering hostility, apathy and prejudice.

     

    Many a times, I tweet hoping some friend or ex-colleague in the media will take note and campaign for equal rights for persons with disabilities as well as those limited by age or illness.

     

    We’ve seen consistent reporting on urban developmental problems of potholes, badly designed flyovers, dangerous curbs, which cause several deaths every year. Do the barriers of ingress and egress go unreported because they are not life threatening?

     

    Why can’t the media do something about the ignorance impeding access for millions in the country?

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as Director, EnAble India where she heads North India operations as well as media and communications outreach. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

  • Disability Inclusion: Should the media practise and propagate accessibility?

     

     

     

    By Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Shruti PushkarnaMay 19, 2022 marks the eleventh edition of Global Accessibility Awareness Day (GAAD). Founders, Joe Devon and Jennison Asuncion teamed up in 2012 to initiate the famous GAAD movement following a blogpost (by Joe) and a thread on Twitter (spotted by Jennison).

     

     

     

    The objective is to raise awareness and know-how on how to make the digital environment (products and services) accessible for one billion people across the world, who live with some form of disability.

     

    Through various events, talks and hackathons, everyone gets talking, thinking and learning about digital inclusion and access. India has been an active participant in the movement. But other than the usual suspects, including disability advocates, potential beneficiaries of accessible ecosystems, accessibility testers and consultants, most of us don’t really care about this annual observance.

     

    In fact, unless one is aligned to the disability sector in some way, the term GAAD is probably alien.

     

    Before we (society and media) can propagate the removal of barriers in access, it is imperative to understand the problem and its magnitude.

     

    Imagine not having access to online services like banking, food delivery, social media, maps, search engines. Feels strange, right?

     

    In the digitally connected world, we cannot fathom making physical trips to the bank, telecom provider, grocer, fruits and vegetable vendor, chemist et cetera for essentials.

     

    It’s almost paralysing to think of a life without our handy gadgets: smartphone and computers.

     

    Persons with disabilities live with physical, mental or sensory limitations. But technology can enable them to lead less crippled lives.

     

    Here are just a few scenarios citing how digital inclusion can alter the rules of engagement.

    1. Booking flight tickets online

    A person with hearing or speech impairment, vision impairment or locomotor disability can access travel booking apps or websites using computers and assistive technology (or devices). However, an inaccessible audio or image Captcha can prevent them from independently closing the transaction.

     

    2. Internet banking

    A disabled person confined to his or her home because of the barriers in the physical environment, can avoid the hassles of visiting a bank for financial transactions. Most of us are empowered by the ease of digital payments today. Persons with disabilities can also use payment gateways, online banking and mobile wallets to seamlessly transfer money. Again, the platforms need to be compatible with assistive tools and technology.

     

    3. Ordering food, medicines, other essentials

    Persons with disabilities don’t have to depend on another for everything. There are a lot of daily activities and needs that can be met independently. Like ordering groceries, medicines, vegetables, fruits or scrumptious food, using popular websites and apps that deliver stuff to the doorstep.

     

    4. Reading

    Whether it’s catching news updates or reading fictional accounts, e-publications and audio books make reading easily accessible for a larger population, including print disabled. Needless to say, this impacts inclusion in educational institutions as well as the workplace.

     

    5. Social engagements

    Access to social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram helps expand a disabled person’s social circle. They can interact with a wider and diverse group in a virtual setting, without being constrained by their disability.

     

    So why should we care about ensuring access to this section of the population?

    The numbers are huge.

    We are talking about 15 per cent of the world’s population that faces challenges in accessing websites, mobile applications, or other digital products, if developers and designers don’t adhere to accessibility guidelines. And these include people who are educated, employed and even taxpayers.

     

    Disabled folk are caught in a vicious cycle of marginalisation.

    Excluded from opportunities of education, employment and entertainment, persons with disabilities continue living on the margins. Access to digital services, especially in a world driven by technology, can help them attain personal and economic independence.

     

    Equal access implies increased participation that helps in refuting stereotypes.

    Picture an inclusive classroom where students with and without disabilities can access books and lessons through computers, smartphones or assistive devices. Quality education can reduce the burden on reservations and benefits, with more and more disabled folk pursuing jobs based on merit and aspirations. Gradually belying the stereotype of lifelong dependency.

     

    Seeing the disabled as active citizens.

    The ability to attend school, work a job, participate in an online forum, make financial investments, argue and opine on social media, transforms the disabled from an invisible majority to active citizenry. A natural progression towards ‘person first’ narrative follows, where disability becomes inconsequential.

     

    Untapped human resource can impact the economy.

    The International Labour Organisation suggests that including persons with disabilities into the workforce can positively impact the GDP by 3 to 5 per cent.

    Accessibility not only paves way for an inclusive society but also makes perfect business sense to make products and services available to a wider pool.

     

  • Shruti Pushkarna: Are you really inclusive? Or is it just a lip service?

    Shruti PushkarnaBy Shruti Pushkarna

     

    As someone who feels strongly about disability inclusion, I always look out for accessibility incorporations in physical spaces or the lack of it. Narrow or steep ramps get me all riled up. Just like escalators in shopping malls in lieu of elevators! How can those be interchangeable?

     

    Often, I find myself voluntarily explaining the use of braille signages and tactile markings to random strangers. I take pictures of accessible and inaccessible services/ products to share on my social media handles. All in the name of vociferously seeking equal rights for all citizens.

     

    In the polarised world we inhabit today, people are unapologetic about their opinions and beliefs. If we were to go by social media trends, millions are up in arms against discrimination of any sort. They rake up a storm on any talk of exclusion of women, disabled, children, elderly, LGBTQ+.

     

    But do they really care or understand the issues of diverse communities?

    If yes, then why hasn’t the collective discontent of so many led to a change in mindset?

    Is it because most people don’t practise what they preach?

     

    One thing I have learnt over the years is the need to educate before you advocate. We need to understand the issues and perspectives of vulnerable minorities before we can voice their concerns. The challenges faced by persons with disability in their everyday lives are real. Places like schools, offices, temples, entertainment hubs et cetera pose barriers that keep them estranged from the mainstream society.

     

    How much do we know about this gap in order to be able to bridge it? Here’s a quick quiz to assess your basic knowledge of disability and inclusion. Answer these ten multiple choice questions and find out your individual disability quotient!

     

    1. What do you call someone who requires a wheelchair to move around?

    a. Handicapped

    b. Wheelchair bound

    c. Invalid

    d. Wheelchair user

     

    2. Which of the following is true?

    a. All persons with autism are intellectually disabled

    b. Intellectual disability is a type of developmental disorder

    c. Intellectual disabilities are hereditary

    d. Down syndrome is the only cause of intellectual disability

     

    3. An accessible building has…

    a. Ramp

    b. Elevator

    c. Braille signage

    d. All of the above

     

    4. How do you help a blind person cross the road?

    a. Drag them by their shirt or dress

    b. Offer them your elbow

    c. Yell audio instructions at them

    d. Push them from their shoulders

     

    5. Which of these is not a disability recognized by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016?

    a. Hearing impairment

    b. Speech impediment

    c. Attention DeficitHyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

    d. Thalassaemia

     

    6. If a school is inclusive, it allows admission to which community?

    a. Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe

    b. Transgender

    c. Disabled

    d. All of the above

     

    7. How you shouldn’t communicate with a deaf person?

    a. Texting

    b. Calling

    c. Signing

    d. Writing

     

    8. Which of these spaces should have tactile markings?

    a. Bus stop

    b. Metro station

    c. Airports

    d. All of the above

     

    9. The Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan was launched in December 2015 to ensure…

    a. All physical and digital spaces are made accessible

    b. Reservation for persons with disabilities in private and government jobs

    c. All schools have accessible classrooms for disabled students

    d. Accessible toilets are built across the country

     

    10. Which of these make content accessible to persons with disability?

    a. Closed captioning

    b. Audio description

    c. Sign Language

    d. All of the above

     

    Answers: 1 d, 2 b, 3 d, 4 b, 5 c, 6 c, 7 b, 8 d, 9 a, 10 d

     

    So how did you score? If it’s 10 on 10, then go ahead and term yourself an inclusion champion. But anything less than that means your tall claims of DEI (Diversity Equity and Inclusion) are unsubstantiated.

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as a programmes and media specialist for the inclusion of persons with disabilities. Shruti was part of the founding team of MxMIndia and now writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

  • Time to empathise with the caregiver?

     

     

    By Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Shruti PushkarnaAll along I have been writing about the missing disabled perspective from the media narrative. How the society (and media) overlooks issues surrounding disability, challenges faced by the community, resulting in their absence from the mainstream scheme of things.

     

    But there is something that finds even less of a mention in discourses around disability and healthcare. Caregiving. Without which daily existence of many can turn into a nightmare.

     

    Persons with disabilities are portrayed in a stereotypical fashion, either glorified or demonised, commended for their success or pitied for the lack of it. If nothing, they have been labeled as a minority. But truly faceless and invisible are their caregivers.

     

    It’s the caregivers who make it possible for 15 per cent of the global disabled population to get by on a daily basis, helping with waking up, showering, eating, interpreting, commuting and more.

     

    For a family caregiver, it’s a 24-hour job that needs patience, attention to detail, a bit of humour, and most importantly, compassion. Not every caregiver may have all those traits, so they have no choice but to cultivate them.

     

    During the first two Covid waves, governments and citizens across countries put up a show of support in their own ways, for the caregivers. These were nurses and doctors who are paid for their service to humanity. While the gesture of gratitude was heartwarming and necessary encouragement, I wished we recognised the millions of anonymous supporters who work tirelessly, without pay. Their motivation is sheer love for a dear one who may be sick, old or disabled.

     

    In order to attain independent living with a sense of dignity, persons with disability must have a strong support system in the form of parents, teachers, siblings and friends. A child on the autism spectrum or born with a learning disability, a hearing or vision impairment, cannot make sense of the world without an empathetic parent. Similarly, a person with a chronic medical condition cannot go through life without a caring family.

     

    It’s great to celebrate the disabled folk who make it despite all the hurdles in education, employment and social environment. But what about the millions rooting for their triumph? Don’t they deserve an applause? Don’t they traverse the same path ridden with obstacles?

     

    As a caregiver, I have never really deliberated on how different my life is from someone who doesn’t have such responsibilities. Probably because there has never been a need for comparison.

     

    Since childhood I have known and accepted this to be my ‘normal’. It has shaped me into the person I am. A natural empath, caring for another’s physical and emotional needs, at times more than my own.

     

    Is it easy? Definitely not.

     

    Caregivers face the risk of shelving their personal needs and dreams. Often overwhelmed with the chores that drive their routine. I don’t have any regrets, nor do I feel compromised in any way. But I must confess, it feels a bit lonely at times.

     

    As much as we talk about mental health these days, why don’t we have peer help groups for caretakers? Why aren’t the struggles of empaths acknowledged and normalised? Why aren’t there any mechanisms in place to support the primary attendant?

     

    If disability and chronic illness hamper the standard of living of the person affected by the condition, it also significantly alters the lives of people around.

     

    In fact, some such issues have been highlighted in films and books showcasing disability themes. Some characterisations highlight the complexities and dilemmas that are inherent to the lives of caregivers. Their choices oscillating between personal aspirations and the overarching needs of another.

     

    In the post-Covid world, caretaking has taken on new definitions. With more and more people experiencing deteriorating health on a physical and mental front, we need compassionate warriors to stand the ground. It can only help to celebrate the unsung heroes, those who go about business without expecting or complaining.

     

    Can the media ensure that the caregiver’s everyday battles are not dismissed or forgotten?

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as a programmes and media specialist for the inclusion of persons with disabilities. Shruti was part of the founding team of MxMIndia and now writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

  • Representation matters. Inclusion matters. Disabled lives matter.

    The Oscar audience applauding Best Supporting Actor Troy Kotsur in sign language. Picture: Screengrab from the Oscar award ceremony – Access/ABC

     

     

    By Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Shruti PushkarnaCODA (Child of Deaf Adults) was named the ‘Best Picture’ at the 94th Academy Awards presented in Los Angeles on March 27, 2022. Equal rights and disability inclusion advocates across the world, reveled at this historic win.

     

    Personally, I felt vindicated. As someone who firmly believes in integrating persons with disabilities into the mainstream, I have consistently decried stereotyping, misconstrued portrayals and minimal visibility of the subject and the community in the media.

     

    We have seen several Hollywood and Bollywood productions in the past, focused on the subject of disability and social issues around it. What makes CODA worthy of such an esteemed accolade?

     

    Unlike its predecessors, the disabled characters in this gripping family drama are played by deaf actors. The central character of the movie is seventeen-year-old Ruby Rossi who is the sole hearing member of a deaf family. She is torn between her desire to pursue her passion of singing and helping her parents and brother with their fishing business. After years of playing the interpreter and the link to the ‘speaking’ world, she finds it hard to prioritise her dreams.

     

    The film has several scenes which bring out the unique identity of each family member, through the interactions between parents, children, siblings and the external environment. In an emotional exchange following her choir recital, Ruby’s father feels her vocal cords as she sings exclusively for him, so he can ‘experience’ what others can ‘hear’.

     

    Soon after the official announcement, social media platforms were full of admiration for the cast and their outstanding performances. Troy Kotsur became the first deaf male actor to win an Oscar (Best Supporting Actor) for his role of Frank Rossi (Ruby’s father) in the film. Sign language memes and GIFs populated timelines with ensuing threads on accepting differences, accommodating diverse groups and adopting new ways of communication to stop the ‘othering’.

     

    There was also a flurry of coverage in the Indian media, especially news items showcasing awe-inspiring stories of successful hearing and speech impaired people. Journalists and critics compared the American production to some of the Indian films that have tackled similar themes. One piece deemed CODA as the ‘spiritual successor’ of Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s film Khamoshi that released in 1996. It’s true that both the movies revolve around a young girl torn between responsibilities towards her deaf family and personal aspirations to pursue music. Yet, the depiction, characterisation and messaging vary in more ways than one.

     

    Following the coverage on cinematic representations of deafness and disability, I also recalled the 1972 Sanjeev Kumar and Jaya Bhaduri starrer, Koshish. It’s the story of a deaf-mute couple and their everyday struggles, including the challenges of raising a son. Unlike the Oscar winner, there is little use of sign language on screen and the hearing child ends up giving in to his parent’s desire.

     

    None of the Bollywood productions have been brave or open enough to cast disabled actors for an authentic performance. In a way, we have only witnessed an ableist act projected on the big screen. Films like Black, Margarita with a Straw, Paa, Guzaarish et cetera attempted to address the social stigma around different types of disabilities but somehow, ended up propagating a misconceived idea. Exaggerated fictional accounts and over-dramatisation reinforced stereotypes in the minds of audiences.

     

    The same is true for some Hollywood portrayals. Disability advocates have criticized the shallow understanding of issues and incorrect depictions in films like Rain Man, The Theory of Everything, My Left Foot and so on.

     

    Does the prerequisite to entertain supersede the need to educate and sensitize? Does dressing up the reality make it more palatable and less alienating?

     

    More than the credible rendition, what truly sets CODA apart for me, is a critical shift in the approach towards inclusion. Through the movie and ultimately through Ruby’s choice of going off to Berklee College of Music, the onus to include no longer lies only with the deaf. The surrounding able-bodied fishing community takes cues from the Rossi family and finds ways of interacting, socialising and transacting in mutually beneficial ways.

     

     

    Shruti Pushkarna is a former journalist who now works as a programmes and media specialist for the inclusion of persons with disabilities. Shruti was part of the founding team of MxMIndia and now writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna