Category: COLUMNS

  • Sanjeev Kotnala: Banning Porn… not just Joking!

    By Sanjeev Kotnala

     

    As usual it is the illiterate and the man of no-means that gets crucified at these illogical irrational ‘Looking Tokyo Talking London’ decisions of the government. In a ridiculous attempt to contain child pornography, the Indian government has banned a set of adult content sites creating a panic kneejerk reaction from lovers of the art.

     

    The debate on porn leading to violence and crime is not new.  A far as I know it is even less conclusive than is ‘smoking leading to cancer’. At the same time, it has also not proved if accessing such sites helps in keeping in check the tendencies of violence and crime. It is interesting to note that this seems to be the government’s response to a PIL that said “Watching porn itself puts the country’s security in danger, encourages violent acts, unacceptable behaviour in society, exploitation of children and lowers the dignity of women.”

     

    A lot that happened in privacy and anonymity was troubling no one. Yet, the government action has forced many to check if they were missing something. Ban and scarcity has direct relationship with desirability in life. And they never work out.

     

    In its global impact, many homes abroad are feeling the impact of denial of second income. Phone lines are silent. Wait and watch instructions have been issued. Camera remains unloaded.  Many women finally find time for their neglected life. The traffic is low from the land of Kamasutra.

     

    In some garage, people are recording lines of gibberish. They are hell bent on circumventing the guidelines they know nothing about. They are busy masking, forwarding and diverting the traffic.  They are busy shifting through their big data in creating altered URLs. The loyal users must get access. A load of spam mail is hitting inboxes with new URLs and invitations. Work on this front is at pace that our government cannot even dream of.

     

    Delhi is unable to understand. They find the noise level against porn sites ban as orgasmic. They believe they have the power. They can decide what to serve and what to deny. The intent cannot be faulted. Ban child pornography. Everyone agrees with it. What is objected is the execution style. The bans includes adult dating sites and porn blogs too. It includes Adult Friend Finder and Fleshbot. ‘Ghehu kay saath gun bhi pista hai’. When you grind wheat, the bugs are also get grinded. In the digital era, people defining this country, dream of denying access and literally ban access to fulfilment of a critical emotional needs. They dream that industry mafia will willingly help them. How ignorant  can they be?

     

    Oh, there is bonus in this action. It works magic. Suddenly masses are jumping the digital literacy chain. In last 24 hours, many have started using free proxy and virtual private network (VPN) services as oart of their native knowledge. Suddeny the Android mobile sale has been impacted allowing user ease of  masking and bypassing geographical blocks. Hidemyass, IPVanish,  VyprVPN and ExpressVPN see large download of their software

     

    In the process, audience have branded them as Ban Government. Unfortunately, like many other dictate emerging from these corridors of power, this too has failed to take audiences into confidence. It lacks transparency.  All you have is leaks or inferred understanding by digitally savvy influencers. This is suicidal in digital era that is potently charged with social media intervention.

     

    What is happening? Here is what someone said jokingly but I would not take it lightly.

     

    What if the government, known for understanding  ‘Maan Ki Baat’ is looking at rationing Porn usage? Linking it to your Adhar Card and PAN Number. This ban is the first step in trying to get it under the service tax and a regulatory body. Maybe it is all about feeling the pinch of lack of ‘Made in India’ in this Industry.

     

    If rationed, porn usage will be governed by your geographical location, gender, age, education and life status. These will define your degree of accessibility. The units will be provided at a subsidy to minority and senior citizens.  The units will remain tradable and managed under a liberalised economic agenda by a new body called PORNex.  Hoarding of these units will not be tolerated and can result in blacklisting and denial of service. Net neutrality be dammed, sites showing movies, the one that lets you talk anything under the sun and the sheets in hushed sexy tone and the one allowing interrupted steaming interaction will be charged differential access rate.

     

    Kuch Bhi Ho Sakta Hai is Desh mein.

     

    As I write this, I believe that sense will prevail and as a Step One, the government will lift the ban on adult sites not indulging in child porn. Or be wiling to be reprimanded by the Supreme Court on the issue of freedom of expression and privacy.

     

    **

     

    I am firmly against ban in pornography though there may be ways in which the government can help redefining usage patterns

    …………………………………………………………………….

     

    On a Serious Note:

    The ministry of communications and information and technology, in its order of July 31 under section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act 2000 had banned 857 websites terming their content “immoral and indecent”. As a chosen Government, they are within the rights to define and decide what is immoral and indecent and further to decide if the citizen of the country be denied or allowed access to it. It is stated that this ban is temporary and a prelude to creating a regular regulatory. Viewing adult content by adult is not illegal. Its transmission/publishing surely is. No one is breaking any law while accessing these site privately. Most of the sites hosted abroad, thus circumventing the rules. Banning is also against Freedom of Expression.

     

    Sanjeev Kotnala is Founder and Head Catalyst at Intradia. A Brand, Marketing and Management Advisor. He conducts specialised workshops in the area of IDEATION (Harvest and Liberate) and Innovation (InNoWait). To contact email sanjeev@intradia.in  or tweet at s_kotnala visit www.intradia.in  www.sanjeevkotnala.com. The views expressed here are his own.

     

  • Shailesh Kapoor: The long tail of TV channels: An investor’s delight?

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    We are a country of many channels. At last count, more than 400 channels have enabled themselves with watermarking that’s a pre-requisite for them to be measured and reported by BARC. About 250 of these have a viewership of at least 0.1 GRPs.

     

    The top 10 channels contribute to 48% of the total TV viewership in the Hindi-speaking markets (HSM). Six Hindi GECs and four Hindi Movie Channels (HMCs) constitute this list. The Top 20 contribute 64% of the total TV viewership. Regional GECs and kids channels find a place in this extended list, along with Hindi GECs and HMCs.

     

    The Top 30 contribute 75%, and the new genres to enter this list are Hindi News and rerun-based Hindi GECs like Star Utsav, Zee Anmol and Rishtey. The tail flattens out here onwards, with the Top 40 contributing 81% and the Top 50 contributing 86%. There is no past data to draw a trend here (BARC vs. TAM is a fallacious comparison), so it is difficult to conclude if the long tail is getting longer. But even as the big guns fight their fierce battles, it’s this long tail that is going to be of increasing interest to potential investors in the broadcasting sector.

     

    Look beyond the Top 30 and you see variety in great measure. Regional channels feature prominently in this list, as do genres like sports, news, music and infotainment. However, there’s no ‘only-in-English’ channel in the Top 90, till the English Movie Channel (EMC) category makes an appearance.

     

    There has always been considerable investor interest in the television business in India, over the last two decades at least. With the advent of digitisation and the (somewhat overrated) phenomenon of non-linear television, this interest is increasingly concentrated on the long tail. It is not to suggest that the GEC category has no need gaps available, but the sheer investment in a mainline GEC can make even the most risk-prone investor think twice.

     

    Hence, the focus seems to be on differentiated ideas that can stand out in the long tail. A common problem, however, seems to be that many of these ideas have the potential of being a long tail champion, but the aspirations and funding requirements of one of the Top 20 players.

     

    Like in the films business, there’s no such thing in TV as a good channel or a bad channel. Every channel is as good or as bad as the ROI it can generate for its investors. The long tail has higher chances of creating such high ROI propositions, but with channels that control budgets to suit the long tail potential.

     

    Thinking regional becomes a smart choice in such a scenario. There are more need gaps in the regional spaces, and like-to-like content costs are 30-70% lower in regional vs. Hindi, depending on the market being targeted.

     

    For every eight new channels launched in the long tail, only one breaks even in its first decade. As we mature as a television market, we will see more long tail channels. But we also hope to see more success stories.

     

  • Ranjona Banerji: How about a star news anchor heading our Armed Forces every week?

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    On social media, there is no middle ground. You are either a patriot or an anti-national. More and more journalists in India are joining, it seems, the anti-national brigade. Some commentators too. Many of these had been flag-waving, slogan-shouting, bandwagon-charioteers for the new government in power at the Centre before it became the new government in power at the Centre. Now there are turncoats everywhere you turn.

     

    Luckily, given the immense fear of a social media backlash, we still have several top notch news anchors who are ultra-patriots and given their nightly hysterics on TV, they can singlehandedly take on every Pakistani terrorist with their bare hands if need be. Forget terrorists, the whole Pakistan army, ISI, everything. Listening to them talk about war and terrorism, you wonder why they aren’t all chief of army staff. Maybe we can have a lottery system where one star news anchor heads the Indian Armed Forces every week? Or to be fair, since all are not equal, we can send them off to other para-military services as well.

     

    Every news channel nurtures at least one of them. This ensures that no anti-national tag can ever be attached to them. The winners however for the UPA (Ultra Patriot Accolade, don’t get your saffron knickers in a twist now) are Times Now (the great man himself) and India Today TV (the other two).

     

    Print journalism and to some extent web journalism continues to be anti-national. The government and its policies are questioned and investigations are conducted into claims by every government agency, even those deemed by UPA winners to be beyond reproach. It is incumbent upon all Ultra Patriots to call every person who has ever died a “martyr”, thus adding bad English to their other remarkable journalistic achievements.

     

    It is a very intriguing way of practising journalism or perhaps it is a direct lift of the “Fox News” way. But there are deeper questions at work, not just for patriots but also for journalists. If India is attacked, is a journalist allowed to ask difficult questions? We are not in a state of war at the moment after all, where conditions may apply. Is inefficiency for instance to be condoned in the name of patriotism? Even if you disagree with the extreme position taken by Julian Assange (come on, UPA winners, who he?), is there not a middle ground?

     

    It appears however that fear of social media reactions is frightening journalists into forgetting their primary purpose and that is really frightening.

     

    **

     

    How about our commentators? All those articles headlined, “Five things Modi will do, should do” have dried up. For a while they became, “Five things Modi must do” but when it was clear that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was not listening, those also stopped. Then it became, “Five things Modi would have done if these other evil people within the BJP would let him”. And right now, it’s “Modi has to change his methods of functioning”.

     

    It was an article of the last sort by veteran journalist R Jagannathan which got removed from firstpost.com as we had discussed last time. And now respected columnist Pratap Bhanu Mehta, who led the anti-UPA march of columnists before the election, writes a critical piece against Prime Minister Modi in his much-admired column for Indian Express.

    http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/loud-but-silent/

     

    **

     

    However, those who are pro-Narendra Modi must read this piece in Swarajya, a web magazine started in the spirit apparently of C Rajagopalachari and Minoo Masani, but that runs wholly in the glorification of the prime minister. It will warm the cockles of your heart and make up for the high number of turning worms. This piece outdoes the love that Mani Shanker Aiyar demonstrated for Rajiv Gandhi in his book, Goodnight Sweet Prince. That until now had been my gold standard for “lurrve”. Swarajya beats Aiyar hollow!

    http://swarajyamag.com/politics/the-maker/

     

     

  • Ranjona Banerji: Was there fair reason for govt to send a showcause to news channels

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    The Information and Broadcasting Ministry, an anachronism if there ever was one, issued a showcause notice against three news channels on August 7. Aaj Tak, ABP and NDTV were asked to explain why action should not be taken against them for their coverage of Yakub Memon’s hanging. Memon, an accused in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts case, was hanged at the end of July after losing all his chances for clemency.

     

    The hanging set off a series of articles and comments and debates on the death penalty and the particular details of Memon’s case. Many news channels also covered details of the hanging live, although they could not show the actual event of course. There was some criticism that while Memon’s hanging was covered live, there was not enough attention paid to the funeral of former President of India, APJ Abdul Kalam.

     

    But the “crime” committed by the channel is something else. It is “showing disrespect” to both the judiciary and the President of India. The showcause notices refer to three sections of Rule 6 of the Cable Television Network Rules, 1994. The greater threat is that the channels will be stopped from broadcasting for some period of time as a punishment.

     

    Press and broadcasting associations have reacted swiftly and angrily, protesting against the notice. The Mumbai Press Club, Indian Womens Press Corps, Press Club of India, Guwahati Press Club, Brihanmumbai Union of Journalists and Delhi Union of Journalists issued a joint statement condemning the move. The Broadcast Editors Association was quick to respond and the Editors Guild followed.

    There is a discrepancy here in the way the practice of journalism is perceived, depending on its medium: that is, 24-hour broadcast journalism is subject to more stringent laws because of its reach and possibly its influence. This is unfortunate because no matter what you think about TV news, it cannot be less free than print. (The flip side of course is that no one cares what happens in print journalism!) It is one thing to try and stop TV channels from revealing operational details of a terrorist attack or an army response while it is going on. But it is better when news channels themselves restrict themselves. Government control and regulation has to be resisted and rejected.

    But what we have here is something else and something far more dire in its larger consequences of all journalism in India. It is a government trying to impose its own views on the media and trying to stop the public from knowing about something it does not like. But the purpose of journalism is to do precisely what the government – any government – does not like. The unacceptable action taken against cartoonists under the last UPA government using the disastrous 66A provision against internet freedom is a good example of government overreach. You do not have to go as far back as the Emergency to look at government attempts to muzzle the media.

    Several legal experts have also condemned this notice by the Information and Broadcasting Ministry, another Emergency relic which needs to go. Oddly in this case, instead of going through regulatory bodies like NBSA or BCCC, the ministry has sent the notices directly to the channels.

    Freedom of expression remains the bulwark of a free media and a proper democracy. There are laws to deal with transgressions. Government disapproval is not reason enough to invoke this or any law. You do not like what is being shown on TV, use the remote, read a book or just take a hike. There is no law that forces you to watch non-stop TV or indeed, anything that you do not like.

    While there was outright condemnation of this showcause notice from most journalists, there was one noticeable exception. Sudhir Chaudhary, editor of Zee News, felt that these channels had threatened his love for the nation and deserved what they got.

    He tweeted thus:

    “Freedom of expression cant b used to promote terrorism/anti India sentiments.Viewers should show these channels their actual place. ‪#‎decide”

    I agree. Choose your channels wisely…

     

  • Sanjeev Kotnala: Of Kawarias, and why Brand Nirvana evades you

    By Sanjeev Kotnala

     

    Last Thursday as I was driving down the Delhi-Gurgaon-Jaipur Highway I could see Kawarias (carrying the pious water from Ganges) walking back from Haridwar. On an average every one of them walks 300-odd km. But they have a promise to keep. A promise they made to their deity. On Saturday, I saw trucks after trucks with banners reading ‘Haridwar to Ganjapura’, ‘Haridwar to Bajranjnath’ blaring music on their way to  Haridwar. They will accompany the Kawarias on their walk back and reach their return destinations by August 12.

     

    Throughout the highway, bhajans were being played at high volume, vibrant coloured tents and banners welcoming the Kawarias. There is place for them to rest and organisers get the chance to service them. To many intellectually inspired rational citizens of netro Delhi, it will seem fruitless. It is something that upsets their routine and causes hardship. They have strong objection to kawarisation of the highway. They are also right in their observation. It is that one is working with a strong belief and the other is just questioning it.

     

    This is when you realise that when it is a question of belief, attribute and the functional utility along with the rationality and emotional association can take a walk. There is no space for any argument. Moreover, the shortcomings are attributed to non-diligent use or improper understanding on part of the consumer or follower. The brand is allowed more than the benefit of doubt.  It is beyond questioning. Nirvana is achieved.

     

    This brings me to my question. Are there such Nirvana brands on Planet Earth? Where consumers are more of a cult than a group or a segment. May be the nearest I could think is Harley Davidson, Mac or  iPhone owners, IIT and IIM students affinity to their alma mater, Sachin or Amitabh! Maybe Maggi was there. I am a bit confused about it.

     

    Are there relationships that reach this the Nirvana stage? The mother-son relationship of unspoken promises, unilateral support and submission could be one. In such relationships, no logic is acceptable. There exists an unspoken unwritten and unasked for belief.

     

    Won’t brands want to hit this stage? They do and they fail in their attempts. How could the brilliant teams behind such brands fail to deliver what seems logical and simple.

     

    To reach Nirvana is an exceptionally simple way of differentiated relevant basic need fulfilment; a promised experience delivered repeatedly consistently through a long stretch of time and a sense of independence and promised interdependence. A belief that there could be nothing wrong and if anything did go wrong then they will be there for each other to help through the phases.

     

    Brand Nirvana happens when the consumer is deeply immersed in the brand ethos like Meera with Shyam and has no reason to seek any emotional- rational- logical- functional advantages for continued association.  Once you are there, the propagators, convertors, influencers and others look forward to increase the tribe.

     

    Unfortunately, this is easy to say and tough to achieve. At least I cannot remember a brand of this status. But that really should not mean it is unachievable. In religious and NGO or social service front, we have examples of how simple consistent messaging and a promise creates a belief system that leads to cult followers. Can we see consumers of that thinking? Osho, Sai Baba, Aasaram, Murari Bapu, Mother Teresa, Radhe Maa, Ramdev, Mahatma Gandhi, Subash Chandra Bose and many more. If one was to take Devdutt, Pattinaik thoughts than most of the iconography messages hidden in the paintings and sculptors of the god and goddesses is a perfect example of consistent symbolisation and consistent messaging through the period.

     

    How come learnings from them have escaped our strong insight mining system?

     

    We the brand custodians, owners, facilitators and coaches seek this golden pot of brand loyalties and Nirvana at the end of the market rainbow. We, the intellectualised internalised logic and research insight-driven hard nuts, tend to override intuition. We, with our penchant for change and tendency to leave a mark in the chaotic space of business environment, we invariably spoil a good thing going. The successes and changes in organisation have become more personality-centric than process-centric. The individualistic success charisma is celebrated more than organisational success. It is then natural for every new CXO in the market mating game give existing thoughts a new flip. All in the name of evolving with time.

     

    Before anyone brands me as a proponent of static inertia-laden ways of marketing and communication, let me just say: do take your call, as only time has the answer. But while you do so, just re-evaluate if you are doing that out of a real need or is that just your boredom and ego that pushing you.

     

    Sanjeev Kotnala is Founder and Head Catalyst at Intradia. A Brand, Marketing and Management Advisor. He conducts specialised workshops in the area of IDEATION (Harvest and Liberate) and Innovation (InNoWait). His focus energy in enhancing client’s internal team’s potential and capabilities. In process decreasing their dependence  on external resources. To contact email sanjeev@intradia.in  or tweet at s_kotnala visit www.intradia.in  www.sanjeevkotnala.com. The views expressed here are his own.

     

     

    By Sanjeev Kotnala

     

    Last Thursday as I was driving down the Delhi-Gurgaon-Jaipur Highway I could see Kawarias (carrying the pious water from Ganges) walking back from Haridwar. On an average every one of them walks 300-odd km. But they have a promise to keep. A promise they made to their deity. On Saturday, I saw trucks after trucks with banners reading ‘Haridwar to Ganjapura’, ‘Haridwar to Bajranjnath’ blaring music on their way to Haridwar. They will accompany the Kawarias on their walk back and reach their return destinations by August 12.

    Throughout the highway, bhajans were being played at high volume, vibrant coloured tents and banners welcoming the Kawarias. There is place for them to rest and organisers get the chance to service them. To many intellectually inspired rational citizens of netro Delhi, it will seem fruitless. It is something that upsets their routine and causes hardship. They have strong objection tokawarisation of the highway. They are also right in their observation. It is that one is working with a strong belief and the other is just questioning it.

    This is when you realise that when it is a question of belief, attribute and the functional utility along with the rationality and emotional association can take a walk. There is no space for any argument. Moreover, the shortcomings are attributed to non-diligent use or improper understanding on part of the consumer or follower. The brand is allowed more than the benefit of doubt. It is beyond questioning. Nirvana is achieved.

    This brings me to my question. Are there such Nirvana brands on Planet Earth? Where consumers are more of a cult than a group or a segment. May be the nearest I could think is Harley Davidson, Mac or  iPhone owners, IIT and IIM students affinity to their alma mater, Sachin or Amitabh! Maybe Maggi was there. I am a bit confused about it.

    Are there relationships that reach this the Nirvana stage? The mother-son relationship of unspoken promises, unilateral support and submission could be one. In such relationships, no logic is acceptable. There exists an unspoken unwritten and unasked for belief.

    Won’t brands want to hit this stage? They do and they fail in their attempts. How could the brilliant teams behind such brands fail to deliver what seems logical and simple.

    To reach Nirvana is an exceptionally simple way of differentiated relevant basic need fulfilment; a promised experience delivered repeatedly consistently through a long stretch of time and a sense of independence and promised interdependence. A belief that there could be nothing wrong and if anything did go wrong then they will be there for each other to help through the phases.

    Brand Nirvana happens when the consumer is deeply immersed in the brand ethos like Meera with Shyam and has no reason to seek any emotional- rational- logical- functional advantages for continued association.  Once you are there, the propagators, convertors, influencers and others look forward to increase the tribe.

    Unfortunately, this is easy to say and tough to achieve. At least I cannot remember a brand of this status. But that really should not mean it is unachievable. In religious and NGO or social service front, we have examples of how simple consistent messaging and a promise creates a belief system that leads to cult followers. Can we see consumers of that thinking? Osho, Sai Baba, Aasaram, Murari Bapu, Mother Teresa, Radhe Maa, Ramdev, Mahatma Gandhi, Subash Chandra Bose and many more. If one was to take Devdutt, Pattinaik thoughts than most of the iconography messages hidden in the paintings and sculptors of the god and goddesses is a perfect example of consistent symbolisation and consistent messaging through the period. 

    How come learnings from them have escaped our strong insight mining system?

    We the brand custodians, owners, facilitators and coaches seek this golden pot of brand loyalties and Nirvana at the end of the market rainbow. We, the intellectualised internalised logic and research insight-driven hard nuts, tend to override intuition. We, with our penchant for change and tendency to leave a mark in the chaotic space of business environment, we invariably spoil a good thing going. The successes and changes in organisation have become more personality-centric than process-centric. The individualistic success charisma is celebrated more than organisational success. It is then natural for every new CXO in the market mating game give existing thoughts a new flip. All in the name of evolving with time. .

    Before anyone brands me as a proponent of static inertia-laden ways of marketing and communication, let me just say: do take your call, as only time has the answer. But while you do so, just re-evaluate if you are doing that out of a real need or is that just your boredom and ego that pushing you.

     

    Sanjeev Kotnala is Founder and Head Catalyst at Intradia. A Brand, Marketing and Management Advisor. He conducts specialised workshops in the area of IDEATION (Harvest and Liberate) and Innovation (InNoWait). His focus energy in enhancing client’s internal team’s potential and capabilities. In process decreasing their dependence  on external resources. To contact email sanjeev@intradia.in  or tweet at s_kotnala visitwww.intradia.in  www.sanjeevkotnala.com. The views expressed here are his own.

  • Shailesh Kapoor: Hindi GECs’ Latest Itch: 4% Rating

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    The ratings provider may have changed, but the definition of the central programme performance measure remains the same. Called TVR % (TAM) earlier, and Rating % (BARC) now, it is a time-weighted measure of the % of universe that watched a programme, effectively connoting the “viewership” of the program.

     

    In primitive days of measurement, TVR % of 25-30 was not uncommon, delivered by blockbuster films such as Hum Aapke Hain Koun. Through the decade of 2000, the best of daily fiction on Star Plus scored in the 13-20 range, led by the K triplet of Kyunkii, Kahaani and Kasautii.

     

    With time, touching 10% became harder, as more channels meant higher fragmentation. An odd film premiere like Main Hoon Naa or 3 Idiots would get close, but even at its most masterfully manipulated high point, a fiction show (I speak of Hindi here, down South is a different story), would hit a glass ceiling at 7-8 TVR.

     

    Over the last two years, the benchmark continues to reduce. No Hindi programme has crossed an average weekly rating of 4% over the last two weeks. For a huge film premiere, 7% is an excellent result, perhaps an equivalent of 10% not too long ago. Even big-ticket cricket doesn’t rate like old times anymore.

     

    In my opinion, GECs have not spent enough time understanding this area over the last five years or so. Yes, there are more channels and the consumer has more to choose from. Much of the trend till 2011-12 could be explained on account of this fragmentation. Digitisation further fuelled fragmentation, acting as a level-playing field for smaller channels, which would lose out in the analogue environment because of poor placement.

     

    But instead of looking at it as a trend, what if we just asked the question: Is it so impossibly difficult to create a programme (daily, weekly, whatever) that only 4% of Hindi-speaking India watches?

     

    For every show that goes on-air, at least five, often more, are considered. That means that there are more than 150 daily fiction shows alone that enter a stage of serious consideration in Hindi GECs every year, not to speak of the weekend options.

     

    A diverse set of producers, some of them channel employees in the past, churn out these concepts. The writer pool that is engaged to work on them is not too diverse though. It’s the same set of writers that freelance for multiple producers, sometimes working on 2-3 running shows, while working on pitches for another couple. The seamless movement of plot points from one show to the other is easy to catch for anyone who follows the category.

     

    It seems, then, that we have caught ourselves in a seemingly vicious circle of the current output becoming the input for future output, and thus, both the current and the future looking remarkably alike. For a consumer, that means “nothing new”.

     

    The Hindi GEC category has been steady at about 1,100 GRPs over the last two years. But no superhero shows have emerged in this period. Admittedly, there is no magic formula to churn out one. But the best bet will be to infuse fresh writing talent into the industry. It’s easier said than done, because a lack of understanding of the daily fiction audiences and its grammar can be genuine roadblocks, as seen in recent examples like Yudh and Everest respectively.

     

    I’m convinced we’ll have a consistent 4+ TVR show sooner than later. I’m curious to see what it will be and how soon it will come our way.

     

  • Ranjona Banerji: Don’t frighten us presstitutes and newstraders…

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    It may be unfair to blame either Prime Minister Narendra Modi and former chief of Army staff and current minister in the Modi government, General VK Singh for this kind of behaviour. But, by calling journalists “newstraders” and presstitutes”, they opened the door as it were for their supporters to get even more vicious and abusive with individual members of the media than they were before, if that is possible.

     

    All journalists have to fend off, ignore or respond in some manner to a torrent of abuse which targets them on social media and in the comments sections on websites. Often, it is easy to laugh it off or fulminate to yourself. But there are times when abuse crosses not just lines of decency but also of legality.

     

    For supporters of the BJP, the larger Sangh Parivar and Narendra Modi (these categories overlap but are not necessarily the same), the Indian media is involved in a massive conspiracy against them. And the entire Indian media is on the payroll of the Congress Party and the descendants of Jawaharlal Nehru who are part of the Congress Party.

     

    On August 8, 2015, senior journalist Neeta Kolhatkar (disclaimer, she is a friend and we have worked together in a newspaper), wrote a somewhat tongue-in-cheek piece on Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi and his new “fit” look. She also added her own political insight co-relating Rahul Gandhi’s appearance with the changes which the beleaguered Congress Party needs to make.

     

    One can agree or disagree with Neeta. And there are enough civilised ways of doing that. But what did the blogger who calls himself “Chaiwallah” and posts on the blog-site Dynasty Crooks do? He writes a long post headlined “Presstitute Neeta Kolhatkar is orgasming for real”. He refers to the Indian media as “Mameluk media”, referencing the Arabic word for slave so please do not miss the sly implication that this media is also pro-Muslim.

     

    The rest of the piece is full of sexual references and is too full of schoolboy prurience to be repeated here.

     

    But this is the sort of writing that Chaiwallah specialises in:

    Not surprisingly, he is inspired by MediaCrooks run by Ravinar, one of the most abusive gentlemen out there.

     

    Neeta is her normal sanguine self about this having been a journalist for a long time, but she has filed a complaint with the cyber cell about the blog. Which is just about all she can do. Freedom of expression and the way the internet runs mean that such abuse cannot be stopped. But it can be exposed and seen for what it is: An attempt to stop all dissent and suppress all disagreement to your political position by using cheap and frankly uncivilised means. Is it worth repeating once again that writers like this also claim to uphold the best of Indian tradition or will the irony fail them as it always does?

     

    And is it also worth repeating that there are enough articles by journalists and commentators, not just bloggers, out there telling us how great Prime Minister Modi was and will be? Many of those experts in fact promised the nation all kinds of goodies that the PM would bequeath upon us. Sadly, almost none of those promises have been made. It would be easy to assume that the lack of action on the ground by the Centre has made the government’s fans edgier and therefore angrier with the criticism. They were vicious and abusive before but the victory and comments by BJP leaders seem only to have emboldened them.

     

    Is it also worth repeated that women are especially targeted and usually with explicitly sexual references? This is what makes people assume that such bloggers are men. Whatever their gender though they are expressly and sadly without imagination, wit and even intelligence as they cannot move beyond basic insults to do with intercourse and body parts.

     

    This is Neeta’s response to the blog:

    “I am not shocked by the fact that there are such anonymous trolls on the prowl all the time. I am livid to say the least that these sorts have done no homework before making brazen allegations against me. Especially by insinuating I am paid in exchange for the focus of my writing. In my entire life, I have lived off nothing but only the salary paid to me, (which was Rs 700 at the beginning of my career). I am NOT bribeable and will not be in this entire lifetime. Worse still, they have called me names. It just shows the power that the pen has. My writing has irked them and made them stoop so low. But nothing can deter me. However, these hypocrites need to be exposed, they are only targeting women. It is disconcerting that the current socio-political environment is allowing such menacing behaviour against us citizens.”

     

    Could not have put it better myself.

     

  • Ranjona Banerji: Anyone for news in the papers and on telly?

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    Is watching endless TV news an addiction? Until Ted Turner invented 24-hour news television with CNN, broadcast news was an evening bulletin or updates on the radio. And even CNN in its early days had many feature programmes like Elsa Klensch on style, which I still miss although I have not seen it for decades. The 1991 Gulf War gave CNN its defining moment. And whichever part of the world had satellite TV was glued to scuds and Patriot missiles zipping through the night sky. And Benjamin Netanyahu, as he was known then, acting as tourist guide to a young Christiane Amanpour. Many young or wannabe journalists then decided that they wanted to be Christiane Amanpour and become world famous on TV. Netanyahu decided he wanted to become prime minister of Israel.

     

    The editor of the magazine I worked for then even booked a room at a nearby hotel so that we the lowly staff could see this phenomenon for ourselves. But the essence of 24-hour news television has become in India a series of high-octane slanging matches, as we all know. And even as people fulminate against it, they watch it anyway. It’s like a compulsion, an addiction. And the more they complain, the more they watch.

     

    In print, the criticism from readers is usually about too many advertisements and too much entertainment and glamour news. But sadly, these complaints usually do not reflect any research done by print journals. In most cases, readers love the glamour stuff and ignore the serious matter. It is as if readers are railing against their own weaknesses. Just for a moment, ask yourself that if the Economic and Political Weekly had the resources of Bennett Coleman, if it could top the Times of India in terms of circulation and readership without changing its content?

     

    Paddy Chayefsky’s brilliant story for Sidney Lumet’s brilliant 1976 film Network laid bare the sheer depravity that ratings-driven news television can descend to. However, in India, we seem to have taken our “discussions” to our own version of incredible lows. I am amazed that people keep watching them. The formula is so set (one this party, one that party, two agent provocateurs and the anchor – barring a couple – adding fuel to the fire he or she has lit) that it rivals those terrible Bollywood films of the late 1980s.

     

    And yet, people watch them.

     

    I have almost completely stopped watching news television however. I only watch when there is a news event. I read newspapers and I rely on the internet. It is safer, less stressful and frankly, even if I stare into space like a zombie after 9 pm, my time would be better spent.

     

    How many others like me are there? Am I part of a growing tribe or am I an anomaly? I am starting to wonder…

     

    **

     

    Living in smalltown India with iffy connectivity with big media centres, newspapers take a while to cue in. As far as the English print media goes however, the Times of India’s local coverage has improved drastically. Stories focus on the civic, environmental and government issues. Doon, Mussourie and Hardwar get ample coverage and stories from the Kumaon region are also increasing. National news is no longer two days late to reach the press. In fact sometimes it is on par with the later editions. Doon Times, the entertainment supplement however, is struggling. Local glamour is still in short supply and often we have to admire the different display portraits that local young people put up on their social media accounts. No, really.

     

    Unfortunately, the best local newspaper until now, the tabloid Garhwal Post, appears to be slipping as a result. Ads have dried up and with that, actual news content. Instead we get a selection of press release news. I do miss the days when we would be delighted by stories like: “Crowd gathers on Rajpur Road as man parks his car and goes away for four hours”. Now can I make something like that up?

     

    The best English Doon paper though is the Tribune. On point in every way. Remarkable.

     

  • Sanjeev Kotnala: In a country full of rituals, we underplay impact of rituals in brand-building

    By Sanjeev Kotnala

     

    August 15, freedom songs are blaring from loudspeakers at every street. People take that extra effort to be dressed in traditional attire. They spend time and carefully select the combination of saffron, white and greens that makes Independence Day a lot more powerful experience. The raised head with palms raised next to eyebrows in a proud salute. We watch the tiranga unfurl.  Standing at attention while the national anthem plays. The President’s address to the nation on August 14 and the Prime Minister’s s from the Red Fort. The patriotic feelings swell to new record high. The truth – these are one of the most powerful rituals of our life.

     

    These are the irrational impact multipliers. They help make the product experience more interesting and involving. The experience lasts that extra moment. They make you part of a select group and meaning of tribe gets enhanced.

     

    We live in a country of multitude of rituals. Our life revolves around rituals of many passions. Religion, Cricket and Movies to stated the most clichéd ones. These are a series of not-so-well understood, stated or even seemingly irrational actions that precede, follow or run parallel to consumption process.

     

    Rituals emerge from existing behaviour or are short-tweaked into one. The brands pick and choose the one they wish to exploit or imbibe. Then they create these simple-to-act and tough-to-forget rituals. These are based on observations and strategic intent in a way mirroring the brand ethos. They normally would promote some socially relevant or acceptable behaviour. They are consistent and iconic in their symbolism. They live through many years. They are like a viral binding all audiences / consumers in an unsaid bond. Rituals build a lasting relationship, preference, and a tribal groupism, strengthen association and build in a long lasting loyalty that would enhance the life-time-value of a consumer.

     

    In India, brands have been doing great when it comes to identifying and placing the existing social rituals in their communication. Mera Bharat Mahaan, Hero Honda and Tata Tea are few examples of it. You have images of team huddle at the start of a match, performer paying respect to the stage, folded hand near a roadside temple, the Sindoor, kaala tikka and even the breaking of a coconut.

     

    Yet, when it comes to brand rituals, we have very few examples. Prime among them have been like Kitkat (foil open, cut and break), Hero Honda (fill it, shut it, forget it) Oreo (twist, lick, dunk), Corona (lime in bottle neck), HUL advertising (problem statement- product introduction- solution heightened- branding), Ujjala (Chaar boondo wala), Lirl (waterfall bath), Sprite (Dar kay aagey Jeet), the Rajdhani Thali (bell of satisfaction), Tata tea (the vote ink)… in fact one of the biggest rituals that we live without realising is the act of giving cards giving pushed by Hallmark and Archie’s cards.

     

    We are a country of rituals. There is one for every stage of life, for success and for failures, for respect and for revenge, for marriages, for Holi and for Diwali and for naming ceremonies. For some unsaid reasons, Indian brands have stayed away from attempting to create rituals. Some of the brand that have definitely missed out on this are – Old Monk, Britannia biscuits, Thums up and Amul Butter.

     

    We are in an era where consumer holds the power. He or she is the one who dictates, creates and owns a brand. I do not think that should be reason enough to stop marketers in their attempt to create brand rituals. The advantages are too many.

     

    If you plan to do so then ensure that they are not forced or a fad, are simple and are discovered or tweaked or transposed not created, repeated and reinforced at every opportunity and have that viral ability of easy to share, duplicate and act.

     

    Remember our brain is neurologically wired to prefer the way of least resistance and favour well established behaviour. The repeated enact of the ritual is what helps building emotional unity leading to strong association and loyalty.

     

    Sanjeev Kotnala is Founder and Head Catalyst at Intradia. A Brand, Marketing and Management Advisor. He conducts specialised workshops in the area of IDEATION (Harvest and Liberate) and Innovation (InNoWait). His focus energy in enhancing client’s internal team’s potential and capabilities. In process decreasing their dependence  on external resources. To contact email sanjeev@intradia.in  or tweet at s_kotnala visit www.intradia.in  www.sanjeevkotnala.com.

  • Ranjona Banerji: Emphatically, the old order changeth at Network 18

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    The old order changeth blah blah blah. And sometimes is it more than that? Is it Reliance establishing its firm imprint on Network 18? Rahul Joshi, editorial director of Economic Times, is set to take over as CEO of news and group editor-in-chief. Joshi has been editorial director of ET since 2006.

     

    Furthermore, after the recent fracas at firstpost.com when an article critical of Union finance minister Arun Jaitley by the website’s very popular columnist R Jagannathan, also editor-in-chief of firstpost.com and Forbes India, was taken down, there are some changes here too. Lakshmi Choudhry had resigned as executive editor after the Jaitley critique was removed from the website. Now BV Rao has been appointed editor and Ajay Singh as executive editor to “assist” Jagannathan, whatever that means. Rao has been working with Reliance as news and communications director.

     

    The wording is interesting here. Surely, any person junior to the editor would “assist” the editor by the very nature of hierarchy or position. Indeed, this applies to any organisation. So why specify it? Are more changes afoot? Certainly people have long expected a more hands on approach from Reliance at Network 18 and looks like they are getting it. Rahul Joshi however is a very welcome surprise, given his experience.

     

    Stories doing the rounds say that the editorial staff at firstpost is very worried – naturally – after the Jaitley comment was removed. Caravan reports that the website has been given a list of top three leaders who cannot be criticised. Anyway you spin that it means a death knell for free comment. It will be fascinating to see what changes if any Joshi will make in both editorial policy and management control.

     

    Business Standard has gone a step further, saying these moves represent Mukesh Ambani’s total takeover of Network 18. As everyone knew, Network 18 will create content for his Jio project. Also Jagannathan is expected to retire in a few months when he turns 60 and this will presumably allow Rao full control of firstpost and Forbes.

     

    Already, firstpost.com’s first mover advantage is under threat from the clutch of news and views websites which have been launched since. Scroll, The wire, DailyO, Huffpo, Quint, Quartz, Catch News and forgive me if I have left anyone out, all offer a variety of information and opinions, often superior to print journalism or to rival it anyway. Rediff.com, the true first mover, continues to have a presence. So if firstpost is going to become an open government or management or party mouthpiece, then it has its work cut out for it. Because of course, there is another whole universe already in operation there from Niti Central to Swarajya and many more.

     

    Interestingly though the news channels seem to continuing without that “star” (or wannabe star) presence that seems to be a must in Indian TV news. Perhaps those will be the next changes before us?

     

    This looks like fast-moving and fast-growing story with all the attendant drama of an Ambani takeover, even if it has arrived a bit later than many expected.

     

    http://www.caravanmagazine.in/vantage/why-firstpost-being-asked-refrain-criticising-three-top-leaders-bjp

     

    http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/mukesh-ambani-moves-to-integrate-newsrooms-with-jio-115082000282_1.html

     

  • Shailesh Kapoor: Rural Ratings: Interesting Days Ahead

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    It’s not been long since the official TV ratings of the media industry shifted from TAM to BARC. But BARC has moved ahead at good speed. When it was first announced that BARC will report only 1Lac+ towns data initially, and that urban LC1 (<1Lac) towns and rural will be added later, one was prepared for a long wait.

     

    But it’s good to be pleasantly surprised. As per a recent announcement, we may see urban LC1 and rural data as early as September 2015. Well done, BARC!

     

    Urban LC1 is not unfamiliar territory for broadcasters. TAM started covering this pop stratum in 2013, and broadcasters, especially the mass players, have made considerable investments in distribution, marketing and research in these markets since then. I’m sure BARC would refrain from the nomenclature “LC1”. I have been told it stands for two different things: Less Than Class 1 (Towns) and 50-100K population towns (L being 50 and C being 100 in Roman numerals). I suspect the former is the more accurate description. But who dreams up names such as “LC1” anyway?

     

    The addition of rural markets, in contrast, is an absolute first. There is no taste of rural ratings from the past, and there’s a mystery box feel to the whole thing. In one of their roadshows, BARC indicated that 50% of the universe would be rural, though the sample would be more skewed towards the more heterogeneous urban markets. We can expect ‘Urban+Rural’ and ‘Urban Only’ data cuts to be available soon.

     

    The inclusion of rural may not impact several genres, including those based on the English language, infotainment, lifestyle, etc. But it could wreak potential havoc for mass channels, read GECs and Movies. Two other categories that are likely to be impacted are News and Kids, though many advertisers may continue to buy them on Urban Only data.

     

    Impact on programming is likely to be significant as well, especially if the 50% weightage indeed becomes reality. Early prime is bound to gain more importance, and we should be prepared to see more mythology, culture reinforcement and patriarchy. It may not seem like a step in the right direction, but if it is closer to an accurate representation of what India watches, we can’t fault the logic.

     

    In a parallel universe, the internet and smartphones are enabling content consumption for a sizeable audience base (at least 10% of the Indian population). This content, as we know, looks nothing like what’s on TV. With the addition of rural markets to measurement, the gap will widen even more.

     

    At some stage then, an advertiser may have to choose which India it wants to target. Most research worldwide shows that television and Internet are complimentary media, and not competing ones. But the India story can pan out differently. We shall wait and watch.

     

    For now, it’s time to welcome Rural India to the world of television ratings. It was long overdue.

     

  • Ranjona Banerji: Gobbledygook on our business news channels

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    If ever you want to treat yourself to some fine gobbledygook then you must tune into business news channels when some stock market event happens. Of course, I call them business news channels but what I mean is “stockmarket channels”. This is their forte. (I think.) So when the Sensex and the NIFTY plunged on Monday and the rupee took another beating against the dollar (every other day), these channels were in their element.

     

    Or rather, some looked as if the world had ended.

     

    Fortunately for them, the world has ended many times and recovered and ended once again thanks to human greed and stupidity. For those of us who understand nothing of this, we crave the excitement of crowing about extreme human fallibility. Like the fun money explosions of the past – tulips, North Sea bubbles and such.

     

    There are the tragic ones of the past. Although wit played its role there too. So who was it who said after the 1929 Wall Street crash that it’s time to get out of the market when the shoeshine boy starts giving you stock advice? Here in India, those of us alive and adult at the time were all taken in by the Giant Harshad Mehta Good Times Game. And almost everyone lost money in the end.

     

    To get back to our business channels, you have to get past their remarkable screens before you can even concentrate on what the voices are saying. There are more things happening in a second than happen on regular news TV screens on election days. There could be six running scrolls, five pop-up boxes, some channels have colour schemes like white and light blue, others experiment with every shade in the Pantone Color Guide, often there are several talking heads and information moving both vertically and horizontally…

     

    After you get past that, you try and zone in on the voices. Or in my case, you get stuck.

     

    I listened to an important mutual fund manager talk in a constant monotone for 10 minutes but my fickle mind kept thinking about why I ate that popcorn yesterday and whether it was going to rain. Then the anchor thanked him and translated what he said: buy when prices are down. Yeah, I thought that was basic stuff but as has been established, what do I know?

     

    Like what does “being overweight on PSU banks mean”? I am overweight all the time, as it happens. It is fabulous metaphors like this that make this jargon fascinating. Like getting a haircut is a bad thing although many people I know spend vast amounts of money to get their hair cut properly.

     

    I was happy to see one growth manager on Bloomberg say that no one had a clue as to what was going on. This was remarkable honesty when you consider how much people were talking and explaining on the other channels. I needed no more. If even experts admit no one has a clue what’s going on, why watch any more?

     

    **

     

    Twitter was far more fun since it was full of jokes co-relating crashing markets with rising onion prices and promises of better days.