Tag: MxMIndia

  • We are 10. Ten-tena-ten

     

    We are 10. Phew.

     

    It’s our tenth anniversary. MxMIndia was born on September 9, 2011.

     

    When we started, we were very idealistic. We think we still are that. We believe that it’s possible to rise and shine in B2B journalism without compromising on integrity.

     

    We phewed earlier because these have been tough years. Very, very tough. The last year saw our revenues dramatically. The lockdown in fact gave us reason to not rue too much about the state we were in, as if we were down to 25% of our receivables, some bigger ones saw revenues shaved to lesser.

     

    This last decade has seen Indian media change its face, and the pandemic period has seen even more changes. We’ve often cheered the players, but we’ve also sighed and got very angry. Often we’ve even regretted that we cheered some.

     

    Our 10-year journey has seen us re-engineer ourselves. We’ve outsourced all non-core functions. Technology, accounts, payroll and even editing. So we are a small team, we aren’t a publication of record, but we record every significant thing that matters.

     

    We started with video interviews aggressively last year, but slowed down when all and sundry were doing it. Unless the content was arresting, there weren’t enough takers. But the low patronage didn’t hold us from taking up issues that we believe deserve coverage and scrutiny. Like gender sensitivity. Media literacy. Disability. Ethics.

     

    It’s difficult to thrive in the mess that prevails in the media. Especially when we dismiss all attempts to curry favour, write favourable content so that it can generate revenues. We are happy to embrace advertisers to sell our advertising inventory. Not our editorial…

     

    MxM wasn’t the first in the business. Perhaps the tenth. Or the fifteenth. We are decidedly not meant for the media professional looking for the routine news, though we do feature them. We don’t the quickie ask-five-people-for-their-views analyses. We offer commentary from top professionals in the business. And top-grade young and emerging professionals as well.

     

    On our tenth anniversary, a big thank you to all those associated with us through this last decade. Thanks to our staffers, columnists, writers, the industries and professionals we track, friends in the media, our technology, accounting partners and of course our advertisers, our benefactors. The families of all those working with us. And mine.

     

    Our primary allegiance has always been and will always be to our readers. They come first. Now, and in the next five, 10, whatever.

     

    Thanks much,

     

    Pradyuman Maheshwari

    Founder, Editor-in-Chief and CEO

    MxMIndia

     

    Mumbai, September 9, 2021

     

  • Shruti Pushkarna: Disability Inclusion: How far are we from a Sugamya and Saksham Bharat?

    Shruti PushkarnaBy Shruti Pushkarna

     

    In his first term, Prime Minister Narendra Modi was applauded for path-breaking campaigns like Swachh Bharat, Jan Dhan Yojana, Sugamya Bharat, Ujjwala Yojana and so on. The promise of ‘inclusion’ for larger sections of the Indian population gave the country hope for a better tomorrow, or ‘Acchhe Din’.

     

    Having been sidelined and neglected for decades, the disabled community felt vindicated with the announcement of the Accessible India movement in 2015. Finally, the lack of ‘access’ was acknowledged at a national level. In a move to dignify their existence, PM Modi also coined a new term, ‘divyangjan’ or divine being replacing the demeaning usage of ‘viklang’ or handicapped.

     

    Furthermore, the passage of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act 2016 was celebrated as a landmark moment. Repealing the 1995 Act, the new legislation included 21 types of disabilities, with a view to empower and enable as opposed to a dependence on mere handouts.

     

    Often persons with disabilities face entry-level barriers in education and employment. The reasons could vary, discrimination, poor financial condition, ignorance or inaccessibility. And that adversely impacts their social and financial standing, mis-shaping the general societal perception.

     

    The RPWD Act 2016 introduced new sections, providing rights and entitlements to ensure barrier free access to the physical infrastructure as well as to information and communication technologies (ICT). Four per cent reservation in government jobs, equal opportunity policy for private establishments in addition to incentives for recruiting at least five per cent disabled employees, and extending the right to free education to every disabled child between the age group of 6 and 18 years, are some of the pertinent steps to level out the playing field.

     

    With all these initiatives and asseverations, one would assume all is hunky-dory. Except it’s not.

     

    The leadership seems to have mastered the art of utopian announcements. Spinning yarns ridden with lopsided statistics, they have created a false picture of progress to sway voters. The ground reality is not as idyllic as the written word. Red tapism, absence of coordination between departments and ministries as well as Central and State governments, creates roadblocks in implementation.

     

    Unique Disability ID (UDID) is a case in point. The UDID portal, swavlambancard.gov.in was launched in 2016 with the intent of creating a national database of persons with disabilities (PwDs) and also to ensure easy access to schemes and benefits. As opposed to a state issued Disability Certificate, UDID is valid pan-India, which enables PwDs to avail government provisions without producing multiple documents.

     

    But the rollout has been shoddy. As of March 2021, 54.84 lakh UDIDs have been issued against nearly 1.66 crore Disability Certificates. Across states, disabled folk face challenges in online application, medical verification from district hospitals, tracking the issuance status, editing wrongly registered details on printed IDs et cetera. Even after completing all the steps in registration, thousands of PwDs haven’t received their cards. See tweet below.

     

    1) Applied in 2016 till 2021 waiting (19150000016100029048)
    2) A Municipality/SUB DIVISION (HMC/SADAR )missing from WEB Page Application Form Howrah Dist ,WEST BENGAL #UDID@Drvirendrakum13@socialpwds @RamdasAthawale @kataria4ambala @MSJE_AIC@MSJEGOI#DigitalIindia pic.twitter.com/30w4lSbhFK

    — Mangal Hazra (@mangalhazra3) July 22, 2021

    A tweet stating UDID applied in 2016 has still not been received

     

    From June 1, 2021, the Centre notified for all disability certificates to be issued online. “The Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (DEPwD), Government of India has issued Gazette notification SO 1736(E) dated 05.05.2021 making it mandatory for all States/UTs to grant certificate of disability through online mode only using UDID portal w.e.f. 01.06.2021.”

     

    The notification conveniently puts the onus on the States and local hospitals at a time when they are preoccupied with administering vaccines and managing Covid-19. How does the Centre plan to achieve the desired digitisation when the online process so far has been moving slower than molasses?

     

    Just last week, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment issued a notification exempting all posts under the Indian Police Service and Indian Railway Protection Force from the provision of four per cent reserved quota for persons with benchmark disabilities. This goes against Section 34 of RPWD Act 2016 which states that “the appropriate Government, in consultation with the Chief Commissioner or the State Commissioner, as the case may be, may, having regard to the type of work carried out in any Government establishment, by notification and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in such notifications exempt any Government establishment from the provisions of this section.”

     

    In this case, only the posts for combatant roles should be exempt from reservation. Interestingly, a separate notification issued on the same day by the Ministry distinguishes between combatant and non-combatant roles, exempting all combat posts in the Border Security Force, the Central Reserve Police Force, the Central Industrial Security Force, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police, the Sashastra Seema Bal and the Assam Rifles.

     

    It’s important to note that all reserved posts are based on the jobs identified for PwDs by a specially appointed committee. There are several skilled and unskilled roles under Group A, B, C and D categories, where disabled people can be hired as clerks, technical specialists, engineers, delivery assistants, cleaners, telephone operators, designers etc.

     

    On January 4, 2021 the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities notified 3566 posts in Central Government establishments as suitable for persons with benchmark disabilities, adding 593 new posts to the previous list issued in 2013. The latest detailed list can be seen here: http://disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/upload/uploadfiles/files/224370.pdf

     

    There are many more examples that point to a lackadaisical approach of the government when it comes to integrating persons with disabilities into the mainstream. While progress has been made on several counts, we need stricter enforcement and execution of policies. Empty sloganeering won’t suffice.

     

    It’s also time for the media to go beyond inspiration porn and focus on consistent hard-hitting coverage of issues facing the disabled population.

     

     

    Shruti Pushkarna heads operations of the New Delhi-based Score Foundation where she works as Director-Programmes & Communications. She is a former journalist (part of the founding team of MxMIndia) who has moved full-time to the social sector. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. You can tweet your comments and suggestions to @shrutipushkarna

     

  • Have a Grievance Against MxMIndia? Here’s What You Can Do

     

    By Team MxMIndia

     

    At MxMIndia, we take our journalism very seriously. We are journalists, we are editorially-driven and uphold all that’s commonly perceived as journalistic ethics.

     

    Right from the day we launched, September 9, 2011, we have been governed by a clear Code of Ethics and all our staff are signatories to it. We have a clearly laid out Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. In the Privacy Policy, we have clearly given the connect to a Grievance Officer. So, if anyone has had a problem with our content, there is a clear line for lodging a complaint.

     

    We wrote about this a few weeks back, but we are repeating this to drive home the message.  At MxM, given that we carry a fair amount of commentary, and are often even critical of the powerful and the powers that be (including those from/at private and social establishments). It’s only fair, hence, that those who are aggrieved have a formal recourse. Rather than threaten to stop advertising or curtail access which some entities may threaten to do (or even do), we’ve encouraged people to write to us. And we’ve haven’t ever, shied from apologising if we’ve erred. We use the word ‘Apologise’ or ‘Sorry’ and not an impersonal ‘regret’.

     

    MxMIndia is now a member of Digipub India, a representative body of digital publishers in the country (https://www.digipubindia.in/). As members, we have also said we will honour the Self-Regulatory Body that has been set up by the organisation. MxMIndia also submitted its ownership details to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting as desired of all digital news publishers.

     

    Digipub India has set up an internal committee to provide our members with an industry-wide level of self-regulation. The committee is constituted of individuals with an unimpeachable public service record and accomplishments. They are:

     

    1. Former Supreme Court judge Justice Madan Lokur

    2. Mr Jawhar Sircar, Retired Indian Civil Servant

    3. Ms. Swarna Rajagopalan, Founder and Director, Prajnya Trust

    4. Mr Bezwada Wilson, Activist and National Convenor, Safai Karmachari Andolan

     

    If a complainant is dissatisfied with our (as in MxMIndia’s) grievance redressal procedure (write to editor(at)mxmindia.com), please reach out to Digipub’s grievance officer at the following address: selfregulatorybody(at)digipubindia.in.

     

    We assure our readers, constituents and the ecosystem in general that we will honour the advice/decision of the Digipub Self-Regulatory Body.

     

  • MxM is a member of Digipub India

     

    By Team MxMIndia

     

     

    At MxMIndia, we take our journalism very seriously. We are journalists, we are editorially-driven and uphold all that’s commonly perceived as journalistic ethics.

     

     

    For us, to twist a title of a Hindi film, it’s a case of pran jaaye par ethics na jaaye. Well, almost. We of course do have a responsibility to our loved ones.

     

     

    Right from the day we launched, September 9, 2011, we have been governed by a clear Code of Ethics and all our staff are signatories to it. We have a clearly laid out Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

     

     

    In the Privacy Policy, we have clearly given the connect to a Grievance Officer. So, if anyone has had a problem with our content, there is a clear line for lodging a complaint.

     

     

    At MxM, given that we carry a fair amount of commentary, and are often even critical of the powerful and the powers that be (including those from/at private and social establishments). It’s only fair, hence, that those who are aggrieved have a formal recourse. Rather than threaten to stop advertising or curtail access which some entities may threaten to do (or even do), we’ve encouraged people to write to us. And we’ve haven’t ever, shied from apologising if we’ve erred. We use the word ‘Apologise’ or ‘Sorry’ and not an impersonal ‘regret’.

     

     

    MxMIndia is now a member of Digipub India, a representative body of digital publishers in the country (https://www.digipubindia.in/). As members, we have also said we will honour the Self-Regulatory Body that has been set up by the organisation.

     

     

    We have pleasure informing that Digipub India has set up an internal committee to provide our members with an industry-wide level of self-regulation. The committee is constituted of individuals with an unimpeachable public service record and accomplishments. They are:

     

    1. Former Supreme Court judge Justice Madan Lokur

     

    2. Mr Jawhar Sircar, Retired Indian Civil Servant

     

    3. Ms. Swarna Rajagopalan, Founder and Director, Prajnya Trust

    4. Mr Bezwada Wilson, Activist and National Convenor, Safai Karmachari Andolan

     

     

    If a complainant is dissatisfied with our (as in MxMIndia’s) grievance redressal procedure (write to editor(at)mxmindia.com), please reach out to Digipub’s grievance officer at the following address: selfregulatorybody(at)digipubindia.in.

     

     

    We assure our readers, constituents and the ecosystem in general that we will honour the advice/decision of the Digipub Self-Regulatory Body.

     

     

  • MxM Offer: 50% discount on ad hoc ads if marketing team is fully vaccinated

     

    By Your Team @ MxM

     

    Vaccination is key to curb the spread of Covid-19 as also reduce the risks that a virus attack could have on one. However, there are also many who are hesitant about taking a jab, and, sadly, there also exist several anti-vaxxers.

     

    In an effort to encourage and incentivise vaccination in the A&M and M&E sectors, MxMIndia will offer a special rate for advertising (on MxM) in the form of ad hoc mailers and site captures from June 11 to July 10, 2021.

     

    Here’s how: Just make a self-declaration of how many members of your marketing team have taken at least one jab. We don’t need proof… we trust you.

     

    If the team size is 8, and all 8 have taken at least one jab, we will offer a 50% discount on all ad hoc activity – mailers, site captures and banner ads. By ad hoc we mean advertising that is outside of annual deals or longish campaigns. If 90% of the staff have taken at least one jab, we’ll offer a 45% discount. And so on. If the team size is two, and only one colleague has taken a shot, we will offer a 25% cut.

     

    Is this a gimmick? It may seem like one, but it isn’t. We have been thinking about it for a while, and firmly believe that the solution to the current problem of the Covid-19 spread is masking, distancing, hygiene and vaccination. This is just a move to incentivise the vaccination process in organisations in a sector we are associated with.

     

    Over the years, MxMIndia has partnered the industry in various social causes. Whether it’s the flash floods in Kerala or free advertising to a television show that’s helped in the cause of cancer care. That’s how we are. That’s what we believe in. Business and revenues are important, but they aren’t our end-all.

     

    The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic has been huge. Let’s all work together to ensure the world we live in is safer and better.

     

    If you or your organisation wish to use this opportunity, please feel free to write directly to Pradyuman Maheshwari at pradyumanm [at] mxmindia.com, Whatsapp him or call (98338 76278). Or please get someone in your team to do so. Also, please forward this message to all. Also, get other media platforms – including our rivals to do the same. We aren’t doing this to earn brownie points. We sincerely believe that every eligible Indian must be vaccinated.

  • Sorry about yesterday. We had a non-tech system glitch

    By Team MxMIndia

     

    Sorry for not turning up with our usual updates yesterday.

     

    We had a non-tech system glitch yesterday. One of our team members had a medical issue that needed to be attended to. Not Covid, but in times like these, one can’t ignore any health issue.

     

    It happened all of a sudden, so we couldn’t update you, not even drop a message via Twitter.

     

    Sorry about this. Our team member is better now.

     

    Thanks for this.

  • The Hyperlocal Exposure of Covid Truths

     

    By Shashidhar Nanjundaiah

     

    Shashidhar NanjundaiahA sensational headline from The Guardian that’s doing the rounds these days reads, “The system has collapsed: India’s descent into Covid hell”. To this dramatic text, a friend and a media lecturer from Patna, Rajeev Sharan, remarked that the famed UK daily’s headline is just being charitable. “Actually, the system has not collapsed. It just stands exposed. This is the system here.”

     

    “Meanwhile, people are asking where their vaccine dose is,” the story by BBC’s India correspondent Yogita Limaye concluded. After presenting the ugly political bickering around vaccines in India, that was the bottom line-their immediate, proximate reality.

     

    People in a crisis mostly care about the truth that they need-blood, oxygen, vaccines. People whose relatives are dying in hospitals often blame the system for their fate. “The doctors are helpful, but government is not helping.” Blame goes onto a distant, unreachable entity that we call the system. Yet it is the local, a-systematic entity with tremendous reach and is yet very local that often cuts through the red tape and helps.

     

    It is fair to assume that many of the people whose relatives are dying are surely those who are also intemperate in their hypernationalism and protecting national image, which, hitherto, was more important than reality. Yet, the same technology-enabled social system comes to their rescue when the need is immediate and critical.

     

    As a system, the social media has proved that is both a boon and a curse in these trying times of Covid 2.0. On the one hand, it is replete with nationalistic “triumphalism” and booster doses for Modi’s image. Much has been documented and argued-including by this author-about the perils of such ongoing government-induced, often unscientific euphoria that has caught the fancy of politicians and the social media distributors of their messages.

     

    So it is evident that a system of fake news has arisen right before our eyes. To that extent, sections of our media that do question the system-however raucously and irritatingly-drill down the bottom line, that people are at the bottom of it all. They remind us that the system is not “the other”-we are the system. Yet by being selective in accountability-seeking, they are exposing the media’s own system.

     

    Yet, on the other side of that disturbing new social system is a much more heartening alternative of how the social media is doing what our media has largely failed to do: help people. This kind of crisis is where the word “social” in the term social media is validated. Geographically apart strangers are helping one another, appealing for blood donation or oxygen.

     

    Although its meaning is obvious and un-tricky, hyperlocal has taken on a new meaning. This new definition is about not the reach but the origin. It means hyperlocal is not about geographic proximity, but about the dissemination of a reality from a locality. An important book, self-explanatorily titled Hyperlocal Journalism: The Decline of Local Newspapers and the Rise of Online Community News by David Harte, Rachel Howells and Andy Williams (2019), albeit largely in a west European context, includes a pertinent discussion around “excessively local”-so local that local, crowdsourced information is too culturally specific for its mass distribution to bear the right connotations.

     

    One argument can be that such news is too mundane, too ordinary. But like all news, it is at times of crisis that its true relevance and value kick in. The hyperlocal nature of social media lends that personal touch to a global technology, and in a sense, it defies what system is. Even the most local of the so-called mainstream media must resort to anecdotal evidence or broad generalisations. It is only the sum of all anecdotes that can make the reality emerge as it stands, devoid of headlines and bottom lines.

     

    It should be evident, therefore, that hyperlocal news is both informational and cultural. It is informational when it is immediate and proximate, and a cultural informant when it is not. Last Saturday, the first weekend of a curfew in the Garden City, The News Minute published pretty pictures of a few leafy streets to support the headline “Roads deserted, shops shut during Bengaluru weekend lockdown”.

     

    Let’s think about the political, social and cultural undertones in that news item. What this headline will not tell us it is showing only a part of the reality. It would be fallacious for the reader to assume that all roads are deserted, all shops shut. (Clearly, they were not.) The headline is important for a variety of reasons, after all-they tie together an un-complex form of truth, providing a conveniently one-sided evidence for newspapers and portals to evidence a strict weekend curfew, individuals point out that traffic is almost normal in their neighbourhood. Additionally, to someone who is geographically removed, it connotes-falsely-that the city has been totally compliant and disciplined.

     

    That is why it is the social media that can provide the actual truth-whether it is in the form of exposing the underbelly of our society or our minds, whether it is depressing for many of us to know how much hatred there is, or whether it is delightful to know how much compassion there is. Where there is no hatred or compassion, there is pretence of either—which is also a reality. It is what people want to convey about themselves. Like its mainstream counterpart, this crowdsourced messaging is best at, and worst at ‘news you can use’. It could lend itself to use or misuse, but hyperlocal is the most organic counter to hypernational.

     

    As the founder of Being Responsible, the author, Shashidhar Nanjundaiah, is attempting to build awareness via Responsible Media Literacy. Prof Nanjundaiah has led media institutes to positions of repute and leadership. You can reach him at shashi.nanjundaiah@hotmail.com. His views here are personal.

  • The MxMIndia Code of Ethics

     

    Every six-odd months, we publish our Code of Ethics. For more than ever before, the Indian media needs to adopt one and practise it.

    We are now part of the Digital Publishers Association of India and will follow the self-regulatory procedures set by it. Our editor is also a member of the Editors Guild of India and the Press Club, Mumbai. More than ever before, it’s important the media acts responsibly as must people around it. In the next month-odd, we will publish the process of the self-regulatory body set up by DigiPubIndia.

    MxMIndia adopted a Code of Ethics even before it was launched. Although it’s on the site, since it could have become a blindspot, we publish it as our Big Story once or twice a year. This is the link to the Code: http://www.mxmindia.com/code-of-ethics/

    Read on…

     

    The MxMIndia Code of Ethics

    This code of ethics is not meant to be a treatise in ethics. We believe all MxMers are mature professionals, of sound character and have values we agree with.

    However, since a Code of Ethics is not really followed in organisations that some of our employees may have worked with in the past, we have a formulated an easy-to-follow set of Do’s and Don’ts that each and every employee has agreed to follow.

    Also, since there’s a general belief that many media companies (business-to-business and mainstream) follow unethical practices, it’s hence critical to put the record straight on why MxMIndia isn’t like the ‘many’ others.

     

    1. While the objective of MxMIndia is to be a profitable enterprise, our revenues will not come from compromising editorial standards. Excellence is what we are setting out to achieve, Ethically and with Integrity.

     

    2. We will not be influenced in any way by advertisers – past, present or future, and will write or comment on an individual, service or organisation regardless of whether or not it advertises with MxMIndia.

     

    3. We will not sell our editorial content. Content includes text, photographs, videos or any visuals.

     

    4. Accuracy in presenting facts is of utmost importance and facts must be correctly presented.

     

    5. We will not present any bias in our news sections. If, however, MxM India does undertake a campaign, it will clearly state its editorial policy

     

    6. If there’s any advertisement that could be confused with editorial content in appearance, it will be clearly tagged as an Advertisement and be displayed in a style that is different from normal editorial content.

     

    7. Our reports and features will always attribute sources to people. In case, the source does not want to be named for fear of loss of employment or due to some sensitivity, every attempt must be made to look for an alternate source who could be named. If that fails, every attempt should be made to make the reader rest assured that our source is authentic and this may be done by describing who the source is.

     

    8. We have a no tolerance policy towards plagiarism. Employees may be given a warning if found plagiarising, but in most cases, the services of any employee found plagiarising – regardless of her/his seniority or utility to the organisation – would be terminated within 24 hours of the Editor-in-Chief conducting his/her investigation on the act of plagiarism.

     

    9. If any attempt is made to influence us by way of a threat to withdraw advertisements, we reserve the right to expose such individuals and/or their organisations.

     

    10. We will not publish photographs off the internet. If a picture is be taken from the internet, it will be done only after written permission of the source. Else, we will own the rights for the picture which may be procured by buying rights for appropriate usage. Ditto for text. If we do carry syndicated content, the source needs to be clearly be stated at the end of the article.

     

    11. Our journalists will take the permission of the interviewee to record her/his comments, especially when the meeting is not face-to-face.

     

    12. Unless approved by the Editor, we do not part with the transcript of any interview. A journalist may however play back a few quotes attributed to an individual.

     

    13. We will allow individuals or organisations adequate time to revert with their response to a question. In most case the adequate time would mean four to six hours. If it’s a non-critical story, then we would recommend holding the story for at least (and at most) a day.

     

    14. We will not accept any gifts that attempt to influence us. These should be returned immediately. Gifts in the form of chocolates, mithai, flowers or basic promotional material that is of reasonable value (of up to Rs 750-1000) is fine. Mementos or promotional material of nominal value may be accepted. No gifts must be solicited. If there’s a doubt, please consult the Editor-in-Chief/CEO. If an organisation is found to influence an MxMIndia journalist, under extreme cases, MxMIndia may even blacklist the organisation and/or its products and services.

     

    15. We will not solicit any outstation trips. If however there is an invitation for a junket, we will accept it only if the Editor believes there is a news value in the event. In such a case, MxMIndia will mention that the journalist concerned has visited an outstation venue at the invitation of the company which must be named. For local travel, all our employees are defrayed expenses towards local travel, and hence we discourage taxi pick-ups or drops, as is the norm in some sections of the media.

     

    16. We will not solicit any invitations for a meal or a drink. We discourage MxMIndia employees to drink beyond their limits at events, dinners, press conferences etc where they represent the Company. We will also not solicit free books, software, movie tickets etc.

     

    17. MxMIndia employees are discouraged from moonlighting. If, however, employees do receive requests to write an occasion article for a non-competing publication, the employee could do it after seeking permission via email.

     

    18 .Unlike some media houses, we are happy to see our employees – regardless of their seniority levels – to be interviewed and featured in other media. However, prior permission is desired for every appearance on television. Employees must ensure that their work at MxMIndia doesn’t suffer due to their appearances on TV, radio etc. While tweeting, participation in social networks like Facebook and Linked In are encouraged, every attempt must be taken to ensure that the values and interests of the organisation are not compromised.

     

    19. We will ensure that our ethical standards are followed in all that we do – events, conferences and awards. We will ensure our integrity is not compromised.

     

    20. We discourage the use of pirated products and services for official use. We advise our employees to only use legally procured software. Employees using their personal computer equipment for work are encouraged to switch to legal software.

     

    21. MxMIndia has a no tolerance policy on sexual harassment.

     

    22. Our employees are not allowed to deal in stocks related to the media and entertainment sector. If they hold shares before joining the organisation, they must disclose their holdings in writing to their immediate boss. They could, however, invest in mutual funds related to the M&E sector.

     

    23. While this Code is only applicable towards conduct as an employee, we advise all MxMers to ensure that they are ambassadors of MxMIndia and all that it stands for even outside of work hours.

     

    24. Over the last few years, there have been question marks raised about the ethical standards adopted by journalists and media organisations. While a lot of it may be untrue, we believe that journalists and others working in various media organisations are also responsible for this perception. At MxMIndia, our attempt will be to reverse this.

     

    25. This Code is applicable for all employees of MxMIndia. Associates, retainers, columnists, regular contributors are also required to adhere to the above Code.

     

    We encourage all our constituents and advertisers to read the above document and cooperate with us and enable us to abide by it. If you wish to report a dishonest act, write directly to pradyumanm [at] mxmindia.com.

     

     

  • MxM reports go Short & Sweet

    By Our Staff

     

    We understand people don’t have much time. The extended lockdown and WFH culture has ensured that.

     

    In order that we respect your time, we are making that extra effort to cut the flab in press release-based reports and give you what we think is relevant.

     

    This will ensure better readability although the reports won’t have the very many nice things that PR folk may have written.

     

    Also, all reports that are press release-based will be clearly tagged ‘Press Release-based’ and not put as ‘By Our Staff’. These clearly mean that MxM India staff hasn’t verified the contents of the report or spoken with any of the people mentioned in the report.

     

    Hope you appreciate the change.

     

    Cheers!

  • Happy New Year! See you Monday, Jan 4

    From Team MxMIndia

     

    Our offices are closed tomorrow, January 1, 2021 as it’s New Year’s Day. Though we know we should extra hard on the day to ensure the year ahead is healthy, happy and prosperous, we are taking a chhutti (holiday) along with many others in our industry.

     

    So, see you on Monday, January 4. We will be back with our scheduled updates, newsletters and renewed energy and ideas.

     

    Happy New Year!

  • Shruti Pushkarna | Lessons from 2020: Time to think mainstream solutions for all

    Shruti PushkarnaBy Shruti Pushkarna

     

    2020 is finally coming to an end. We all agree on what a waste this year was, considering how our plans were reversed, lives disrupted and holidays canceled. As for work, we found new ways of functioning and remaining productive amidst a global pandemic. Truth is we survived this terrible year and the next one is just round the corner.

     

    Typically, in December, people think of resolutions, goals, budgets, but our lives are still shrouded in uncertainty. When will the vaccine be rolled out? Will it be effective? How long before we build herd immunity so that we can go back to normalcy just like in the pre-Covid days?

     

    No easy answers there. How about ending 2020 by acknowledging things that SARS COV-2 helped us discover, as individuals and as a society?

     

    The most important thing I have learnt especially while working with persons with disabilities is, the key to surviving (and thriving) is ‘acceptance’. When Covid struck, people were frustrated. The government called for a nationwide lockdown leaving us with no choice but to accept our situation. When we accept, we stop fighting with the problem and start channelizing our energy into finding possible solutions.

     

    Operating from home is a case in point. In the absence of physical spaces to work, study, exercise, hang out or play, we found alternatives within our residential confines. We modified our living situations to make room for daily routines that were conducted outside earlier.

     

    Acceptance leads to possibilities. Yet another learning.

     

    There are always alternatives, a different line of thinking and a new way of processing limitations. The disabled world knows it well. For persons with disabilities, the only real barrier is a negative attitude. Responses like ‘no, can’t do’, ‘not possible’, ‘not equipped’, ‘can’t happen’, exclude them from majority of mainstream activities.

     

    The past year may have helped the ableist society realise some such truths. Thanks to Covid, now we know that possibilities are only limited by our (collective) imagination. When able bodied people like you and me were denied access to our regular environment, we created a close replica in the form of a virtual universe.

     

    Barrier-free access is something persons with disabilities across the world have been fighting for, over decades. Attending school or college, getting a job in an office, watching a movie, reading a book, traveling, dining, sightseeing, even accessing social media or other digital services, poses serious challenges to the disabled. But we have never thought of mainstream solutions to these problems because their impairment has been grounds for an almost legit exclusion.

     

    We are all intrinsically selfish, is also a lesson learnt, though this one’s hardly exclusive to 2020.

     

    If the society accepts differences in abilities rather than typecasting people as ‘incapable’ or labeling them as ‘invalid’, we can start building an inclusive environment for all. Innovation in technology and increased internet penetration makes it easier to allow access to a larger, heterogeneous group.

     

    Let me state some obvious examples from the current scenario. Disabled students are attending online classes with the help of smartphones and computers along with able-bodied peers. Similarly, jobs are being carried out remotely, irrespective of physical impairments. OTT platforms have a wider share of the content viewing pie and their audience includes persons with different types of disabilities. Banking and other financial transactions are taking place online, albeit certain access issues. And the list goes on.

     

    When Covid-19 rendered us helpless despite all our defence mechanisms, we didn’t give up. We simply started safeguarding afresh. Among those who have survived the virus, some have experienced temporary disabilities, and there are others who have developed chronic illnesses due to partial respiratory or renal failure. But we are not blaming their karma for the medical outcome, are we?

     

    Why can’t we see the disabled people without the stigmatised lens too? If there is hope for a better tomorrow, then why shouldn’t similar optimism be extended to someone with a hearing, speech, visual or locomotor impairment?

     

    It’s time we acknowledged that the differences we see in people and situations, first emanate in our minds. What we actually choose to see outside is a mere reflection of that mindset.

     

    Here is an idea to carry forward to 2021. Let’s never forget what a person is capable of, given appropriate environment and aids. Let’s stop walling off people with problems presumably different from our own.

     

     

    Shruti Pushkarna heads operations of the New Delhi-based Score Foundation where she works as Director-Programmes & Communications. She is a former journalist (part of the founding team of MxMIndia) who has moved full-time to the social sector. Shruti writes for MxMIndia every other Thursday. Her views here are personal. She can be reached via Twitter at @shrutipushkarna

     

     

  • It’s coming: The 2020 MxMIndia Person of the Year

     

    By A Correspondent

     

    Just three days to go for Friday, December 18. Our Big Day. The day when we will announce the 2020 MxMIndia Mediaperson of the Year.

    We are not driven by commerce. We don’t have a title or presenting sponsor. We know the industry has been in bad shape, but in that mess, we have had many stars.

    So who do you think will it be?

    As our readers are aware, over the last few years, the MxMIndia Mediaperson of the Year has earned the reputation of being the most credible barometer of the highest performer(s) in the fields of advertising, media and marketing in India in a calendar year.

    Last year’s winner of the accolade was Sidharth Rao on his rise and rise in the Indian creative world. For mainstreaming digital. In 2018, it was Piyush Pandey and in the previous year, it was Arnab Goswami for the launch of Republic TV. In 2016, we had Dentsu Aegis Network South Asia CEO Ashish Bhasin and for 2015 it was the BARC India core team of Punit Goenka, Shashi Sinha and Partho Dasgupta.

    As we said earlier, this year, the award will be presented online (on MxMIndia) on Friday, December 18, 2020. Wait for it.