Tag: Amith Prabhu

  • Amith Prabhu: The art of Public Relations – it is about practising what we preach

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    Last weekend I encountered a unique situation on social media. A suggestion I made on Twitter was misconstrued by the officebearer of the organization in question. Instead of taking it in the right spirit and offering to make amends in the future for the betterment of the profession he started vociferously defending an omission.

     

    My biggest strength is my humility. I unleashed it fully after realising the allegations and counter allegations were going nowhere so I chose to apologise and let go. I not only apologised on Twitter, on text and on email but also made attempts to call the person and also offer to meet in the following week for hardly any fault of mine.

     

    Two quick learnings from the above. As Public Relations professionals we advise clients not to take a spat in public but sometimes we forget this advice we give out so often. But humility and quick thinking are essential ingredients in our profession and I chose to apply these in good measure.

     

    Anyway, all is well that ends well. We met on Friday for lunch and decided to focus on the future and leave behind the past. The purpose of mentioning this incident in this column is because every situation has some learning in it.

     

    How we apply this learning in our personal and professional lives is of paramount importance. Well, on a different note I have begun to believe that PR should no longer stand for Public Relations but the ‘R’ should stand for Reputation. I will write about Public Reputation in the future and try and explore the various facets of this concept.

     

    Public Reputation is about a holistic approach to building, managing and enhancing the reputation of a product or corporate brand. It is bringing in creativity, digital marketing, consumer outreach, media relations and event management under one bouquet to strengthen relationships and offer experiences. Advocacy plays a bog role in all this and Public Reputation is built. As I move to a new philosophy of looking at PR, I would like to sum up what PUBLIC RELATIONS is all about in a way that captures its true essence.

     

    Publicity Campaigns

    Unique Stunts

    Big Ideas

    Leading Communications

    Intelligent Conversations

    Creative Solutions

    Reputation Management

    Ethical Approaches

    Leveraging Relationships

    Agenda Setting

    Tactical Support

    Igniting Thoughts

    Opening Avenues

    Nurturing Stakeholders

    Supporting Causes

     

  • Amith Prabhu: Positioning, Participating and Packaging and a night to remember

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    I was at the Sabre Awards night in New Delhi last Friday. Now in its second edition in India, the programme received 400 entries from over 25 firms, which, as the organisers claim, is double the number of entries received on its debut last year. The awards ceremony was preceded by a mini-conference on three interesting topics.

     

    My column is about three observations in three capacities – first as a PR professional, secondly as an observer of all things PR and thirdly as a member of the jury at Sabre. I am not batting for any of my former employers nor am I trying to promote an event I co-organise. I may be provoking a debate and I hope I do.

     

    First, the positioning we have created for our profession of calling firms we work in as agencies is pitting ourselves alongside any other service provider which in my humble opinion needs to change. I think the day we collectively stop saying PR agency we will be better off in just bringing back the self-esteem that some clients, ad agencies and media have helped to erode. One of the panel discussions brought up a heated debate about how the client felt that PR firms were not delivering value. My only suggestion to clients who think that way is to step back, think hard and find out if they even have access to budgets to run meaningful PR campaigns which certainly come at a price and then to tell their firm on record to invest in outstanding talent that come from Ivy League institutions who are paid what they deserve and then give them 12 months to deliver some great action based on jointly arrived at ideas. Until this happens, the chicken-and-egg debate will never end till the cows come home.

     

    Second, several practitioners felt left out of an awards night that is the pride of the business. We are not an industry though we like to call ourselves as being part of one. We are a community of consultants and that’s that. The weirdest part is that some firms who sent entries were not sent invitations to buy seats or tables at the event because they were not members of the organization that co-hosts this event. It is a different matter that 7 of the Top 20 firms in the world besides three other prominent Indian firms are not members. It is the duty of the Indian organisers to ensure three things – a) that whether or not the firm is a member of the organization, the fact that it has participated in an awards programme deserves an invitation to buy seats or a table b) the organization cannot suggest that one should check news in order to become aware of the availability of tables c) there has to be a way to promote the event to as many people from in-house roles who feel left out.

     

    One solution is to have an association of individual practitioners from both sides – consultancy as well as in-house that comes together to celebrate the profession. This also has to involve the under 35 generation (largely millennials) to be part of the growing movement. I’m sure that someone will bell the cat soon.

     

    Lastly – the packaging of entries needs a serious introspection. As a member of the jury I was fortunate to glance through some great work but only one firm has mastered the art of sending entries in a format that is succinct and clever. I hope that firms learn to use storyboards or a one page format to share the campaign and its outcome. I pray that firms do not send reams of media output as part of the entry. Put it up on a microsite and share a link if you really want to flaunt it. And for our own sake let’s stop using AVE in entries. It can’t get more awful if we as professionals subscribe to that devious concept.

     

    I hope this marks the beginning of better positioning for ourselves, better packaging of our entries and more inclusiveness, more transparency and more relevance. If the majority of the professionals are left out when they belong to an age group where they long to belong it will be unfortunate. So here is to more collaboration in the times ahead.

     

  • Amith Prabhu: The vicious PR cycle of education, jobs and salaries

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    I spent a day on the campus of a leading communication school this past week interacting with first and second year students. Something that is an annual feature on my calendar. The institute also happens to be my alma mater. Students here invest or spend a million rupees over two years to get a master’s degree – this amount is ten times more than what my batch mates and I shelled out a decade ago.

     

    The students hope to graduate and get job offers at an annual package that is close to what they pay as their fees in the first year and this is where a major mismatch happens. Half the fee is Rupees 5 lakh and starting salaries at most PR firms are not even remotely close. They range between Rs 2.5 to 3.5 lakh. This leads to students wanting to pursue corporate jobs which promise better entry level salaries but not the kind of learning one would get at a PR firm. To add to this wound, I’m told some firms discriminate between institutes and choose to pay students from one institute a premium over the other, which is an unfair practice, if there is truth in it.

     

    The reason PR firms cannot pay fairly higher salaries to freshers is because the retainers have not risen in the last ten years the way the fees have skyrocketed. Hence there is a major disconnect between college fees, starting salaries and retainers. How does one fix this constant problem?

     

    To add insult to injury, there are the undergraduate courses which compete for the same jobs and same internships. Can PRCAI step in to work closely with the communication management institutes offering two year programmes to offer them opportunities that are better I terms of number of quality jobs at a better pay?

     

    Because if this problem is not addressed we will continue to pay peanuts and get monkeys.

     

    Our profession will continue to remain mediocre. And no amount of tall talk can salvage the situation. There is a school of thought that feels a master’s degree in communications is not a prerequisite for a career in Public Relations but that idea is not based on a solid foundation.

     

    The communication institutes need to unite and relook at their fees. One can’t hope to recover huge infrastructure costs in five years instead of ten and put the onus of paying back huge investments indirectly on PR firms through greater starting salaries than they already are. A vicious cycle is being created which does not seem breakable in the short to medium term.

     

    The salaries, retainers and college fees need to be interlinked and three sets of stakeholders need to sit across the table and find a solution. Clients need to realise that if they want to get the best team working on their business from a PR firm, the PR firm needs to hire the best talent available. This can only happen when retainers go up.

     

    Until such time this happens, there will be sulking faces all around. Public Relations firms will not be able to attract better talent who come at a price. The face of the business will not change.

     

  • Amith Prabhu: Praxis 2014 is slicker, smarter and super

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    There is one instance every four to six months when I use this space to promote an event close to my heart. I do it because this is not a commercial venture and MxMIndia is a founding online media partner. This column will give readers an overview of the upcoming summit, which is India’s only offsite, weekend conference for the fraternity.

     

    This year we have divided the summit into two parts. The conference on afternoon of Day 1 and morning of Day 2 which is the main event and a workshop segment on the evening of Day 2 and morning of Day 3. While over 250 professionals are expected for the summit, only about 50 are expected to pay an additional sum and attend the workshop, which is being organised in partnership with The Communique, a company that focuses on training for PR and communications professionals.

     

    The opening afternoon will have a keynote address and a special address along with two high profile sessions. The first of two keynotes will be by the mother of cause-related marketing in America, Carol Cone who is the global chair of the Business+Social Purpose practice at Edelman. This is followed by a session where we bring together four individuals who founded four of India’s big firms. They include Prema Sagar of Genesis BM, N S Rajan of Sampark Ketchum, Sunil Gautam of the erstwhile Hanmer & Partners which is now MSLGroup India and Madan Bahal of Adfactors. The other high profile session will have three veterans who run the Asia operations of some of the large firms. They are Viv Lines of H+K Strategies, Jon Hughes of Golin and Bob Pickard of Huntsworth. A fourth chairperson is likely to confirm shortly. This is followed by a perspective from Europe by Yanina Dubeykovskaya who runs an independent event in Davos called the World Communications Forum.

     

    This then moves on to the regular feature of a few felicitations and a Friday evening of entertainment over cocktails and conversations, followed by dinner.

     

    Saturday morning starts early with a panel of and by millenials from both in-house and consultancy backgrounds. This is followed by either a panel of corporate responsibility chiefs or a special address by an international speaker. Bonin Bough of Mondelez and Jimmy Soni of Huffington Post have tentatively indicated their interest to be present for this session. The second keynote will be by Paul Holmes who needs no introduction. The ultimate session is MINDFIRE 2468 where 10 firms are invited to present a campaign along with their client in not more than 8 minutes, using no more than 6 slides, with not more than 4 bullet points per slide and will have to be presented by 2 individuals from the client and consultancy side.

     

    Once this concludes, attendees break for lunch followed by which those who wish to see the Taj Mahal may do so, the others are free to return to their next destination. The workshops commence at 3 pm with journalist Charles Assisi leading a segment on Creative Writing Skills and on the following day a session on Leadership Skills by executive coach Advait Diskhit. These sessions will be of four hours duration each. And one can register directly for these at http://www.thecommunique.co.in/workshops/

     

    This seems like a slicker, smarter and super summit in more ways than one. More information is available at www.praxis2014.in This completes the journey to PR heavy zones from Pondicherry in the south to Lavasa in the west to Agra on the north. Since the response from the East is lukewarm, in all likelihood the summit will move to the South in 2015. Where and when will evolve from feedback and conversations.

     

  • Amith Prabhu: The great PR place to work

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    I’m no spokesperson for any PR firm as some may want to believe. I’m a big believer though that PR firms must practice what they preach. Several PR firms advise their clients to participate in the Great Place To Work (GPTW) Survey and get listed as one.

     

    It was heartening to see that Edelman India was featured in the survey last year and MSL Group India was featured in the same this year. I wish an increasing number of PR firms participate in the same and do the right things to feature in that prestigious list. This column is about the three things that make a workplace great according to the survey organisers and you may add to this list.

     

    Every firm can ensure they get these basics in place and thereafter all it takes is to apply to be a GPTW. I’m hoping there are at least three firms that feature in next year’s list. So what are the three things that a company needs to get right? The three that GPTW mentions on their website are –

     

    a) Trust the people they work for

    b) Have Pride in what they do; and

    c) Enjoy the people they work with

     

    Let’s analyse what goes into each of these three. I have had the fortune of being associated with both the firms that have made it to this list. With Edelman, having spent two years in their Chicago office and with MSL Group first as a client in 2009 and currently as a consultant on special projects.

     

    There are many firms who do a lot of things right but then do not muster the courage to participate in this survey. They say people join companies but leave their managers or because of their managers. This most often happens because of the arrogance with which the leadership operates leading to mistrust and a disgruntled employee base.

     

    Working on a set of blue chip clients enables professionals to not only learn more and do more but also take pride in what they do. A firm that has great brands as clients ends up doing great work. This in turn gets into the portfolio of employees as things accomplished.

     

    Lastly, right hiring and managing attrition well leads to a good work atmosphere. If the environment we wok in sets a positive tone, it leads us to bring out the best in us. This in turn has the potential to create happy minds and hearts which all leads to a great work place.

     

    I think building trust, instilling pride and making the experience of working enjoyable is not a difficult ask, it is neither easy. It needs consistent leadership, a great product or service that one can offer customers or clients and the right hiring of a good mix of people. PR firms can certainly get this formula right. Hope this becomes a trend and we see more PR firms in the list because then we can tell our clients more confidently how to be on that list as well.

     

  • Amith Prabhu: Whose Cannes Lion is it anyway?

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    My column last week was blank to express dissatisfaction that no Indian PR firm won a lion and that no PR firm won the Grand Prix. Some friends wrote to me stating that a PR firm had indeed won the Grand Prix and I told them that I had done my research before stating publicly that no PR firm had won the Grand Prix.

     

    First, some background from publicly available information. Only two firms based in India decided to send four and two entries respectively for four campaigns. Madison sent one entry in three categories and one in one. Perfect Relations sent one entry each in two categories. All the other 32 entries from India were from ad agencies. Some of them won Lions. I keep saying that PR firms are used by ad agencies to publicise their work, similarly PR firms should use ad agencies to package their work better.

     

    Coming to the second point. It is unfortunate that the Grand Prix went to an events/content agency based in LA called Creative Artists Agency. In India they have are better known as CAA/Kwan and run by Anirban Blah. A new rule demands that the entity that enters the award should name the PR firm that worked on the campaign. However, the Scarecrow campaign was out and out a creative campaign by Moonbot Studio and CAA.

     

    The world’s largest independent PR firm was fortunate to be present at the awards ceremony and claimed that the Grand Prix for PR was finally in PR land. Edelman was lucky that CAA who entered in this category gave it due credit. Many campaigns did not mention the name of the PR firm because creative agencies do not want to share the limelight. Edelman was luckier that folks from CAA or Moonbot Studio were not present to accept the award and they got to claim the trophy as their own.

     

    For more context, the Chipotle Scarecrow was created by film makers Brandon Oldenburg and Limbert Fabian. CAA stepped in and worked with them as the main force, but the messaging came from Chipotle. The production was done by Moonbot Studios. All this for an app, which was a game accompanied by the video.

     

    The PR firm came into the picture to help support earned media initiatives. Solely promoted through PR, starting with a USA Today exclusive and earned social media, the Scarecrow generated over 7 million views. I lived in the USA when this campaign was launched and personally, it did not make an impact on me though I love Chipotle. This column is not to belittle the PR firm. I have worked there. I have the highest respect for the company. But somewhere it does not feel that the Grand Prix has come to PR land yet. In fact Fleishman claimed that they were the first to win a Grand Prix for PR a couple of years ago. Even that is incorrect as the submission was by their sister company TBWA.

     

    Firstly, the PR firm did not conceptualize the campaign, they only amplified an existing initiative. Secondly, they entered several of their campaigns from offices in Shanghai and London and New York but this was not a campaign they entered and lastly, because for a student of PR there is nothing to learn from this campaign that was done uniquely or differently.

     

    This column is to wish Edelman which is the largest single firm in revenue better luck in 2015. May a campaign win next year, which is conceptualized and submitted as an entry by a PR firm. I hope that firm is Edelman because having worked in one of its largest offices I am convinced they have the potential. And then we can all say with pride the Grand Prix has truly come to PR land.

     

    It is weird that no one has written about this. I choose to because the question remains; as to whose Cannes Lion is it anyway?

     

  • Amith Prabhu: Is a Cannes PR Lion within our reach?

    By Amith Prabhu

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    As a mark of dissatisfaction that only six entries went from two PR firms in India and that no PR firm in India or abroad won the Grand Prix this column remains blank today.

     

     

    However, the quiz is available to win yourself a book of your choice worth upto Rs 500 from amazon or flipkart – Who began his career in PR working on clients such as Quaker Oats and ContiCommodity in the late 70s? Type your answer in the comments section here with #MxMprQuiz

     

  • Amith Prabhu: The elusive Cannes Lion

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    India has had a representative on every Cannes Lion PR jury ever since the category was introduced in 2009. For the record, Prema Sagar, Nandita Lakshmanan, Veena Gidwani, Sunil Gautam, Dilip Cherian and Radhika Shapoorjee. Interestingly, three of the six jury members have had their roots in one PR firm, which also happens to be my alma mater.

     

    This column is not about them but about all of us – the public in Public Relations and how Indian PR firms has never won a single Lion in the five years of the category’s existence. What eludes us from the Lion and what can we do to make the Lion a possibility. I wrote about this last year and you can read the same here – http://www.mxmindia.com/2013/06/amith-prabhu-why-cant-our-pr-firms-win-pr-lions-at-cannes/

     

    As this column gets published on the June 16, the shortlist for the PR Lions will be out and a day later on June 17, the winners will be announced. I will be delighted if an Indian firm wins a Lion in this category but I will not be surprised if it does not. I do not even have data that tells me how many Indian firms participated.

     

    Is the PR Lion a big deal? I have always believed they are not but for those winning it say they certainly make a big difference. Then why this column you may ask – because it is the season of awards and it is important to remind ourselves that we need to bring out quality work that stands out.

     

    Well, while the Lions get announced during the week and India had its Elephants last week through the Kyoorius Awards I am thinking of launching India’s first weekly PR quiz that will be part of this column and give away a PoRcupine in the form of a book to one winner every week. The answer may be written in the comment section here or tweeted as a tag to me @amithpr with hashtag #MxMprQuiz

     

    The first question – In Spring 1982, Mark and Tom met a guy called Steve, who worked at a little American company creating programming languages for computers. Steve wanted Mark and Tom’s help to grow the business, so he introduced them to two of his colleagues. What PR firm was born out of this? Answer to win a book on PR worth upto Rs 500 of your choice from Amazon or Flipkart.

     

  • Amith Prabhu: HR in Public Relations needs to do the right things to build a better reputation

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    It’s June and that time of the year when in some companies appraisals are completed and in some appraisals are just beginning. This is also the time when people are actively looking out for greener pastures because they feel it is time to move on or because they are disgruntled at a nominal hike or are feeling the raw deal is not worthwhile. But most importantly this is the time HR is under immense stress because transitions are taking place.

     

    But this column is to let HR folks in PR firms realize that they need to act as enablers rather than play an obstructive role. They need to strike a balance between the junior most person and their handlers. While HR is not a role that needs to be charitable, it certainly needs to be friendly and honest, which in my opinion is not any longer in PR firms.

     

    Let me elaborate further with two examples and I will obviously use fictitious names of people and firms. Let’s take for instance Raju from Gadkari Public Relations – a reputed firm got a great offer from a rival company, Banerjee Public Relations. Now he has the right to freedom to move on but it would be unethical for him to try and take his team along. Whether or not he does that he has resigned at his existing organization and they have got a whiff of things to come so decide to ask Raju to go on leave until the end of their notice period and at the same time spread a rumour that Raju has been sacked, which is unfair to his reputation and in the long term not a good thing for the HR team’s reputation as well.

     

    In another example, let’s take Rani who has just resigned from Omar Public Relations and is serving her notice period. The HR team in her office and the management begins to treat her badly by giving her the cold shoulder and taunting her. What HR does not realize that Rani will grow in her career and end up as a client someday and give Omar Public Relations a tough time and this has happened time and again.

     

    One can go on and on about unsavory stories from the world of Public Relations talent management and have a solid collection of real life stories where HR has ruined its own reputation and that of the firm. Well, I hope HR wakes up and gets it act together by asking employee engagement professionals, CSR specialists and corporate reputation experts how to repair the damage they have done. May be, it’s time to do some PR for HR.

     

  • Amith Prabhu: The exclusivity of exclusives

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    One reason PR professionals are less respected is because of the abuse of the word ‘Exclusive’. How many of us have used this word incorrectly over the last decade? How can we change this trend by trying to do some things better?

     

    For the uninitiated, the term ‘Exclusive’ is used to denote something that is restricted to the person, group or area concerned. We have cleverly over the years manipulated the term to suit our greed for more media output or as commonly referred to as ‘coverage’. Can we coin a better term to kill the ambiguity this has brought about?

     

    Exclusive typically meant there was a transparent agreement that only the individual or group was exposed to a spokesperson during the time frame of an announcement. And the others would get exposed to it once the news was public from the outlet that had exclusive access. However, this changed as some media outlets which were not the leaders in their segment began to approach PR firms or the in-house corporate communications for exclusive access after the special treatment was offered to the media outlet of choice.

     

    This has led to an unpleasant situation where more than one media house and sometimes running into dozens get exclusive access to a spokesperson which they position as ‘Exclusive.’ The better term to use would be ‘Shared Exclusive’ or ‘One-on-One’.

     

    The question that can be debated is – if exclusives are a good idea? I would think they are not, from a long term. The only person who benefits is the journalist and his or her media outlet. If an organization chooses to rotate the exclusive arrangement with multiple media outlets they lose out in the mid-term as a media house that got an exclusive in June for a less important story in June would be left out for a bigger and better story in July.

     

    Exclusives work best when the organization ensures it is not shared and strikes a deal to get substantial coverage or space. But this alienates other media houses and journalists, often leading to a broken bridge that takes time to build. While I’m not writing this column to suggest if exclusives are good or bad I’m definitely rooting for the use of the correct term to avoid ultimately making a fool of the end consumer – who is the reader or viewer.

     

  • Amith Prabhu: The year flew by and we have a brand new government

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    Fifty columns in 52 weeks is an interesting milestone for India’s only weekly column on Public Relations. I am glad I could be its steward and I hope I have been able to make a tiny difference to those of you who read this religiously every Monday. When Pradyuman Maheshwari (Editor-in-Chief of MxMIndia) invited me to write this column last April, I was sceptical about having enough to write on and took couple of months to agree.

     

    In the past one year, we have seen a lot happen in the Indian Public Relations community – a dedicated international award, an annual gathering of the fraternity and a number of high profile people and account movements. The year ahead seems to be as exciting as we have just seen the world’s largest event just conclude. Today all eyes are on New Delhi as a new government takes charge and this government gets Public Relations right from the word Go.

     

    Three things that stand out are the way the swearing-in has been pegged with an invitation and its acceptance by heads of state of neighbouring countries. Then the entire one week after the result has been managed fairly well in terms of keeping citizens in the loop on the PM-designates actions. The positive press that has been generated for a man who until recently was persona non grata to some is immense.

     

    In the midst of this, the Twitter controversy generated by the outgoing PMO was the last in a series of PR gaffes committed by the former communications advisor. The entire episode could have been avoided or handled better. It is unfortunate that PR handlers of the nation’s highest office are not aware of the basics of relationship management.

     

    Then there is the Congress party which throws away every opportunity to mend its ways and create goodwill. Starting with Rahul missing the farewell dinner to the Prime Minister on the eve of the election result, to not taking drastic steps of stepping down after the election debacle to bring in radical reform, to winking at someone during the concession speech.

     

    Missing the communications bandwagon is not an option anymore and the Congress can only reinvent itself by building block by block on the bedrock of transparency, accountability and crystal clear communications. On the other hand, BJP with a strong mandate to govern should bring in a new ray of hope based on the expectations it has set in running a fair and feisty government. On the first anniversary of this column, my three wishes from the government in the sphere of communications are as follows:

     

    To have a weekly address by the Prime Minister’s office and once a month, that address may be made by the Prime Minister himself. To ensure there is a quarterly report card of achievements and plans for the next three months are shared as well in the form of a power point. Lastly, to make sure freedom of speech is respected and right to freedom of every individual is protected.

     

    If you have other suggestions for the PMO and the Congress party to work their Public Relations programmes better, feel free to mention them in the comments here. Thanks again for the support over the past 12 months. Hope to hear from you on topics you will like for me to focus on in the forthcoming columns.

     

  • Watch the Recorded Video of the MxM Google Hangout session on the Media Coverage of General Elections 2014

     

    Watch the Recorded Video of the MxM Google Hangout session on the Media Coverage of General Elections 2014. MxMIndia columnists Ranjona Banerji, Shailesh Kapoor and Amith Prabhu participated in the discussion moderated by Pradyuman Maheshwari