MxMIndia

Category: DIGITIZATION

  • Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd has applauded the Delhi state government's stand on 'No postponement' for the deadline mandated by the government to convert to digital signals via set-top-boxes by June 30, 2012.

    [94 days to D-Day] Hathway applauds Delhi govt

    By A Correspondent

     

    Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd has applauded the Delhi state government’s stand on ‘No postponement’ for the deadline mandated by the government to convert to digital signals via set-top-boxes by June 30, 2012.

     

    The Commissioner of Taxes and the other state officials of the State Government of Delhi had recently called a meeting of all cable TV service providers in Delhi. The purpose of the meeting was to confirm the readiness of cable TV service providers to roll-out Digitable Addressable System (DAS) to consumers across Delhi and review the current progress of implementation. The commissioner directed the service providers to deploy set-top-boxes in consumer homes by June 30, 2012 and reiterated that there will be ‘no postponement’ whatsoever in this deadline.

     

    As per The Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2011, the cable TV industry is required to convert all subscribers from analog signals to digital.

     

    Commenting on the directive by State Government of Delhi, K Jayaraman, Managing Director and CEO of Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd, one of the leading MSOs, said, “The industry is happy with the decision. The digital roll-out will enable consumers to watch high quality digital television channels of their choice.”

     

  • Digital Pay TV penetration of TV homes in India will grow from less than 20% in 2011 to 50% by 2016, and 61% by 2020, a new report by Media Partners Asia (MPA) indicates

    Digitization to up Pay TV penetration by 150% in 5 years, says MPA report

    By A Correspondent

     

    Digital Pay TV penetration of TV homes in India will grow from less than 20% in 2011 to 50% by 2016, and 61% by 2020, a new report by Media Partners Asia (MPA) indicates. The key demand drivers will come from cable operators, six commercial DTH platforms, and DD Direct, the government-owned DTH platform. A gradual consolidation of last-mile local cable operators will become inevitable, leading to a shift in industry profits and value to centralized distribution platforms and broadcasters, the report observes.

     

    Commenting on the findings, MPA executive director Vivek Couto said:

    “India’s digitization timetable implies a three-year transition to full digital TV (DTV) conversion. This is ambitious though we believe DTV transition will occur but over a longer time frame. The industry will remain capital-intensive until 2017 at the earliest, due to the capEx requirements associated with digitalization. This will lead to more M&A and fund-raising activity in both primary and secondary markets. The sector’s improved transparency, scale and operating leverage will attract large domestic and international strategic players, who will play a key role in M&A activity. Our biggest concerns include: cable execution and capitalization, as MSOs transition from a B2B to B2C model; DTH satellite capacity; and the extent of regulation in the broadcast ecosystem. While digitalization is the result of policy progress, this has not been the case for investment and taxation policies.”

     

    The report, entitled Asia Pacific Pay TV & Broadband Markets 2012, measures consumption and revenue generation across pay-TV and broadband industries in 16 Asian markets, including India, which the remains the key pay-TV market for Asia in the future.

     

    MPA projections indicate that Pay TV industry subscription fees will grow at an 11% CAGR between 2011-16, driven by increased volume over DTH and digital cable. Total Pay subscribers are expected to reach 172 million by 2016, and 199 million by 2020. MPA projections measure Pay penetration after accounting for households that opt for multiple services. Using this definition, MPA estimates that Pay penetration will grow from 79% to 89% between 2011 and 2020.

     

  • The News Broadcasters Association (NBA) has expressed 'shock" and "dismay" at TRAI's Tariff Order.

    [60 Days to D-Day] NBA damns Order for ‘legitimizing’ carriage fees

    By A Correspondent

     

    News Broadcasters Association (NBA), the apex association of Indian news broadcasters, has expressed “shock” and “dismay” at TRAI’s Tariff Order.

     

    The Notification has legitimised the very practice the NBA had hoped would be ended, said secretary general Annie Joseph in a communiqué, referring to the payment of “steep” carriage fees by broadcasters: “The primary purpose of digitisation was to increase the number of channels broadcasted. The objective was to give consumers greater choice and to eliminate the phenomenon of ‘carriage fees’, which were being charged due to capacity constraints. However, the NBA is distressed and disappointed that TRAI’s new notification has actually legalised the practice of ‘carriage fees’ and given distributors the freedom to unilaterally set the amount of ‘carriage fees’ broadcasters must pay.”

     

    Ms Joseph added: “This unfairly penalises broadcasters and threatens the very survival of the broadcasting industry.” The NBA has urged the government and TRAI to take corrective action.

     

    A member of the cable trade pooh-poohed the NBA’s reaction as childish. “Let them set up their own distribution mechanism and see how much they will need to pay. If we bleed, they will cease to exist,” a senior industry person told MxMIndia, requesting anonymity.

     

    We are fine with rationalising carriage fees, but not eliminating them, the industryperson from the distribution sector added. “They should look at increasing ad rates to earn more,” he said, arguing that carriage fees are justified

     

  • We shall all have to brace ourselves to a large surge in operational logistics at the last minute, but yes all this is surmountable, says Neeraj Sanan, EVP- Marketing and Distribution, MCCS

    [60 Days to D-Day] All stakeholders need to work together: Neeraj Sanan

    The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) issued new rules refurbishing the regulatory structure of the broadcasting, cable and DTH industry ahead of the digitization switch over in four metros, Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai from July 1. The order deals with issues such as channel availability, channel pricing, carriage fee and revenue sharing.

     

    Digitization is being seen as the game changer for the Indian TV industry, expected to bring a sea change for viewers, broadcasters and cable operators. The broadcasting industry is expected to see a growth in subscription revenue post digitization, as opposed to the present model where they depend largely on advertising revenue.

     

    As per the new guidelines, ‘The Broadcaster would enjoy ‘must carry’ provision from 1.1.2013 or 1.4.2013 as the case may be, for Hindi, English and channels in the regional language of the concerned area.’  In the order, TRAI has also addressed the much debated issue of carriage fee. The order states, “Keeping in view the fact that substantial investment for implementation of Digital Addressable Cable TV Systems is made by the MSO and the cost involved in carriage of channels, the Authority has decided that every MSO may fix the Carriage Fee. However, it should be published in the Reference Interconnect Offer and applied in a uniform, non-discriminatory and transparent manner. The Carriage Fee cannot be revised upward for a minimum of 2 years. The Authority would intervene in case it is felt that the Carriage Fee is unreasonable.”

     

    The regulatory has also prescribed the MSOs to increase their channel carrying capacity, stating that every MSO should have a minimum capacity to carry 200 channels by July 1, 2012.

     

    MxMIndia’s Shruti Pushkarna spoke to Mr Neeraj Sanan, EVP- Marketing and Distribution, MCCS to get his response on the Tariff Order and Interconnection Regulations for the Digital Addressable Cable TV Systems issued by TRAI.

     

    What’s your first response to the Tariff Order? Specifically the MCCS position?

    It is a reaffirmation of the government’s stated position and something that TRAI has been working towards for a long time.

     

    The TRAI observes that the Order will help profitability of channels. But carriage fee exists. Do you think your bottomline will be impacted in a positive way with this?

    The TRAI’s order will help all stakeholders move to a position of working in a structured manner. A well-run business can hope to get its deserved profit.

     

    Do you see the implementation happening in the four metros before July 1?

    I understand that a lot of intelligent people in well-run MSO and LCO organizations are working round the clock to make it happen. A key factor here will be for the government to continue to do what it has been saying. We shall all have to brace ourselves to a large surge in operational logistics at the last minute, but yes all this is surmountable.

     

    What are the marketing initiatives you are undertaking to ensure that you retain viewers?

    This is a challenge more for a distributor.

     

    Do you think the government is doing enough to promote the switch to digitization and explain the benefits to consumers?

    There is always something better we could do, but yes, government has been consistent in it’s thought. Now it is for all stakeholders, including all state governments to realize the prudence of digitization and work together to make it happen.

     

    Are there any areas of worry in the run-up to digitization (given that we have just 60 days to go)?

    No constructive business happens without risk and yes there are a lot of things that could go awry but if all players remain aligned, this is achievable. We should all realize that it is history being written everyday for distribution and we need to carefully tread this path.

     

  • MxMIndiaspoke to Sahil Gupta, Senior Manager, Tax and Regulatory Services, PwCIndiato get his reading of the tariff order for cable TV issued by TRAI.

    [60 Days to D-Day] Digitization good for industry: Sahil Gupta, PWC

    The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) issued the Tariff Order and Interconnection Regulations for the Digital Addressable Cable TV Systems on April 30.

     

    Aimed at providing the viewers with a better viewing experience and maximum choice, digitization is being seen as the biggest change broadcast and cable industry in the country is set to witness. Television viewers will get to choose a minimum of hundred Free to Air (FTA) channels at a maximum retail price of Rs100, as per new tariff rules for Cable TV announced by TRAI.

     

    The order states: “The basic purpose of digitization is to ensure ample choice to the consumer as well as to enable him to budget his subscription according to his paying capacity. Accordingly, the Authority has mandated MSOs to carry a minimum of 500 channels from January 1, 2013. However, keeping in view that the smaller MSOs having less than 25000 subscribers may need some additional time for building the capacity, they have been given time up to April 1, 2013. Besides, to ensure that the consumer is not adversely affected, the Authority has prescribed that every MSO should have a minimum capacity to carry 200 channels from July 1.”

     

    In the new guidelines issues, TRAI has also addressed issues pertaining to revenue sharing between MSOs and LCOs, carriage fee paid by broadcasters, channel pricing and so on.

     

    Mr Sahil Gupta, Senior Manager, Tax and Regulatory Services, PwCIndia shared his analysis of the recent order with MxMIndia’s Shruti Pushkarna and how he sees digitization as a win-win for all.

     

    What is your view on TRAI’s Tariff Order? 

    It’s a pro-consumer directive. Consumers can now pay for what they want to see, unlike in today’s time when they purchase a bouquet which has unwanted channels as well. Hence a la carte selection works more cost-efficient for consumers.

     

    So do you see digitization as a win-win for all?

    Digitization per se is good for the industry – consumers get better quality reception, broadcasters can know their exact consumer base, which will help them realise full value from MSOscable operators (which gets under-reported in current times based on what subscription base the intermediaries disclose to broadcasters). Moreover, it helps in bringing addressability in the system.

     

    Do you think the government is serious about the July 1 deadline?

    The government is taking a lot of initiatives to push digitization – it has a stakeholders’ meeting every week or two weeks and is helping stakeholders migrate to the new system. They are thus doing their bit for helping meet the deadline of July 1.

     

    But on the ground we hear that there is much to be achieved?

    The infrastructure is what is taking time. The digital/upgraded set top boxes need to be procured and be ready for installation at the consumer’s end. Some MSOs/cable operators are looking at funding mechanisms for meeting these procurement needs, while others are working towards building a right procurement strategy for the same. All in all, the industry is gearing up for it and all stakeholders doing their bit.

     

    Your view on the guidelines for carriage fees in the Order?

    Carriage fee is what MSOs charge broadcasters for carrying their channels to viewers. Some element of arbitrariness gets reduced from this Order as it needs to be uniform and non-discriminatory across all broadcasters. The TRAI will step in if it’s unreasonable and this will help.

     

    And on pricing of channels?

    The limits on pricing mentioned in the order is aimed mainly at ensuring that channels, especially popular ones, are not priced high.

     

    There’s also a mention on the revenue sharing between MSOs and cable operators…

    There seems to have been certain disputes between MSOs and cable operators in regard to sharing of distribution revenues. Prescribing the revenue sharing formula, in absence of an agreement between them, will help and bring in transparency…

     

     

  • We will need a postponement of at least three to four months. The tariff order has just come; there are so many other issues such as DAS licenses being not issued till date, says JS Kohli, CEO of Digicable

    [60 Days to D-Day] Digitization in 4 metros will not happen by July 1: JS Kohli

    Late Monday night, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) announced the new tariff structure for digital cable TV services. Under the new rules, all cable operators will have to mandatorily offer a Basic Service Tier (BST) to viewers which would consist of 100 free to air channels, including 18 mandatory Doordarshan channels, as well as the Lok Sabha channel. The tariff order states that apart from the mandatory channels in the BST, cable operators and Multi System Operators (MSOs) will have to provide customers a minimum of five channels of different genres.

     

    The authority also stated that MSOs will have to increase their channel carrying capacity. TRAI stated: “The Authority has mandated MSOs to carry a minimum of 500 channels from January 1, 2013. However, keeping in view that smaller MSOs having less than 25,000 subscribers may need some additional time for building capacity, they have been given time up to April 1, 2013.” The TRAI has prescribed that every MSO should have a minimum capacity to carry 200 channels by July 1.

     

    TRAI has also established new guidelines for revenue sharing between Multi System Operators (MSOs) and Local Cable Operators (LCOs).

     

    MxMIndia’s Shruti Pushkarna spoke to Mr Jagjit Singh Kohli, a veteran of the cable industry and CEO of cable distribution firm Digicable, on his reading of the latest order issued by TRAI and if he thinks the sunset date of June 30 is still achievable.

     

    What’s your first response to the Tariff Order?

    Well, the order is on expected lines, no big surprises there. Given the circumstances, I am happy with it, in the sense that we know the regulatory has been operating under tremendous pressure from various stakeholders, so given that situation, I am actually happy with the order.

     

    TRAI has observed that the Order will help profitability of channels. But carriage fee exists. Do you think the bottom line will be impacted for both broadcasters and the cable trade?

    The channel capacity is increasing to 500 channels, so automatically the pressure on carriage will reduce. So, although the carriage fee remains but the channel capacity itself is increasing so much that the price per channel will come down.

     

    Given the status as of today, do you see the implementation happening in the four metros before July 1?

    Now, that I don’t think will happen. We will need a postponement of at least three to four months. The tariff order has just come; there are so many other issues such as DAS licenses being not issued till date. To meet the deadline the industry needs to deploy atleast 150,000 boxes every day, only then will we be able to meet that deadline, and that’s impossible.

     

    What about the availability of set-top boxes?

    Even that is an issue. But even if set top boxes were to be made available, it would be very difficult to meet the deadline.

     

    Do you think the government is doing enough to promote the switch to digitization and explain the benefits to consumers?

    Yes, you can’t blame them on this. They have been quite aggressive on the timelines and in their campaigns.

     

    Are there any areas of worry in the run-up to digitization (given that we have just 60 days to go)?

    The only area of worry is that we will need some more time to meet the deadline, otherwise everything is fine.

     

    Photograph: Fotocorp

     

  • The genuine fear is that the BARC initiative will again slow down or worse – get delayed due to lack of clarity or infighting amongst the associations/players

    By Invitation | Atul Phadnis: Will TV measurement in India finally get its logical direction?

    By Atul Phadnis

     

    In March this year, three industry associations that have a significant say in television broadcast and TV advertising jointly announced a new chapter in the TV Ratings Measurement initiative. Broadcast audience Research Council (BARC) is the joint venture that has been in discussion, for the longest time, between the three stakeholder associations – Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF), Indian Society of advertisers (ISA) and the advertising agencies association of India (AAAI) to measure nationwide TV audience viewership. BARC has taken birth where a lot of earlier industry initiatives have failed to take off – hence, a lot of folks (including me) are watching these events very closely and curiously.

     

    Yes. There are cynics who doubt whether the BARC initiative will be able to streamline the industry ambitions for a wider and robust TV audience measurement thereby recasting/enhancing the offerings of the current ratings provider – TAM Media Research (a joint venture between Nielsen and Kantar-WPP).

     

    The genuine fear is that the industry initiative will again slow down or worse – get delayed due to lack of clarity or infighting amongst the associations/players. It’s a legitimate concern based on what we have seen in the past. In fact, the recent announcement has been possible only when a formula for compromise was reached after months of stalemate on the BARC shareholding and composition of its board.

     

    The genesis of the industry initiative that has now taken birth as BARC has in its vision the Rs329 billion TV industry that to a large extent depends on ratings and viewership information for key decisions, growth and business. So what are the key expectations of the industry that should get addressed if BARC is the answer to the TV industry’s call on TV Ratings?

     

    1. The Burden of Transparency

    For years now, TAM has been criticized, publicly and privately, for alleged opaque policies relating to aspects such as third-party audits, pricing, technology R&D results and panel performance KPIs. as is the case with any competitive industry bustling with cut-throat competition, rumor mills and conflicting agendas of different players, the transparency burden had been conveniently dumped on TAM. after all, we do see from time-to-time the so-called ‘open letters’ that certain channels would send out to TAM asking for explanations on why their blockbuster programs did not do well in terms of TRPs. Irrespective of where the answers for failure lie, these occasions, nonetheless, cast all sorts of aspersions on the trading currency and are hardly constructive. I haven’t seen a single such instance over the last decade produce any positive reaction – either in providing more answers on causality nor a bettering of the ratings system. and these instances surely can’t be healthy for the industry that has dependencies on advertising that in turn needs TV measurement.

     

    It’s high time the industry associations, perhaps via BARC, put their necks on the block and take frontal onus and responsibilities on transparency elements that will boost confidence on TV Ratings. Not only will this sharing of burden save the industry the blushes in front of the advertisers, it will also have a correctional effect with the routine debates being laid to rest. Hopefully, BARC is able to bring in transparency by defining deliverables and quality parameters clearly to the Ratings vendor(s) in the new scheme of things.

     

    2. Evolving data reporting policies

    Transparency in KPIs will also have an effect on how TV ratings data should be reported in our industry. There are a host of mature markets, in particular theUK, that have a threshold viewership criteria for TV program ratings to meet; if those numbers have to be reported in the weekly data. This ensures that viewership estimates for very small channels and very niche programs inside very small market groups are not reported. However, in our market, if the 700th channel gets launched tomorrow, TV ratings for that channel for very small markets and microscopic audience definitions will be available. Lack of industry understanding and consensus has stopped from any policy to take shape and solidify in this specific issue. This, in turn, has led to a sad saga of inexplicable rating fluctuations for specialist channel genres in small markets/ audiences. With the BARC coming in, certain wise old men (and women) can roll out this policy of releasing viewership numbers of only those channels and programs that are in the permissible and acceptable error level range.

     

    3. Structural changes in panel construction

    The methodology for TV Ratings in India- especially the way panel homes are selected from a neighborhood has remained largely the same. The criteria is defined through Primary Control Variables, a system to carve out quotas of what sort of homes should be selected to enter the panel. However, the dramatic changes that have occurred in the last 5 years – that of DTH now forming a large part of the TV universe – requires the Primary Control Variables to reflect an acceptance of that new reality. Earlier, say 8-10 years ago, cable monopolies in a neighborhood within an area, city or town ensured homogeneity of received signals in spite of the heterogeneity of viewing. That signal homogeneity within the neighborhoods would ensure that thousands of homes within that area would receive the same input from their cablewallah into their TV sets. Today that cable structure lies shattered wherein one single neighborhood would have the cablewallah’s analogue signal in certain homes, his digital (CAS) box in certain households as well as scores of homes with DTH connections from 7 DTH providers.

     

    Now layer this information on the specific channels or channel packs subscribed by DTH or Digital Cable viewers – and you have a distribution complexity that snarls into existence, dramatically affecting TV viewership. This distribution factor needs to be well modeled inside the Primary Control Variables to construct the panel. It is not there at the moment and neither has there been an active industry debate on how to bring newer factors such as these into the panel construction/ panel design exercise.

     

    4. Critical Measurement/ Panel Decisions (including R&D, Technology)

    Consumer patterns of TV consumption are dramatically changing with the advent of set-top-boxes, recorders, mobile TV, and so on. Viewing is also happening when people are on the move rather than only in-home TV viewing. In India, ratings are reported only for in-home TV viewing. TV consumption on mobiles, tablets, IPTV, computers or outside-of-home is unmeasured. If these new patterns need to be measured, a significant emphasis would be needed on R&D. This R&D and Trial Panels have to be budgeted by a vibrant industry determined to capture every viewing instance so as to analyse and eventually monetize those audiences. It would be a disappointment and a terrible waste if BARC did not have this early in its agenda.

     

    5. TV Measurement Vision

    It might seem unbelievable but it is true – the largest customers and users of TV ratings info today do not have a common goal or vision for the future of TV measurement in our market. Issues such as Rural versus Urban, increase coverage vis-a-vis better representation, upscale versus mass-market – would find distinctly different views within the industry. In the absence of a common vision, the strategy to expand, enhance, improve the measurement system is clearly not going to be very effective. With a forum like BARC, the attempt should be to collectively define the vision as well as the timelines and path to attaining that goal by mobilizing opinion and the industry war-chest. This is, perhaps, the most crucial aspect of the success or failure of BARC, the failure of which would risk reducing this initiative into a rudderless and spineless wonder.

     

    6. CPM versus CPRP

    In the last few years, broadcasters have tried, albeit unsuccessfully, to correct a long standing trading currency aberration in our industry. While the world uses CPMs (Cost per thousand ad impressions) to price benchmark TV ad inventory, our market has erroneously got locked into CPRPs (Cost Per Rating Points) – thanks to the myopic vision of media agency AORs of the 90s. While the entire industry (including media agency heads who publicly oppose change but privately admit its fairness) wants transition to the correct trading currency, the longstanding question has been who will do it first on both ends – advertisers and channels. Perhaps with BARC, the opportunity is in planning that roll-out as a coordinated industry action.

     

    7. Redressal Forum

    One of the biggest opportunities for BARC is to streamline the custom arguments, debates and requirements that individual players have on TV ratings into an ever evolving bucket of policies. In the current scheme of things, individual players have their differences with the TV ratings company, but not really have an escalation route to get their views heard. These issues range from pricing (dis)parity to use of raw data to choice of ratings software to conflicting TAM’s policy of not selling their data to certain client categories. Perhaps the most common arguments relate to unexplained fluctuations and peaks-troughs in the ratings data.

     

    BARC would be better served to pursue an approach built on open, transparent debates and a clever commercial policy in such instances that might see lesser open issues but greater revenues into the industry kitty.

     

    Summing up…

    The above piece is my attempt to get a constructive dialogue out in the open on a matter that deeply concerns TV Media professionals cutting across organizational lines. I personally have tremendous respect for professionals in this stream including those within the TAM Executive team as well as the industry folks driving the BARC initiative. It is my sincere hope that a constructive dialogue followed by clear and rapid forward actions by stakeholders leads to the World’s finest and biggest TV measurement initiative! amen…

     

    Atul Phadnis is Chief Executive, WHAT’S-ON-INDIA

     

  • Ensuring a "must carry" clause for all TV channels and putting an end to their regulatory pricing wherein TRAI mandates the price that viewers pay for every channel, are also critical to revive the sick TV broadcasting industry

    Govt can plug revenue leakage by banning carriage fees, says broadcasting industry

    By A Correspondent

     

    Industry sources have said that banning carriage fees in the new digitisation of cable distribution regime w.e.f July 1 is necessary to ensure that government can plug the huge revenue leakage upwards of Rs10,000 crore annually due to cable companies levying huge carriage fees and grossly under-declaring their subscriber base.

     

    Moreover, ensuring a “must carry” clause for all TV channels and putting an end to their regulatory pricing wherein TRAI mandates the price that viewers pay for every channel, are also critical to revive the sick TV broadcasting industry, which continues to reel under the triple burden of usurious carriage fees, regulated tariffs for their channels as well as getting a fraction of their due subscriber revenues.

     

    At present, over nine-tenths of TV channels are in the red and are unable to invest in quality programming, while many smaller/niche channels with big-ticket pedigrees – Imagine TV being the latest – have had to shut down.

     

    Another fallout of these distorted industry practices has been that potential new export avenues have closed, because India is not able to export television formats and finished content – while other industries like software, music and animation (which do not suffer such a usurious regulatory/industry scenario) have been big-ticket forex earners for over a decade.

     

    Industry sources said that TV channels collectively paid at least Rs3,500 crore last fiscal to cable companies and distributors as carriage and placement fees, of which news channels alone paid at least Rs1,500 crore. These carriage fees turned many profitable TV channels immediately into the red, thus denying the government a large income tax earning opportunity upwards of Rs1,000 crore per year.

     

    According to another industry estimate, given the estimated subscription revenues of all MSOs/LCOs in the country, the government has lost about Rs5,950 crore over the five-year period from 2006 to 2011 in service tax alone by reason of under-declaration while the evasion of income tax is about Rs17,413 crore over the five-year period 2006 to 2011; and loss of entertainment tax by states is in addition to that amount.

     

    Additionally, TRAI had, itself mentioned in a March 2010 paper that “there is evidence of tax evasion in the cable industry…the last publicly available CBEC report of 2005-06 shows only Rs75 crore of service tax being collected from the industry on a base of 68 million subscribers paying an average of Rs165 per month, the estimated service tax collection from analog cable should be in the range of Rs1,400 crore per annum”.

     

    Another estimate – from HSBC for 2011 – says that the government lost around Rs1,380 crore last year in entertainment and service taxes alone due to cable companies under-declaring their subscriber base by as much as four-fifths. This estimate assumed the potential revenue to government at Rs1,725.90 crore given a Rs165 ARPU for 67 million analog pay TV households and entertainment tax at Rs20 per household along with 12 per cent service tax.

     

    But because only 20 per cent or 13 million households are disclosed, the actual revenues collated were estimated to be only Rs 345 crore even as TV channels lost out on the bulk of their subscriber fees. These practices have ensured that India now has a cash-rich last mile; India already has the third-largest TV distribution industry in the world where viewers can and are willing to pay for content – borne out by the fact that pay TV penetration is as much as 80 per cent in India, which is amongst the highest in the world.

     

    On the contrary, TV channels, who actually create the content, get less than a fifth of what viewers actually pay the cable companies. However, broadcasters say that the only opportunity to correct these distortions and ensure that TV channels do not continue to close due to extraneous factors, lies in the digitisation of cable distribution, for which the government is currently putting together relevant rules.

     

    Under this, it will be mandatory for all viewers to get a digital set-top box and for operators to distribute channels in a digital and addressable format. This will give viewers a wider choice of channels with better viewing quality. In fact, digitisation is now being seen as the game changer for the entire Indian TV industry as it will also significantly benefit distributors the multisystem operators – (MSOs) and local cable operators (LCOs) – whose paying base will improve even further.

     

    In this regard, Dr Prannoy Roy, chairman, NDTV told ET, that “digitisation of cable distribution is a major step towards making India’s media achieve truly global quality”. However, Rajat Sharma, chairman, India TV, pointed out that digitisation will be “meaningless unless all channels are made available to the consumer and he is given the power to make a choice”.

     

    He told ET that this can be done “only if it is mandatory for the cable operators to carry all channels and ensure that set-top boxes have the capability to carry more than 500 channels” and added that the government must curb any effort to create an artificial scarcity at the head end or in the box in carrying the channels.

     

    Pointing to the other issue of price controls on TV channels, Uday Shankar, president, Indian Broadcasting Federation, told ET: “IBF has always believed that channel pricing should be kept under regulatory forbearance and market forces should be allowed to discover channel valuations. Internationally, apart from countries like China or Taiwan, there are no instances of government regulating the pricing of channels. Freedom in pricing is essential for channels to offer best in class, quality programming. In the absence of this freedom, broadcasters are compelled to somehow match spiraling input costs with regulated prices thereby running the risk of compromising quality”.

     

    He added that there is enough competition in every genre to “remove any fears of exorbitant pricing”, given that the consumer has a choice between multiple DTH platforms and cable operators and “as a result of that, we have seen that the ARPUs have been flat to down”.

     

    Source: The Economic Times
    Copyright © 2012, Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved

     

  • The much awaited TRAI order on tariffs is out paving the way for the digitisation regime in metros starting July 1

    TRAI issues tariff order for cable TV

    By A Correspondent

     

    The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India issued the Tariff Order and Interconnection Regulations for the Digital Addressable Cable TV Systems late yesterday.

     

    While the Tariff Order has been issued as an amendment to the existing Tariff Order for addressable systems, the Interconnection Regulation is comprehensive one for the Digital Addressable Cable TV Systems.

     

    As per the communiqué, here are the salient features:

     

    1. All channels (pay and free-to air) to be offered on a-la-carte basis to subscribers.

     

    2. There will be a Basic Service Tier (BST) consisting of a minimum of 100 free-to air (FTA) channels comprising at least 5 channels of each genre namely news and current affairs, infotainment, sports, kids, music, lifestyle, movies and general entertainment in Hindi, English and regional language of the concerned region. 18 channels of Public Broadcaster and Lok Sabha channel will also form the part of the BST. While Multi-system Operator (MSO) has to offer the Basic Service Tier, it is not obligatory for subscriber to subscribe to the BST. Instead subscriber can form his own package of a maximum of 100 FTA channels.

    In either case the MSO cannot charge the subscriber more than Rs100 per month.

     

    3. It shall be open to the subscriber to subscribe to the BST or one or more FTA channels or one or more Pay channels or bouquets offered by MSO or any combination of these.

     

    4. In case subscriber chooses Pay channel(s) with or without FTA channel(s) the MSO can fix a minimum monthly subscription not exceeding Rs150. If the total value of the channels/ bouquets opted by the subscriber exceeds Rs150 then actual subscription charges has to be paid.

     

    5. The basic purpose of digitisation is to ensure ample choice to the consumer as well as to enable him to budget his subscription according to his paying capacity. Accordingly, the Authority has mandated MSOs to carry a minimum of 500 channels from 1.1.2013. However, keeping in view that the smaller MSOs having less than 25000 subscribers may need some additional time for building the capacity, they have been given time up to 1.4.2013. Besides, to ensure that the consumer is not adversely affected, the Authority has prescribed that every MSO should have a minimum capacity to carry 200 channels from July 1, 2012. Authority expects that all the MSOs operating in areas of Phase-II onwards to take suitable measures to enhance the channel carrying capacity to 500 channels.

     

    6. Only those MSOs that have the requisite capacity, as mentioned above, can invoke ‘must provide’ clause. The broadcasters shall not provide their channels to MSOs who have channel carrying capacity of less than 200 channels immediately and less than 500 channels from 1.1.2013 or 1.4.2013 in case of smaller MSOs.

     

    7. The Broadcaster would enjoy ‘must carry’ provision from 1.1.2013 or 1.4.2013 as the case may be, for Hindi, English and channels in the regional language of the concerned area.

     

    8. The provision relating to amount charged by broadcaster to MSO remains unchanged. They can charge a maximum of 42 per cent of the rate, they charge in the non-addressable systems.

     

    9. The Authority has addressed the issue relating to the Carriage Fee. Keeping in view the fact that substantial investment for implementation of Digital Addressable Cable TV Systems is made by the MSO and the cost involved in carriage of channels, the Authority has decided that every MSO may fix the Carriage Fee. However, it should be published in the Reference Interconnect Offer and applied in a uniform, non-discriminatory and transparent manner. The Carriage Fee cannot be revised upward for a minimum of 2 years. The Authority would intervene in case it is felt that the Carriage Fee is unreasonable.

     

    10. The MSOs can fix the retail tariff and also package and price offerings. However, the sum of the a-la-carte rates of channels, forming part of a bouquet, shall not exceed 1.5 times the rate of the bouquet. Further, the a-la-carte rate of any channel shall not exceed 3 times the average channel rate of the bouquet.

     

    11. The July 2010 Tariff Order provides that the revenue share between the MSO and LCO shall be based on mutual negotiations. The Authority has now prescribed that in case the mutual negotiations fail, the revenue share shall be in the ratio of 55:45 (MSO: LCO) for BST or FTA channels. The revenue share for Pay channels or bouquet of Pay channels with or without FTA channels shall be in the ratio of 65:35 (MSO: LCO).

     

    12. Implementation of Digital Addressable Cable TV Systems will lead to better choice to consumers, variety and quality of content, adequate revenue to stakeholders and healthy environment for the industry in addition to bringing in transparency in the business transactions and subscriber base. It would also ensure that the Government receives the due revenue.

     

    Details of the Interconnection Regulations and Tariff Order are available on TRAI website: www.trai.gov.in.

     

  • The TRAI chairman has said in a television interview that the TRAI will not relook at the recommendations on carriage fee

    No comebacks on Tariff Order: TRAI chairman

    By A Correspondent

     

    While the News Broadcasters Association has protested against the tariff order for digital cable TV issued by TRAI on April 30, saying that the order ‘legalized’ carriage fee, TRAI Chairman JS Sarma has maintained that there is no cause for dissatisfaction on carriage fee.

     

    In an interview to NDTV 24×7, Mr Sarma said: “Carriage fee is now a well-regulated issue and it should be transparent. We will intervene if required but we won’t relook at the recommendations.”

     

    The NBA claims, “The primary purpose of digitization was to increase the number of channels broadcasted. The objective was to give consumers greater choice and to eliminate the phenomenon of ‘carriage fees’, which were being charged due to capacity constraints. However, the NBA is distressed and disappointed that TRAI’s new notification has actually legalized the practice of ‘carriage fees’ and given distributors the freedom to unilaterally set the amount of ‘carriage fees’ broadcasters must pay.”

     

    The TRAI has also prescribed that the MSOs increase their channel carrying capacity. In its recommendation, MSOs have been mandated to carry a minimum of 500 channels by January 1, 2013. TRAI stated in its order, “The Authority has mandated MSOs to carry a minimum of 500 channels from January 1, 2013. However, keeping in view that smaller MSOs having less than 25,000 subscribers may need some additional time for building capacity, they have been given time up to April 1, 2013.”

     

    The TRAI has prescribed that every MSO should have a minimum capacity to carry 200 channels by July 1.

     

    The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) convened a board meeting to discuss the issues pertaining to the TRAI order. A press statement is scheduled to be released on the issue later today.

     

  • The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) has welcomed the Tariff Order but sought clarity on carriage fees that are crippling the industry

    IBF welcomes Tariff Order, seeks clarity on Carriage

    By A Correspondent

     

    The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) has welcomed the initiatives taken by the I & B Ministry and TRAI in bringing about much needed reforms in the cable sector.

     

    The Tariff amendments and the new Interconnect regulations for Digital Addressable Cable brought about by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) will inject necessary transparency across the value chain. With a slew of consumer friendly measures – namely choice of packages and introduction of Basic Service Tier, TRAI has ensured that all subscribers of varied socio economic background are duly taken care of and provided for. IBF also welcomes the mandate to enhance the channel carrying capacity to a minimum of 200 channels wef July 1, 2012 and 500 channels wef January 1, 2013.

     

    The new interconnect regulations have brought within its wake the much awaited specifications for digital addressability while at the same time laying down the eligibility criteria for availing signals. The reporting requirements will help the government in plugging leakages while the provisions on disconnection of signals will ensure that all stakeholders are aware of their rights and obligations.

     

    Overall the Tariff Order and the Interconnect Regulations read with the amended Cable TV Act and Rules are steps in the right direction and will help the country to make the digital transition.

     

    However, a big area of concern for Broadcasters is Carriage Fee. The Broadcasters have taken up this issue in various discussions with the TRAI and the Government in the past. Carriage Fee has crippled various broadcasters, especially the smaller sized companies, and it has restricted a broadcaster’s ability to invest in content and other activities of a channel. Therefore, there is an urgent need to revisit this issue and IBF will seek clarity on this matter from TRAI.

     

    India is on the threshold of a digital makeover and IBF trusts that this will, over a period of time, make way for more freedom to stakeholders as digitalization acquires critical mass and the country gains more confidence in bridging the digital divide.

     

  • Assocham organized the 6th annual summit on entertainment and media, Focus 2012 where the topic in focus was Digitization for Inclusive Growth

    Full report of Assocham ‘focus’ on M&E

    By Shruti Pushkarna

     

    Assocham organized the 6th annual summit on entertainment and media, Focus 2012, inNew Delhion May 4 where the topic in focus was Digitization for Inclusive Growth. The event began with a keynote address by the Chairman of Press Council of India, Justice Markandey Katju, who came down heavily on the media once again, in his address.

     

    Justice Katju referred to the role played by the European media between the 17th and 19th century. He talked about the sacrifices made by writers like Voltaire, Rousseau and Thomas Paine to uplift the society and help it convert from a feudal state to a modern society. He criticised the Indian media for promoting superstition in form of cheap astrology shows on news television channels all day instead of promoting rational and scientific ideas. He said: “The function of the media is to uplift the intellectual levels of citizens, but our media instead has stooped down to the level of Indians, of which 90 per cent are fools.” He said that in the race for TRPs, the television channels focus on entertainment which constitutes 90 per cent of programming and leaves only 10 per cent room for real issues to be telecast.

     

    Justice Katju urged media professionals to play a socially responsible role at a time whenIndia, likeEuropein the 17th century, is going through a transitional phase. He emphasized on the need to promote rational ideas in this period of transition in Indian history. He also emphasized on the need for regulation as opposed to self regulation. He said, “I am the greatest fighter for freedom for press and that’s why I am not recommending control but regulation. In control, there is no freedom but in regulation there is reasonable restriction in the public interest.”

     

    Self regulation is no regulation, he added: “You cannot have absolute freedom to harm society. There is need for regulation, and this regulation cannot be from the government, it has to be from an independent regulatory authority which has penal powers.”

     

     

    Broadcasting & Digitization: India Goes Digital- Challenges & Way Forward

    The session on broadcasting and digitization was chaired by Supriya Sahu, Joint Secretary (Broadband & Policy), Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The session was moderated by Preet Dhupar, Director, BBC World,India. The panelists included Anthony D’Silva, Group CEO, Sun Group; Hemant Upadhyay, Advisor, VOICE; Jehangir S Pocha, CEO, INX News; Roop Sharma, President, COFI; Vishal Mahajan, Sr. Director, Yes Bank; Himanshu Patel, COO Videocon D2H; Ashok Mansukhani, President, MSO Alliance; Joy Chakraborthy, CEO, TV Today Network; Pulak Bagchi, VP, Star India and SM Khan, DG, DD News.

     

    During the discussion, Ms Sahu said that the work on digitization, especially Phase 1, which looks at the four metros, was on track and with help from all stakeholders the government should be able to push digitization to happen in time. She defended the TRAI tariff order: “It is a win-win situation for every stakeholder. The clear winner, of course, is the consumer.” She said that the cities were almost ready for digitization, the government had made good progress as far as procurement of set top boxes (STBs) is concerned and the only area that needs attention is the seeding of these boxes. She agreed that for the target date to be achieved, around 20-25 lakh STBs have to be seeded and that makes it 1 lakh STBs to be seeded every day.

     

     

    Representing the MSO Alliance, Mr Mansukhani congratulated the government on taking up the challenge of digitization. He agreed that there were some concerns and issues on which they will seek clarification from the TRAI. He reiterated the commitment to digitization on part of MSOs and urged newspapers and business channels to clearly present all points of view to the debate on digitization.

     

    Ms Roop Sharma, President, COFI expressed hers and the cable operators’ disappointment at order issued by TRAI. She claimed that the order was unfair to LCOs and will result in putting them out of business: “Regulator wants to be the controller of the industry…the role of the regulator is very bad. We are all for digitization, but we are unhappy with the revenue share that has been decided in the order.” She added that 60 days are too less to meet the challenges of digitization and it is unlikely that the sunset date for Phase 1 is achievable.

     

    Jehangir Pocha, CEO INX News shared the plight of the broadcasters with the panelists on the issue of carriage fee. He said that a channel like Times Now had to pay a carriage fee of Rs50-55 crore to reach the viewers. He said: “I can’t applaud this order. Those who applaud this regulation perhaps benefit from it. It is the first time in the history ofIndiathat carriage fee is legalized, institutionalized and not regulated.” He said that the government claims to have taken the views of all stakeholders involved but their views were taken only in theory and not in spirit.

     

    The TRAI in its recommendations stated: “Keeping in view the fact that substantial investment for implementation of Digital Addressable Cable TV Systems is made by the MSO and the cost involved in carriage of channels, the Authority has decided that every MSO may fix the Carriage Fee.” But Mr Pocha argued that why should a channel pay for MSO investment. He said he would like the government to issue a white paper that looks at the earnings of all players.

     

    Sun Group CEO Anthony D’Silva said that the need of the hour is to get down to the nitty-gritties: “The lessons learnt from DTH are applicable to any other digital system. We need to look at how the subscriber management systems will work, what are the service parameters and who’ll set up the call centres because that involves huge costs.” He added that the government needs to look at  digitization as any other infrastructure project and support it by whatever means, whether its tax holiday or any other subsidies.

     

    Pulak Bagchi, VP, Star India expressed a need to recognize the challenge government and the regulator had in thinking through the entire process of digitization and the fact that it’s difficult to make everyone happy. He said: “Government and regulator are out there to protect the public interest and not to add to company bottom lines. We entrepreneurs need to work out our own course.”

     

    Responding to the issues voiced by the various panelists, Ms Sahu said: “All concerns are genuine and we would try and address them as well as we can but please read the fine print to clarify some of the concerns.” As for cable operators, she said that if cable operators don’t move to digitization fast enough, they will be wiped out by competition from DTH.

     

     

    Films, Animation and VFX: Digital Cinema- Present and Future

    The session was moderated by Karan Ahluwalia, Executive VP, Yes Bank and the panelists included, Ramesh Meer, CEO The FX Factory; Sunaman Sood, Co-founder, Director, Acendo Capital Advisors; Siddhartha M Jain, Producer@iRock; Vishnu Patel, CEO-Special projects, UFO Moviez and Manoj Srivastava, CEO, Enternainmentt Society of Goa.

     

    Siddhartha M Jain of iRock started the discussion by talking about the paradigm shift occurring in cinema: “Low budget films without stars which used to be niche earlier are picking up. We’ve had hits like Ragini MMS and Vicky Donor. So there is huge investor appetite, provided you have the right content. The key lies in keeping the budgets low and using the latest technology.” He added that there is also a huge power shift happening from Bollywood movies to movies outside Hindi cinema.

     

    Sunaman Sood said that producers have now begun to treat regional cinema with some seriousness, realising its potential. But Manoj Srivastava added that there is no platform or agency in the country that promotes regional cinema well enough.

     

    Speaking of digitization’s benefits to cinema, Vishnu Patel said that digital technology has helped revive the industry which was otherwise on a decline. He said that regional cinema has also benefitted from digital technology because digitization has cut down the distribution cost in terms of prints. Now regional film producers can distribute their films better without having to worry about prints’ costs.

     

     

    Print Media: Challenges and Opportunities in Digital Age

    The session was chaired by Suprio Guha Thakurta, MD, The Economist Group India. The session was moderated by Vikas Mehta, VP & Executive Business Director, JWT Delhi. The panelists included, Sukumar Ranganathan, Editor, Mint; Vandana Das, President, DDB Mudra;Sudha Sarin,MD, Ipan Hill & Knowlton and Raghav Subramanian, COO, Lintas Initiative Media.

     

    Sukumar Ranganathan initiated the debate by making a strong point that print is here to stay: “We often look at the western trends to decide the future of print in the country but we forget that the dynamics of the western market are very different from the Indian market.” He said that Mint has never defined itself as a newspaper; rather it looks at itself as a ‘newsroom’. Talking about integration of content, he said: “We update a story online as soon as it breaks. We also use social media to amplify the news. And in the paper, we value add with analysis and so on. I think integration is key to what a newspaper needs to do to survive in a digital area.”

     

    Suprio Guha Thakurta echoed Mr Ranganathan’s views but he also emphasized on the fact that content for every platform needs to be looked at differently: “You can’t just cut and paste from print to online or any other device.” He added that The Economist, which at present has about 85 per cent of subscriptions from print, aims at converting these into at least 50 per cent in digital in the next two years.

     

    Raghav Subramanian said: “It’s not that print is going to go away but it’s being increasingly threatened by digitization. Print is slow as a medium and now with news all over the place, the tangible paper is eroding in terms of the first choice for the younger generation.”

     

    Concluding the debate, all panelists agreed on the need to integrate content across different media to reach out to consumers/viewers/readers at different touch points.

     

     

    Radio and Music: New Avenues for Revenue/ Social Media & Gaming: Creating New Markets

    The last two sessions on radio and gaming were merged into one discussion. The session was moderated by Uday Chawla, Secretary General, AROI and the panelists included, Anand Raj, Head- Non Traditional Revenue, Red FM; Geetanshu Anand, Head- Content, Mystica Music; Pallab Mitram Head- Consumer VAS, Tata Teleservices; Deepak Abbot, Head- Product, Zapak Digital Entertainment Pvt Ltd; Nikunj Jain, CEO, Inoxapps; Anshu Mor, Lead Entertainment & Media, Microsoft; CP Singh, CTO, Possible Worldwide; Akhilesh Saurikhia, Consultant, Department of Electronic and IT, Govt of India and Viraj Malik, CEO & MD, PK Online Ventures Pvt Ltd.

     

    Anand Raj of Red FM talked about alternate revenue avenues that radio stations can look at. He said that audio production is an unorganized market right now and if radio stations start looking at doing audio productions in-house, there is huge potential for revenues. He also pointed out initiative like the Mahabharata or Ramayana productions done by Fever and how radio stations can look at making money by selling productions like these to VAS mobile operators. Another area that radio stations haven’t exploited properly he said was social media. He said that radio can look at building communities on social media for commerce.

     

    Geetanshu Anand of Mystica Music said: “There is no lack of avenues for revenues; all we need to do is fill up the loopholes for revenues.” Radio industry, she said, plays a crucial role in promotion of music but when it comes to rights sharing then both radio and music companies get selfish and each wants a larger pie. She said that the need for the hour was to review the statutory licenses. She also said that it is important for radio to start promoting non-film music alongside film music.

     

    Talking about gaming and creating new markets for it, Anshu Mor of Microsoft said: “It’s important for us as an industry to change the concept of gaming and how we look at gaming.” He added that social media provides with an opportunity to promote the ‘Brand Me’ and hence plays a huge role in marketing.

     

    Viraj Malik added that mobile gaming is on a rise and will turn into a larger opportunity inIndiabecause mobile is fairly big in terms of reach and affordability. And this creates a huge opportunity for content and app developers, he said.