Category: Awards

  • Upclose with Rajesh ‘Kyoorius’ Kejriwal

     

    First a disclaimer. MxMIndia is an active trade partner of the Kyoorius Designyatra and Digiyatra. But that’s not the reason why we are carrying this extra looooong interview. Even if we say it ourselves, the interview with Rajesh Kejriwal is a must-read as there’s nothing written between the lines. Mr Kejriwal talks about why his awards are not called the Yellow Pencil even though there is a tie-up with D&AD, on Goafest and how it’s different from his event and what according to him the Goafest organizers should do… and how he doesn’t allow his event sponors to have a say in the speaker line-up of the twin conference (to be held in Goa from August 29 to 31)

    Read on…

     

    How’s Design Yatra 2013 going to be different from the previous years?

    It’s not going to be very different from that of the previous years. As a format, we look at content and select an appropriate theme. Our theme defines who our speakers are going to be, what our content is going to be etc. So anything that is going to be different is the theme this year and that is: to create change. So everybody over there is going to be talking about how to create change… whether advertising can create change or can branding create a change or can digital create change…or if digital can create change then we will have some people who have created that changed by using the digital medium.

     

    Design or re-design is generally about change or is there more to it?

    Sometimes design in India is about change but mostly it is cosmetic. We are not talking about cosmetic changes here. One thing you’ll see is a lot of companies say that we have changed this logo to another one etc but in essence nothing much has changed. Change is more about what have you done internally; what have you done to connect or engage with your consumer or how transparent you have become with the digital age coming up etc. With the onset of digital, you could be saying you are the best but there are people out there who think you are not. What change can design help achieve or how can design help make a change in an organization should be the way forward.

     

    One of things people tell us about the Designyatra is that it more of branding and graphics and less of stuff like product design or architecture etc. Justified comment?

    When we started Design Yatra we were very clear that we are in the visual communication business where we look at branding, digital, packaging, graphic design etc. We were never what we call into product design or architecture or stuff like that. But over the years, it has been felt that one can’t be independent of the other. An architect can’t create a building and then call a designer and say hey, do the graphics. They have to work together because the times have changed today. Designyatra serves as a platform inspiration, innovation, ideas etc and for this we just can’t have visual communication designers. So we always have an installation designer. Most of the times we have an architect or one product designer. This year also we have a product designer but am I product heavy? No. I am still going to be visual heavy.

     

    And will that change at all or is it a conscious decision?

    It’s a conscious decision because the thing is that there is no infrastructure in India to give me space for more than 1300 people at a venue. I get that kind of crowd anywhere so am I going to add certain more things and get people from another segment and reduce the impact of the number of people coming from this segment? No. My thing has always been that we are essentially a platform. And I can’t say a platform and then deny an opportunity. We get a lot of enquiries from Italy, UK, Netherlands, Dubai, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia etc but we don’t entertain them so much because I only have capacity for 1300 people and 80 percent of them are repeat audiences who come for that one particular thing. So I don’t want to get too much into it but if I find something is interesting for this community I would bring that in.

     

    The other comment about Designyatra is that it is very rich in content. You’ve attended many other conferences. What is that you offer that others aren’t able to do?

    I think we were in the same space where others were in 2006. We look and say hey, we are a conference…we need to have 12 speakers for say two days so let’s get eight big names and six good names. Today, we have moved away from that and we have said let’s look at people who have made something different. So one, we never call a speaker out of the blue. We first set a theme for the conference then we do research on the basis of that theme like who the speaker should be and this research takes almost of three four months. That is I think what a lot of conference guys don’t do. They say, hey, let’s call her or him… send out invites, get confirmations etc. That’s not what we do.

     

    How much time in advance do you plan for this?

    As we speak we have already started planning for next year. We have six speakers confirmed for 2014.

     

    And are there any pulls and pressures? Are there any people who want to be there?

    We get about 20 requests every year.

     

    And how many do you accept?

    Two.

     

    Two out of twenty? Aren’t you being harsh?

    Doesn’t fit the theme sometimes, sometimes people want to come… lot of them want to come because they want a free ticket…

     

    Are there pressures from sponsors – people who are associated with them? Do you accept those?

    No, because where there is pressure we don’t take them on as sponsors.

     

    So you have that as a very clear part of your deal?

    Yes a very clear part, in black-and-white that we will not give any speaker slot to any sponsor. For example, we have had situations where we had to have a speaker because he is a good speaker so that year we do not take him as a sponsor. We tell them to come on as a sponsor next year, but not this year. So we are very clear that sponsors and speakers won’t happen simultaneously.

     

    While you have revived your awards this year, one of the worries is that awards take away from the conference. What’s your view on this?

    Two ways of looking at it. One is whether an award adds an element to the conference or whether it takes the thunder away from the conference. We are not like Cannes or other such events that have a lot of glamour attached to it. We are more about prestige and credentials. We are very serious about the awards and that is why we tied up with D&AD and the process that D&AD follows is very strict. For us it is just that if we have this community of 1300 people and if the right audience is present then why not have an evening of awards? And the awards are happening in the evening; it’s not disturbing the content of the conference in anyway. It’s just a single evening of the three days!

     

    The thing about awards is that while it makes a lot of people happy there are also many who are unhappy. Your views on awards being politicized or critiqued by an unhappy few?

    I think the politics of awards happens when there is a politics of judging and I feel that if you don’t have politics in judging then there won’t be politics of awards. People will be unhappy but I think it’s time India grows up and people should realize that if you have good work you get awarded and if you don’t have good work  then you don’t get awarded. And it’s not that they don’t have good work, it’s just that someone else has done better.

     

    You were also there at this year’s Goafest. How is Designyatra different from Goafest?

    I will start from the beginning. If you look at Goafest and us, we have D&AD as partners who I think are one of the most prestigious and the credible awards institution today. Also they have been the people who been doing the entire process control for the awards. Secondly, a lot of these award shows don’t have judges that come and sit down, debate, talk and judge on ground… most of them are done online where people are sitting in different parts of the world, giving some point system and then you also have the leeway for, as you said, the politics of judging.

     

    In our case we flew in international jury members and the D&AD people were there to monitor the entire judging session. Nobody else other than D&AD and jury were allowed…even I was kicked out of it from the first two days when the main thing happened. None of the Kyoorius team was allowed there and they sat, they nominated, they shortlisted first, they discussed the nominations… the D&AD people made sure that they discussed every entry in detail and that allows it to be very fair in its judging.

     

    What other difference do you see between the two events?

    I don’t think Goafest has a conference. It has 3000 people but only about 400 or 300 people attend the conference. I think that’s difference with us as we have more delegates at our conferences. I don’t think Goafest focuses so much on the tradition of conference as much as it does on the whole thing as a festival. And both have their own space. Goafest is about enjoying the festival and we are about serious content, innovation, inspiration, ideas… they are two different things. So should Goafest change completely and make its conference very serious, I am not sure because the fun element is also necessary. So it just depends on where you want to go.

     

    So then why do it in Goa? You could have done it in Mumbai or someplace else…

    In Mumbai you can’t have the fun element. I have tried it one year. But I think what was different was that when you tried it here, it didn’t work well on the networking front. I think the major part of the conference is about networking. People meet after a year, you meet so many of your friends, you meet new contacts, you have clients coming…we have 300 clients who are non-designers coming to the conference and this is a opportunity for networking. In Mumbai, the moment the conference ends everybody is like, ‘I have to go home’ or people go to meet up with friends. Once you come to Goa, you don’t have clients, you don’t have an office to badger you, you don’t have anywhere to go… so you are in the evening at the conference busy networking. In Goa, everybody is relaxed and stay concentrated on the conference and that I think is big. So that’s the reason we moved back to Goa.

     

    How would you assess your association with D&AD given that they have their own style of judging and running an awards show?

    I think they are great partners. There are two things to an award at a conference. First, I think over a period of time you either build yourself as very credible with good credentials…so if you win, for example, we have elephants as a trophy and if you win a blue elephant it means you have really done something worthwhile. We don’t have gold, bronze or silver. In some categories there has been no winner because the jury decided that none of the nominees qualified to reach the benchmark criteria that D&AD and Kyoorius together had set to be a winner. So in two categories there were no winners while in one category we have had four winners.

     

    One of the other things that a couple of the jury members told me some of the better design works from India haven’t entered the competition. How do you ensure this is taken care of going forward?

    I think this was the first year so there is always a learning curve when you do it the first time and lot of people especially design studios do not have faith in awards so they don’t necessarily participate. That is why I said D&AD and Kyoorius is about being credible is what will get these entries in…everybody wants to be recognized but everybody wants to be recognized as being credible and not being one among the many. And D&AD ensures that but I have met people who have said oh, I have won at Cannes and that’s it…they are happy that they have won in Cannes. And then they win a D&AD Pencil and they say wow, I won a Yellow Pencil and normally these people who take the Pencil home, leave the Cannes trophy in the agency. That’s the amount of pride one gets when winning a Yellow Pencil verses a Cannes…that’s where I think if you have something really credible along that good work will also come.

     

    Why didn’t you give the Yellow Pencil as the award for the Kyoorius Awards?

    We didn’t want to do that. You never know the partnership may not exist five years later, so we didn’t want to piggyback on them.

     

    Ufff, you are saying it on so many words.

    Why not be transparent?

     

    What if they read this and decided to drop you?

    They won’t because they know. They have come to us because we are transparent. I am not saying we are going to move away from the partnership but I also realized that they have a heritage, they have done so much good things…they have partnered with us and for us. That’s like an honour for me. This is the first partnership they have done globally. They have never partnered with anybody and that itself is good enough. Why would I want to piggyback on the Yellow Pencil and reduce it – I don’t want to do that; more for them than for us. I will be happy to have a Yellow Pencil; it automatically uplifts the whole experience…

     

    In a sense, you could have done the same thing without D&AD?

    We could have… we did it in 2007 where we had what we call Kyoorius Verdict. There is an experience then there is credibility and the whole process of jury selection etc which they have finetuned for 50 years. I would have to go through a 3-4 years learning curve to do it by myself…

     

    Have you been hit by slowdown in terms of delegate participation?

    Yes, we had about 430 entries whereas normally we would have expected about 800 entries. We were priced very reasonably even if we were compared to any other award. I think a single entry was Rs 4500 but if you had five entries the participation came down to Rs 3200 per entry. Again it comes back to the same thing: If I price it at Rs 7000 I still get entries but I get entries only from larger agencies but there is this small boutique design studios who do good work. The question is: can they afford Rs 7000? May be or may be not…may be for one entry then they would not be able to participate in two categories or three categories because they can’t afford it. So if I build a platform, I need to make sure that everybody has an opportunity to take part in it.

     

    One more observation is that there are lot of designers across agencies and a sizeable or a small section of it are not English-literate. But at the Kyoorius Designyatra, English is the medium. Is that something that you are conscious about?

    We are conscious but what can we do? India is a nation with so many different cultures and so many different languages and you are talking from perspective that there is a Marathi guy who could not converse well in English but there is a Bengali guy, a Tamilian, a Malayali…

     

    How do you transcend that because if you have to take Kyoorius Designyatra to the next level, you have to get people who are not known, who may not be good in English. How do you get them in?

    What we are planning to do at Kyoorius is that through this event, which happens once a year but we meet we talk to so many people during this one-and-half months of preparation and maybe three days at the conference but then nothing for the next one year. So we are launching what we call Kyoorius FI Day. FI stands for Foreign Information Day and it’s just an evening. We plan to do this across India on month-on-month basis. So we may do about 20-odd next year but this will happen maybe four in Mumbai, two in Chennai, one in Kolkata, one in Kochi, two in Pune, four in Delhi, three in Bengaluru, one in Hyderabad and across India. So this will be one particular subject and it could be editorial design, broadcast design, typography…it could be strategy within branding, it could be design within branding, it could be packaging just for the FMGC sector. So when we do it in Kochi we are expecting to have one international speaker and one speaker from that area in South India.

     

    Will you at any point of time look at a design discussion happening in an Indian language – a non-English Indian language?

    I don’t know because if you see the young generation, they don’t want it in a local language. So if you are talking about the difference between languages it is only in between generation of 35 and above .I have seen it as I travelled across private schools etc.

     

    But the Mumbai scene could possibly be different from that of Kolkata…

    No, I have been to Chitrakala Parisad in Bengaluru which is a very local school. DJMD in Coimbatore…they are all completely English-speaking institutes. Maybe some of them are a little bit here and there and all of them are on Facebook so it has changed…you know what I call the new India, if you ask me, I would be very happy to do a conference in Indian languages but content in multiple Indian languages are not available that much.

     

    Getting back to Designyatra, what are the numbers you are expecting, since the confererence is a few days from now?

    We expect to have about 1300 people. We had a good 1300 people earlier but as you know the capacity of the hall is a problem. We could even get 1600 people but there is no infrastructure in India that will allow me to host that big number. Also, we sponsor about 250 students – that does not change. We make sure we have participation from all the 18-20 design schools. We sponsor about 50 faculty members to the conference…so 300 would fall in that category, 100 would be special invitees, speakers, press etc. 900 are professionals. Out of it, this year I am very happy to say that there are 300 people who are coming that are non-designers and are from marketing and corporate teams – brand managers or product managers…for me that is like brilliant. We never had this before. Companies like  Himalaya, Godrej, Titan watches, TCS, Nestle, Unilever, Proctor & Gamble have been sending people…

     

    You have more people than in Goafest…

    Surprisingly!

     

    I think Goafest should have you in the organizing committee?

    (laughs) No, I think what Goafest needs to do and I am being a bit vocal about it, what it needs to do is over a period of three years curate the conference element much more. You cannot have a 2000 sq ft hall to fit in 2000 people; there is nothing that 2000 people could hear so it should be curated in such a way that every audience out there has something to look back to and take back from there. You have a lot of young crowd coming there, so maybe you can take 500 of those and do something in terms of a half-day session with three or four speakers. It should be so interesting that those 500 people will forget about going to the beach but attend the sessions. Also, I think the trick is that if you have beer on the beach with rain dance and conference happening side by side, you have to decide where the people will want to go.

     

    You do have beer at Designyatra, don’t you?

    Not during the conference time; between 10-6pm nothing but 6-10pm we are okay with. And that’s really because we want people to stay back and talk to each other, network with each other, get introduced, build a network etc.

     

    Do you making money from the Designyatra?

    Okay, I have a favourite line which I am going to quote here – a we are not-for-profit organization. Last year I said this and I saw there was a lot of glamour attached where I was going to people and saying not-for-profit and stuff but then I said, this has cost me a lot of money. So last year I made a mandate that we should be not-for-loss organization. Not-for-profit is nice but not-for-loss is better. We started working at every one of our initiatives and seeing if it is sustainable. We don’t care whether we make money or not but we do care whether we lose money or not. So we are making each of our initiatives sustainable and we are saying that not-for-profit does not mean you cannot make profit, you should make profit and then see if you can use that money for something else. This year we made some…last year we sustained ourselves. This year I think we will be having some profits and we will be using that profit to launch something called Kyoorius Grant, which we will be launching at Designyatra. I am not going to tell you any more about it now. But it is something which we are making as a Fund for the student community, which they are not able to get in India so far. We eventually expect more people to donate more money other than from what we generate from the event to build scholarships etc.

     

    So Kyoorius is not for profit…

    Not for loss now!

     

    I see you spending all your time in Kyoorius. How do you make money? I do know about your paper business, but do you spend time on it?

    Last three years I wasn’t and to be honest, the last three years we went through a huge turmoil in our paper business because we decided to launch our own paper brand rather than selling brands from overseas. Selling brands from overseas is always restricted by what they want to sell in India rather than what Indians wanted here and we were making foreign brands more famous in India than Indian brands in India. I think the time has changed where I think Indian brands need to do build themselves up and go global. So we misaligned from all the foreign brands which we were selling which took us two years of non-compete clause. So there wasn’t much of paper business happening. This year, we launched our own brand and we are spending more time on that now. And I hope that all this design-led activities that we do at Kyoorius, which is about building a platform for the design community, we will see an equal reciprocation on behalf of the design community.

     

    Do you think there could be some conflict sometimes between the design unit and the paper brand and also the media and events division that you have under your umbrella?

    No, both are two different companies actually. We are keeping Kyoorius neutral. If you see our magazine, I don’t know about this issue but one of the past issues we had the other paper merchants who are our competitors advertising in it. So we are neutral. Kyoorius is not-for-profit or not-for-loss and we are open to it. In fact this year at Kyoorius Design Yatra, we had two paper merchants asking for stall space and we gave them both.

     

    Hmmmm.

    I think we should see the larger picture and not be single-minded. One should look at growing the industry and then maybe look at how to get a larger part of the share. But if you are too narrow-minded and you don’t grow the industry then you yourself are the major loser. So you build a community then build the market expand the base and then see how your division can get a larger market share.

     

    Will you ever be doing something for the packaging community, printers and all the others you target?

    We are trying to do that; now the objective of Kyoorius has changed. We are going to be looking at building the platform. So it will be the print community, maybe packaging community… Also, the second step is to look at design as wholesome…we may do a separate activity for the design industry that we have not yet dealt with which is about architecture, interiors etc. This year we launched Digiyatra specifically for the digital community. Next year, we may add something else. At some point of time, I would be happy to go for a one-week-long festival at Goa where different streams come together and where some people could stay for one week or one day, four days, etc.

     

  • Nothing curious about it: D&AD-powered Kyoorius Awards tonight

     

    As the Kyoorius Digiyatra and Designyatra take off today in Goa, the highlight of the day (and we guess the event) is the 2013 Kyoorius Awards which are being held in partnership with D&AD and IAA India Chapter*.

     

    But even as the awards are presented, as is in the case of most awards, it’s the culmination of many months of hectic activity. Last month, the judges went through each and every entry to pick the nominees and then the winners. The judges, under the supervision of D&AD’s operations manager Donal Keenan and Jury Foreman Sanky (Simon Sankarayya) went through the exercise with the rigour that a quality awards merits.

     

    The judges Elsie Nanji, Gabor Schreier, Jeremy Leslie, Simon Sankarayya (Sanky) (Jury Foreman), Tania Singh Khosla and Ton Van Bragt came together in Delhi to decide who should win with the Black and Blue Elephant and the Red Elephant for students. The Indian judges Elsie Nanji and Tania Singh Khosla helped the others in understanding the context and local nuances of various entries.

     

    MxMIndia engaged the jury members in a quick chat at the end of their meeting.

     

    Excerpts:

     

    Scam ads are a problem everywhere: Donal Keenan, D&AD
     

    Q&A with Donal Keenan, Senior Awards Operations Manager, D&AD who administered and supervised the 2013 Kyoorius Awards jury processAre you happy with the process that been followed..has it been easy?

    Oh, of course I am! That is why I am here. We are very much implementing D&AD’s process and judging coordination.

     

    Guess it was easy since some of the jury members have been on D&AD’s juries in the past?

    Not all of them, but some like Sanky and Jeremy have done it. But the judges really appreciate the process and the voting is completely impartial.

     

    We’ve had some issues with our own creative ad festival at Goafest. Issues of scams and plagiarism. How do you take care of these at D&AD?

    Scam ads are a problem everywhere. We have that in D&AD as well so certainly through the entry process… there is a client sign off for that entry as well. Of course that is not always reliable so the jury here too questioned the eligibility and status of certain entries. We acted on the spot and called the entrants or the clients to verify whether the work genuinely ran or if it was a poster, has it been display commercially. So we settled any kind of questions there and then.

     

    And how do you deal with plagiarism?

    There was one entry today that one of the judges brought up and said I have seen this before and I know people who have done something exactly like this. It that kind of balance of whether that you can respect that those people possibly did not know about this work and have done it on their own original thoughts or whether you think that they have actually think that they copied someone else and we need to get rid of this entry.

     

    Lastly, if the entries here were to be entered at D&AD internationally, do you think they would have stood a chance?

    Certainly the winners that we will see today they wouldn’t be out of place amongst the winners at D&AD. Part of the pact of the partnership with Kyoorius is that the winner will get a free entry and we will see them attending in next year for D&AD awards…for 2014 awards

     

    First off, how would you rate the standard of the entries that have been submitted at Design Yatra this year? Also, how does the jury process of this event compare vis-a-vis the other juries that you have been on elsewhere across the globe?

    [] The standard of work this year has been slightly high in terms of the fact that I thought we were fairly sure that we were going to have a high level of finished product but not sure about how the conceptual thinking would be compared to the finished product. But we found ourselves some really great ideas which were really well-delivered and also had great content and then the next task comes through. A couple of pieces were fairly iconic and the strongest categories were for stuff that was slightly more sustainable. This kind of illustrates a little bit about what’s going on in the country. That it is a place of change where people are recognizing that such needs have to be addressed; and also the design communities and the credit communities where a lot of such stuff can be answered. That is a really good message where you don’t just have to work for big brands and you don’t have to just work for yourself but that you can do great work by working with good briefs for clients not just with huge budgets but with more substance where the service is really effective.

     

    [] For those not familiar with the standard of judging in D&AD in London, it’s the one award worldwide which is of very high standard and the really keen creative people who are interested in very high standard of design work and advertising communication work, which is conceptual plus beautifully designed and executed work…it all sits in annals of D&AD. So that community of people in India, which is quite big, are very aware that D&AD is of very high standard and so they rate it as No 1. Everybody in India is almost scared to send in an entry to D&AD… apart from the fact that it is so expensive but so many people find it hard. Design companies are small compared to advertising companies who have big budgets to enter the awards while design companies are small and they don’t have the budget to find exactly what they think stands a chance to win an award in D&AD. Over here, the fees are so much less so maybe people don’t even know that even for that amount of money that you spend entering into Kyoorius, will give you the distinction that a D&AD can give you because this set of jury is almost dictated by choice from the D&AD and others. So that mix of jury who’s telling us and tempering the work, choosing with us… has maintained that standard of work.

     

    [] At Goafest and other festivals, everybody’s work is in that lot so everybody goes out of the room and sort of say to the others that these are my friends so I will give him one and the other one more etc…so it’s kind of incestuous. Over here, it’s really fair because nobody knows anybody. So fairness and that distinction that D&AD has has been transferred very well and you know partnered with Kyoorius has been the focal point.

     

    [] I also think that this will give Indian designers more confidence to actually apply to D&AD. I don’t know how many actually do we have from India that apply but because we have a selection from here, the winners get a free entry into D&AD which is a big thing. It is a really big thing because it is an expensive award to enter so you are going to have more entries from here going there and I think it will encourage them further. Also, the standards will go up which I think is great.

     

    What is your view on the works that have come in from India?

    [] I have always noticed that there are beautiful pockets of work but this time it’s coming from the design agencies. In the past I have seen it coming most of the times from advertising agencies. It has been my regret actually as to why is it that only advertising people enter Design Awards? It has been that way at Spikes, at Cannes, in D&AD and Goafest…all four places. I often ask people that how many of these entries come from advertising agencies and they say about 80%. So if you are going to judge that kind of work where so much of it is not real, so much of it is created for the awards – and we all know that…we never see it in print so we know that it has been created for the awards. All of that work is eliminated in this lot. This is all real work done by design companies.

     

    [] If there is some kind of issue or doubt in the works then we try and dig out some information about it and don’t take it lightly at all. We got a no-tolerance policy on scam work. We have been as rigorous as we possibly can to make sure that none of that gets through because it’s the easiest thing to do.

     

    [] It only works if it’s in reality; I mean its applied design so it stays in the field of conceptual ideas and I am very impressed with the work what we have seen and it’s very impressive. The difference that I found between most of the good and the really good work – the stretch is quite big. So we managed to really narrow it down and focus on really super good quality work.

     

    [] Not quite yet to what we expected but it could have gone either way. I am very pleased to see the works that have come through; there has been an impressive range of work from different spheres and it’s a really good mix of stuff.

     

    [] I think it’s very interesting for me as a foreigner to see how the local sensibilities, the design sensibilities are applied, visualized and executed.

     

    [] Yes, I found it encouraging to see variety in terms of not just creative but variety in terms of what is Indian, what is of more international etc. Also, the execution – the printing quality versus the not-so-good one. The learning from it is that there is still lot of difference that may have to do with the lack of education or that this is the pending work that needs to be done…education for people who want to get into that business and more than that education of clients. Clients need to understand what is the difference between advertising and branding. For example, where does packaging start, where does identity start, what is difference of an identity to provide a business cart and a holistic 360-degree project and we have seen a bit of everything sometimes in the same category it’s very difficult to judge…so how do you compare this with that but I have to say my expectations were sort of less but when I came here they exceeded and I am happy.

     

    If you were to decide the Indian entries vis-à-vis International ones that you have seen, how many of these would really match them in terms of quality?

     

    [] I would say definitely the top tier of work or the top 5 percent of work which we have seen is equal to anything we have seen be it D&AD, ADC or Cannes… or any other design that we have seen around the world. I have been to ADC and others and I saw a lot of stuff there and this could fit right with that without any problem. Actually to be fair this is from India, which you wouldn’t expect. It is very rare that you come across work from India compared to any other international works like the US etc. I mean you can compare the works from here to the other countries and when people will find that it is from India they will be pleasantly surprised. This means that people should know that it’s a work of caliber and could end up being more internationally recognized than the others.

     

    [] What is also interesting is the range of work that has finally made it through. I mean it’s not all big budget, it’s not all from the non-profit sector, it’s really all varied and it’s much big budget work. I think that is encouraging for the design community as well.

     

    Thoughts on how we could raise the quality next year?

    I think this year’s Annual will give everyone an awakening. I think all design companies should have this annual… it will really open one’s mind.

     

    There’s a wealth of talent across the country…

    [] In Delhi especially there are so many designers who are just lost by themselves in the small corners of the big city.

     

    [] But this would at least give people a single point of reference you know someone from South of India can talk to someone from elsewhere…we can have multiple conversations around design.

     

    [] Also, the Indian language, craft is so much celebrated…a person in Kerala can sit and say wow, this is a good design and there is a book that says that.

     

    [] Design makes for a very good conversation. I hope the outcome of this is that the levels designing will go up. Till now, there’s been absolutely no benchmark in the Indian context and the fact that you got D&AD coming in, we all know that they are by far the toughest awards. So when you get that kind of stamp with this then there will be a prestige attached with it…

     

    *MxMIndia is a Trade Partner of the 2013 Kyoorius Designyatra and Digiyatra

     

  • Abin Design Studio & Gurgaon Codesign Brand Consultants win top honours at 2013 Kyoorius Awards

     

    By A Correspondent

     

    Kolkata-based Abin Design Studio and Gurgaon’s Codesign Brand Consultants bagged the Black Elephant indicating the ‘best of show’ entries at the first edition of the 2013 Kyoorius Awards held in Goa on Thursday (Aug 29).

     

    These awards were held in partnership with D&AD and the International Advertising Association (India Chapter) and sponsored by Zee*.

     

    Laura Jordan Bambach, Deputy President and Member of the Board of Trustees at D&AD and Donal Keenan, Senior Awards Operations Manager, D&AD other than Rajesh Kejriwal, Founder-CEO, Kyoorius spoke on the occasion.

     

    Spanning over nine categories including print, packaging, retail and design for good, a six-member international jury comprising two members from India poured over the 437 professional entries vying for the Blue and Black Elephants and 113 student entries in the running for the Red Elephants.

     

    The jury members included Elsie Nanji, Gabor Schreier, Jeremy Leslie, Simon Sankarayya, Tanya Singh Khosla and Ton Van Bragt. The jury manager from D&AD was Donal Keenan.

     

    Said Mr Kejriwal, “We had conceptualized this with the aim of recognising exceptional work in the design industry.” The D&AD awards are recognised globally as the among the most prestigious amongst creative awards.  Tim Lindsay, CEO of D&AD said, “The Kyoorius Awards were conducted at par with international standards and the delegates and industry peers received an opportunity to view some excellent work done by the winners.”

     

    Meanwhile, buoyed by the success of the Awards, Kaushik Roy, Immediate Past President – IAA India Chapter said he was certain that there is a long association in store between Kyoorius, D&AD and the IAA- India Chapter. “Together, we have the vision to realize the power of design and it is crucial that we support and award the best creative minds in India, ” he said.

     

    *Disclosure: MxMIndia is Trade Partner of Kyoorius Designyatra 2013

     

    Category Title Entries Nominations Blue Black Red
    Identity

    7

    1

    2

    5

    Packaging

    9

    2

    Communication

    15

    4

    Digital

    4

    0

    Space

    3

    1

    Books

    5

    3

    Editorial

    3

    0

    Craft

    17

    3

    Good

    10

    4

    Total Nominations – Professionals

    437

    73

    Total Nominations – Students

    113

    12

    Total Wins

    18

     

     

  • India TV announces Salaam India awards

    By A Correspondent

     

    Leading news channel India TV has announced Officer’s Choice Salaam India Awards to salute the spirit of courage by the common man.

     

    The initiative will recognize exemplary acts of bravery and spirit of courage, notes a communiqué. These will be awarded to individuals who have stepped forward altruistically and with great determination to face challenges head-on, safeguarding someone else’s interest while risking their own lives, the release adds.

     

    India TV has invited nominations from all over the country. The Award will be given among four broad categories namely Bravery Awards, Gallantry Awards, Damini Awards and Special Awards. An eminent panel of jurors will select the final honorees.

     

    Ritu Dhawan

    While announcing the awards, Ritu Dhawan MD & CEO, India TV, said: “Salaam India is a humble attempt to salute our real heroes, who inspire simply by their acts of exemplary courage. As a responsible news channel, it is indeed a matter of pride for us to attempt to bring to fore light the sense of true bravery, as an inspiration for the rest of the nation.”

     

    The awards will be presented at the Taj Palace hotel in New Delhi on September 28. Officer’s Choice packaged drinking water is the title sponsor of the initiative.

     

  • Mindshare emerges victorious in a closely-fought Emvies 2013

    The victorious Mindshare team winning the Best Media Agency of the Year 2013

     

    By Johnson Napier

     

    When an award show in the dynamic world of advertising returns with its next edition, one always expects an element of newness or surprise to come along with it. In keeping with the tradition, Emvies, the annual awards property honouring the best works coming out from media agencies, managed to do just that. The Ballroom at Taj Lands End, Mumbai was a house under deafening noise attack last Friday (September 6) as The Advertising Club hosted the thirteenth edition of its popular awards show. *See Disclaimer

     

     

    It is teamwork that matters: Atit Mehta

     

    It’s a different feeling to see your brand being felicitated at an awards stage that is meant to be dominated by another industry in limelight. But it’s become a habit now for Hindustan Unilever Ltd. that won the Media Client of the Year award at Emvies 2013, a platform that felicitates good work done by media agencies in the year gone by.

     

    Atit Mehta, Head of Media Services - South Asia for Unilever South Asia opens up on his excitement on winning the top prize at the Emvies and what makes HUL an organisation to vie for. Excerpts…

     

    Like your Agency of Record (AoR), winning the Client of the Year award at Emvies has become a habit of sorts for you too. Your comments.

    Rather than a habit, the good work getting appreciated is a very satisfying feeling. This year has been great; HUL has again won the Best Media Client of the Year award and our agency has also won the Agency of the Year award so it’s double excitement for us.

     

    What is the extent to which HUL associates itself with your AoR in reaching out the brand’s message to the masses?

    It’s teamwork that matters; they are our agency partners and whatever work comes out is a collaborative effort.

     

    What is the thrust that HUL lays on ad spends for its products under various categories?

    We are quite a large advertiser but more than that it is the hard work and sweat put in by the agency members that has resulted in us attaining the top spot this year too.

     

    How easy or difficult is it to get the desired work done by your agency year after year?

    It’s always a challenge but we push ourselves ahead with the belief that we need to excel and work hard every single day.

     

    Were you disappointed that some of the entries did not win any awards?

    No, there is no disappointment as such.

     

    What has been your emphasis on digital as a medium for advertising? How do you see it growing going forward?

    Digital is and will remain an important medium as we go forward.

     

    While those in attendance will vouch for the extent of euphoria that descended upon the venue, what was more unnerving was the neck-and-neck battle that was on between the Top 3 players every stage of the way. But at the end there had to be a single winner and it was no different this year as that honour was bestowed upon Mindshare, the WPP-owned agency that’s part of the Group M stable. With 165 points and 18 metals under its belt, including 3 Golds, 9 Silvers and 6 Bronzes, the agency just about marched past the others to emerge Agency of the Year for the sixth year in a row. Also, retaining its place as the best of the lot was Hindustan Unilever Ltd. that emerged the Client of the Year for 2013 as well. With 4 Golds, 4 Silvers and 4 Bronze metals to its credit HUL ended at the top of the client list tally with 120 points.

     

    But while Mindshare proved its dominance yet again what many would like to remember of the night was the manner in which it was challenged by surprise runner-up Lodestar UM. From the fifth position last year, the agency proved that it was right up there when it came to being the best as it finished a close second this year. With the most number of Golds (5) to its credit, the agency closed its tally at 150 points including 7 Silvers and a single Bronze metal. At No 3 was another regular Maxus, which ended its tally this year at 120 points that included 3 Golds, 6 Silvers, and 3 Bronze metals.  Maxus, also part of the Group M stable, was numero uno in the leaderboards for a good part of the awards ceremony.

     

    In keeping with the surprise element this year, what was also noteworthy was the emergence of another minnow (in terms of awards competence) ‘ibs’ that walked away with the Grand Emvie for work on its client Tata Docomo – Hyper personalization: The world’s first CRM-powered campaign on Social Media. With 65 points, including 3 Golds, it occupied the No 7 spot overall on the leaderboard. Also noteworthy, and surprising, was the presence of creative agency Ogilvy, which gave the big media agencies a run for their prowess, as it occupied the fourth spot with 85 points. It included 4 Golds, 2 Silvers and a single Bronze award with its work on Lifebuoy Roti Reminder and Akanksha Foundation – Classroom Mumbai being awarded across multiple categories.

     

    A total of 90 metals were handed out to agencies this year that had submitted the highest number of entries in 2013 at 742.

     

    As for the gold winners, Mindshare won two golds for work on ‘5.2 years of digital content viewed in just six months!’ campaign for Axe Deodorant in the Best Media Innovation – Digital (social media) category while its work on ‘Cholchhe Na Aar Cholbe Na: “Can’t Happen”, Won’t Happen Anymore!’ for ABP Ananda in the Best Integrated Campaign – Media/ Media Property category accounted for the third gold for the agency. As for Lodestar UM, its work on ‘National Headache Reliever’ campaign for Saridon (Best Media Strategy – Consumer Products) was one of the most appreciated and also won it a gold alongwith its work on ‘Making Milk Exciting – The Olympics’ campaign for Amul Milk (Best Media Innovation – Sponsorship), ‘Unfinished Stories’ campaign for Tata Docomo (Best Media Innovation – Print, dailies) and ‘Coke Studio: One with youth’ campaign for Coke Studio (Best Integrated Campaign – Consumer Products). Maxus bagged three golds for work on ‘The Advantage and Disadvantage’ for Fiat that won two golds in Best Media Strategy – Consumer Durables and Best Media Innovation – Digital (Search) categories, while the third gold came from ‘Your Wish is My App’ campaign for Nokia Lumia (Best Media Innovation – TV – Media/ Media Property).

     

    Hindustan Unilever awarded Media Client of the Year

     

     

    It’s not been that easy this year: Ravi Rao

     

    Emvies 2013 could be summed up as the closest contest ever fought between the Top 3 medai agencies in recent years. But it was business as usual for Mindshare as they bagged the Agency of the Year award for the sixth year in a row.

     

    In conversation with MxMIndia, Ravi Rao, Leader, South Asia at Mindshare shares his excitement of repeating the feat year after year, and, what to expect from the awards going forward.

     

    Lodestar UM and Maxus nearly toppled you from the top spot but in the end you prevailed and won the Media Agency of the Year title yet again. Did you expect the kind of contest that was witnessed at the Emvies this year?

    It has not been that easy this year. Two agencies Lodestar and Maxus almost gave me a heart attack with many of their works being appreciated. But this year was the sixth year in a row that we managed to win this title. The way the contest was fought this year only means that it is going to be a tough race again next year but I can assure you that we are going to give our best shot next year as well.

     

    Did you expect such a tough challenge from them?

    I did expect a close race from Lodestar UM and Maxus. I had seen some of their presentations and they were really up there. But all I want to say is that we want to continue to excel and keep giving the others a stiff competition. We will keep doing that all the time.

     

    Are you disappointed that a few entries did not make the cut and that the Grand Emvie did not come to you?

    There were a couple of shortlists that did not make the mark, so, yes, I am a bit disappointed over there. But that’s life; we’ve got to keep moving forward.

     

    Any entries or agencies that managed to spring up a surprise this year?

    I think the entry by ibs on Tata Docomo was brilliant. It was an agency that one had not heard of much before but the kind of work that they put up and the awards that they bagged this year makes them worthy of an admiration.

     

    How has Emvies as an award evolved this year? Are you happy with the way things panned out on this platform?

    I think this is one of the best media awards that you’ll see. Over here, the clients also decide on the calibre of work to be rewarded and for me that’s a huge compliment for the media agencies.

     

    Any words of advice to your sibling-cum-competitor Ajit Varghese?

    I’d like to say ‘hats off to you Ajit Varghese!’. It was such a close touch-and-go contest all the way. I know they are going to keep coming stronger… and I am prepared for that!

     

    What do you anticipate for the year 2014 on the awards front?

    I cannot say about 2014 right now but I wish and insist that it is us only.

     

    The other two big winners from the client’s end were Cadbury India Ltd that bagged a total of 3 Golds, 3 Silvers and 2 Bronze awards while Tata Docomo was third with 1 Grand Emvie and 3 Golds to its credit. Also noteworthy was the Young Emvie of the Year award that was bagged by Farah Siddiqui of Mindshare.

     

    As for the awards tally, the other winners include MediaCom Communications and ibs that secured sixth and seventh places with 80 and 65 points while DDB Mudra Max with 50 points, MEC with 30 points and OMD India with 20 points finished the tally in the eighth, ninth and tenth positions respectively.

     

    The awards presentation was interspersed with media professionals performing and competing for team and solo Indian and Western categories of the Band Baja Award.

     

    *MxMIndia was a Media Partner of Emvies 2013

    Photographs by Puneet Chandok. Courtesy: DNA

     

  • 509 Indian entries to vie for Spikes Asia metals

    By A Correspondent

     

    The Spikes Asia Festival of Creativity, the awards and festival for the creative communications industry in Asia Pacific to be held from September 15 to 17 in Singapore, has reported receiving a total of 4,832 entries from 20 countries.

     

    Australia has submitted the most entries with 710, followed by China with 679, Japan with 622, Singapore with 520, India with 509 and Hong Kong with 307 entries.

     

    Entries have been submitted into 16 different awards categories: Film (373), Print (565), Outdoor (762), Radio (154), Media 447), Direct (342), Promo & Activation (385), Digital (273), Print & Poster Craft (368), Film Craft (331), Design (263), PR (195), Mobile (124), Integrated (58), Branded Content & Entertainment (161), and Creative Effectiveness (31).

     

    As many as 78 industry practitioners from APAC and beyond that make up the 10 juries will soon cast their votes and decide on who will take home the coveted Spikes awards. Leading the juries are: Tham Khai Meng, Worldwide Chief Creative Officer of Ogilvy & Mather and Chairman of Ogily’s Worldwide Creative Council (Film, Print, Outdoor and Radio plus Integrated); Jose Miguel Sokoloff, Chairman of Lowe SSP3 and President Creative Council of Lowe Worldwide (Direct and Promo & Activation); Masaru Kitakaze, Executive Creative Director and Corporate Officer of Hakuhodo (Digital and Mobile);  Mike Cooper, Worldwide CEO of PHD (Media); Derek Lockwood, Worldwide Director of Design, Saatchi & Saatchi (Design); Lynne Anne Davis, President and Senior Partner, Asia Pacific, FleishmanHillard (PR); Lo Sheung Yan, Chairman, Asia Pacific Creative Council, JWT (Craft); Anthony Freedman, Group CEO of Host, Sydney (Branded Content & Entertainment); and Jarek Ziebinski, President, Leo Burnett Asia Pacific (Creative Effectiveness). There are six Indian jurors in the 78 (in no specific order): Josy Paul, Sanjiv Sharma, Sudhir Sharma, Chandrasekar Radhakrishnan, Pratap Bose and Ajit Varghese.

     

    “This is an extraordinary amount of work that will require the full attention of the talented juries as they unite to select the best pieces of creative communications being produced in the APAC region,” says Philip Thomas, CEO of Lions Festivals.  “The winning work which will drive inspiration and push the industry forward, will not only have an impact at a regional level, but also globally. We eagerly look forward to the results of Spikes 2013.”

     

    The winners will be revealed during the Spikes Asia awards ceremony on Tuesday, September 17.

     

  • Mixed results for India as Spikes Asia gets underway

     

    By A Correspondent

     

    Better known as the Cannes of the East, the Spikes Asia Festival of Creativity is no new international adfest. It was set up way back in 1987 as the Asian Advertising Awards by Media Magazine. It was held in Hong Kong and for seven years thereafter. It later moved to Bali and finally to Singapore.

     

    Then, 21 years after inception, it got relaunched as Spikes Asia, following a collaboration between Haymarket, publishers of Media magazine now called Campaign Asia, and the organizers of the Cannes Lions. The proceedings take place in Singapore’s Suntec City.

     

    There are various other festivals in Asia, as they are on an international level, but Spikes has grown much in stature. This year, over 1800 industry professionals from 28 countries are said to be attending the three days of learning, insights, celebration and networking. Honouring Asia-Pacific’s creative excellence in advertising and communications, this year a total of 4832 entries have been received for the Awards which are judged by leading international and regional creatives and industry experts. The best creative work in the categories of Film, Print, Outdoor, Radio, Digital, Integrated, Direct, Promo & Activation, Media, Print & Poster Craft, Film Craft, Design, Mobile, PR, Branded Content & Entertainment and Creative Effectiveness are awarded.

     

    Australia has submitted the most entries with 710, followed by China with 679, Japan with 622, Singapore with 520, India with 509 and Hong Kong with 307 entries. Entries have been submitted into 16 different awards categories: Film (373), Print (565), Outdoor (762), Radio (154), Media 447), Direct (342), Promo & Activation (385), Digital (273), Print & Poster Craft (368), Film Craft (331), Design (263), PR (195), Mobile (124), Integrated (58), Branded Content & Entertainment (161), and Creative Effectiveness (31). Note the number of overall entries has reduced a wee bit and so have the entries from India.

     

    As many as 77 industry practitioners from APAC and beyond that make up the 10 juries will soon cast their votes and decide on who will take home the coveted Spikes awards. Leading the juries are: Tham Khai Meng, Worldwide Chief Creative Officer of Ogilvy & Mather and Chairman of Ogily’s Worldwide Creative Council (Film, Print, Outdoor and Radio plus Integrated); Jose Miguel Sokoloff, Chairman of Lowe SSP3 and President Creative Council of Lowe Worldwide (Direct and Promo & Activation); Masaru Kitakaze, Executive Creative Director and Corporate Officer of Hakuhodo (Digital and Mobile);  Mike Cooper, Worldwide CEO of PHD (Media); Derek Lockwood, Worldwide Director of Design, Saatchi & Saatchi (Design); Lynne Anne Davis, President and Senior Partner, Asia Pacific, FleishmanHillard (PR); Lo Sheung Yan, Chairman, Asia Pacific Creative Council, JWT (Craft); Anthony Freedman, Group CEO of Host, Sydney (Branded Content & Entertainment); and Jarek Ziebinski, President, Leo Burnett Asia Pacific (Creative Effectiveness). There are six Indian jurors in the 78 (in no specific order): Josy Paul, Sanjiv Sharma, Sudhir Sharma, Chandrasekar Radhakrishnan, Pratap Bose and Ajit Varghese

     

    “This is an extraordinary amount of work that will require the full attention of the talented juries as they unite to select the best pieces of creative communications being produced in the APAC region,” says Philip Thomas, CEO of Lions Festivals.  “The winning work which will drive inspiration and push the industry forward, will not only have an impact at a regional level, but also globally. We eagerly look forward to the results of Spikes 2013.”  The winners will be revealed during the Spikes Asia awards ceremony on Tuesday, September 17.

     

    Day 1 and 2 of Spikes Asia had an interesting set of speakers, but all eyes were on the shortlists that were declared in two instalments. India drew a blank in Radio, Digital, Mobile and Branded Content/Entertainment. But the news from the shortlists is no great shakes for India. There’s just one in Promotions and Activations, two each in Direct and Film, PR gets three (and these are not PR agencies), Design gets six, Media has eight (including some in digital and mobile which didn’t get a mention in the digital and mobile shortlists, Print gets 14 and Outdoor is the big one with 26. The tally thus far has 62 shortlists.

     

    It’s too early to do an agency-wise analysis. It would perhaps be more appropriate once the final results are out tomorrow (Tuesday, Sep 15) evening. The rest of the shortlists will also be announced tomorrow, which is the last day of Spikes Asia.

     

    SPIKES ASIA DAY 1 SHORTLISTS OF INDIAN ENTRIES

     

     

  • McCann gets a Grand Prix at Spikes

    By A Correspondent [updated]

     

    McCann Worldgroup’s India office has reasons to bring out the bubbly. At Spikes Asia which concluded in Singapore on Tuesday, its entry for ATSS Keyless Entry System won a Grand Prix in the Design category.

     

    Before we gush further, the bad news. India drew a blank in the following categories:

    Branded Content & Entertainment, Creative Effectiveness, Digital, Direct, Integrated Winners, Mobile, Promo & Activation and Radio.

     

    Back to McCann (MWG)’s winnings, there are 8 metals that the folks bring back. The tally for Ogilvy is 8, Ramesh Deo Productions is 5 and Taproot is 4. (note: the earlier report had grave errors given that the calculation was based on each individual entry in the table below. Campaigns typically have to be clubbed together. Note: in the table below Ogilvy has bagged two Outdoor golds for its Philips campaign. We deeply regret the error – Ed).

     

    See the three tables to see how Indian agencies and advertisers fared.

     

    Winner by Category

     

    Winner by Entrant Company

     

     

     

    Winner by Advertiser

  • Last date for Designomics Awards 2013 is Sept 30

    By A Correspondent

     

    The last date for accepting entries for the third edition of the Designomics Awards, held in association with Whirlpool and endorsed by the India Design Council, is September 30. Entrants can avail of a special ‘Early Bird Discount’ by sending in their entries before  September 20, 2013. The Awards will be presented on October 23, 2013 at Taj Lands End, Mumbai.

     

    The Designomics Awards recognises businesses and their creative partners that incorporate strategic design in important milestones of commerce, notes a communique adding: while The Designomics Awards acknowledge examples of design that add value to businesses, it also aims to educate and encourage the use of design, not only to enhance visual aesthetics but also to engage audiences and guide the driving philosophies at the core of the organisation.

     

    Additionally, to encourage strategic design thinking among young designers, the Designomics Awards also offers Students Awards that recognise students who demonstrate the values of Designomics in their projects.

     

    This year’s jury comprises: Alok Nanda, Founder and CEO, Alok Nanda & Company Communications;  Alpana Parida, President, DY Works; Anil Mathur, COO, Godrej & Boyce; Ashish Deshpande, Director, Elephant Strategy + Design; Ashwani Kumar, Senior Principal Technologist Packaging Graphics and Design, ITC Limited; Prof. Dhimant Panchal, Director & HOD Pre-Design Foundation, MIT Institute of Design  Harshil Karia, Co – Founder & Online Strategist, FoxyMoron; Lucy Unger, Managing Director(South Asia), Fitch; Pradyuman Vyas, Director, National Institute of Design (NID); Revathi Kant, GM – Design, Innovation & Development, Tanishq; Santosh Desai, MD & CEO, Futurebrands; Shanoo Bhatia, Founder Director, Eureka Moment Design Company; Sonia Manchanda, Co-Founder and Principal Designer Idiom, Creative Chief, DREAM:IN; Suresh Sethi, Vice President , Global Consumer Design Asia, Whirlpool Corporation and  Tarun Rai, CEO, Worldwide Media

     

    The jury will evaluate all entries based on the strategy, creativity and effectiveness of the design solutions in the following categories:

    Strategic Brand Identity, Print, Retail, Digital, Packaging, Product Design, Design Integration and Environment and Spatial Design

     

    For details: www.designomics.in

     

  • AAAI lifetime achievement award for Anil Kapoor, Emeritus Chairman, Draftfcb+ Ulka Group

    By A Correspondent

     

    Anil Kapoor

    The Advertising Agencies Association of India will present Anil Kapoor, Emeritus Chairman, Draftfcb+ Ulka Group with the AAAI Lifetime Achievement Award. This is the highest honour given to an individual in India for his/her outstanding contribution to the advertising Industry.

     

    The awards ceremony is scheduled for Friday, September 27, 2013 at 7:30 p.m. at Trident, Nariman Point, Mumbai. The last recipient of the AAAI lifetime achievement award was Piyush Pandey. There was no award presented for 2011 and 2012.

     

    Piyush Pandey

    Here’s a short note on Mr Kapoor from the Draftfcb+ Ulka’s ‘Ulka 50 years’ website:

    ” ‘Never say die’, that’s Anil’s attitude to life. His love for challenges saw him taking charge of Draftfcb+Ulka (Ulka Advertising, at the time), turning it into the fastest growing agency in India and taking its rightful place as one of the ‘Big Five’. With the formation of Draftfcb in 2006, Anil was appointed as Draftfcb President with responsibility for Asia-Pacific region and Africa.

     

    “Recently, he has been appointed Chairman Emeritus of Draftfcb + Ulka, after a 22-year stint with the company and its other associated agencies. As one who is known to make things happen, Anil’s role expanded naturally into industry bodies. He is a Past President of the Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI), the Chairman of the Audit Bureau of Circulation of 2007-08 and was also on the Management Board of the National Readership Survey and the Television Audience Measurement Research. He was also on the Editorial Advisory Board of the Economic Times, the second largest circulating business newspaper in the world. In May 2002, Anil was also inducted into the Foote, Cone & Belding’s Worldwide Board.”

     

    “Before joining Draftfcb+Ulka, Anil was with the Boots Company, India, for 14 years, where as the Marketing Director, he launched a string of brands, all of which went on to become No. 1 in their markets. At Boots, he also set up two field forces, one for consumer products and the other for ethical pharmaceutical products. Before that, he was with the legendary agency MCM and though not the cause, he says he had to preside over its closure – quite a learning experience! Now a confirmed Mumbaite, Anil grew up in Delhi and graduated with a BA in English Literature from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi and then did his MBA from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.”

     

  • 8 of 18 Warc Asian Strategy prizes from India

    By A Correspondent

     

    A BBDO Guerrero for the Philippines Department of Tourism won the $5,000 Warc Prize for Asian Strategy Grand Prix. A total of 18 papers were awarded Gold, Silver or Bronze and eight of these are from India (list below). Two Indian entries (Ogilvy’s Tagging Drive and Voltas All Weather AC campaigns) were among the five which won $1,000 Special Awards

     

    Leanne Cutts, the 2013 Prize chair and President & Managing Director Japan at Mondelez International, said the Grand Prix winner stood out due to the simplicity of the idea, and its potential to evolve across media and across time. “The winning campaign was not only an idea for its own category, but it spilled over into other parts of life. We felt that this was an enormously valuable idea that could be sustainable and grow over time,” he said.

     

    The 18 winning entries came from six different markets – eight from India, four from China, three from the Philippines, and one each from Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia.

     

    Winning entries (Agency / Client / Campaign Market)

     

    Gold

     

    It’s More Fun In The Philippines

    (BBDO Guerrero / The Philippines Department of Tourism / Regional)

    Also winner of the Grand Prix

     

    THPF Smoking Kid: A Personal Message to the Smokers

    (Ogilvy & Mather Thailand / Thai Health Promotion Foundation / Thailand)

    Also winner of the Asia First Special Award

     

    Voltas All Weather AC – how a pure play Indian brand turned a giant killer

    (Ogilvy & Mather / Tata / India)

    Also winner of the Local Hero Special Award

     

    Milo Cans: Twisted Football

    (Ogilvy & Mather Kuala Lumpur / Nestlé / Malaysia)

     

    Gillette: Shave Sexy

    (BBDO China, @PR / Procter & Gamble / China)

     

    Silver

     

    Nike China: Greatness Campaign

    (Wieden+Kennedy, Mindshare, AKQA, Razorfish / Nike / China)

    Also winner of the Cultural Connection Special Award

     

    Once Again: The Tagging Drive

    (Ogilvy & Mather Bangalore / Once Again / India)

    Also winner of the Channel Insight Special Award

     

    SMART TXTBKS

    (DDB DM9 JaymeSyfu / Smart Communications / Philippines)

     

    Also winner of the Market Pioneer Special Award

     

    Baileys: Cream With Spirit

    (BBH Shanghai / Diageo / China)

     

    Corona: Let the World Wait

    (TBWA\ Singapore, Digital Arts Network (DAN), INTO-DIGITAL OY, Wicked Digital Media / Grupo Modelo / Regional)

     

    Lifebuoy: Help A Child Reach 5

    (Lowe Lintas & Partners, PHD / Unilever / India, Indonesia)

     

    Realtime Olympics

    (NIM Digital / McDonald’s / China)

     

    Taking On A Religion Called Cricket

    (JWT India / PepsiCo / India)

     

    Women For Women

    (McCann WorldGroup / Stayfree / India)

     

    Bronze

     

    Ariel Shirt Flag: How a detergent not only lifted stains, but the spirit of an entire nation

    (Ace Saatchi & Saatchi Advertising / Procter & Gamble / Philippines)

     

    Mediker Anti-Lice Treatment: The Journey from Lice Negative to Life Positive in Rural India

    (BBH Communications India, Madison Media Group, Radiowani, Perfect Relations, School / Marico / India)

     

    Mission Kerala: Times Of India’s Final Frontier

    (JWT India / Bennett Coleman / India)

     

    Vat Man

    (BBH Communications India / Diageo / India)

     

  • Anil Kapoor: An ‘Outsider’ who was more than an ‘Equal’

     

    All roads lead to the Trident at Nariman Point today (Sept 27) as the Advertising Agencies Association of India felicitates and awards Anil Kapoor, Chairman Emeritus, Draftfcb+Ulka with the Lifetime Achievement Award.

     

    A little about Mr Kapoor, courtesy the Draftfcb+Ulka website: His love for challenges saw him taking charge of Draftfcb+Ulka (Ulka Advertising, at the time), turning it into the fastest growing agency in India and taking its rightful place as one of the ‘Big Five’. With the formation of Draftfcb in 2006, Mr Kapoor was appointed as Draftfcb President with responsibility for Asia-Pacific region and Africa.

     

    He was appointed Chairman Emeritus of Draftfcb + Ulka, after a 22-year stint with the company and its other associated agencies. As one who is known to make things happen, his role expanded naturally into industry bodies. He is a Past President of the Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI), the Chairman of the Audit Bureau of Circulation of 2007-08 and was also on the Management Board of the National Readership Survey and the Television Audience Measurement Research. He was also on the Editorial Advisory Board of The Economic Times. In May 2002, Mr Kapoor was also inducted into the Foote, Cone & Belding’s Worldwide Board.

     

    Before joining Draftfcb+Ulka, Mr Kapoor was with the Boots Company, India, for 14 years, where, as the Marketing Director, he launched a string of brands, all of which went on to become No. 1 in their markets. At Boots, he also set up two field forces, one for consumer products and the other for ethical pharmaceutical products. Before that, he was with the legendary agency MCM and though not the cause, he says he had to preside over its closure – quite a learning experience! Now a confirmed Mumbaikar, Mr Kapoor grew up in Delhi and graduated with a BA in English Literature from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi and then did his MBA from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.

     

    Dr M G Parameswaran

    Executive Director and CEO, Draftfcb + Ulka

    I have worked with Anil Kapoor for over two decades and I have seen him in various roles, as Head of Marketing of a large British multinational, as a CEO of a pioneering media company and as a CEO of a struggling ad agency. One thing that defines him is his ‘Never Say Die’ attitude. When he joined Ulka no one thought he had a chance of saving an agency that was fast sinking. In fact someone who is revered in advertising world even told me that I was mad to join Anil Kapoor in his mission of saving an ailing Indian agency. Anil proved all his detractors wrong though his passion, attitude and commitment to the cause. He also showed the industry how to build a strong team and keep it together for two decades. How to build an agency group entirely from within, and without the help of international experts and hand-me-down accounts. He demonstrated how to partner clients at senior levels to launch one successful brand after another,  in tough market conditions. As Ulka became FCB Ulka and later DraftFCB Ulka, his managerial and leadership skills got recognized on the global stage, many times over.

     

    Anil Kapoor, who was seen as an outsider in the Industry, was soon accepted as an equal and may be as a ‘more than an equal’. He went on to play leadership role in various industry bodies such as AAAI and ABC. He was instrumental in setting up the independent NRS survey in the mid-’90s.  He also played a very vital role in helping the formation of IBF as a body that could work with AAAI to create norms and processes on how agencies work with television.

     

    We don’t have too many people in advertising industry today who can fill his shoes.  While Anil Kapoor continues to serves as the Chairman Emeritus of Draftfcb Ulka Group and continues to play the role of an advisor to the Group which he built,  he has not been involved with industry affairs for almost a decade. I am sure it is the industry’s loss that he decided to move on. But then, all things have to change, and that is not an entirely bad thing after all.

     

    Shashi Sinha

    CEO, IPG Mediabrands and Lodestar UM

    They don’t make people like Anil Kapoor these days.

     

    I have had the good pleasure of working with Draftfcb+Ulka a few years before he joined the agency from a strong client background. In fact that possibly ensured that he was very focused on deliveries.  As someone who helmed the agency for many years and even now as Chairman Emeritus, we and our clients included have always known him to be a no-nonsense man. Forthright, never into any frivolous conversation. He was always focused on the task on hand.

     

    He had a keen eye on the business and would actively engage with all his clients.  Even now when some of us meet him, his observations are pertinent to the business and may I say: bang-on.

     

    Anil Kapoor has always been an excellent people manager considering his team has been together for so long.

     

    I have always had an excellent rapport with him and have found in him a Guru whom I admire and respect.