MxMIndia

Author: Shailesh Kapoor

  • And all eyes are currently on the big India-Pakistan clash tomorrow, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    The Games Take Over

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorThe Cricket World Cup has taken off to a good start. As good as the World Cup for an eight-hour format can be, in today’s age of instant gratification. Why does the 50-over format still exist is a larger question, whose answer is purely commercial in nature. Many experts have raised doubts over the purpose this format is serving, but who needs to disrupt a cash-generating machine, in India at least?

     

    So, the current World Cup will put that question aside for a few weeks, even months. The 2027 World Cup, by the way, is already planned to be held in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Namibia, though four years is a long time away, and a rethink is not entirely ruled out in the coming year or two. On the format itself, not on the venue.

     

    But let’s come back to the World Cup that is currently underway. By and large, on-field action has taken large share of the attention in the last one week, and India’s two wins have given an initial sense of comfort to the fans. All eyes are currently on the big India-Pakistan clash tomorrow. India’s record against Pakistan in the 50-over World Cup remains unblemished, with a 7-0 lead. We could see both television and online records for live sports being rewritten tomorrow.

     

    The only major off-field controversy over the last week is not a frivolous one. It’s to do with mismanagement of tickets. The opening game between 2019 finalists England and New Zealand had thousands of empty seats visible on camera, even as the tickets showed largely sold out on online platforms (Imagine that happening with ad inventory during a World Cup game!). BCCI’s handling of scheduling and ticketing of this event has been unprofessional, even incompetent. The advantage of a long tournament is that you can learn on the job, and one hopes corrective action is already being taken.

     

    The broadcast of the World Cup is strictly on expected lines, and I say that in a good way. BCCI and Disney-Star have kept it simple, focusing on first principles, than offering too many distractions via meaningless innovations. Commentary in nine languages is impressive, though the absence of Bhojpuri (JioCinema’s cute contribution to sports broadcast) takes a bit of the fun factor away.

     

    The World Cup ends in the week after Diwali, and shortly after, we will be entering the elections season. Our news channels have enough fodder to keep themselves busy till mid-2024 at least. Which is not such a bad thing at all, because at least they will not have too much time to conjure up bizarre stories to keep the ratings going.

     

  • It's been more than halfway through the Men's World Cup Cricket and we haven't had a single nailbiter so far, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    Knocking on November’s Door

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorWe are at the start of what may be a long election season. Legislative assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Telangana, Chhattisgarh, and Mizoram are scheduled for the month of November. These campaigns will segue into the bigger one, the General Elections in 2024. There’s going to be enough in the news to keep everyone busy for at least six months, perhaps a bit longer.

     

    Of course, when one says “news”, one doesn’t mean print or television anymore. It’s a collective, amorphous mass of sources that intersect and feed into, and from, each other. Earlier this week, Rahul Gandhi interviewed former J&K Governor Satyapal Malik for his YouTube channel. The video has, since then, been widely circulated and discussed on YouTube and social media. But not surprisingly, TV channels and most newspapers have ignored it. Malik is known for being a critic of the Prime Minister, and has gone on record in recent times, including a rather candid interview to Karan Thapar for The Wire, about the systemic lapses in the Central Government that led to the Pulwama attack in 2019, at the time of his Governorship.

     

    Why did Rahul Gandhi have to interview Satyapal Malik is as interesting as the interview itself. The interview itself has a conversation on this topic. With mainstream media not giving any coverage of any consequence to the Opposition voices, social media and digital news platforms seem to be their recourse to get themselves heard.

     

    This could be how the media side of the story of the 2024 General Elections plays out. YouTube, and not TV news, could be primary platform where the story unfolds, at least for those hoping to upset BJP, which continues to be a frontrunner to win those elections.

     

    YouTube’s daily and weekly reach in India is not very different from that of the television news genre’s reach. TV carries more credibility than digital media, but purely for legacy reasons. We have seen digital media overtake traditional media as the lead marketing medium in various mainstream domains, including cricket and theatrical films. Politics is next on the list.

     

    Talking of cricket, a rather uneventful Cricket World Cup is underway currently. It’s been more than halfway through the round robin stage of the tournament, and we haven’t had a single nailbiter so far. There have been some exciting games, including the recent India-New Zealand one, and some upsets by Afghanistan and Netherlands. But no game has gone into the last five overs without reasonable clarity on who the winner will be.

     

    Of course, this is an inherent issue with the 50-over format itself. India’s winning streak, now at five matches, has kept the otherwise-drab World Cup alive for fans and sponsors. A semi-final spot is all but assured, and India has a strong chance of being the first team since Australia in 2007 to win a Cricket World Cup without losing a game.

     

    November, then, is expected to be an action-packed month for more than one reason.

     

     

  • Debates on news television have degenerated into a cacophonic mess over the years, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    The Health of our News

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorPolitics is in the air (though that may be true for any given day of the year). We are in election season again, and the build-up to the 2024 General Elections has well and truly started, even though there remains speculation on the dates, even the possibility of an early election, before the stipulated May timeline.

     

    It’s only natural then that the media scene heats up too. Last month, the I.N.D.I.A alliance announced a ‘boycott’ of 14 news anchors across channels. The news has met with various reactions, depending on which side of the political spectrum one is aligned to. Some have called it a violation of press freedom, while others have endorsed the move as a message against hate speech and biased media coverage.

     

    The decision to not engage with certain sections of the media is an age-old tactic followed by politicians and celebrities frequently, and to call it a violation of freedom of press is quite a stretch. It’s not so much the move that has caused the debate, but the public announcement of it. If I.N.D.I.A would have silently decided to not send their spokespersons to the shows hosted by the said anchors, no one would have cared much. But by making their decision very public, they have stirred up a hornet’s nest.

     

    The decision itself carries limited practical value. Many of the anchors listed don’t even have programs that have spokespersons on them. In any case, debate shows on Indian news channels do not need official spokespersons. There is a long list of unofficial supporters and sympathizers who are willing to come on debate shows on short notice. Many even get paid for it, from what one gathers.

     

    The only pertinent question that is more important than the short-term controversy is: How did we reach here? The Indian media and polity were in a symbiotic relationship for decades, and incidents of friction, some dating back to the times of Indira Gandhi, if not earlier, were more aberrations than norm. But over the last few years, there has been a gradual decline in the health of this relationship. It is no secret that the current Government at the Centre does not give press the kind of access earlier Governments did. Cabinet reshuffles, for example, are rarely known to the media till they are formally announced. This seems a part of a well-considered media strategy, where engaging with the voters directly, via social media for example, is a preferred option.

     

    But there has also been a gradual decline in the quality of political representation on news channels. Till about a decade ago, it would not be unusual to see faces like Arun Jaitley, Sushma Swaraj, Jairam Ramesh, Ravi Shankar Prasad, et al on various TV news debates, often every night. That is almost unthinkable today. People of stature and experience do not want to be associated with the cacophonic mess TV debates have degenerated into, over the years. They would rather give one-on-ones when they something specific to say.

     

    But these occasional one-on-ones cannot fuel four hours of prime-time programming every night. So, news channels must manufacture topics, and ‘spokespersons’, to keep their ship running. The viewer may see it as news or entertainment, but that’s not something anyone is losing sleep over. Not anymore.

     

    The ‘fourth estate’ role of the media seems like an age-old idea in today’s Indian context. Boycott or no boycott, the Hindu-Muslim debates and the thin-on-facts coverage will continue. Because if there are eyeballs, no one is really complaining.

     

  • Someone with pan-India and global stature would be a minimum expectation for World Cup of a sport India is crazy about, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    Understanding Bollywood’s image problem

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorThe ICC Cricket World Cup is less than two weeks away. The mad rush for tickets has been the dominant headline associated with the tournament so far. But as we get closer to the date (October 5), on-field action will, hopefully, be where all the attention is.

     

    Earlier this week, ICC released an abomination of a video in the name of the event’s theme song, titled Dil Jashn Bole. There’s so much wrong with the song that one wouldn’t know where to start. Why is the song of a world tournament in Hindi, when it’s not even the language all of India understands? Bizarrely enough, the official YouTube version does not even have English subtitles. Fans have been brutal about their feedback, remembering the much-superior De Ghuma Ke, which was the theme song the last time the event was held in India, in 2011. Despite being in Hindi as well, that song was distinctly Indian (and sporty) in its spirit, and never seemed to struggle on inclusion.

     

    Which brings me to the main point of this piece: The random obsession with Bollywood. With due respect to Ranveer Singh, who’s a fine actor, ICC (or BCCI, whoever greenlit this train-wreck of a project, pun intended) should have known better. Cricketers don’t need film stars to represent the sport to the fans. And even if one were to go in that direction, someone with a pan-India and global stature would be a minimum expectation for World Cup of a sport India is crazy about. Like an ensemble of SRK, Allu Arjun and Vijay, for example, in the video.

     

    Obsession of other domains with Bollywood was also evident in the Parliament this week, when Kangana Ranaut and Esha Gupta were present on the day when the Women’s Reservation Bill was presented (and passed) in Lok Sabha. The former’s choice is clearly political in nature, and I don’t quite know what to make of the latter’s presence on the day.

     

    Over the last few years, and since the pandemic in particular, the idea of stardom has evolved in India, and is clearly a lot more ‘pan India’ in its spirit. As per Ormax Stars India Loves, out of the Top 10 most popular male and female film stars each in August 2023, only three men (SRK, Akshay and Salman) and four women (Alia, Deepika, Kiara, Katrina) hail from the Hindi film industry. The Bollywood lens should have been an obsolete idea by now, for events of national and international significance. Yet, it continues to find more than a few takers.

     

    Ironically, this obsession doesn’t do Bollywood much good. The industry has been fighting for reputation, and even as box-office has been better this year (though driven by the stars from the 90s, which makes the success precarious), the overall image of a low-on-innovation, spoilt, and inward-looking industry continues to persist as a media narrative. And projects such as the Dil Jashn Bole video only add to that narrative.

     

    Image management at an industry level is always tricky terrain, because the ownership is de-centralised. But one hopes that somehow, the industry finds a way to come together to address what’s a growing concern, definitely for brands, if not for the box office.

     

    Meanwhile, away from all this, let the games begin!

     

  • It may seem like an extreme position to take, but the days of pay content in India, that’s targeting a wider demographic, may be numbered, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    Free-to-stream: Will subscription models survive?

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorThe much-anticipated India-Pakistan clash in the Asia Cup, scheduled tomorrow (Sep 2), marks the start of a busy cricketing scene. The action is equally hectic off the field too. The start of the Asia Cup also coincided with the news that Viacom 18 has bagged the rights for BCCI-organized bilateral series in India over the next five years.

     

    Viacom 18/ JioCinema’s entry into sports has disrupted the landscape in 2023. From being a driver of paid subscriptions, cricket is now playing the role of reach aggregator on OTT. The Asia Cup is available for free streaming on Disney+ Hotstar, and the ODI World Cup that follows will go the same way. Indeed, the era of paid sports content in India maybe over. It’s only a matter of time that sports channels on TV go free-to-air as well.

     

    With the no. 1 sport in the country (and by some margin) being available for free, the state of several other sports, including football, tennis, wrestling, etc. hangs in balance. Will they continue to be “premium” offerings that get smaller audiences who are willing to pay for them? Or will the networks hope to expand the reach of these sports by making them available free? The question, of course, extends to television too.

     

    Are we going back in time, by shunning subscription models in favor of those dependent on advertising? Far from it. For the last several years, almost all major players, in the streaming space in particular, but also in linear television, have over-rated an average Indian’s inclination to pay for content. They have priced their products at levels that are untenable, and then gone on to offer handsome discounts, to the extent of 50-75% at times.

     

    But the core question is not about the price alone. It is: “Why pay at all?” Changing a market’s mindset from free to pay is an arduous task. We have seen how niche channels lost out once the NTO effects kicked in a few years ago. Outside the top 10 cities in India, paying for data, however low the rates maybe, itself is a choice to make. Stand-alone subscriptions are not even serious considerations. Reluctantly but inevitably, platforms have consented to being a part of aggregator bundles, where the ARPUs are much lower. A Jio-Netflix deal was announced just last week.

     

    It may seem like an extreme position to take, but the days of pay content in India, especially when it comes to mainstream content that’s targeting a wider demographic, may be numbered. The major GECs going free-to-air in the next 2-3 years is not ruled out either. It would just take one of the top 4 to make the move and grab the top spot, and things may look very different overnight.

     

    All hail the advertising economy!

     

  • For all the naysayers of the cinema medium, it’s time to wake up and smell the popcorn, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    The Box-office Boom: Gadar 2 & Co

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorThe Indian box-office is minting money. After an extended lull that stretched 3.5 years, punctuated by an odd film here and there, like RRR, K.G.F: Chapter and Pathaan, there is an unmistakable buzz at the ticket windows. The weekend of August 11-13 grossed nearly Rs 400 crore at the domestic box-office. To put this number in perspective, films releasing across the entire month of February 2023 grossed a similar amount (Rs 396 cr). August 2023 is in the reckoning to become the first-ever month ever to achieve the Rs 2,000 crore gross mark. It’s a long shot, but not out of bounds as of today.

     

    The boom has been ably supported by Rajinikanth’s Jailer, and the franchise social comedy OMG 2. But it’s Gadar 2, a sequel to the blockbuster 2001 film Gadar: Ek Prem Katha, that is headlining the windfall. The film is on its way to challenging Pathaan, released just earlier this year, to become the highest-grossing Hindi film of all time at the domestic box office.

     

    In September, Shah Rukh Khan will have a shot at breaking his own record, and Gadar 2’s, with Jawan. Later that month, Prabhas’ pan-India film Salaar – Part 1: The Ceasefire releases, and is expected to gross 100+ cr all India on its first day itself. 2023 is now well on course to become the highest-grossing year of all time, at the Indian box-office.

     

    It’s a narrative Indian cinema needed desperately. Knives have been out, targeting the cinema medium and its relevance in today’s streaming-centric entertainment ecosystem, since the pandemic set in, in the first half of 2020. Lack of solid films from the Hindi film industry, barring the odd one every 4-5 months, have not helped matters. But all that is a thing of the past, with Gadar 2, OMG 2, and Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani delivering within two weeks of each other, after the Hollywood-led boost in the Barbenheimer week.

     

    Outdoor entertainment options are scant in India, and movie-going remains the only inclusive one. It takes a film like Gadar 2 for the inclusivity to realise its true potential. The contrast between the urban, multiplex-centric audience profile of Oppenheimer and Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani, and the wide, all-in audience profile of Gadar 2 is a healthy sign for the medium, and its robust growth in the coming years.

     

    The success of Gadar 2 is also a validation that the star system has been re-imagined. In Pathaan or Jailer, we see conventional stardom at work, in its full glory. In Oppenheimer, it’s a director’s fan base at work. In Gadar 2, it’s the enormous equity of the original film and its characters, rather than that of its lead star, who hasn’t exactly been active or successful in recent years. This multiplicity of factors that can take audiences to the theatre allow for different types of content models to co-exist, and for the cinema medium to prosper.

     

    For all the naysayers of the cinema medium, who were eager to record its obituary in 2020/21, it’s time to wake up and smell the popcorn.

     

  • As we get into the elections year, be prepared for more noise and vitriol than ever before, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    Shailesh Kapoor: News: Television’s Problem Child?

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorThe successful landing of Chandrayaan 3 on the surface of the moon has given our news channels, at least for a couple of days, a much-needed break from the pointless primetime communal politics we have now come to expect every night, across channels. The coverage of Chandrayaan 3 landing was not free of politics, and certainly not rooted in science either. But mercifully, the Hindu-Muslim narrative was kept aside.

     

    The news genre has been under the scanner for the last five years, for various reasons. Reporting of news channel ratings has been a subject of perpetual debate, on topics as ranging from legitimacy of landing pages, to manipulation of ratings, to the evident political bias in favor of the ruling party at the Centre. A few key channels have withdrawn their audio watermark, in effect withdrawing from the ratings ecosystem. Demand to stop news ratings keeps gaining momentum every now and then. Despite BARC being an industry body, it has been difficult to drive consensus on these topics. And the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting always seems to be breathing down everyone’s necks in any case.

     

    We are entering the year of General Elections soon. News channels look forward to it, because there’s significant advertiser interest in this period, and political advertising (though it has reduced on television in recent years) adds to the topline too. Absence of ratings can lead to a disruption that the category can do well without.

     

    But at the root of a lot of issues plaguing the Indian television news genre is the larger question: Given its evident role in society and politics, can news be seen with the same lens as rest of the television? This debate is not India-specific. Globally too, including in the US, some of the biggest news channels have been under the scanner for their political dispositions, their tendency to peddle fake news to garner ratings, and for the absurdity of news reporting in general.

     

    One school of thought would suggest that the free market should be left to decide the fate of all content, including news. And by implication, if audiences watch news for entertainment, so be it. Instinctively, this seems like a fair argument. But in a country where censorship and moral policing is incessantly irritating in the entertainment domain itself, this argument can be hypocritical. A regime that can ask OTT platforms to put a disclaimer on screen every time a character lights a cigarette, surely cannot turn a blind eye to news platforms shunning their social responsibility.

     

    But we live in a confused and cluttered world, and it will be wishful to think that sanity is round the corner. As we get into the elections year, be prepared for more noise and vitriol than ever before. It’s par for the course, even if the course itself remains undefined.

     

  • Games between the arch rivals transcend the sport, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    India-Pakistan Cricket: Bigger than the Best

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorA high-decibel cricket season is round the corner. The ICC Men’s World Cup kicks off two months from today, on October 5, in India. There’s also the Asia Cup from the end of this month, as the lead-in to the World Cup. BCCI has taken its time to release the World Cup schedule, and are still tinkering with it.

     

    In a cricket crazy nation like ours, a World Cup in the thick of the festive season is an irresistible proposition, and the delay in scheduling, or the dwindling fortunes of the 50-overs format for that matter, are unlikely to keep viewers or advertisers away from this mega event. The last time the 50-overs World Cup was held in India, the home team emerged victorious. A repeat this year is what many will be hoping for, including Star Sports and Disney+ Hotstar, who have a lot riding on this event.

     

    But the really big cricket story of the year is… India-Pakistan. There are at least two ODI contests lined up: Sep 2 at Pallekele (Sri Lanka) for the Asia Cup, and Oct 14 at Ahmedabad in the World Cup. A second Asia Cup encounter is almost a certainty, given the Super Fours format. And a clash in the final is not ruled out. That could mean potentially four India-Pakistan games in six weeks. When did that last happen? In 2012-13.

     

    India-Pakistan games transcend the sport, and can even make the World Cup setting look like mere scenery. Having closely followed the exciting Ashes series that concluded earlier this week in England, one would be tempted to compare the India-Pakistan cricket rivalry to that between England and Australia. But there’s a crucial difference. The Ashes rivalry is cricketing in nature. It largely plays out on the ground, in the stadia, or in press conferences leading up to a match. But India-Pakistan cricket matches come with their share of politics and diplomacy, and the aura around them is never quite limited to just the cricket itself.

     

    The Indian team is currently on a dreary tour in the West Indies, where even the T20s feature scant crowds, and not just because they must be held during the day to match broadcast timings in India. As we gear up for an intense cricket season after the West Indies humdrum, this article titled ‘Can Indian fans ever expect a pleasant stadium experience?’ by Sidharth Monga (ESPNcricinfo), resonated with me immensely. I have now traveled to watch cricket in England and Australia on three occasions, including the recent WTC Final at the Oval. And it’s fair to say that the in-stadia experience in India is not even in the same vicinity. For a board that’s got all the money, there just doesn’t seem enough will to fix this broken piece. Because in a country of 1.4 Billion, it’s easy to fill in the stands anyway.

     

    If one looks at this issue at a more macro level, in India, cricket matches are still seen as forms of video entertainment, whose real potential is realized on TV and streaming. The crowds at the stadia are merely seen as tools to create the atmospherics that make the telecast look good. This mindset is an outcome of the absence of a sporting culture in India, at large.

     

    So, as one prepares to watch the games at home, one hopes the commentary lives up to the standards a World Cup deserves. Of late, that’s been a growing concern for those who prefer English commentary. But that’s another grouse, for another day.

     

  • As we approach the peak festive season in India, be prepared for a lot of buzz around the movies, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    ‘Cinema is Dead’. Really?

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorEven as I write this Friday morning, Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer, which released today, is running to packed houses in late night and early morning shows in India. Thus far, Hollywood box-office in India has with the action/ superhero genre. But here, we have a biographical period drama, which is likely to challenge the opening of last week’s Mission: Impossible film, singularly on the strength of its director’s equity among the urban youth in the big cities. The film, incidentally, releases along with Barbie, a ‘franchise’ film like no other. Unlike the West, Barbie will trail Oppenheimer at the India box-office, but is still expected to gross respectable numbers.

     

    And yet, there continues to be incessant talk about how the theatrical medium is in danger. This narrative, that started during the pandemic, when streaming took over as the only medium of premium video entertainment worldwide, continues to find traction in sections of the industry and the media, but is fast becoming facetious, with no facts supporting it.

     

    In May this year, I co-authored this report on the Ormax Media website, which explains how ‘big-ness’, whether it comes from the genre, or the franchise, or the director (as is the case with Oppenheimer), is the dominant expectation from the theatrical experience in India, which is why smaller films will struggle, even as the bigger ones continue to get bigger.

     

    The first half of 2023 grossed 15% less at the India box-office compared to the same period in 2022. But this is certain to be compensated to a large extent, if not entirely, by the second half, which has a stronger line-up of big-ticket releases. 2022 itself was the second-best year at the Indian box-office, being just a notch behind 2019. Yet, some people would like us to believe that cinema is in danger.

     

    I suspect this narrative is driven by Hindi cinema, or Bollywood as it’s called (and now pejoratively so), not being able to live up to the changing audience expectations from the medium. While Pathaan is by far the biggest Indian film of the year so far, and Jawan, another Shah Rukh Khan film, looks equally promising from a box-office perspective, the in-betweens are where the problem lies. Only five Hindi films have managed to cross the 100 Crore (nett box-office) mark this year in six-and-a-half months. 16 films managed that across the 12 months in 2019.

     

    That’s the real source of the faulty perception that cinema is struggling. The frequency of high-grossing films created a positive perception about Hindi cinema in the last decade. Post-pandemic, it’s been more about the tentpoles. The lull periods punctuating the tentpoles can make the theatres look woefully short of content.

     

    But as long as the tickets are being sold, there should be little cause of concern. One would even argue that a tentpole-driven category is less risk-prone, because even in the worst-case scenario, at least 50% of the tentpoles will emerge as blockbusters, something that cannot be said about mid-range cinema, where even 20% is a healthy hit rate.

     

    Tentpoles also go well with marketing-friendly concepts such as ‘event films’ and ‘theatrical experience’. They allow advertisers to plan a more concerted campaign, than spread themselves too thin across a long-list of films that are uncertain to deliver.

     

    As we approach the peak festive season in India, be prepared for a lot of buzz around the movies. But I’m not betting on the ‘cinema is dead’ debate dying down anytime soon. But it will begin to make even lesser sense with time.

     

  • Being pinned down for a particular show is no longer required, because catch-up TV is available, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    Almost the End of the Road for Appointment Viewing

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorIf you entered the Indian television industry about two-three decades ago, the two words that would be drilled into your sub-conscious within a week were: Appointment Viewing (or Appointment Viewership, in a later variant). Appointment was the Holy Grail of television. It was the ability of a TV show to get a certain guaranteed mass of audience every day or week, depending on its telecast frequency.

     

    Everyone wanted their channels to be watched by appointment. Even movie channels and niche channels, which had no intrinsic merit to demand appointment from their audience, chased the idea. What else explains an assembly line of “DDT” (Day-Date-Time) promos for movie re-reruns, at all the major movie channels?

     

    Even at a channel like Zoom, for which I headed the marketing function in its launch period, there was significant on-air inventory spent on getting viewers to watch by appointment. In hindsight, one was chasing the unattainable, but such was the buzz value of the term back then, that it even found a mention in KRAs (even though there is no evident way of measuring what proportion of a show’s viewership is by appointment).

     

    The term Appointment has lost some of that buzz value in the last decade. “Habit” is what is understood to drive non-GEC consumption in primetime, and all consumption in non-prime time. The habit of watching news at 10pm, for example. Or the habit of turning on a kids channel to watch a cartoon programme after coming back from school. Habit is a less ambitious variant of appointment, and does not have the brand loyalty aspect attached to it. Watching a movie on TV every evening for an hour (habit) is different from watching a particular movie channel every evening for an hour (appointment).

     

    With the advent of OTT platforms, appointment has become increasingly elusive, especially for men, and younger (unmarried) women. Being pinned down at a particular time for a particular show is no longer required, because catch-up television is available. That not too many TV shows are appointment-worthy to begin with doesn’t help matters.

     

    Except marquee sports events and a select few TV serials for married women, rest of Indian television viewing is now functioning on habit. Watching Star Plus from 8-10pm could be a daily habit for a family, but it doesn’t carry the same stakes as appointment. They would gladly trade it off for an IPL game, a new show like KBC, or some important news on a particular day. Stories of wars over the remote control in Indian families are things of the past, because Appointment Viewing is a thing of the past too.

     

    The habit of watching TV makes the medium secure, because this habit is linked to the grand Indian institution: Family. But in the absence of appointment, it makes channel brands and shows vulnerable, and their success more fickle, less enduring.

     

    Studying habit, instead of chasing appointment, should then be the new mantra for the many, many television executives who have viewership KRAs.

     

  • In this one-story-a-time, two-stories-a-week model, what doesn’t excite the peoplemeters doesn't make the cut, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    Shailesh Kapoor: News Channels or Storytellers?

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorAs I write this Friday morning (June 23), PM Narendra Modi is at the State dinner at The White House. The coverage of Prime Minister’s US visit started last evening on the news channels, and has continued on the other side of the night, with an address to the US Congress punctuating the welcome address and the dinner.

     

    The time difference between the two countries is a bit of a bummer for our news channels, as it takes away the opportunity to gather ratings over a day-long live event. But then, live telecast is not the only form of ratings-generating news in this case, and the coverage will continue over the next two days, including sidelights, such as culinary analysis of the dinner menu.

     

    That’s the nature of our news today, moving from one topic to the other, and almost never really focusing on two at a time. Before the Prime Minister’s US trip, Adipurush was that one topic. On the first two days of the film’s release, most news channels celebrated it. Never the one to miss an opportunity to politicise anything that has the remotest potential, Arnab Goswami even ran the hashtag ‘Hindu Re-awakening’.

     

    But between Friday and Saturday, the social media backlash became increasingly evident, and the narrative shifted to accusing the makers of the film, in particular its rather-vocal dialogue writer who has been flouting his political connections ahead of the film’s release, of not respecting Hindu sentiments.

     

    Any topic like this has a shelf-life of about three days. That suits our news channels quite well too, as it means an average of two such topics a week. But it’s an all-or-nothing approach, and nothing else can find a foot in the door over those three days. Operational Sheesh Mahal, the story on Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s expensive new house, was one such prominent story in recent times. From Thursday, the focus moved from Adipurush to PM Modi’s US visit, and shall continue to be so, till a new topic comes up for selection on Monday.

     

    It is only mildly surprising that most news channels end up picking the same topic, as if they are working in some kind of editorial unison, even as they engage in cut-throat TRP wars. Sometimes, it’s a result of the information fed to them by the political parties (invariably the ruling party). Sometimes, it’s just the knack of smelling a juicy story from half a day away.

     

    In this one-story-a-time, two-stories-a-week model, what doesn’t excite the peoplemeters doesn’t make the cut. Over the last two months, there has been negligible coverage from Manipur, which is by far the most pressing law and order matter in the nation today. It is hard to imagine an equivalent story being sidelined in most free-press democracies around the World, including the one the Prime Minister is currently visiting.

     

    This story selection model is elegant in its simplicity. It also makes journalism look a lot simpler than one always thought it to be. It’s almost like feature reporting of live news. Maybe one should do a year-end compile of the 100-odd stories covered in 2023. It will look like the annual special edition of a political tabloid: Seemingly purposeful on the outside, but largely junk on the inside.

     

  • The Indian Premier League is the biggest 'pan India' property in the media business today, writes Shailesh Kapoor

    The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

    Courtesy: iplt20.com

     

     

    By Shailesh Kapoor

     

    Shailesh KapoorThe 16th edition of Indian Premier League is in its last leg now. The 2023 edition has been the most closely-fought of the 16, and by some margin. At the time of writing this, five games are left in the league stage, and yet, only one team (2022 winners Gujarat Titans) have qualified for the playoffs. Seven of the remaining nine are in the reckoning for the remaining three spots, though two of them have only an outside mathematical chance.

     

    How IPL manages to grow in stature year-on-year is quite extraordinary. And it’s not just growth in commercial stature (viewership, revenue, etc.). The impact of IPL in shaping Indian and international cricket is unmistakable. The meteoric rise of Yashasvi Jaiswal in the last six weeks is a topical example. Jaiswal’s humble background makes for a great underdog or rags-to-riches story. He’s almost certain to earn an India cap this year itself. But it’s difficult to imagine how that would have happened if there was no IPL.

     

    From a media perspective, IPL pretty much stands at the last marquee media event standing in India. The clutter of infinite options has fragmented audience consumption over the last decade, and it seems that days of a hit show that will unify the entire country (or even the Hindi markets) are long gone. But IPL bucks that trend. To borrow a term from the theatrical business, it’s the biggest ‘pan India’ property in business today.

     

    By offering IPL free to stream, JioCinema has managed to add to the property’s stature, by giving it recognition as a brand of the ‘masses’. Premium properties can be mass too, and IPL is a fine example of that. One hopes that JioCinema doesn’t relook at this proposition next year, now that the platform has entered the SVOD business.

     

    There’s another big-ticket cricket event later this year, the ODI World Cup in India. The ODI format is in a bit of a no-man’s-land, sandwiched between the popular entertainment offering of T20 and the connoisseur-backed Test cricket format. ICC is not the most nimble-footed organisation, which is why the ODI format continues to drag on. In the process, it’s damaging the global prospects of the sport of cricket irrevocably. Logically, this should be the last ODI World Cup. It’s only imminent that curtains are drawn on this format sooner than later.

     

    But nevertheless, the 2023 ODI World Cup will be a commercial success, especially because it’s being held in India, which opens up a wide array of advertising and association options for Indian brands, that are not available in an overseas tournament.

     

    But even as its best, a World Cup (ODI or T20) cannot match the brand power of IPL, an idea that continues to grow bigger with time.

     

    This column is taking a summer break, and restart from Friday, June 16, 2023