Category: XTREME FOCUS

  • Alok Kapuria: A superb innings

    By Alok Kapuria

     

    One year of existence…

     

    Where do I begin? I’d rather start by reporting from the other side of the editorial bastion. Firstly, I’d like to state that it is because of the belief and faith that has been bestowed upon us by our readers and advertisers that we have reached here. Like the Fox Traveller show “This journey is fun…” I’ve had a superb innings so far and the journey has really been fun. It gives me immense pleasure when a media planner/buyer tells me that he/she visits our website and spends anywhere between 7 to 30 minutes every day; I feel mesmerized when I hear such things. Likewise, it feels good seeing the comments that get posted below most of the stories written by many seniors and midlevel media and marketing professionals. It surely builds up one’s confidence. We at MxM feel that the future of news is analysis, which we do in plenty since our focus is always around topics that are new-age, forward looking, agile, alive yet insightful. It is with vigour that I end up telling my clients: invest on us, we are the future!

     

    In the last one year, we have been able to achieve what we aspired to, and that is gaining editorial trust and respect from everyone from the industry. All one needs is clarity of thought. I feel proud to say that we at MxMIndia have managed to keep our environment clutter- and confusion-free. Here, all colleagues are treated equally and guided equally.

     

    As for my personal background, I am a pseudo-Bengali from Hyderabad (as my parents live there) but after spending 10 years in Mumbai, I have become a complete Mumbaikar. I am learning Marathi too and I love Maharashtrian food. Bombay or Mumbai does not matter as long as I am breathing in this city. When Malishka of Red FM raises an alarm every morning shouting Gooooood morninnngggg Mumbaiiiii… it makes me feel that I am very much a part of this city now. When she was the anchor of the show “It happens only in India” on Fox Traveller, I never missed an opportunity to watch it including the repeats. Seeing her transition to television, I wished the same for another famous RJ by the name of Jituraj from Radio Mirchi. It would have been good to have him as a host for a musical show on MTUNES or MIX or MTV as I am sure that the youth of today will relate with him. It helps knowing that he is damn good as a host on air too. Any takers?

     

    Moving on to my obsession for good food, while I have enjoyed the delicacies from Bade Miya in Mumbai on many starving nights, I was equally tempted to tickle my taste-buds by consuming delicacies from Kareems and Pind Baluchi in Delhi. This was made possible as I have to constantly keep travelling to the capital city, since my designation reads ‘National Sales Head’. I am thankful to MxMIndia for giving me this opportunity that allows me to travel to different cities. Similarly, I enjoyed reading Amar Ujala, a Hindi newspaper, while waiting at their reception to meet the team. I was happy to see lots of advertising done by local and national brands. But I am yet to visit clients in Chennai and Bengaluru. Will it mean that I will be able to read and understand content in Malayala Manorama or Sakshi? I do not think so, as I don’t understand that language. So sitting in Mumbai and Delhi, I will never know about local news in South India as much as I will know about news from North India belt by watching channels like India TV and P7.

     

    Trends are changing, reading habits are changing, we all are becoming thirstier for knowledge and there is more appetite for news and more specifically analysis.

    While our love for food and travelling is known, it is something that draws us to other facets of the business as well. I love watching FoodFood channel and attempt cooking some of the dishes at home. Poh’s Kitchen on TLC is good too as it makes one feel hungry watching some yummy culinary delights being prepared. Unfortunately, the channel is missing on my STB right now. The cable guy tells me that they are in testing mode as they getting ready for digitization. Hence many times some channels will not appear. I felt happy with the thought that soon my broadcaster-clients will be richer by some percentages in the digitization era. I get happy because it will benefit everyone in the chain. BTW, you must check out our channel on “Digitization” http://www.mxmindia.com/category/media/tv/digitization-tv/ which features the views of stakeholders on the countdown to digitization and its challenges and opportunities.

     

    Today, I can proudly state that I see MxMIndia as one-stop destination for news on everything related to media and marketing. I look forward to the following content every day…

     

    The reviews of the latest television commercial in the section ‘DEBRIEF’ by Anil Thakraney.

     

    Ranjona Banerji’s column ‘FREAKING NEWS’ is seriously freaking given the way she analyses news that gets played in the evening on news channels and in the morning newspapers. When I miss reading the TOI or miss watching ABP News or Times Now in the morning, I rely on this section for my daily updates. Otherwise too, I just read the section to gain perspectives. Yes I do watch India TV in the evenings to make life little entertaining. It’s different. Times Now’s ‘The Newshour’ is a must-watch for me. In case I miss watching it I make sure that I visit ‘Freaking News’ to update myself.

     

    Another blog by Anil Thakraney, ‘HARD KNOCKS’ where he writes about the truth behind the business of media and marketing, is another favourite. Sometimes very bold but not necessarily brash. It’s fun reading through the column and leaves you asking for more.

     

    Paritosh Joshi’s articles on media measurement and the whole business of ratings through ‘MEDIA MATRIX’ are insightful too. I am sure planners and marketers love reading them.

     

    Peter Mukerjea’s thoughts in his column ‘MEDIA MULLINGS’, where he shares global perspectives on the way media businesses function abroad and the way we do business here, is also very enlightening.

     

    Another very interesting section ‘TV TRAIL’ by Shailesh Kapoor, where he shares interesting facts about consumer’s behaviour towards television shows is also fascinating. The section talks about trends in business of television, television content, viewership patterns and consumers preferences. We believe that such content helps planners/buyers, media and marketing professionals to take the right business decisions.

     

    The channel ‘EXTREME FOCUS’, focuses on in-depth analysis of the latest big development in the media and marketing space. A few examples that I enjoyed reading were IPL 5, Imagine turn-off, Satyamev Jayate, NDTV vs TAM and the recent one on Taproot.

     

    And then there is the blog written by my boss, titled ‘MEDIAAH’, which sees him analyse recent issues and concerns surrounding the media and marketing space.

     

    Some ask me why we are not into the business of breaking news. Well, I say that we are in the business of analysing breaking news, trends, research, reports, new launches, account movements and analysing the whole gamut of the business of media and marketing. The core focus for MxMIndia I feel is to do analytical-based content that helps all of us take logical business decisions and one that allows us to keep questioning facts and statements.

     

    Trends are changing, reading habits are changing, we all are becoming thirstier for knowledge and there is more appetite for news and more specifically analysis of any news. Fragmentation is a way of life and the target audiences are scattered. Hence, it would make sense for our clients to invest in us as I see uniqueness in the way we portray the industry. We are the future.

     

    I take this opportunity to thank to all my existing clients and the others who have trusted and supported us from the beginning. I want to thank WWM, Bindass, Lokmat, Colors, Sakal, Star World, Star Movies, Love BIGCBS, BIGMAGIC, Sparks Punjabi, Bigfm, PRIME BIGCBS, Sparks BIGCBS, Sahara One, ABP News, Discovery, Hungama Digital, Movies Now, ET Now, NGC, PIX, AXN, MIX, MAX, Suvarna, Bloomberg, Neo Sports, Web18, CNBC, Zee 24 Taash, Vh1, OPEN, History, Forbes India, UTV Action, Amar Ujala, Mastiii, Dabang, DNA… I also want to thank clients who have given me the opportunity to come and present them our credentials. I specifically want to thank Dainik Jagran, India TV, Myfm, Dainik Bhaskar, Hari Bhoomi, India Today, Headlines Today, Mail Today, Hindustan, HT, iNext, Delhi Press, Redfm, Fever fm, Zee News, Zee Uttar Pradesh, Mathrubhumi, Cartoon Network, Nick, Disney, Star Network, Zee Network, Sony, Maharastra Times, Radiomirchi, Zoom, B4u and Sakshi.

     

    As I end this long, yet emotional note, my request to all would be to keep reading MxMIndia, as we are clearly different from the clutter. Our focus is to not just keep you well-informed, but keep you future-ready.

     

    Cheers! 🙂

     

  • First Person Team accounts by: Alok Kapuria, Tuhina Anand, Vidya Heble, Johnson Napier, Shruti Pushkarna, Ananya Saha, Meghna Sharma, Akash Raha, Robin Thomas, Shubhangi Mehta, Insiyah Rangwala, Rafiq Barak & Kishor Kate

    While some of those who were part of our founding team have moved on, we value their contribution in helping MxMIndia attain the success that it has.  Presenting Team MxM accounts on ‘The Year That Was’:

     

    Alok Kapuria: A superb innings

    We have been able to achieve what we aspired to, and that is gaining editorial trust and respect from everyone from the industry. All one needs is clarity of thought. I feel proud to say that we at MxMIndia have managed to keep our environment clutter- and confusion-free.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30606

     

    Tuhina Anand: Giving something more… &more!

    MxMIndia has always been about pushing boundaries, it’s about giving an edge to our coverage, knowing that when people will read the same stories on different media the next day, they will realize that we have gone that extra mile to give our readers something more meaningful.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30623

     

    Vidya Heble: A year of living excitingly

    Getting the story, ensuring it is accurate, telling it well… we do it all in a sort of measured frenzy, and though we have moments when we think we’re going to fall short, it somehow all comes together

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30624

     

    Johnson Napier: Daring to dream

    Though it has turned a year old now, MxMIndia’s story is one that could easily be referenced by aspirers or businessmen as a model to go by when launching a venture of a similar kind in future.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30609

     

    Shruti Pushkarna: A year of learning happily

    When I look back now, I can say I got a chance to do a lot of other stuff that I wouldn’t have done in my conventional role as a TV producer. But back then, the first time I was writing and reporting a story, the idea seemed ridiculous!

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30627

     

    Ananya Saha: Short but sweet

    I have not been a part of this journey for long, but it looks promising. It has been a good month chasing crazy stories, always-tied-up in-meeting people, and just-do-or-die deadlines.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30607

     

    Meghna Sharma: Happy to be here

    We are small team; some work from home; but somehow, the office never feels empty. We discuss work, industry trends and ideas. And of course, have our share of fun too. Who doesn’t love a little office gossip?.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30625

     

    Akash Raha: Being different

    What makes me proud is when I see a media house reports fearlessly on issues. There are obvious disadvantages of doing that. Losing friends in the industry is one, and if I may, even losing an advertiser.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30690

     

    Robin Thomas: The journey has just begun

    Despite the tough competition in the market, brand MxM has already created positive vibes, not just among the media industry but also with advertisers and agencies.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30626

     

    Shubhangi Mehta: MxM’emoirs: An experimental voyage

    The admirable element of working with MxMIndia has been that whether one is a beginner looking to express one’s own voice or someone experienced looking for inspiration, there has been room for it all.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30628

     

    Insiyah Rangwala: Breaking through the comfort zone

    MxM for me personally has been a great experience. It has been a fantastic stepping stone in the media field, as well as just a great place to start one’s working life.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30608

     

    Rafiq Barak: Getting the picture

    Of all the tasks, the one that is the most challenging but also fruitful for me is preparing imagery for the Big Story.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30629

     

    Kishor Kate: High on feel-good factor

    One of the best things about working with MxMIndia is the fact that I am constantly learning new things, and the exposure it offers me to various multinational companies and big media houses, many that I have only heard about.

    http://www.mxmindia.com/?p=30610

  • One Year & Counting: MxM@1

    Design often drives content. Every morning (or the previous evening), we set ourselves thinking on the Big Story image. It isn’t easy. An Amitabh Bachchan or Yuvraj Singh pic that you saw last week is a luxury we don’t have every day, One needs to think up ideas for themes like jobs, slowdown or how agencies have fared at the Cannes Lions.

     

    Our trusted lieutenant Rafiq who works on the Big Story images faces another handicap. MxM rules clearly disallow what’s a common practice amongst many publications – Google an image, right-click and copy! If there’s a watermark, it’s Photoshopped. Sad. This policy to be legit also has an impact on our bottomline… recently when we did a special booklet on the Hindi hinterland, all the photographs were legally sourced and paid for.

     

    On Friday, when we were sure to have an emblem as our main image, we set ourselves thinking on what should be our credo to be inscribed within the media or plaque.

     

     

    First Person Team accounts on The Year That Was by

    Alok Kapuria, Tuhina Anand, Vidya Heble, Johnson Napier, Shruti Pushkarna, Ananya Saha, Meghna Sharma, Akash Raha, Robin Thomas, Shubhangi Mehta,
    Insiyah Rangwala, Rafiq Barak & Kishor Kate.

     

    Anil Thakraney: Behind the interview

     

     

    Ranjona Banerji: End to innocence

     

     

    Our galaxy of weekly and other regular columnists and contributors to write and/or reminisce. By Invitation

    Peter Mukerjea, Jaisurya Das, Sundeep Nagpal, Deepa Gahlot, Paritosh Joshi, Shailesh Kapoor & Sorbojeet Chatterjee.

     

     

    The Anchor: Ajay Kakar on 10 reasons why the Ad & Marketing world needs independent publications like MxMIndia

     

    Journalism with integrity & credibility? MxMIndia will eventually be more of an information repository than just journalism, so that was out. Image, Integrity, Innovation was a suggestion. We cover and uncover all, a third. Or a flip Hinglish: Hum Honest Hain.

     

    It’s sad that we need to underscore the fact that we are honest, credible and do whatever we do with integrity. Shouldn’t all of this be par for the course? A given that if you are in the business of news, you need to do so ethically.

     

    This is an argument which I have kind-of figured is soon going to be as outdated as M K Gandhi’s call for non-violence. Okay, the comparison to Bapu’s ahimsa is a bit of a stretch, but you know what I mean. The fact is that some of Indian media’s best brains turn a blind eye to some regressive (and reprehensible) acts.

     

    But we aren’t here to change the world. We can’t do it, though we keep trying.

     

    What we have done though is ensure that we don’t indulge in the same. Trade or B2B media has got a bad name for cash-for-content deals. Before we set out to build MxMIndia, we formulated a Code of Ethics which each of us have resolved to follow.

     

    I am not going to go on and on about the MxM philosophy – you need to track it for over a week or so to know what it’s like, and I have also written about it in the past: here and here.

     

    ~~

     

    By around June last year, we were sure we wanted to build MxMIndia. Once we had a core team in place, we set out with the task of getting a web developer and an office. Work started in right earnest around July, and while the list of people who I would like to thank is rather long, there are some without who MxMIndia wouldn’t have been around: above all: my friend Prashant Basrur and the Deadline team in Mumbai and Bengaluru and all his friends who I have leaned on – Shree, Pandian, Radha and more.

     

    Thanks to: our web partners – Mediology with Manish Dhingra, Gaurav Bhatnagar plus Arun Nair and his team. Our landlord in Mumbai – Turakhiabhai, our CA – Deepak A Joshi and his team, our legal advisor – Nandita Saikia (Saikrishna & Associates). Our printing and email co-partners – Spenta, Advantedge and Netcore. Our syndicate partners: Times Syndication and Fotocorp. A variety of friends – very many of them who have guided and helped us – that list is endless.

     

    Huge thanks to all those who reposed the faith in us by way of revenues. To the various people whom we are speaking to for our funding process. To all our columnists – thank you for accepting our invitation to be part of the MxM family.

     

    And, last but not the least: to all my colleagues – present and past, their families and my own family: eternal gratitude. Yes, MxMIndia couldn’t have attained these heights without your active contribution. Often long hours, hardships, sacrifices… Salute!

     

    ~ ~

     

    So where do we go from here? Those who have tracked us closely would be aware that we have missed out on a few self-promoted projects: the print edition being the foremost. Well, we did produce six fully sponsored magazines, but a regular print edition requires surer revenues and/or deeper pockets. We’re in the process of licking this with some benefactors on board, but it’s taking its time. Suffice to say we’ll be there in print soon.

     

    To start with, we are looking at beefing up our sales team. Build a marketing team. On the content front, we are trying to expand our coverage, be even more on the ball, and have more commentary.

     

    What will stay unchanged, I can assure you, is our commitment to the cause and our ethical standards. Our allegiance is essentially to you as a reader.

     

    Best wishes,

     

    Pradyuman Maheshwari

    Email pradyumanm@mxmindia.com

    Gtalk pradyumanm@gmail.com

    BBM 29FEA79C

    Twitter @pmahesh

     

  • Zee@20 | Rajdeep Sardesai: In 1992, no one believed a 24-hr channel was possible

    Rajdeep Sardesai

    By Rajdeep Sardesai

     

    I still remember the day in 1992 when I got a request to write about a private channel that was about to start and if I would be interested to meet the person behind the initiative. I was the city editor of the Mumbai edition of Times of India then. I went to the Worli office of Zee to meet Mr Subhash Chandra. During the course of the interview, he told me about Zee’s plans of launching 3-4 hours of entertainment programming, including films and serials, and then also told me about plans to make Zee a 24-hour channel.

     

    After that meeting, when I came back to office and told my colleagues about it, no one would believe that the 24-hour channel was possible. My editor allowed me to make it front-page news about Zee. In 1992, a 24-hour channel drew apprehensions of whether it would work or not work. To tell you the truth, even I was sceptical. Who would believe that in 1992, a channel that would be uplinked from Hong Kong and would show 24 hours of entertainment would work! It was the era of Doordarshan. Even Star had not made a mark then. Frankly, none of us had foreseen the future.

     

    But Zee has been ahead of the times in whatever they have done. In the media, they have successfully stayed ahead of the curve. And for this, the visionary Subhash Chandra deserves huge credit.

     

    Zee, as it stands today, has become synonymous with certain kind of strength. Even though I am not sure about their news since it is kind of patchy, they have shown enormous strength in entertainment. Their success lies and has root in the ability to foresee the future.

     

    I have another great memory of Subhash Chandra. We became good friends after the first article I wrote about Zee. We were members of the Bombay Gymkhana. And I have seen him many times sitting in a quiet corner of the club with his wife, and smoking a bidi. I am sure that even today he goes to the club, sits quietly, and smokes a bidi.

     

    Mr Chandra was never flamboyant or has courted publicity, even when he has reached this stature. Over the years, I have secretly admired the manner in which he has risen to this position.

     

    (As told to Ananya Saha)

     

  • From ‘Okara Dukaan’ to Zee… the complete story

    Subhash Chandra

    The origin of the Essel Group may be traced to the end of the nineteenth century, though the company assumed formal shape only in 1926.

     

    Around 1890, Rameshwardas Goenka, the great great grandfather of Subhash Chandra, was running an established agro commodities business under the name of Jagannath Rameshwardas. Jagannath was the name of his partner.

     

    In 1920, Ramgopal Goenka, the son of Rameshwardas Goenka bought a plot of land in Okara in Punjab which is now in Pakistan. Ramgopal had three children – Jagannath, Gopiram and Inder Prashad.

     

    Shops were set up on this plot under a new establishment, Inder Prashad Harchand Rai (Harchand Rai was a family friend). The establishment, however, came to be popularly known as Okara Dukaan.

     

    With business at Okara Dukaan being sluggish, Ramgopal Goenka’s son Jagannath Goenka began exploring greener pastures. This brought him to Adampur Mandi in undivided Punjab. Adampur Mandi is now in Haryana.

     

    In 1926, Jagannath Goenka set up Messrs Ramgopal Indraprasad at Adampur Mandi to deal with food grains. This company is considered the precursor of the Essel Group.

     

    In 1930, Mr Chandra’s father Nandakishore Goenka was born in Sadalpur Village near Adampur Mandi. In 1941, Jagannath Goenka shifted to Hissar town due to poor business at Adampur Mandi. In 1946, Messrs Ramgopal Indraprasad ceased all operations at Adampur Mandi and moved to Hissar.

     

    The same year, Nandakishore Goenka entered the family business at the age of 16. He returned to Okara and tried to revive the business there. The business failed to pick up and subsequently Nandkishore Goenka too shifted to Hissar after wrapping up Okara Dukaan.

     

    In 1948, Jagannath Goenka shifted to Delhi and bought a plot at Mothiakhan where he set up a pulses factory which churned out polished pulses. He suffered heavy losses and the machinery was shifted back to Hissar in 1951. The new unit started operations in Hissar and supplied polished gram to Gujarat and the Southern States. This turned out to be a profit-making venture. By 1966 their firm M/s Ramgopal Indraprasad ran one dal mill and two cotton ginning factories, and the going was good.

     

    Mr Subhash Chandra was born to Nandkishore Goenka and Tara Devi Geonka on November 30, 1950 at Adampur Mandi. He was the eldest of the seven siblings – Laxmi Narain Goel, Jawahar Goel, Ashok Goel, Kusum, Urmila and Mohini.

     

    He was also known as Subhash Chandra Goenka (Goel); he chose to remove the surname and changed his name as Subhash Chandra as he felt that independent India was being divided by the political establishment (as per a notification dated August 31, 1989 of Govt of Maharashtra).

     

    Mr Chandra showed an inclination towards business even as a child. He went to the local village school which taught only up to the primary level. From the fifth grade, he shifted to CAV School in Hissar, where he was placed under the tutelage of his grandfather, Jagannath Goenka.

     

    Jagannath Goenka’s wisdom left an everlasting impression on the young boy. It was at the “Jagannath Goenka University,” as Mr Chandra would say, that he learned the three most important lessons of life: have no fear; never go back on your commitment; and do not stray from the path of truth. If there is one man from whom Mr Chandra draws his inspiration even today, it is his illustrious grandfather.

     

    Jagannath Goenka’s business involved buying grains and selling them for a flat commission, warehousing and money-lending. Every day when Mr Chandra returned from school his grandfather would sit with him and make him write letters to hundreds of people or clients. This was among the first lessons he learnt from his grandfather.

     

    Jagannath Goenka then went on to teach Mr Chandra his earliest lessons in business, the most important being how to analyse people. He taught the young boy to observe people intently and understand their motives or intentions through their behaviour. This is a lesson that has stood him in good stead till today.

     

    The grandfather also impressed upon Mr Chandra that he should not go back on his commitment, even if it is verbal. Even now Mr Chandra is known to seal a deal with a mere handshake.

     

    As a child, Mr Chandra was always in awe of what he calls his grandfather’s native wisdom. Jagannath Goenka played the role of a matchmaker in his spare time. During one of his visits to a house, he lined up all the women along with the prospective bride. When he found that another lady was more beautiful than the bride (to be), he advised that she should not be present lest the boy fall for her. Such small incidents would leave a lasting impression on Mr Chandra.

     

    On school holidays, the young Mr Chandra would go about the village bazaar with his grandfather collecting information and gossip about people. This taught him to constantly keep his ear to the ground. Even today, Mr Chandra is much the same and collects as much information as he can. He is a man who listens to what people say and has no hesitation in taking advice from the most humble of his employees.

     

    Mr Subhash Chandra always dreamt of becoming an engineer, but destiny willed otherwise. The family business suffered a series of reverses in 1967. Due to the mismanagement of the business by a relative, the family suffered heavy losses in cotton trading. The Adarsh Cotton Ginning and Oil Industries which was set up the same year went into the red and had to be subsequently wound up. A major road accident ensured that family had to spend what little resources were left. To make matters worse, Jagannath and Inder Prashad decided to split the business. Though at that time the businesses had net deficit of about Rs 600,000, Inder Prashad was given cash of 50,000 in addition to the equal properties.

     

    The family was not just bankrupt, it owed over Rs 6 lakh to friends and relatives who had lent monies. With the family going through a bad patch, Mr Chandra was told by his father that he now had to help with the business as he could no longer afford to pay his college fees.

     

    But Mr Chandra refused to be bogged down by this twist of fate, and instead took life head-on, turning an adversity into an opportunity. Two years later, that is in 1969, Messrs Ramgopal Indraprasad was renamed as Subhash Chandra Laxmi Narain (SL).  In 1976, the company came to be renamed as the Essel Group of Industries, which later took the form of the Essel Group.

     

    Steering a bankrupt business with just Rs 11 in his pocket was no easy task for this 17-year-old.  Mr Chandra struggled to find ways to continue business without making any investment.  Fortunately, he met a manager of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) in 1968-69 who took a liking to him. That was the turning point in Mr Chandra’s life.

     

    The Army was a big buyer of grains, pulses and dry fruit. But the FCI was unable to meet the high standards set by the Army. Mr Chandra suggested that his family could upgrade the product by polishing pulses and cleaning barley. The FCI agreed and the family was back in business because he found a way to add value without any significant investment. Mr Chandra also convinced the FCI to supply him with whole dal which would then be split and supplied to the Army.

     

    In 1971-72, Mr Chandra shifted to Delhi and leased a dal mill, at C-35/1, Lawrence Road Industrial Area, Delhi. The initial days in Delhi saw Mr Chandra’s evolution from agriculture to industry as he ventured into several new businesses like fibreglass mouldings, from which he exited soon after.

     

    In 1976, this 26-year-old entrepreneur got his first big break. India was by then thriving on the back of its green revolution, and the crop surplus in the mid-1970s had the FCI frantically looking for space to store 14 million tonnes of food grain. It was Mr Chandra who came to the aid of the FCI.

     

    His solution to store food grains out in the open under polythene sheets found favour with the FCI. Mr Chandra entered this business buying polythene sheets and then cutting and welding them into tents.

     

    The same year, he set up Lamina Packers, which for the first time manufactured flexible packaging and laminates for packaging pharmaceutical tablets and other combination of paper, plastic and aluminium files of international quality on indigenous machinery. Soon, also set up a manufacturing and the plant supplying empty capsules to the pharmaceutical industry, and also purchased a company manufacturing hand tools (mostly food grains). However, he had a mission in his head and that was “to remain in a business where he can be either the No 1 or strong No 2” else exit from that business.

     

    The year 1981 marked Mr Chandra’s entry into the big league. The country had just given its verdict in favour of Mrs Indira Gandhi, who for the first time in the history of the country, decided to open the doors of the economy to private players. For young entrepreneurs like Mr Chandra, this came as a blessing.

     

    These were bilateral trade agreement signed between India and the USSR. Once again, Chandra turned to his favourite business of food grains. Rama Associates, which Chandra had set up in 1976, won a lucrative deal to export rice to the Soviet Union. It was on May 21, 1981, that an agreement was signed to export 30,000 tonnes of rice to Russia at a cost of Rs 5,500 per tonne, under the bilateral trade agreement.

     

    But this was not without its share of hiccups. Barely moments before the agreement was to be signed, the deal threatened to slip through his hands, due to a communication gap with the Russian delegation. In the absence of mobile telephony those days. Mr Chandra who was in Belgium had to cut short his visit and rush to Delhi to salvage the situation. He subsequently won an additional contract to export soya bean. Within 17 months, the company exported grains worth a billion.

     

    The buyers as well as Indian trade authorities was so happy with Mr Chandra’s performance that he was awarded the Russian deal every year during 1981 to 1985. It was also a time when the Soviet Union was beginning to show its first signs of crumbling. The zero taxation policy of the Soviet government on export profits meant huge cash flows for Rama Associates.

     

    By 1982, the turnover of the Group had gone in excess of Rs 1 billion, a far cry from the bankrupt company that he had taken over in 1973.

     

    A cash-rich Mr Chandra now had ambitious plans. But before he took the next big leap, he made his brothers go through a traditional Marwari ritual called pani mein namak daalna, which literally means adding salt to water. It is a sacred vow within the community. Once you agree to do something during this ritual, you can never back out. They decided that they would never do any business outside the books.

     

    With the ambition to explore new avenues of expansion, the 31-year-old Chandra visited a packaging exhibition in Germany in 1981. The visit changed the course of his business. Essel Packaging was incorporated in December 1982 and began commercial production in the second quarter of 1983.

     

    In those days in India, toothpaste was primarily packed only in aluminium tubes and Chandra came across laminated tubes or soft squeeze tubes at the exhibition. In the West, multi-layered lamination tubes were replacing the aluminium tubes, which had earlier virtually monopolised the business of medicines, cosmetics and toothpaste.

     

    Undeterred by the advice of well-wishers that the product would not find a market in India, he imported a new technology and began making laminated tubes which he believed would replace metal tubes as toothpaste containers. As predicted, this Western innovation had arrived ahead of its time in the Indian market and Mr Chandra had to fight to survive for five long years in the face of low capacity utilization and mounting losses.

     

    But Mr Chandra stood to his ground, confident that this was a product that was bound to succeed someday. It was only in 1988-89 that the 50 million tube capacity packaging businesses showed signs of a turnaround. It was then that India saw the launch of gel toothpastes which required a non-aluminium format filling. Essel Packaging which is now Essel Propack is today the world’s largest manufacturer of laminated tubes, with a presence in 13 countries.

     

    Following the success of Essel Packaging, Mr Chandra was once again itching for something new. That was when he began eyeing the business of fun and entertainment. “After Essel Packaging, I became unemployed and was looking for new opportunities,” he says.

     

    In 1983-84, Mr Chandra had bought 753 acres of land in Gorai, on the outskirts of Mumbai. Inspired by his visits to amusement parks abroad, he introduced the Indian version, called Essel World, in 1989.

     

    But contrary to his expectations, the initial response was lukewarm. Mr Chandra was told by his friends that the Indian middle class would prefer entertainment closer home than travel to an amusement park two hours away. A spark instantly ignited in him.

     

    Those were the days when the country was witnessing a boom in video parlours. Mr Chandra initially toyed with the idea of equipping a fleet of video vans that would tour the countryside charging people to watch the videos. He had also made a quick calculation of the revenue he would earn through advertisements.

     

    In 1990, a casual visit to the office of Doordarshan in Mumbai inspired him to launch a satellite television channel, though at one point he had toyed with the idea of entering the cellular phone business too. He decided to pick up a TV station instead.

     

    Mr Chandra had contacted a school friend in Doordarshan who in turn arranged a meeting with the chief engineer. The meeting was a focal point in Mr Chandra’s foray into the television business. He was told that the Indian reputation did not permit television broadcasting as it is reserved for public sector.

     

    Then came another trigger. Mr Chandra was watching the Gulf War on CNN in 1990 and wondered why India could not have a private satellite channel of its own.  He asked why and how the foreign TV channels were seen in India and why the law did not permit Indians to start a TV station.

     

    For a while, he also explored the possibility of setting up a terrestrial channel to be beamed from Nepal. But when he learnt that the signals would not reach major Indian cities, he gave up that idea.

     

    That was when he heard about Asiasat. In December 1990, Hong Kong had granted a licence to a joint venture of the Chinese government and Li Ka Shing to launch a satellite to begin a Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) service in Asia.

     

    Mr Chandra practically chased the Chief Executive of Asiaset, finally locating him at Canada where he was holidaying in the Christmas of 1991, only to be told that the transponders were leased to one company named Satellite Television of Asian Region (STAR).

     

    Mr Chandra repeatedly knocked only the doors of STAR headquarters in Hong Kong, only to be cold-shouldered. Finally, because of his sheer persistence a meeting was fixed with Richard Li, son of Li Ka Shing, the owner of STAR. But it ended on an unpleasant note.

     

    Mr Chandra’s team was made to wait in a room for a long time. When Mr Li finally made an appearance, his executives told him there was a gentleman from India who wanted to start an Indian language general entertainment channel in a joint venture partnership. “India!” snapped Mr Li, “There is no money in India. I have no interest in India.”

     

    Having outright rejected the joint venture, Mr Li then asked Mr Chandra how much he would pay for the transponder. “I do not want to do joint venture with you, so you can take the transponder on your own,” was his remark. Mr Chandra said the price of $ 1.2 million had been agreed upon with STAR executives. “Not enough,” said Mr Li.

     

    “I do not know what came over me, but I got up and said I would take it for 5 million dollars, provided the agreement was signed within 24 hours,” recalls Mr Chandra. Mr Li refused to take Mr Chandra seriously and walked out of the room in a huff. The meeting ended there.

     

    By then, STAR had hired an investment banker to advice it on potential Indian customers. The banker did not even deem it fit to meet Mr Chandra who had no media credentials. In April 1992, Mr Li arrived in Mumbai to explore the possibilities of leasing the transponder to the highest bidder. His extensive appointment list figured big guns like Hindustan Times, The Times of India and Nusli Wadia of Bombay Dyeing. Finally, nobody was willing to pay as much as Mr Chandra.

     

    Meanwhile, Mr Chandra too was actively looking for opportunities outside the realm of STAR. But this time he was approached by Mr Li. Mr Chandra hired a helicopter and took him to Essel World and to the packaging plant. When Mr Li realised that the Essel Group was dealing with big FMCG companies such as Colgate, Lever and P&G, his opinion changed. The agreement to lease the transponder was signed on May 21, 1992, between Mr Chandra’s Asia Today and STAR.

     

    True to his word, Mr Chandra finally leased the transponder for an astounding USD 5 million. But he needed the cash to fund his ambitions television project. This time, the much-needed assistance came from an unfamiliar corner and in the form of a fund in Hong Kong owned by Sir James Goldsmith and Kerry Packer, three non-resident Indian friends and some other venture funds.

     

    “The existing media companies felt that satellite television would not succeed in the country. Since I did not know anything about the media business, I had nothing to fear,” says Mr Chandra.

     

    But launching a private satellite channel met with roadblocks at every stage. When Chandra broached the subject with the Secretary for Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, he was livid. “You will introduce consumerism and destroy the country. Your proposal can fructify only over my dead body,” the Secretary thundered.

     

    Mr Chandra then approached several legal luminaries, all of who shot down his proposal. Not a man to take no for an answer, Mr Chandra worked out a strategy. His question was simple: “If foreign channels like CNN and BBC could be viewed in the country, why not a private Indian channel?”

     

    In 1992, he entered the business of entertainment software through a company called Empire Holdings Ltd, which he had started in 1983. The name of Empire Holdings was changed to Zee Telefilms Ltd which provided content to Zee TV Hongkong which in turn beamed the signals into India from Hong Kong. That was how Zee was born on October 2, 1992, initially with only two hours of content.

     

    Overnight, Mr Chandra had ended the monopoly of Doordarshan.  Initially, he focused on inexpensive programming. The average programming cost was barely Rs 30,000 an hour for the first year. The formula of cheap programming worked and Zee was an instant success. Zee became a hit, with soaps like Tara and Hasratein and interactive musical shows like Antakshari and Sa Re Ga Ma. In six months, Zee had proclaimed its arrival in the television industry and Mr Chandra was slowly giving shape to his television business that was reaching out to almost 12 million homes across the country.

     

    But Mr Chandra had a shock in store. In an unexpected development in 1993, News Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch bought a 63 per cent stake in STAR. Initially, Mr Murdoch had very little time for India as those days everybody was focusing on China. That was until he heard that out of the 20 million homes that STAR claimed to reach, 12 million were in India and they were Zee homes. Mr Murdoch now upped his ante.

     

    As Mr Murdoch began eyeing the Indian market, he contemplated pulling Zee off from Asiasat. As days passed it become clear to Mr Chandra that he had to look for an alternative to Asiasat.

     

    While Mr Chandra had no funds to invest in another transponder, the threat of Zee’s ouster from Asiasat loomed large. Driven to the wall, Mr Chandra had no option but to sell a 49 per cent stake in Asia Today to Mr Murdoch, the company that had leased Asiasat in December 1993. STAR and Zee set up Zee Cinema and Mr Murdoch became an investor in Siticable which Mr Chandra had started in 1992.

     

    However, relations between the two began to sour in 1996. The shareholder agreement between the two companies had clearly stipulated that STAR would concentrate only on English content. But STAR violated the agreement and began beaming Hindi content.

     

    “He thought being a global media baron, he could run roughshod over us, but his calculations went wrong. We were on the path of truth. He made the mistake of taking us for granted,” says Mr Chandra.

     

    Mr Murdoch then made an unsuccessful bid to take over Zee. He offered Mr Chandra USD 2 billion as against the company’s valuation of USD 500 million. That was when Mr Chandra remarked, “India is not for sale.”

     

    Mr Chandra sued in London and in the face of STAR’s imminent defeat, both the companies finally settled the case in 1998. Mr Chandra paid $180 million for Murdoch’s share of Asia Today and Siticable. The bitter partnership came to a final end in September 1998.

     

    Then on, there was no looking back for Zee or for Mr Chandra. Today, Zee has its presence in 167 countries with a viewership of 500 million.

     

    The rest, as they say, is history.

     

    Text courtesy: The Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited Corporate Communications team

     

  • Zee@20 | Sundeep Nagpal: What a score!!!

    Sundeep Nagpal

    By Sundeep Nagpal

     

    Those who are familiar with Abraham Lincoln’s famous speech that started with the words “Four score and seven years ago ….”  (which actually meant 87 years ago …), will recollect that the word ‘score’ refers to a period of 20 years (but of course, it’s seldom used in that context nowadays!)

     

    But the point here, is that Zee has scored! And how! It has been around for the last 20 years, in what has probably been the most eventful, dynamic, anarchic & explosive phase for the media industry in this country.

     

    Although Star TV, as it was known (not Star Plus, s’il vous plait!), was the first satellite TV network in India, it was certainly Zee that heralded the satellite revolution in India.

     

    Star TV’s only other claim to fame were the mother of Western soaps – ‘The Bold & The Beautiful’  and ‘Santa Barbara’.

     

    At that time, in the days when the best known channels were always ‘DD-some-number-or-the-other’, and when transponders were perceived to be some gadgets that aliens used for communication, most of us reacted quite surprisingly at an innocuous brand name as ZEE. And if I may say, even with a certain degree of scepticism with respect to a certain, Mr Subhash Chandra Goel – the man behind the idea of an Indian satellite channel. But it didn’t take long to recognize his vision and to realize that he already had a few firsts to his credit – Essel Packaging and Esselworld!

     

    But satellite television was to be a different ballgame. It even began with a tie-up with Star TV. Those were the earliest days of Stratagem Media. And I recollect developing a pitch for Subhashji, along with Ashok Kurien (the then chairman of Ambience Advertising, which handled the Esselworld account), to Star TV for this tie-up, which happened mainly for utilizing Star TV’s uplinking facilities in Hong Kong and perhaps for some content sharing as well (and which eventually fizzled out, a couple of years later).

     

    Stratagem Media continued to service Zee’s needs in those initial days, and I also recollect working on a handful of sponsorship proposals for P&G, etc, with the then chief of Zee – Digvijay Singh (Diggy). And coming to think of it, there were just a handful of them, and none other than the big boss had to be involved.

     

    I hardly need to elaborate on what followed. Tara became the new synonym for soaps in India and Navneet Nishan – the soap queen! Close-Up Antakshari became the best platform for relaunch of the brand in those days and TVS Sa Re Ga Ma, gave Bajaj a run for its money !

     

    And let’s not forget, advertisers and media planners went into a tizzy trying to match data with observation and other realities. Viewership measurement methodology, which used a diary (yes, a minuscule set respondents in some select cities supposedly recorded their daily viewing in a diary), in the 1990s, found its way out around the turn of the century, and made way for the electronic Peoplemeter system, because it was just not representative of the satellite channel scenario.

     

    Little wonder then, that Subhashji never really accepted TRP ratings as the yardstick of channel popularity, and I recollect that his comment about the futility of media planners pouring over reams of data, some years later, at an annual review of the Ad Club, in Mumbai.

     

    Without much doubt it can be said that Zee taught the lessons of TV content to the other players in the satellite TV business in India, not just by virtue of being the pioneer, but mostly by feeling the pulse of the viewer. So much so, that it took Star TV many years after Zee’s entry, to Indian-ize, and morph into Star Plus. In fact, prior to that, and thanks to the onslaught from Zee TV, even Doordarshan made two valiant attempts to resurrect themselves with two avatars of what was known as the ‘metro’ channel.

     

    And now, as we know it, the Zee bandwagon keeps rolling on, even in the face of stiff competition from at least three multinationals. So, cheers to Zee – keep scoring !!!

     

    Sundeep Nagpal is Founder-Director, Stratagem Media Pvt Ltd, a media agency founded in the early 1990s

     

  • Zee@20: Producers raise a toast to team spirit

    By Meghna Sharma

     

    Tara, Tol Mol ke Bol, Antakshari, Zee Horror Show, Hip Hip Hurray and many more iconic shows like these take us back down memory lane. And why wouldn’t they? Twenty years ago, almost every family’s entertainment dose came from Zee television. The network revolutionized the concept of television watching for many.

     

    Even today, the channel continues to not only entertain but enjoys being a part of its audience’s life. As India’s first satellite television channel turns 20 on Oct 2, MxMIndia spoke to some of the current producers about their association with the channel…

     

    Ranjeet Thakur, producer of DID3, DID Lil Masters 2 and Dance Ke Superkids: After working for almost a decade in Zee, finally my partner (Hemant Ruprell) and I decided to start something of our own. Zee was gracious enough to give us an opportunity. The show (DID) has done really not only for the channel but the industry too. Also, the team from the channel is very cooperative and helps each one to evolve his/her creativity.

     

    Sashi Mittal, producer of Punar Vivah: Almost nine years ago, I started my career as a writer with Zee. I wrote my first show for them and since then have written many. This is my experience as a producer and I’m happy that it’s with Zee. The channel as well as the whole team is very cooperative. It’s been a wonderful journey and I hope it will go a long way.

     

    Rakesh Paswan

    Rakesh Paswan, producer of Afsar Bitiya:

    As Zee completes 20 years, we complete 200 episodes of Afsar Bitiya on the channel. So, for us it’s a double celebration! With too many general entertainment channels available today, it is very important for a channel to create its own identity, which according to me Zee has been able to do very well. Every channel has its own audience and market and hence, needs a balanced programming – fiction and non-fiction – strategy. And the same can be said about the channel especially if one takes a look at its weekend programming, which is strong. Also, one thing that separates the channel from the rest is the fact that it doesn’t run after stars because the shows speak for themselves. Also, their business strategy is also good, where they have been able to create a brand for themselves in today’s competitive market.

     

    Rashmi Sharma

    Rashmi Sharma, producer of Mrs Kaushik Ki Paanch Bahuein:

    I started working with Zee as a creative head (freelancer) more than three years ago and it’s been two years since I’ve been working for the channel as a producer. And the journey so far has been fantastic. I have learnt so much while working with Zee as the channel works as a team with production houses and has been very supportive. It’s always been a collective effort. And with Zee completing 20 years, I’m sure it has been a wonderful and emotional journey for anyone and everyone who has worked with or for the channel, like it has been for me.

     

     

    Neelima Bajpai

    Neelima Bajpai, producer of Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke:

    Zee will always be very special to me as I started my career with the channel way back in 2004. The channel didn’t hesitate in launching and promoting unknown people like me. It gave us a chance to work without doubting or asking us a million questions. I had come to the city from Delhi with an idea of a show and the channel let me go ahead with it. The channel puts a lot of faith in the people it works with and that really motivates people to put forward their best.

     

     

    Amrit Sagar

    Amrit Sagar, producer of Ramayan:

    I am the third generation of Sagars working for Zee TV. My grandfather Dr Ramanand Sagar worked with them on Sri Krishna and I’m doing so on Ramayan. I think Zee is a great channel to work with. Our association is nearly two decades old. It is a long-lasting, positive relationship and I am very proud of this fact that we have moved through generations together.

     

     

  • Zee@20: At the helm of the vision

    By Meghna Sharma

     

    Nitin Vaidya (Currently preparing to launch his own business in the field of Media & Entertainment):

    Nitin Vaidya

    I started my career in the world of television with Zee way back in 1997 after being a print journalist. I was instrumental in launch of Zee Marathi channel in August 1999 which was the first non south private satellite channel in India. After the success of the channel, I was also given charge of other regional channels in 2004 (Bengali, Gujarati & Punjabi channels). The network has been way ahead of its time and therefore, was able to see the growth in the regional market when others were hesitant to put their money there.

     

    The entry and growth of Zee in the regional channels can be said to be instrumental in the overall growth of the regional markets be it television or films. And in 2008, I assumed the charge of National Channels of Zee Network and was directly responsible of Zee TV as its Business head. For over a decade with the network, I looked after National as well as Regional channels of Zee, before calling it quits in October 2010. The journey has been a long learning experience wherein I got to work with creative and vibrant team. It was also great to work with Subhash Chandraji and Punit Goenka.

     

    Like me, I’m sure there are many in the industry who started their careers or have worked with Zee at some point in their careers. The industry – television as well as film – have to thank the Zee network for giving them opportunities and a learning ground to reach where it is now.

     

    Also, I do believe that one can easily say that the entertainment industry was started in the country by none other than the Zee TV. It is the pioneer of GECs!

     

    Ashwini Yardi

    Ashwini Yardi (Currently producer of the film OMG):

    Fresh out of college, I had joined Zee as assistant director and after working with the network for 15 years, I left as programming head. And I can proudly say that today whatever I am is because of the channel and all the lessons I learnt while working there. Unlike today, there weren’t any courses in television also the satellite television was young too. Therefore, we all learnt on the job and nothing can be more exciting and enriching than that. Even the team as a whole was young (average age of 26-27 year-olds) who were full of ideas.

     

    I have only good and enriching memories of my time spent in Zee. I can call it my family!

     

    Meenakshi Menon, founder and chairperson, Spatial Access:

    Meenakshi Menon

    It was September 1994, I had just joined Zee as Vice President Sales and Marketing. My appointment letter was issued by Ambience Space Sellers Pvt Ltd. but I was head of Sales and Marketing of Zee TV, a channel that was owned by Asia Today Limited, a Hong Kong based company that was floated by an Indian businessman called Subhash Chandra whose brothers were Goels.

     

    That was my entry into the exciting, confusing world of Zee TV.

     

    Satellite TV was just a few years old. The Gulf war of 1990 was the catalyst for CNN and drove penetration of satellite dishes across the country. Star TV launched in Dec 1991 with Santa Barbara and the Bold and the Beautiful. In October 1992 Zee TV had launched its Hindi satellite service. Programmes like Saanp Seedi, Colgate Top Ten, Close-up Antakshari, Khana Khazana, Tara and Bournvita Quiz contest were fresh and entertaining. They fuelled TV penetration as strongly as they fuelled C&S penetration. The middle class bought TVs because for the first time they could sit at home and in the comfort of their homes be entertained by television where the focus was creating a fresh new world every 30 minutes. But this is not about TV programmes. Enough has been written about that and how Zee created a genre of programming that set the pace for change; social re-engineering we use to call it. There were protests from men’s groups that Tara was encouraging women to stand up against their menfolk. The woman’s media advocacy groups on the other hand gave Tara and its lead Navneet Nishan an award. But this story is about the people behind Zee and not anyone else but the man who was Zee. SC as we called him with a mixture of respect, affection and angst in equal measure.

     

    My first week at Zee, my immediate boss Digvijay Singh was travelling. SC sent for me. He wanted an update on the revenue figures for the July/Sep quarter. I grabbed the reports from my finance team and ran up the stairs to meet him. My heart in my mouth. SC was known for his short temper and his ability to reduce everyone (including the senior guys) to tears. I walked into his waiting area, told his secretaries (he used to have two secretaries and two office assistants, even in those days) that I had been summoned and settled down to wait. The Boss would have three, four, five meetings running in tandem. He would step in and out of meetings and pick up the threads without skipping a beat. Ten minutes later he walked up to me and said “Meenakshi, kaise chal raha hai? Sab theek?” Much later I was to learn that “Sab theek” was his way of telling us that all was well and not the question that I thought it was in the initial months. “Haan SC, sab theek.” He looked at the sales figures and frowned. It was September, the Divali season was around the corner and SC was not happy with what had been done the previous quarter. “I want you to double revenues for the next quarter,” he said. “Can I count on you to do it?” Now Diggy, my boss, had not warned me that SC was not used to refusals or debate. His question was purely rhetorical in nature. He was not looking for an answer. All he wanted was action. Unfortunately I had not been briefed and it was too late. “Double revenues? No way. Not unless we revamp our operations systems and hike up our rate card.” Have you ever experienced time stand still? I did that day for the first time. There were three sets of people waiting to meet SC, two foreign visitors, his four-member office staff. Everyone was frozen. Did I not know that you were forbidden from saying no to SC? Did I think my professional reputation would save me from the gallows? What was I doing? Why was I messing up the day for the whole company? Nothing moved. Even the phones were silent. The crows outside his first-floor office window were cawless for one crazy suspended-in-air moment. SC looked at me and said, “Toh rate badhao! Par revenue double hona hi hai.” I could hear the loud intakes of breath from a dozen lungs around the room. SC stood up and so did I. My knees were quaking. Double revenues? Hike rate card? I had escaped SC’s wrath but I was about to be the most hated person in the advertising industry. Little did I know that day that it was to become a bit of an occupational hazard for me. Being on the opposite side of the hordes was always a preferred position.

     

    Second week September, I have created a new rate card. Built a concept that permits us to take a rate hike 365 days of the year. Programmes move up or down a cost scale based on delivery and demand. Pricing is perfectly positioned to seize the moment and double the revenues of the quarter. I ask SC for a meeting to walk him through the new rate card, Digs is still in Europe. SC’s response is, “Can it be justified? Then why do I need to see it? Don’t waste time, send it out to the market.” The rate card is out, agencies and advertisers are up in arms. How dare Zee hike rates just before the festive season. What is SC thinking? He gets calls from agency heads, advertisers. To each one he says, “Nayi bachchi hai, maalum nahi. Ab kya kare? Aage dekhenge.” Then he stops taking calls because he knows I am pissed off at being made the scapegoat behind my back. I have no problems with being the fall guy but it has to be stated up front. I draft a letter for him to send out to all those who call or complain. It says the same thing but asks them to call me if they have a problem. I will sort it out. No one gets in touch. The few that do are dealt with compassionately but end up paying just as much as those who did not call. Some agencies run by a bunch of SC cronies and distant relatives go to him with a complaint. I am arrogant. He needs to put me in my place. His answer to them is, she is arrogant with me and I pay her salary! The new rate card is accepted by the industry. Even today It forms the basis of all the rate cards that are currently used by TV channels across the country. Programme and day part categorisation. Where the categories do not change but programmes move up into higher categories. Rarely do they move down. The weekly rate adjustment (hike is a four-letter word) is here to stay something that was created by me in my second week at Zee TV. Something that SC did not even want to see because he had faith in me….in my second week on the job.

     

    That is the most amazing thing about SC. If he trusts you he will be one hundred percent behind you. If on the other hand he suspects your motives you could be Mother Teresa and he would find fault with everything you did. In those early years of private broadcasting there were no rules and conventions. We were all inventing the rules as we went along. What would succeed, what would fail? The only way to find out was to jump in head first. We were a young team with no experience but huge ambitions. SC was there to support, motivate, chastise, reward, reprimand. He was there for us 24×7 before the term became fashionable. In turn he expected the same from us. We were all consumed by Zee TV. It was not a job. It was a calling. We were all responding to SC’s vision of taking an amusement park into every household. To have people enjoy the thrills, spills and chills in their living rooms. He did not know TV. People used to disparagingly refer to him as a rice trader. His inability to mask his accent. His proclivity to smoke bidis with the lit end in his mouth. His lack of flash and dash were all part of the message that he was sending out to people. “Do me a favour, underestimate me.” That was his mantra and it served him well for many years until his adversaries and partners and partners who turned adversaries got smarter.

     

    SC was an amazing teacher. He taught me about business. He taught me that anger could be used constructively and that emotion was better than intellect and that human nature does not change even if the accent does. He taught me how to be a boss and how to be generous with my staff and how to get them to acknowledge it. But more than anything else he showed me the value of going after my beliefs. Today, almost 20 years later, his inputs hold me in good stead. Zee will evolve, will have its ups and downs, but for me the time spent learning from SC will always be my initiation into the business of the world.

     

  • Jaldi 5 with Ashok Kurien: Zee changed the Indian consumer forever!

    By Johnson Napier

     

    It was a dream that was waiting to become one big reality. When the rest of India was hooked on to the goings-on of the Gulf War in 1991 through relay from international news channels, a bunch of visionaries were contemplating launching a private channel that would do something similar in India. Thus was sown the seed of India’s first and private Hindi channel, Zee.

     

    Ashok Kurien, the man who ran Ambience Advertising which handled the ad business of Essel Group, recounts how a chance conversation took shape to create one of India’s earliest and most successful Hindi channels. Mr Kurien continues to be on the Board of Directors of Zee Entertainment.

     

    1. Do you recall how you reacted when Mr Subhash Chandra first came to you with the idea of launching Zee? From what we hear, it’s after your reassurance and active support that he got into it.)

    January 1991: Subhash, my client at Esselworld, and I were watching the Gulf War ‘Live’ on CNN. It was our early exposure to satellite TV in India.

     

    “Why can’t we do this here in India?” the conversation went.

     

    “What do you know about TV?” asked Subhash.

     

    “More than anyone else,” I replied, having spent many years on the ad agency side: Concepts and Pilot programmes, Sponsored programmes and FCT during the Doordarshan days…

     

    “Write me a business plan,” said Subhash.

     

    I did… and the rest is history.

     

    Of course, Subhash was way ahead of me, with advice and plans from some ex-Doordarshan people.

     

    The first 5 or 6 years, working hands-on to help Subhash build India’s first private TV station, was the most exciting chapter of my life.

     

    Zee changed the Indian entertainment scenario, and along with it changed the Indian consumer forever.

     

    2. Zee obviously had the advantage of being the first mover in the Hindi space, and later there were many others who entered the scene. What according to you is the reason Zee has been such a success story?

    Zee moved fast, was always the first, and stayed far ahead of everyone for over the first decade.

     

    Zee understood the emotions and tastes of the Indian consumer. It took a long time for the competition to figure it out… mainly by hiring Zee TV’s people.

     

    3. Other than being a director on the Board, are you active in advising the Zee management presently?

    No advice to Zee at all….. unless I am asked to.

     

    I have played a role in helping Dish TV grow to leadership over its first 3 or 4 years, and now helping to take the Zee group into new media with India.com.

     

    4. If there was one thing that Zee could have possibly have done differently in these 20 years, what would it be?

    Zee should have launched a Tamil/South channel 15 years ago. But it was my error of judgement and ill advice that prevented that. My one, big, unforgettable mistake!

     

    5. Zee, it’s said, mirrors Mr Subhash Chandra’s personality: dynamic, aggressive, a maverick, often restless, cost-conscious, risk-taker and a visionary. He’s been a friend for many years, would these descriptors be appropriate (for him and Zee). And how much would you attribute the success of Zee to Mr Chandra and in recent years, his family?

    Subhash’s personality is all this and more. He is fearless and will walk where angels fear to tread!

     

    But as a friend I have seen the warm, but very private, human side of him too. He has great inner strength, and this too is inbuilt in Zee’s DNA.

     

    Zee’s success was driven almost 100 percent by Subhash for many years, and only in the last decade or so did the professionals who joined Zee start contributing majorly.

     

    Punit has reinvented the ‘creative magic’ that Zee started with 20 years ago.

     

    But today, it’s certainly TEAM ZEE!!

     

  • MxM Buzzer # 11 | Quiz on 20 years of Zee

    Welcome to the Eleventh edition of MxMIndia’s media quiz – MxM Buzzer, that happens every Friday (but was pushed to today because of the special on Zee TV.

    Our quizmaster is Sorbojeet Chatterjee, Vice President – Marketing at DNA. We’ve done away with the contest for a bit, but will be back with an attractive one soon. Meanwhile, do please attempt our quiz. Answers will appear on Firday, October 5.


     In March 2012, India’s Foreign Minister SM Krishna announced that Zee TV has got the landing rights in an Asian country, thereby becoming the first Indian channel to get the rights. Which country?

    Identify the MD and CEO of Zee Entertainment?
     Which Bollywood A lister made her acting debut with the cult Zee sitcom Hum Paanch?
     Which pioneering and popular show on Zee is the longest running TV show in India?
     Zee Talkies is a regional channel showcasing movies in a particular language. Which language?
     Zee televised India’s first ever reality show with Mohan Kapur as the host. Identify the show?
     Another first for a private broadcaster, Zee launched a dedicated Urdu infotainment channel in 2010. Name the channel?
     Navneet Nishan played the protagonist in which cult television program during the initial years of Zee?
     This movie by Zee Telefilms is one of the biggest blockbusters in Bollywood and created a record by being the first film where the costs were professionally audited and every expense was made in white. Identify the movie?
     Zee acquired a leading channel from Abdul Rahman Bukhatir. Which channel?

     

    Answers to MxM Buzzer #10 (Quiz on WPP):

    1. Vikram Sakhuja, 2. Colvyn Harris, 3. Wire and Plastic Products, 4. Google, 5. Saatchi & Saatchi 6. Encompass, 7. Ogilvy, Mather, 8. Kantar, 9. Hungama, 10. Suhel and Swapan Seth

     

  • What makes Zee such a force to reckon with

     

    By Pradyuman Maheshwari

     

    I still remember the day a few weeks before Subhash Chandra was setting up Zee TV. Although I would edit a computer magazine then, I would review television for film trade weekly Screen and moonlight for a few publications.

     

    Those were early days of television. Films dominated all magazines and newspapers, there weren’t too many journalists who wanted to cover television, even as viewership for the small screen was rising. This was good news for rookie media journalists like me.

     

    Star Plus wasn’t for the masses then – though shows like The Bold and The Beautiful and Santa Barbara were very popular with the urban set. One would watch the BBC to find out what actually happened at Ayodhya in 1992, and many of us would be nuts about the graphics on MTV and knew each veejay by name.

     

    Zee arrived and not many took it very seriously initially. All we knew was that a Subhash Chandra Goel was behind the venture. Yup, the same man who had set up the Esselworld amusement park on the outskirts of Mumbai, was once a rice trader and had made a success of Essel Packaging. But for someone like me in the Mumbai media, it was the association of Ashok Kurien, then poster boy of Indian advertising, that led me to believe that there was merit in the venture.

     

    A friend at Mid-Day asked me to write about this weirdly-named ‘Z’ TV. For a while, we would call it Z, thinking that just as our Maths professor at college would pronounce ‘z’ as ‘zee’, the announcers called the channel Zee. I am fuzzy about it, but I think my story on Zee appeared soon after Rajdeep’s did in the Times of India. I tried looking for the story in the Mid-Day archives when I worked there, but couldn’t locate the file.

     

    I remember reasoning with my friend that Zee had a future because Kurien couldn’t get it wrong, and it’s for this reason I insisted we also interview Subhash Chandra on the occasion. I don’t think we carried the interview.

     

    We’ve transformed from broadcaster to content creator/ provider: Punit Goenka
     

    By Johnson Napier

     

    He’s been credited for the channel putting up a sterling performance over the past few years, be it in terms of staying in the top-3 or whether for being the most profitable among its peers. But much of what MD & CEO of ZEEL, Punit Goenka is able to do today to the network is due to the passion and vision that was carved out way earlier by its founder & Chairman Shri Subhash Chandra.

     

    As the much-cherished family channel celebrates 20 years in India, MxMIndia gets Punit Goenka to relive some memorable moments of the channel’s past and what it plans to do to get audiences to love it in the future as well. Excerpts:

     

    Your memories of Zee when it started 20 years back… did you think it would become such a big, powerful empire?

    I was still studying that time, but always believed in my Chairman’s vision and that he would make it big.

     

    The future of Zee is in a sense your hands. We have seen some rapid progress in the few years you’ve been at the helm. What do you think will be the way to go over the next 10 years?

    We have transformed from being a broadcaster to content creator/ provider. We will address viewers at the end of any screen. Also, our focus has moved from catering to only south Asians globally to even addressing the local audiences in the international markets. Our focus is going to be on Middle East, Russia, Africa to start with, before opening up new markets.

     

    The emphasis thus far has been on profitability. But over the last few years, we’ve seen some emphasis on marketing and promotion. How do you strike a balance between the two for a GEC?

    The change is that marketing has become more intense but has always played an important role. Both functions are linked as you can’t have success without both the functions working in tandem with each other.

     

    In some genres like news and music, Zee has been lagging behind. Any plans to shore these up in the near future?

    No comments.

     

    A little about the last 20 years:

    a. What do you think led to the success of Zee?

    Our ability to stay rooted and focusing on what we want to do rather than focusing on what competition is doing.

     

    b. Your favourite Zee shows?

    Saat Phere.

     

    Any shows you would like Zee to have had?

    More of home-grown formats.

     

    Zee moved on from strength to strength. UTV, which had done programmes like The Mathemagic Show on DD, came up with a variety of gameshows… Saanp Seedi, for one.

     

    Doordarshan launched a Bollywood music countdown show in Superhit Muqabla (produced by Harish Thawani’s Nimbus), but the satellite channel came up with its own popular countdown show (Philips Top 10).

     

    There was a period when Doordarshan’s primary and Metro channels gave Zee serious competition, but with time, couldn’t match Chandra’s longterm vision of the space.

     

    Zee experimented a fair bit – a news bulletin in colloquial Hindi peppered with a lot of English words, a weekend show on the stockmarket, a telefilm by Mahesh Bhatt, and finally a second channel called EL TV.

     

    Zee’s top team saw various captains as business and programming heads: – Karuna Samtani, Nitin Keni, Digvijay Singh, Kamlesh Pandey, Meenakshi Menon, Anil Dharker for a bit, Chandraprakash Dwivedi… the list could go on. Sandeep Goyal too was CEO and announced a makeover, but he exited soon, to be followed by Apurva Purohit. Pradeep Guha occupied the CEO’s chair, but he left after a few years. Nitin Vaidya, who had helmed the regional channels for a while, took charge of the flagship Zee TV, but he too moved on leaving one with the belief that while the Zee top job may be coveted, it was too hot to handle for professionals. In fact when MxMIndia tried speaking to some of the former captains, many refused to be quoted saying that since it was too long ago for them to remember much.

     

    Yet, privately they acknowledge that even though Subhash Chandra is a maverick, he’s a huge force to reckon with in Indian media. He is aggressive, dynamic, cost-conscious and a big risk-taker.

     

    Very few others in the media have seen the ups and downs that he has probably seen. After being a darling of the stockmarkets and the Indian viewing public, Zee’s stock fell – in every possible way. In the early 2000s, the Economic Times would have a story virtually every other dialing quoting some regulatory irregularity.

     

    But Subhash Chandra, minus the Goel that he dropped in the late 1980s, wasn’t going to be down for too long.

     

    In 2005, after hiring Pradeep Guha from The Times of India group, he stitched up a joint venture with the Dainik Bhaskar group to launch a newspaper called DNA. PG, as Guha is popularly called, and the Bhaskar group’s Agarwals ensured that the paper had a high profile launch. That the Times of India improved its offering several times over, launched Mumbai Mirror and Hindustan Times too kicked off a Mumbai edition may have been dampeners, but DNA didn’t take too long to establish itself.

     

    I was fortunate to be part of the DNA editorial team for a bit, though often felt the strains of a newspaper with too many people at the helm – owners and top management.

     

    Much after I had left DNA and the Bhaskar group, I learnt that Subhash Chandra had assumed charge of DNA. There were several exits around that time, and one feared there would be instability after that. But that didn’t happen, although the editor changed and the paper dropped the editorial page. K U Rao continues to helm DNA, and the paper has an all-new business team to steer it forward.

     

    Flagship channel Zee has seen its ups and downs. From a clear #1 in the 1990s to losing its leadership first to Sony and later for a long, long time to Star Plus, Zee has come back and attained strength in the GEC space.

     

    Post Kaun Banega Crorepati in 2000, Zee was hit badly. It produced a dud in Sawaal Dus Crore Ka to combat KBC.  All those who backed the network had fallen in love with the new Star. Not for too long, as Subhash Chandra’s team picked up the pieces and steadily started inching up. And then Colors happened in 2008, pushing Zee down again. However, soon after his channel had turned #1 the then Colors CEO Rajesh Kamat told me that more than Star Plus, his team and he were watching Zee very closely. Its fictions and reality shows had promise.

     

    Which it did. Cut to 2012, although there’s been a see-saw in the Hindi GEC space for the top slot, in the pure non-Bollywood general entertainment category, Zee is a GRP grosser.

     

    Zee Timeline
     

    1992

    > Launches Zee TV

    > Initial Public Offering of Zee Telefilms Limited

     

    1994

    > EL TV launched

     

    1995

    > Commences Siticable operations Joint Venture with News Corp

    > Launches Zee News and Zee Cinema.

    > Zee TV goes global – launches Zee TV, UK

     

    1996

    > Starts first cable channel in India – Siti Channel.

    > Launches Zee TV, Africa.

     

    1997

    > Launches Zee Music (originally called Music Asia).

     

    1998
    > Launches Zee TV in the US.

    > Institutes ‘Zee Cine Awards’.

     

    1999

    > Acquires News Corp’s 50% stake in joint ventures of their television broadcasting business tie-up.

    > Launches regional channels.

     

    2000

    > Launches Internet over Cable services – first cable company in India to do so.

    > Enters into content distribution joint ventures with MGM and Viacom.> Launches pay bouquet of channels in the Asian region.

     

    2001

    > Introduces Zee TV and Zee News as pay television offerings.

    > ‘Gadar – Ek Prem Katha’ became highest grossing box office movie (it released on the same day as Aamir Khan’s Lagaan)

     

    2002

    > Acquires controlling stakes in ETC Networks Limited and Padmalaya Telefilms Limited.

     

    2003

    > Launches 5 new channels for the DTH market viz. Action cinema, Classic cinema, MX, Premier cinema and Smile TV.

    > Enters into a distribution tie-up with Rajshri Pictures for theatrical distribution of films in India.

    > Launches ‘Trendz’ – A premium fashion and style channel, targeted at the fashion conscious Indian consumer.

     

    2005

    > JV with Dainik Bhaskar group to set up DNA, DNA launched

     

    2006

    > De-merger of Zee Telefilms Limited.> Failed attempt to acquire news agency UNI

     

    2007

    > Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEE) gets listed as an independent company.

    > Zee Next launched

     

    2008

    > Zee Next shuts down

     

    2010

    > Launches Zee Khana Khazana – India’s first 24-hour food channel

    > Launches Zee Salaam – India’s first Urdu infotainment satellite television channel> Acquires stake in Ten Sports.

    > Launches Ten Cricket – a dedicated 24-hour Cricket Channel.> Launches Ten Action+ – sports channel showcasing the best football action from around the world.

    > Launches India.com – Joint Venture between Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. and Mail.com

     

    2011

    > ZEE’s distribution arm, Zee-Turner Ltd, enters into a 50:50 JV with Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd. to form MediaPro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd.

    > Announces share buyback

     

    2012

    > Launches Ditto TV – India’s first and only OTT (Over-The-Top TV) Distribution Platform

    > Launches Ten Golf – India’s first and exclusive 24 hour Golf channel

    > Launches 24-hour Bengali movie channel

    > Announces launch of a kids’ channel

     

    Source: Zee Corporate Communications, MxM News Desk

     

    Credit for this goes to Chandra’s son and Managing Director and CEO Punit Goenka who has led the network very effectively. There are some chinks even as Zee continues to be among the most profitable media companies in the country. Sun TV is of course up there, but it’s been controversy-ridden for a while.

     

    There are various genres Zee is in, but its channels aren’t much to talk about. Zee News has a new CEO, but it will need to do loads to turn #1. Ditto with the various other channels – Zee Music, Zee Smile, Zee Studio. Zee Cafe has tried to create a bang with more recent seasons of popular shows, but the niche channels require some attention from Goenka (See interview).

     

    His leadership team has an interesting mix… Rajesh Jejurikar vroomed in from Mahindra & Mahindra to be President, Bharat Ranga is now heading content, Ashish Sehgal is Head of Revenue and of course the old and some new stalwarts – Amitabh Kumar, Atul Das, Atul Pande, Hitesh Vakil, M Lakshminarayan, Nittin Keni, Rajendra Mehta, Roland Landers, Sharada Sunder and Utpal Das constitute the A team.

     

    Goenka’s leadership has also brought with it much camaraderie with Star India and its CEO Uday Shankar. They have merged their channel distribution interests into MediaPro and the move appears to be paying rich dividends.

     

    Until a few years back, Zee lacked buzz-creating content. But no longer. DID has been putting up a blockbuster performance every year. Zee didn’t come up with anything like Satyamev Jayate, but it chose not to be a me-too.

     

    At times like these when celebration is in the air, it’s not uncommon to gloss over a company’s various failures. But rather than blips, I would look at these as the network’s strength to have in Subhash Chandra a promoter who was willing to take risks.

     

    Although I wouldn’t report on media in 2000-01, I am told the proposals for Kaun Banega Crorepati and some of the top-rated Balaji soaps were rejected by Zee.

     

    Chandra started EL TV (no marks for guess where that name came from) at a time when he thought he could replicate the flagship’s success with a second GEC. That didn’t happen, and EL metamorphosed to Zee India TV and later Zee News. Yet another attempt to look at the younger, urban set with Zee Next in late 2007 survived for less than a year. Zee’s radio foray was still-born and attempts to publish TV and film magazines didn’t work.

     

    Zee had much failure in bidding for cricket rights, including the World Cup. Despite his bid being the highest, Chandra lost out which many agreed was unfair to the media baron. In 2007, buoyed with India winning the T20 World Cup and the success of the 20-over format, and anguished with the ways of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), Zee set up the Indian Cricket League. While the ICL took off, it never gained ground as key cricketers of the day were not allowed to participate for the tournament was dubbed ‘unofficial’. Chandra gave up after a protracted fight with the BCCI as the ICL became meaningless post the success of the Indian Premier League (IPL).

     

    Twenty years on, how would I rate Zee’s performance? A 9 or 10 on 10 for the spirit of enterprise and growing the industry.  Too many leadership changes may have not given the company stability, but as Chandra once told me, the only reason why he’s had to move CEOs out is because of non-performance. And he shouldn’t be faulted for that. The ousted CEOs naturally have another story, but as mentioned earlier, almost everyone who has been associated with the network recognizes Subhash Chandra and Zee’s tremendous contribution to Indian broadcasting.

     

    Three cheers to that!

     

  • Uday Shankar: ‘Zee is a treasured peer’

    By Uday Shankar

     

    The success of Zee is a testimony to the remarkable vision and entrepreneurship of Subhash Chandra. He helped to spur and shape an industry in a short period of two decades.

     

    What I have always valued about the company is its resilience and attitude: every time it has faced competition in a new market or genre, it withstood the challenge and held its own. Zee has known when to hold back, and when to aggressively chase an opportunity.

     

    Zee is a treasured peer in the industry and I genuinely wish the company, its leaders and its hardworking team the best in the decades to follow.

     

    Uday Shankar is CEO, Star India