The Ghatkopar billboard incident that killed many and injured many more has raised many ethical questions about the advertising and media business.
For many unknown reasons, the outdoor media business has always been known to be of a low moral standard and has once again brought up important questions of ethics in the advertising and media business.
It is well known that the outdoor business is often part of the intricate web of questionable transactions. Which means if you are an owner of a hoarding in Mumbai, by definition you need to be turn a blind eye to the law.
If one goes to the Ego Media website what is shocking is to see all the best brands in the country – from Godrej, Tata, Audi, Honda, Britannia, Big Bazaar, Titan and many more.
Are we saying that some of the best brand names in the country don’t care where their advertising goes and would like to in any way be associated with a company who has shown to have a complete lack of morals and ethics in the business? I know many advertisers and equally their advertising agencies think that a hoarding is something remote in their outdoor plan. Beside the top-ranking client wanting his favourite airport hoarding or a hoarding in the centre of the city because s/he lives there, not much importance is perhaps being given to where the advertising finally goes.
But shouldn’t advertisers care about where their advertising is being placed? Let me give you an example. If your cinema ad was to be tomorrow viewed in a theatre that screens porn films would you want your ad there? Or if your ad was screened in a theatre known to conduct other illegal activities, would you still want your ad placed in that theare? If yes, why don’t you care about where your outdoor creative is being placed?
If so far you have thought that “Oh that is the job of the outdoor owner” you better think again. You are not really distanced from the tragedy that has struck us on the Ghatkopar hoarding. Now that the real operation of Ego Media has been exposed in the media, I wonder how many advertisers have pulled out all their advertising from Ego Media.
Or are they waiting thinking that they are actually at arm’s length from the outdoor business?
There are many parties that are complicit in this act where many people lost their lives.
The owner of the property, which is the Government Railway Police, Ego Media who actually constructed the hoarding, the BMC for having allowed it (or for giving a stability certificate ) and, yes, the advertiser and his advertising agency are equally complicit. After all, lives have been lost.
It is time that the advertisers and their media and creative agencies feel equally guilty about the Ghatkopar billboard accident?
As a nation that is constantly boasting about now crossing Japan’s GDP, we better stop condoning our collective conscience that this is the India we know and nothing can be done about it. Make a trip to Japan to see how strict their laws on construction of any kind are in their cities.
We proudly say the medium is the message, but do we really care about what the medium is, and how the message is being placed on it.
I don’t think so!
Prabhakar Mundkur is a veteran advertising person having led advertising agencies in India and internationally. He is also a prolific writer and commentator. His views here are personal










My first watch was a mechanical and it was an HMT, those considered the pride of India. If I am not mistaken, they cost about Rs 500 those days in the 60s. Over the last few years, I have been collecting the old mechanical HMT watches just to relive the magic of mechanical watches. My first project was to restore my father’s HMT Jubilee watch which was also probably bought sometime in the 60s.




