Author: mxmadmin

  • Tribute: Remembering K Kurian

    By Jameel Gulrays

     

    K Kurian

    On the fourth death anniversary of K Kurian, once again I recall my 17-year-long association with him.

     

    It was in 1977, when I walked up and down the stairs of Shah House, Colaba, at least three times before mustering courage to step inside for an interview with K Kurian, then CEO of Radeus Advertising, one of the best agencies of its time.

     

    I was appearing for an interview for the post of ‘Hindi writer’. He was a man who was not only a brain to work with, but also stood tall amongst advertising contemporaries such as Subhash Ghoshal and Ayaz Peerbhoy.

     

    Jameel Gulrays

    The fact that he is no more is something I am unable to come to terms with, even today.

    In the 17 years that I worked with him, I learnt 17 million things about everything – profession, ethics, values and conduct.

     

    My dad passed away when I was eight, I lost my mother when I was 18; so when I joined him, I wanted him to guide me. And he did. He was like a father to me.

     

    He taught me like a teacher would his favourite student, explaining ever so patiently with a pen and paper. I was like a dry sponge, absorbing everything he said. He was a diminutive man, but one who stood tall on the wealth of knowledge and good sense. He was the powerhouse who built teams and steered brands such as Amul, LIC, Limca, Maaza and Bisleri, and made each a leader in their category. He was an indulgent boss, at least for me. He taught me to treat people equally. No wonder he ensured that I flew with him in the same class, stayed in a similar hotel room as he did.

     

    He led by example. And what a great walk we walked together. It would  have been a journey right up to his last breath, had it not been for one breach of trust on his part when one day, quietly, without even a whisper, he sold Radeus – an agency I was led to believe I would head one day. It was an earth-shattering moment for an orphan like me, to lose a parent again. It broke my heart to turn my back on him and walk away. And it stayed that way since then.

     

    The news of his death was that one moment of loss, when I saw what a great contribution he’s made to who I am. The darkness I feel today is because this light has gone out of my life forever.

     

    I miss you, sir. I miss you, Mr Kurian.

     

  • Digital, the efficient earner: B N Chandrakanth, Theorem

    By Robin Thomas

     

    Theorem, a technology company focused on digital marketing or online media operations, started at a mere number of four, and today has over 1000 people  with offices in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe and the Middle East. The company provides a broad suite of digital solutions in areas ranging from creative services and media operations to reporting and analytical services. In conversation with MxMIndia, Chandrakanth B N, Co-Founder and Managing Director, Theorem India, spoke at length about the company’s journey over the last ten years since its foundation in 2002. He also spoke about his India plans, specifically post Rs 100 crore investments in India, and much more.

     

    Q: From mere 4 people in the organisation, today Theorem is said to be more than a 1000 in just 10 years, over 150 clients… What are the key drivers that have led to this success?

    We are more of a technology player in this domain. One of the biggest growth drivers for Theorem has been the growth of the digital media over the last 10 years. Even in mature markets like the US, the overall ad spends going to digital was only 7 percent; the digital ad pie has of course doubled over the years. We set up our company with the vision to focus on the digital media operations domain. What we brought was the strength of the strong Indian IT service business ie efficiency and technical knowledge, while keeping the costs low for our clients. This became very attractive to our clients in the west, and so our team achieved better quality service delivery than their own teams based in New York or San Francisco etc. Hence, it was very attractive for companies in the digital media space whether it is an agency or publishers or technology companies to work with us because we brought in both domain expertise plus we brought in the scales of operations and very importantly the technical knowhow and skills required. These are some of the factors that I believe helped us grow in the last 10 years.

     

    Q: What would you say are some of the learnings so far in the last 10 years?

    Digital offers the most cost-effective way of communicating or advertising. Not just cost-effective, but it is very effective in terms of reach as well. When we started, display and email were two big key drivers for digital marketing. Right after we started, Google took off, which basically brought in search marketing and so search became a key element of the digital marketing eco-system. We adapted to these changes and then obviously social media came along and mobile came along. So we have seen an evolution of different media vehicles within the digital sphere. We also saw a lot of technological innovation happen within this domain. The evolution of this space has been very fast and there has been so much technology coming in, and there has been much more efficiency too.

     

    Q: So, has there been a change in the way the marketers have approached digital media over the years?

    Absolutely. Since we have largely worked with western markets, we have definitely seen that change wherein marketers or brands are adapting to digital a lot more. We can see that in the numbers ie doubling of the digital ad spends from 7 to 14 percent. There is a lot more awareness about the effectiveness of digital advertising in the western markets and marketers are also a lot more demanding as far as their requirements from the media are concerned. It is a fairly mature market today.

     

    India on the other hand is still an evolving market. Marketers here need a lot more education to understand the benefits of the digital media, its effectiveness in delivering better ROIs, how digital is going to be different from the traditional media, and so on… So, there is still a fair bit of education that is required. We are seeing changes and I believe a company like ours can play a huge role in educating the Indian marketer. I still believe that there is a lot to be done in the Indian market.

     

    Q: What are your India-specific plans? Theorem will be investing Rs 100 crore in India over the next 3-4 years… What is the nature of these investments?

    We have a large facility and teams based out of India, supporting our global clients right now and so we are looking at expanding on that. In Mysore we have our own campus and we are looking at expanding that. More importantly though we are looking at India as a market and how we can take our domain expertise and add value as opposed to being a large-scale IT support organization. We are also trying to be in the forefront of the marketing itself and help with more innovation. So, yes in the next four to five years we are looking to expand our operations from both facilities and team perspective which is potentially a Rs 100 crore investment.

     

    Q: You have two offices in India, Mysore and Bangalore… Any expansion plans within India?

    Yes, as the industry evolves further this is definitely a possibility. It is nevertheless early years for us, but we are definitely looking at probably newer cities, newer regions. The operation centers are in Bangalore and Mysore right now so that may continue to grow in these regions but, if we see the need we may even look at other regions.

     

    Traditionally US has always been a very large market for us, UK would be the next largest and then Europe but, where we are really seeing growth is in regions like Australia and Middle East. In India we have to do a lot of work in terms of creating solutions and that is what we are working on right now. India as a market is very interesting for us, and we are definitely seeing growth in some of the non traditional markets as well.

     

    Q: What is the business model you follow? Which of your services bring bigger share of revenue – creatives, media operations, analytics, consulting? Any newer services we would see you introduce this year or in the near future?

    Right now we are an IT services company supporting the digital marketing world. Largely we provide experienced or trained resources to support online media operations. So, this is really our business model, it is a traditional IT services model but, then we are obviously trying to move up the value chain and provide more high-end services for some of the local markets.

     

    Our revenues are spread evenly across our services, our media operations have been a big portion of our business and all the other services are also growing quickly as well. We are working on some new solutions and products, a couple of which we will launch soon. Some time later this year we will be launching another product and some time next year we aim to bring in some more innovative solutions to the market.

     

    Q: What rich media services does Theorem provide?

    Theorem provides end-to-end rich media services including creative development, trafficking and QA (quality assurance), across a range of media including mobile, email, banner ads, landing pages and micro sites. Furthermore, our expertise spans technologies including MediaMind, DoubleClick Studio, Eyewonder, PointRoll, and Flashtalking among others. Theorem strength and key differentiation lies in its depth of knowledge and breadth of services in providing rich media QA that’s extremely complex and highly evolved. In fact, we are one of the very few firms globally that offer this service to our clients.

     

    Q: And what do you think are the biggest concerns or challenges that Indian markets face, as far as rich media ads are concerned?

    Bandwidth issues in India are a big concern as the internet infrastructure needs to mature a lot more for the mobile rich media ads to become more popular. I believe it has to evolve, the infrastructure needs to get better and I think once we see our infrastructure improve rich media ads will also get more popular.

     

    Q: We have been witnessing some consolidations in the digital industry, with a lot of mergers and acquisitions lately… What is your take on these developments? Good signs for the industry?

     

    I believe it is a sign of maturation for the digital industry in India. I personally think it is a good sign; there is a lot of focus on India. So, as the market matures, our internet infrastructure gets better, and we are able to convince the marketers that digital is a more effective medium for them to start leveraging. We have a huge youth population and they are all going to get on the internet and the easier it gets to log onto the internet, obviously the larger the population you will have to market to. Therefore all our tier II and tier III cities need to get better bandwidth and internet infrastructure.

     

    Q: And are we going to see Theorem too acquire some agencies soon …?

    Potentially yes. There is always a possibility of this as we grow …

     

    Q: What kind of impact did the global economic conditions have on your international and India business? Did it have any impact on the industry?

    Interestingly, we never saw never saw a slowdown in the last 10 years. In fact 2008-09 were one of the biggest growth years for us. During the slowdown we have been hiring and giving raises. So digital provides a cost-effective means of communication and advertising. During the years of slowdown more people look at cost benefits of digital advertising. Although the overall spends may shrink, the piece of the pie is definitely going to increase for digital during these times.

     

    Q: What are your growth targets and goals over the next one or two years?

    We are looking to double by the end of 2015…

     

  • MxM Mondays | Is there a crisis of ideas in Hindi GECs?

     

    By Ananya Saha and Meghna Sharma

     

    From ‘Buniyaad’ to ‘Bade Achhe Lagte Hain’, from ‘Mahabharat’ to ‘Satyamev Jayate’, Hindi entertainment has come a long way. In the channels’ bid to outdo each other in the TVR race, content can take a back seat. Can lavish sets, repeat telecasts, and infinite numbers of episodes help the GECs to win the race? Is the audience ready to lap up the same themes and content?

     

    The theme for this week’s MxM Mondays is ‘Is there a crisis of ideas in Hindi GEC?’. MxM spoke to a crosssection of industry veterans to find out.

     

    Ajay Kakar, Chief Marketing Officer – Financial Services, Aditya Birla Group

    Today, there appears to be a herd mentality when it comes to programming on GEC channels. What we have always noted in Bollywood seems to now reflect on TV too: the ‘success formula’ syndrome.

     

    If one kind of serial or format succeeds, there appears to be a rush, across channels, to try and follow and replicate that seeming formula, be it the trend of reality programmes, dance shows, talent hunt or even soaps.

     

    This apparent commoditisation makes decision-taking more difficult, as a marketer, when you are screening the market for opportunities.

     

    Anamika Mehta, COO, Lodestar UM

    In many ways, yes. We continue to see the same content and programming repackaged and marketed differently. While a couple of fresh initiatives have been undertaken over time, probably the fact they have been literally a handful is reflective of crisis of ideas. So there have been soaps and ore soaps with some twists right from the ‘K’ days to some with a social tack to comedy to the global reality formats customised to Indian flavour and culture. Given the fickle Indian viewer, and the fact that a GEC talks to the lowest denominator; the challenge is to bust existing myths and formula. And experiment large for success.

     

    Anita Nayyar, CEO, India and Southeast Asia, Havas Media

    When Colors was launched it brought a set of fresh content and then both Zee and Star followed it. It was a refreshing change because everyone was fed-up with the saas-bahu sagas. And as for the reality shows, most GECs are following safe genre which has worked well with the viewers. One must realise that programming costs are high and when a programme doesn’t work, it affects the channel. Therefore, a channel has to be very careful about what it puts out in front of the viewers. So, a time-tested genre is what most of them opt for, unless and until a broadcaster is very confident about a format and willing to take the risk.

     

    Indian viewers in general prefer only certain genres – serials, Bollywood related shows, reality shows (where they can related to the lesser known aam adami) and movies. Therefore, channels too prefer to revolve around these genres. For a channel viewership is important because only that will bring in the revenues.

     

    Himanka Das, senior vice president – West, Carat Media India

    Well, I won’t call it crisis, it has definitely become dynamic. Considering the dynamic nature of viewership patterns, viewers do not watch channels by appointment viewing but they watch programmes by appointment viewing. Having said that, it also reflects the way a broadcaster changes programming strategy within a span of 13 weeks most often, though very few of them that go for a longer period. In the term ‘GEC’, the word entertainment has significant relevance to viewers; so long as content entertains the audience, that becomes the longevity of a programme. In that regard, broadcasters do realise the competitive nature of business and are constantly trying new formats and topics in relevant time bands to keep eyeballs going.

     

     

    Jahnavi Pal, TV analyst and columnist

    If one surfs through different Hindi GECs today, he/she will find the same clichéd concepts and sometimes even titles. Today the trend is to name a serial after an old Hindi song! Broadcasters feel that is what viewers want, but to be frank it’s not true. No one is ready to take a risk. They follow each other or ride on a previous show’s success. For example, if a show XYZ was a success then others will have shows which are loosely based on it. However, there are some who are ready to take a chance; take Star Plus for instance, which showcased a revolutionary show – Satyamev Jayate. Agreed, it’s not a primetime soap opera, but a GEC did take a risk in showcasing a show like that on a Sunday morning. There are other shows like ‘Kuch toh log kahenge’ and ‘Bade achhe lagte hain’, which started off very well but somehow now have lost their plot and have become diluted. Therefore, it wouldn’t be correct to say that there is a dearth of ideas because there are plenty of them, it’s the willingness of a channel to take risk is more crucial to take the industry forward.

     

    Nikhil Sinha, producer, Triangle Film Company

    There is scarcity of fresh ideas on GECs. Right now, the trend is about following each other; if one idea works for a channel then others too will start making projects on similar lines. New concepts are considered risk-taking propositions. However, one shouldn’t be surprised if one channel took the risk to experiment and it becomes a hit, others too will follow suit. I feel that GECs should try out new concepts as audiences are maturing too. However, what will click can’t be guaranteed in advance. Having said that, I also know that consensus between business and entertainment is also very important.

     

     

    Sajal Mukherjee, Media veteran

    All channels are trying their level best to create distinct content and appeal to specific audiences. Star Plus, which is the number one channel, dominates the scene when it comes to well-produced programmes, and all the other channels like Zee, Sony and Colors try to emulate the same formula. The shows on every channel go on and on, and they try to stretch the same content without changing the format, over a very long period of time.

     

    It is actually a vicious circle. Each serial has three important parts: content producer, advertiser and viewer. If the channel produces a good show, but it gets no advertisers, because of no or less viewership, the content producer has to balance the budget of the show. If there is no money, the production values also go down.

     

    The channels need to experiment more. KBC has had a good run, and still enjoys dedicated viewership. Satyamev Jayate was appreciated. It is only a question of stretching the innovation. Every channel’s focus is to get the viewership, and advertisers. Once they start making money, then they produce better shows. But it is important that every ‘me too’ channel tries to create different programming.

     

    Saurabh Srivastava, Producer, Panglossean Entertainment (of ‘Phir Subah Hogi’)

    I do not agree that Hindi GECs are facing a crisis of ideas. We, the producers, brainstorm every day to come out with new ideas. At the end of the day, it is just a competition. There are so many Hindi entertainment channels, we try hard to make our shows distinctive and different from all other shows. We work very hard on every show. It is definitely quite hard, but we have to keep trying.

     

     

     

    Shailesh Kapoor, CEO – Ormax Media

    There is definitely no dearth of ideas in GECs. The GEC category inIndiais only about 20 years old, and has constantly evolved in terms of new ideas, formats, stories and genres. Having said that, the culture of daily shows has stretched the GEC content machinery over the last 12 years. The pressure to deliver episodes round the clock means that the creative teams spend less time on ideation and development, and more on execution. This, in turn, leads to an under-exploitation of the potential. Channels and production houses should focus on creating a robust pipeline of strong ideas, which can be tapped when the requirement arises. This would ensure that the creative abilities of the teams, both channel and production, are utilised to their potential. Focus on content development, as against just content production, will ensure that better, bigger ideas see the light of the day more often than what’s happening currently.

     

    Sukesh Motwani, head – fiction programming, Zee TV

    I wouldn’t say that there is a crisis of ideas in Hindi GECs; on the contrary they are doing their best to entertain their audiences. However, I do think that broadcasters will have to decide and show confidence about how much they are willing to experiment with. Zee has always believed in going a step forward and has taken bold steps. For instance, right now we have a paranormal show called Fear Files and earlier we showcased Jhansi ki Rani, a historic saga about a female protagonist. Who had ever thought of it before?! Even our other shows like Choti si Zindagi and Karol Bagh have been different in their approach.

     

    Today, channels are focused on genres like thriller, crime, family drama; but we have to answer the bigger question – are GECs ready to get into genres like dark comedy, science fiction or a violent tale? There is an on-going debate regarding this because most GECs cater to family audiences. So one does have to take this into account. Therefore, for me, the bigger question is, how many genres are GECs open to?

     

  • Florinda Fernandes: Sr. Business Manager, Posterscope

    (Experience: 10 years)

     

    Currently Florinda Fernandes is into both Business Development and Client Servicing. The profile includes everything right from pitching for a new business till the campaign ends. The entire process in terms of strategizing, planning, innovation and execution as a whole is Florinda’s forte.

     

    Explaining her work, Florinda said: “Outdoor is one of the domains in the media fraternity wherein every day is a new day. Each day has a challenge as the industry is unpredictable. It is undergoing changes and evolving into a new platform. Today, we speak on the lines of innovation, convergence and globalization. It’s becoming more consumer-centric and holistic thinking, thus making it more challenging and realistic. I am more than happy to be a part of it, and see it grow.”

     

  • Namita Sethi: Media Director – Lodestar UM

    (Experience: 10 years)

     

    Being daughter of an Air Force Officer, Namita Sethi spent the early part of her childhood in various cities across India before settling in Delhi for her higher education. She is a Commerce graduate, and has done my Post Graduation in Communications from Delhi.

     

    “‘Media’ as a profession happened by chance.” As part of her summer internship, she got an opportunity to work in Universal Mc Cann. During this stint, she got a first-hand experience of media planning. As a student too, she had been good with numbers and analytics, so this profession seemed the most appropriate to take forward her strength and also as a career option. “And now, I am a Media Professional since more than a decade in a leading advertising firm, and happy about it.”

     

    Namita is currently working with Lodestar Universal as Media Director and said that she has learnt a lot from diverse experience across portfolio ranging from Mobile, FMCG, Durables, Finance and Automobiles.

     

     

     

  • Abhita Anand : Business Director – MEC Access, Group M

    (Experience: 10 years)

     

    “Necessity never made a good bargain,” said Benjamin Franklin, but Abhita Anand chose to differ. At 18, when most girls were deciding on what dress and makeup to wear to college, Abhita was busy converting the challenge of a life without her father in an opportunity to chart her career – a decision that made a difference to her and her family’s life.

     

    Abhita started her career as a front desk representative in one of the most recognized and esteemed organization in fashion industry – not only in India but worldwide – Elite Model Management, India. Recognizing her potential and immense inclination to move forward, Elite gave her an opportunity that Abhita was not ready to let go, at any cost. Within a year, Abhita was handling the modeling school and was responsible for business development and targets for its Delhi branch.

     

    It was Elite where Abhita started handling the PR and ad division work for Elite. It did not take long for Abhita, with her business acumen, to realize the potential of the last mile communication and she started the events division in Elite.

     

    Juggling her education and work, Abhita completed her MBA in marketing and finance from Fore School Of Management to correlate the management gyan and its real life application. She spent more than 5 years at Elite handling various verticals and facets of business, making her one of the most important assets there.

     

    With a hunger to try something new and considering the evolving market, Abhita joined Times Red Cell, the activation arm of The Times of India/ BCCL. It was there that Abhita got an unmatched exposure to the media industry and functionality. She spent three years on learning.

     

    Some of the key projects Abhita handled at TOI were WagonR ‘Think Big Challenge’ and Met Life ‘I want to be an editor’. She delivered beautifully, making the clients come back to the organization year after year.

     

    After spending three years with Times of India, Abhita joined MEC Access (Group M). Today, she handles the business at MEC Access, Delhi for clients like LG, Citibank and OCM to name a few.

     

  • Akanksha Jain: Partner, Business Planning at MindShare

    (Experience: 10 years)

     

    What Akanksha Jain values the most is to be true to everything she does and to herself. And she does that by ensuring that she has given nothing short of 100per cent.

     

    Explaining her motivation, Akanksha said: “What drives me is the selfish desire to make a mark; essentially leave everything better than I found it! I wanted to be in the ‘Communications’ industry long before I even understood what it entailed and that’s what led me to MICA.”

     

    She has ‘dabbled’ with account management for about a year at the start of her career, but didn’t follow through as she felt that the well-honed left part of her brain wasn’t getting enough exercise! “I was attracted to media and joined what was then a 3-member team (Pepsi @ Mindshare) to try my hand at it. That I am still here is thanks to the constant excitement and challenges that have engaged both parts of my brain.”

     

     

     

  • NDTV-TAM war impact may be seen in print if Nielsen is appointed IRS research vendor

    By A Correspondent

     

    Measurement has suddenly become a bad word in the Indian media. Over the last month, there has been much sound and fury over TAM Media’s television ratings with news network NDTV filing a 194-page lawsuit in New York. Since last week, the channel and WPP, principals of TAM’s part-owner Kantar, have been sparring via statements issued to the media.

     

    But now MxMIndia learns that there could be rumblings in the print space too, over the appointment of the research company to conduct the unified Indian Readership Survey.

     

    The Board of the Media Research Users Council (MRUC) which manages the Readership Studies Council of India (RSCI) is scheduled to meet today and announce the results of the contract following the RFP (Request for Proposals) issued last year.

     

    In a departure from the prevailing system of the research body being a partner and pocketing 85 percent of the revenues earned from sales, in the proposed system, the researcher was to be vendor being paid a flat fee. Hansa which has been conducting the study for MRUC since around eight years tied up with Ipsos and presented a joint proposal demanding a fee of Rs 10 crore. Nielsen’s original proposal was of Rs 12 crore, but the research major has been beaten down to a little below Rs 11 crore.

     

    However, ever since the news of the appointment of Nielsen was leaked last week, it appears that the controversy plaguing the television media research space could well lead to rumblings in print if it is indeed Nielsen which will be awarded the contract.

     

    MxMIndia too learns from its sources that Nielsen will indeed be appointed vendor for the IRS. The relationship is not of partnership as of now, but that of a client-vendor, where the research company has to undertake the exercise as per a set of instructions and for a fee. A global tender was issued and a technical committee carefully pored over each of the proposals. Various proposals came in but were rejected. The Hansa-IPSOS proposal reportedly did not find favour with the decision-makers because of the consortium modeit followed. It is believed that there was opposition to Hansa from some quarters.

     

    An MRUC member this correspondent spoke with raised some alarm. “While the work put in by the technical committee is commendable and selfless, they ought to have considered the mess that Nielsen has been in thanks to its co-ownership of TAM Media. The 194-page lawsuit sees the firm getting noteworthy mention. Moreover, there have been question marks over the retail audit too,” he said on condition of anonymity. “But it would be wrong to jump to conclusions on Nielsen’s appointment. If it is indeed true, we will raise the questions and convince ourselves. We clearly wish to be certain of the new vendors’ expertise in newspaper readership measurement – either globally or in India. We can’t afford to have any publisher, advertiser or agency questioning the measurement exercise and the bona fides of the vendor as has been the case with television.”

     

    That last bit we agree with. The WPP statement came in at 10.43 pm IST last night.

     

  • NDTV v/s WPP: War of words over the Weekend

    By A Correspondent

     

    I need another holiday, I told the boss.

    But why, he asked?

     

    Because since the time I thought I could bring in the weekend with a drink, the inbox has been inundated with statements from both NDTV and WPP.

     

    Wait, why WPP? The case was against Kantar, right?

     

    Oh, yes, it is. But Kantar is a subsidiary of WPP. And while it’s a listed conglomerate, Sir Martin Sorrell is bossman and he decides what WPP will do.

     

    So while it was good to see the Big WPP Boss himself getting his hands dirty, I was a little surprised to see him speak to the Indian media on the issue. Interviews with Sir Sorrell don’t happen daily, so who wouldn’t want to miss the opportunity.

     

    In one of the interviews, the WPP boss has even suggested that since NDTV’s lawyers essentially deal with litigations for restaurants, the lawsuit has been served correctly.

     

    Ah, well.

     

    Here are the six statements:

     

    26 Aug: Statement saying WPP takes India extremely seriously. That it is “ludicrous” to say WPP is taking India lightly

     

    25 Aug: WPP reacts to the 6 points raised in NDTV’s statement of the same day. Statement says Eric Salama responded to a mail sent by Vikram Chandra on July 27

     

    25 Aug: NDTV responds to WPP’s statement of 24 August (as well as to media interviews). Stings WPP and Sorrel, and sad to read these words: we request Sir Martin not to take India lightly. We request him to clean up his ratings operation in our country and to refrain from using his global PR clout to perpetuate corruption in his India ratings operation

     

    24 Aug: WPP issues a statement in Q&A form. Asserts NDTV’s decline is not down to any perceived failures in TAM data. In an interview with Mint, Sorrell says: “Nothing has been served properly. Nothing at all, that is why we call it a hypothetical lawsuit. The two-lawyer firm (engaged by NDTV) is based in Florida and it specializes in restaurant law. This is an Indian issue, not American. It is a bit of mischief on their part.”

     

    23 Aug: NDTV responds to WPP’s statement. “We request that WPP should focus on honestly fixing (for want of a better word!) their badly damaged and dishonest ratings system in India.”

     

    22 Aug: WPP statement on the NDTV’s “hypothetical” law suit. Says: “WPP is also giving active consideration to issuing proceedings against NDTV for defamation and has instructed its lawyers accordingly.”

     

  • NDTV, WPP trade statements yet again

    By A Correspondent

     

    On television, Dr Prannoy Roy is a gentleman-anchor. He apologises – with a sorry to interrupt – as he interjects while a guest is speaking. Quite unlike some others who are aggressive and don’t care a fig even with celebrated guests.

     

    So if you thought that the on-screen image of Dr Roy and his channel would also be the way his company would act in the ongoing litigation with TAM and its principals and war of words with global advertising conglomerate WPP, you’re mistaken.

     

    Last evening, we received two statements… one each from NDTV and WPP.

     

    First the one from NDTV. Clear here for the statement (PDF version)

     

    And then the WPP reply (again a PDF). Click here:

     

    We don’t really know why WPP chose to get involved in this war of statements but now that it has, no one seems to be complaining!

     

    PS:

    The following are the statements issued by NDTV and WPP so far:

     

  • MxM Comment: Enough of trading charges. Industry needs to bring warring partners to the table

    By Pradyuman Maheshwari

     

    It’s the kind of content that’s been seeing our hit rates go up, but I seriously think enough is enough. It is time the industry gets together and brings warring partners to the table. It’s important that either an industry body like IBF or AAAI or someone who would earn the respect of all parties concerned were to convene this. MxMIndia would have been happy to take the lead, but we’d rather be an independent observer than a participant. Although both Star and Madison do have active linkages with NDTV and WPP respectively, I would think Messrs Sam Balsara and Uday Shankar would do well to take the lead. For, the current blamegame and exchange of unpleasantries can continue forever, and we could still be struggling for solutions.

     

    What’s worse is that Sir Martin Sorrell is himself being dragged into the war of words. So an NDTV statment rubbishes what Sorrell and WPP have to say. And WPP (and Sir Sorrell) haven’t hesitated from commenting on NDTV’s fortunes and its lawyers. Thankfully, Dr Prannoy Roy’s name hasn’t been pulled in yet. But for how long?

     

    Representatives from all stakeholders have privately confided to this writer and corroborated MxMIndia’s original standpoint that it’s the system that’s ought to be blamed for the mess the industry is in and not just TAM. I may even stick my neck out and say that from the information I have, the TAM management isn’t corrupt, though there one may not rule out the presence of some rotten apples in the rank and file. The only way to eliminate that is by a process that has a reasonable number of checks and balances.

     

    TAM’s problem is that for too long it has not had a joint stakeholder body (BARC, earlier Joint Industry Body) governing it and providing it a frame of reference for operations. In the recent past, with the exit of aMap, it’s been a monopolistic play but you can’t blame TAM for that. The industry didn’t patronise aMap well enough.

     

    News broadcasters are particularly peeved with the current measurement system because their demand for a stop to weekly ratings wasn’t accepted by TAM. TAM, on its part, said if all stakeholders – broadcasters, advertisers and agencies – were unanimous, they would make the switch.

     

    WPP is huge in India – Group M, Ogilvy and WPP and several other outfits. The aggregate employee strength is 12,000 and revenues are of around $500million. NDTV too has a reputation of being a quality broadcaster. I am sure neither is taking the Indian market lightly.

     

    Now let’s avoid a bloodbath of words.

     

    PS: I have another worry. The news broadcasters have already asked the Minister of Information and Broadcasting to intervene in the measurement issue. While one appreciates the sentiments of the NBA, asking the government to step in can be suicidal. If the government finds the war of words between statekholders never-ending, it may well do that and last week’s example with blocking Twitter ids is a fair indicator of how governments can act.