Tag: Wall Street Journal

  • When White House condemned venom thrown at reporter…

     

     

    By Ranjona Banerji

     

    Ranjona BanerjiIf ever India’s insecurity as a nation shows, it is in our relationship to the rest of the world. On the one hand, we are constantly looking for affirmation, especially from the West: India is the greatest, Indians are the greatest, best democracy, best prime minister, most popular leader, best national anthem and so on.

    On the other, we are constant “freedom fighters”: Who cares about the West, we are better, our family values are better.

    Often both these exists at the same time in one sentence.

    And let’s not forget that we are a nation that loves to emigrate. You can find Indians everywhere. Far more than you find people of other countries in our land.

    Should I ignore for now the sad fact that those who leave India to settle elsewhere are touchiest about India being criticised?

    Thus the talk around Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the US.

    Best, greatest, they said, they love us and more.

    But when Modi is asked about the reality of discrimination of Muslims and religious minorities in India, out comes the anger. How dare, what about America and so on.

    And this being today’s India, trolls were quick to pick up on the name of the reporter of the Wall Street Journal who asked Modi the question: Sabrina Siddiqui. Her second name sounds Muslim and that alone was enough to set off the rightwing Hindutva brigade.

    https://thewire.in/media/wsj-reporter-sabrina-siddique-modi-question-human-rights-targeted

    The harassment reached such a point that the White House stepped in to condemn the online venom being thrown at the reporter.

    https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/white-house-condemns-harassment-of-journalist-who-asked-pm-modi-a-question/article67013371.ece

    If anything does not show India in a good light, and raises questions about press freedom in India, it is this.

    Indian journalists who question the government are relentlessly trolled online and attacked in the real world. From Israeli spyware being used on them to hacking of devices to raids, court cases and worse.

    Although we are supposed to pretend that all is well in India, everyone is rich, everyone is happy, to further boost the image and ego of the prime minister, the job of journalists is to tell us that we are pretending.

    Does no one see this?

    Modi returns to India, he asks “what’s happening” as if he does not know, and then has a meeting. Having the problem of violence, anarchy and possible civil war in Manipur, he then proceeds to include the inauguration of a few more trains.

    In other times, history shows us, this is how dictators behave. But in India, you will find a media which promotes and tolerates this dissonant behaviour.

    You also have a media which revels in Islamphobia, in othering anyone who is not a chosen upper caste Hindu – “liberals”, civil rights activists, and anyone who criticizes the Modi government loses Hindu status by dint of criticism – and thus furthering the cause of Hindutva.

    As Manipur burns, there is a massive Hindutva movement growing in Uttarakhand.

    A difficult case like the murder of Ankita Bhandari, where the accused’s father was part of the BJP, is being sidelined. The public prosecutor, says the victim’s father, has been assisting the accused.

    There is little in the national or local media about this, even though the murder created much public interest.

    https://www.newsclick.in/ankita-bhandari-murder-case-public-prosecutor-colluding-accused-know-what-family-said

    At the same time, the targeting of Muslims continues in Purola, Uttarkashi.

    https://thewire.in/communalism/purola-posters-muslims-vacate-shops

    It has taken the high court to somewhat calm things down:

    https://indianexpress.com/article/india/purola-mahapanchayat-uttarakhand-hc-8664504/

    The reason I highlight these cases in Uttarakhand is to underline the fact that India is not Delhi and India is not Modi.

    Like Manipur, Uttarakhand is a small state away from the national gaze. But if Manipur spirals down any further or the Himalayas collapse, it will affect all of India.

    You cannot survive as a democracy if the national media promotes a prime minister who inaugurates trains in the midst of various national calamities.

    It doesn’t matter what the outside world says or does not say. Fake online popularity polls will not change this:

    https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/second-edit/douse-the-flames-in-manipur-at-least-now-1228980.html

     

    Ranjona Banerji is a senior journalist and commentator. She writes on MxMIndia on Tuesdays and Fridays. Her views here are personal.

     

  • Business Today beefs up top deck

    By Our Staff

     

    The India Today group’s business magazine, Business Today, is all set for a digital revamp – in text and video.

     

    Aabha Bakaya
    Aabha Bakaya
    Anirban Roy
    Anirban Roy

    As part of its plans, it has announced the appointment of Anirban Roy, formerly with The Wall Street Journal and Reuters, as Business Today’s Online Editor. It has also announced that financial journalist and anchor Aabha Bakaya as co-host of its upcoming Business Today TV show. Bakya was until very recently consultant anchor at ET Now, hosting its flagship ‘The Market’ and ‘Closing Trades’ shows.

     

    Notes a communique: “Ever since its inception in 1992, it [Business Today] has set new benchmarks in business reporting. Last month, the India Today Group announced the appointment of Udayan Mukherjee, the country’s biggest and undisputed icon in business journalism, as its Global Business Editor and host of a daily business show premiering on India Today from August 1. Earlier in July, the network named one of India’s most prominent magazine editors, Sourav Majumdar, as the new Editor of the Business Today Magazine, and Siddharth Zarabi, an award-winning journalist and former editor of Bloomberg TV, as the Managing Editor of Business Today TV.”

     

  • Facebook tests tech to link pages of under-13s with parents’ accounts

    If Facebook wants to open its doors to kids under 13 – as well as acknowledge the millions that are already there – it’s going to need to tread cautiously.

     

    The social network is testing technologies that would link children’s pages to those of their parents and enable parents to approve friend requests and access to applications, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.

     

    These mechanisms wouldn’t be introducing young children to Facebook for the first time, but rather would give them a way to be there officially.

     

    While the fact that young children are using Facebook is about as secret as the gambling at Rick’s in “Casablanca,” the notion of shepherding more kids onto the platform is bound to be controversial for reasons ranging from cyber-bullying to the unseemliness of potentially feeding their data into the engine that drives Facebook’s advertising business.

     

    The report has already triggered a reaction from regulatory powers, with US Reps Ed Markey and Joe Barton, co-chairmen of the Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus, writing to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg: “While Facebook provides important communication and entertainment opportunities, we strongly believe that children and their personal information should not be viewed as a source of revenue.”

     

    There’s evidence to suggest that millions of parents would welcome the opportunity to give their children access to Facebook, with a Microsoft Research-backed study showing that 36 per cent of parents surveyed had knowledge of their children joining Facebook before they turned 13. But even though millions of children are already illicitly using the platform, Facebook could be more exposed legally if it opts to bring them out into the open, since the current setup allows for the company to maintain that the site is not designed for children under 13, according to Linda Goldstein, chair of the advertising, marketing and media division at law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips.

     

    “I think they’re going to be buying a lot of additional regulatory headaches,” Ms Goldstein said. “The value of the data and the ability to eventually capture this data at such an early age is interesting, but they’re going to have to weigh that against consumer perceptions.” In order to move forward with any plan to open up the platform to children under 13, Facebook will need to comply with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, which states that sites collecting data from children under 13 must obtain parental consent.

     

    Source: The Economic Times
    Copyright © 2012, Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved