By Vikas Mehta
It’s time to kick a few butts.
For years, surrogate advertising has been the bane of the Indian communication industry. First it was cigarettes and alcohol and now for the last few years it’s been pan masala.
More than a year ago, Amitabh Bachchan had raised the hackles of many when the septuagenarian appeared in an ad for Kamla Pasand along with Ranveer Singh. The actor, who once was the darling of the masses, took quite a beating on social media when he first defended his action saying that the ad was part of the entertainment business which provides employment to many people.
When he was mercilessly trolled on social media and when a national anti-tobacco agency requested him to refrain from endorsing tobacco products, the actor put on a big act.
He grandly announced that he is terminating his contract with the company, returning their money and also said that he did not know that the silver coated elaichi, which was the product shown in the ad, was part of surrogate advertising. Ha!
Read that again. He said that he did not know that he was part of a surrogate ad. Mr. Bachchan wanted us to believe that his lawyers and his advisors were so unaware that they had no idea of this malaise called surrogate advertising. His naivety was an act for the ages.
The campaign had broken out in September 2021 and in October, on his birthday, Mr Bachchan had made the grand announcement.
But the ads continued. When another round of protests hit social media, Mr. Bachchan’s office released a statement in mid-November saying that they have sent a legal notice to Kamala Pasand, to stop broadcasting the TV commercials with Mr Bachchan immediately, as it was noticed that despite termination of the endorsement agreement ‘ Kamala Pasand ‘ has ignored the same and is seen to continue airing the TV commercials.
The result: Nothing. Zilch. Nada. No change. Social media got tired, bored, disillusioned of this tamasha and moved on. And the ad continued to be aired. Another version of it was also released. Right through 2022, all major cricket events unleashed the campaign. It went on even in 2023. Till almost the half-way stage of IPL.
After more than one-and-a-half year of endorsing a surrogate tobacco product, a time when other pan masala brands, no doubt emboldened by the free run that Kamla Pasand had, and featured celebrities like Akshay Kumar, Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgan, Salman Khan; Mr. Bachchan, seemed to have finally persuaded the brand to remove its ad. No, that should read as, the ad was withdrawn after maybe it had run the course of its contract.
But the legacy of endorsing a surrogate brand continued. And the culprit this time is another septuagenarian cricketing legend along with a dashing cricketer who has a school in his name.
Ladies and Gentlemen, let me introduce Shri Sunil Gavaskar, ex-cricketing legend, ex-Sheriff of Mumbai, Padma Bhushan recipient, Arjuna Award-winner, ICC cricket Hall of Fame member as the latest entrant to the tobacco surrogate celebrity endorser Hall of Shame.
And he is keeping illustrious company. Shri Virendra Sehwag is a cricketer who changed Test cricket with his fearless approach to the game. And now his fearless approach is to endorse a surrogate for Pan Masala. Not fearing that it will influence many people into believing the veracity of pan masala. A Padma Shri recipient, Wisden Cricketer of the year and ICC Test player of the year, Shri Sehwag has also started Sehwag International School in Haryana on a piece of land gifted by the Haryana government. Undoubtedly, he will be a role model for the schoolchildren to consume pan masala.
It’s really shocking that neither the government, nor the advertising bodies and nor the celebrities themselves have an iota of responsibility to clean up this mess.
Why are the anti-tobacco advertising laws full of loopholes for the manufacturers to exploit? Or, if there are no loopholes, then why no action is being taken against the offending brands.
ASCI is a self-regulatory body of the advertising industry. Its rules and regulations are so warped that it is an impotent body which moves to takes action against advertisers after the deed is done. It waits for complaints and it has no legal leg to impose a punishment. It hopes for advertisers to be good boys/girls and accept the punishment, which incidentally cannot be a fine or a criminal complaint or any legal action. After all, the advertisers themselves fund ASCI. So this is a case of the accused having their own kin sitting on judgment?
Whereas the likes of Messrs Gavaskar and Sehwag are joining in the fun. After all if a Mr Bachchan can earn a few crores, why not them?
For the media companies, this is the easiest way to recover the millions they have put not their bids. At a time when inflation is high, global recession looms, a category like pan masala which always fears a blanket ban, is welcomed with open arms and big deals.
The curse of tobacco be damned.
The curse of a generation being influenced be damned.
The curse of lingering health issue be damned.
The curse of making an unhealthy product seem fashionable be damned.
And of course the legacy of the celebrities will not be damned.
All the above culprits, specially the celebrities deserve a kick on their backside. Because if a celebrity cannot care for the very people who made him a celebrity, if a celebrity will sell his soul for making his bank balance heftier and if a celebrity will doom a generation just because he thinks he can get away with anything then a kick in the backside delivered by millions of his fan in the form of a boycott may just make him see sense.
The boycott has been used as an effective tool in the past for political and religious reasons. For once, if we are ready to use this tool for a healthier society, then it will truly reflect the spirit of what the father of our nation meant when he introduced boycott as a weapon. Not just a tool but a weapon.
Let us boycott the channels which use these cricketers as commentators. Let us boycott the films which all the above film celebrities act in. Let parents boycott the school or whatever institutions or brands these celebrities endorse. Let’s boycott the shows which invite these celebrities.
Because if we do not boycott them today, tomorrow a few more will endorse an unhealthy product. And the cycle will continue.
So, stop waiting for the government or ASCI or anyone else to do anything. Just boycott anything and anyone which is associated with surrogate advertising.
And do not expect me to post a link of the ad. I refuse to use it to make a point too. Boycott the ad on you tube. If a friend forwards it, stop it from being forwarded or boycott him.
Make boycott the buzzword to fight surrogate advertising. To kick a few butts.
Vikas Mehta is a senior marketing strategy consultant and educator based in Dehradun. He writes on MxMIndia every other week, and sometimes more often. His views here are personal.
For years, India’s TV channels that pretend to be “news” channels have fomented Indo-Pak and Hindu-Muslim hatred, in order to please a particular “political” ideology and possibly because the anchors and their owners genuinely wanted to get society roiling. The effects have been and are dangerous and violent. As we saw after India lost a cricket match to Pakistan on Sunday. Rumours of Muslims letting off fireworks began, Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami faced vicious trolling… we have seen it before but that certainly does not make it tolerable.