Tag: grp

  • Goodbye, GRP. Welcome, TVT!?

    By A Correspondent


    So, reps of advertisers, media agencies, broadcasters plus TAM have finally been able to smoke the peace pipe and agreed to the way forward for the TV audience measurement ratings process currently being administered by TAM.

     

    This is good news for all of us in the media, because we can finally move on and concentrate on other more meaningful things in life.

     

    However, it’s critical to interpret the press release that has been issued jointly by the ISA, AAAI, IBF and TAM sent to us by the AAAI secretariat.

     

    What it basically says it is that it’s going to be business as usual for broadcasters and agencies and advertisers, but for the media and public at large, the data that will come is not in the form of TVRs, TRPs or GRPs or channels shares, but in a new currency called TVT. Short for television viewership in thousands.

     

    It may be good for one to point out to the powers that be is that the media doesn’t and didn’t manufacture these rating numbers out of thin air. These numbers are given to it (in recent times not by TAM) by broadcasters themselves. Or they are used by broadcasters in their publicity material – in print or electronic media ads or as mailers on various trade portals including MxMIndia.

     

    We understand that the broadcasters have agreed to not use GRPs for a certain week/period in their information to the media. So at one level we don’t think it’s going to be difficult to figure a week’s numbers given the four-week average numbers, but it’ll be interesting to see how much of this information broadcasters keep to themselves.

     

    Also, it will be good to see how ratings of individual programmes or shows are communicated to the trade.

     

    These are interesting times. Perhaps the next time BARC/ ISA/ AAAI/ IBF/ TAM have a meeting on dissemination of ratings numbers, a few reps of the media should also be invited. And, no, it needn’t be anyone from MxMIndia.

     

    Meanwhile, MxMIndia has just decided to send the journalist working on the Measurement TAMasha for a well-deserved weekend break.

     

  • IBF, AAAI, ISA and TAM reach a consensus. Finally!

     

    By A Correspondent

    Representatives of advertisers, media agencies, broadcasters and TAM have finally been able to iron out their differences and agreed to agree on an agreement.

    The media and public will now get to know television viewership in thousands, colloquially referred to as TVT. TVT captures and reflects growth in TV audiences in the country in terms of absolute numbers. TVT will be the sole currency in the public domain.

    In addition four-week TVT rolling average will be provided every week. The rolling average is statistically more stable data on viewership, especially for smaller audiences in niche channels, regional languages, English language programs and news.

    For internal evaluation including planning and buying, %TVR weekly will be available to advertisers and advertising agencies.

    The three constituents have also agreed that TAM will make all future audience measurement changes based on inputs from the joint-industry BARC Technical Committee.

    Commenting on the changes IBF President Man Jit Singh said: “We are delighted to have reached this agreement. We believe it is important for the industry, and from the perspective of our social responsibility, we must reflect both the growing television audience and the data in a more stable and useful manner. We want to thank AAAI and ISA in collaborating and working out a solution acceptable to all constituents”.

    “As three concerned constituents, who believe in working together, we have decided to refer all future currency related changes to the BARC technical committee. I’m glad that now we will have an effective guide and monitor for ratings in the country,” said Hemant Bakshi, Chairman of Media Committee and Managing Committee of the Indian Society of Advertiser.

    “Getting weekly TVR% is important for media planners and buyers to effectively plan and buy TV and do mid- plan course corrections and post analysis. We are glad that we have been able to agree that the agencies and advertisers will have access to this data as in the past. From tomorrow, we look forward to being able to focus back on our clients businesses and effective planning and buying for their brands,” said Arvind Sharma, President of the Advertising Agencies Association of India.

    A TAM spokesperson has also issued a statement saying: “TAM is happy to receive a common brief from the three Industry Stakeholders (IBF, ISA and AAAI) and will work very closely with them to ensure its smooth roll out.”

  • Jalsha Movies records 154 GRPs on its opening day

    By A Correspondent

     

    Jalsha Movies, which launched on December 16, clocked 154 GRPs on its opening day. The first movie on the channel, Awara, scored 5.3 TVR. According to press communique, the channel’s 154 GRP rating in its opening week was higher than the combined ratings of ETV Bangla (80 GRP) and Zee Bangla Cinema (65 GRP).

     

    Jalsha Movies has also helped STAR India strengthen its foothold in Bengal. The network has a firm hold on both no. 1 and no. 3 slots in the Bengali television market with Star Jalsha and Jalsha Movies.

     

    With a vast collection of all the big Bengali blockbusters, Jalsha Movies is proving to be a haven for Bengali movie lovers. Jalsha Movies Movies boasts of the biggest library of most loved Bangla super-hit films and aims to delight viewers by bringing Bengal’s biggest cinema hall right into their homes.

     

    Kevin Vaz, President and General Manager – Star Jalsha and President – Ad Sales at Star India said, “Jalsha Movies is now the preferred destination for the best of Bengali movie entertainment. The channel is already setting new benchmarks and is redefining the pleasure of watching movies for our audiences within a week of its launch. This is a stepping stone for us and we hope to further live up to the expectations by offering a never before entertainment experience to our viewers.”

     

     

  • Hindi GEC yo-yo continues. Star leads in Week 51

    By A Correspondent

     

    According to Week 51 GRPs of the Hindi General Entertainment Channels, Star Plus is steady at 231 points and manages to take a lead over Zee and Colors. Zee stands at 226 GRPs, up from 191 in Week 50. After reigning the GRP chart with 239 GRPs last week, Colors was now placed with 223 GRPs.

     

    Sony also lost a few GRPs in Week 51 as it secured 192 GRPs from 201 in Week 50 even as Life OK overtook SAB by a point at 144 GRPs. However, SAB rose three points to 143 GRPs from 140. Sahara gained a point (23 in Week 50) and stands at 24 GRPs in Week 51.

     

    Please note that the information has not been supplied and verified by TAM Media. However our source is reasonably reliable.

     

  • Week #39: Star Plus ahead as T20 hits HGECs

    By A Correspondent

     

    The GRPs of Week #39, according to TAM, show Star Plus leading in the Hindi General Entertainment category. Star Plus scores 268, inching ahead steadily from last week’s 252 GRPs. The second channel in the category is Colors that remains steady at 233 GRP. Zee TV follows with 217 GRP.

     

    In Week #38, Zee TV registered GRP of 235 and was ahead of Colors by two GRPs. The gap has now widened in favour of Colors. Sony, which registered 232 points the last week, has fallen to fourth position with 202 GRPs. It had registered 232 GRPs in the past week.

     

    SAB registered 122, Sahara One 34, and Star Utsav 31 GRPs. The last week’s GRPs that the three channels registered were: 122, 29, 34 respectively.

     

    The ratings for the India matches in the week were as follows.

    vs Eng: DD National – 1.7, ESPN – 0.3 and Star Cricket – 4.5.

    vs Aus: DD National – 1.4, ESPN – 0.3 and Star Cricket – 3.8

     

    Please note that the information has not been supplied and verified by TAM Media. However our source is reasonably reliable.

     

  • Creative agencies have allowed themselves to be dumbed down: Vikram Sakhuja

     

    By Anil Thakraney

     

    Vikram Sakhuja heads GroupM, India’s largest media buying conglomerate. In a long and animated discussion, the ace number cruncher shares with us insights from the Indian media industry. As well as his own organization’s approach to the various challenges staring at the media business.

     

    Fifty-year-old Sakhuja is an IIT/IIM grad, and he did a number of years in marketing before he shifted to the world of media in 2001, when he signed up as Managing Director of Mindshare Fulcrum. During our meet, I could see that the outspoken GroupM boss is extremely passionate about his work, and is someone who could get easily agitated over provocative questions. Thankfully, we had a smooth run. Guess it’s all thanks to Yoga which Sakhuja has recently taken up. 🙂

     

    You were a hard-core marketing man at one point. What prompted the switch to media?

    I believe in taking the career as it goes, and taking decisions at different points of time. Let me take you through my career graph to explain this. After IIM, Calcutta, I was pretty clear I wanted to get into the marketing side of things. So I joined P&G and did eight years there. When I joined them, Richardson Hindustan Limited (RHL) was becoming Procter & Gamble (P&G). So when I started out, the company had RHL values and very quickly the organization got Procterised.

     

    And you were not happy with that?

    I was happy with that, but Procter believed in the system of specialization. So the guy who gets into sales, stays in sales. The guy who gets into advertising, sticks to advertising. I was in research and they extended that to marketing services. I learnt a lot there, but later on I wanted to move to brand management and P&G wasn’t allowing me that. And I didn’t want my epitaph to read ‘Marketing Researcher’. So I moved to Coca-Cola which was more flexible in these areas. Out there I managed the entire brand portfolio. That worked very well for 5 years. I was reporting to Sanjeev Gupta in those days, and he was handling both, marketing and bottling. And later he went on to take up a bigger job. So they got Shripad (Nadkarni) to head marketing, and I felt my job would get undermined a little bit. And so I left to join Star TV.

     

    And you lasted there for just one year.

    It was a mistake. I call it jawaani ki bhool. Peter (Mukerjea) said they wanted to start a strategic marketing function there, and it would include marketing of the creative product as well as on-air marketing, which is where the bulk of the spending goes. But it didn’t pan out like that because the programming department had a territorial interest in the programming piece. So it became very clear to me this was going to be an off-air game, and that didn’t have too many legs. And I left Star without a job. Later, Ranjan Kapur introduced me to Andre Nair (this is year 2001) who was looking for people to start Mindshare in India. We had a drink and one thing led to another. I felt a little trepidation in the beginning because I perceived ad agencies to be a little unprofessional. But later I thought about it rationally and it made sense. And so here I am.

     

    There are large media shops under the GroupM umbrella. How do you manage to give personal attention to each one?

    I am running GroupM, I am not running Mindshare or Maxus. There are capable people running those. I am a management by objectives kind of a person. One aspect of my deliverable is Profit & Loss, there’s no getting away from it. I have told my guys we should get growth from our existing clients. We should have the source credibility to go to them and manage 100% of their marketing investments. That is the agenda I drive. Then, I have to create an eco system for technology, talent and on how to do things better. The scope of service has actually dumbed down, clients are paying peanuts and they are getting monkeys. So I go and tell my clients if they want the right kind of talent and want to get the value out of it, then this is how it works.

     

    I suppose you operate more as a coach than as a player.

    Do I meet clients? Yes, I do. Am I directly involved in the day to day plans? No, I am not. Unilever is our biggest client. So every year at least one or two deals I will sit in on. Also for other clients. I love to be there for the sheer passion of it.

     

    What is Sir Martin Sorrell’s brief to you?

    Martin is pretty hands-on in most of the businesses. I rely on him more for counsel. I whet my new plans with him. For example, I went to him with the idea of celeb endorsements. And he felt it wouldn’t work, but asked us to try it anyway. And it didn’t work. Then there was a time we were offered some sweat equity in the IPL Deccan Chargers team. I took it up to Martin and he didn’t think it was a good idea, because he didn’t know the nature of the animal. But he’s brilliant, he is one of the few guys who understands our business, he wants to get in deeper.

     

    What is your stand on the shift from the commission system to the fixed fee system for media agencies?

    I definitely support the fee system. Though I would prefer a balance of commission and fee. Because in a growing economy you win with commissions. But when spends are not looking good at all, as is the case this year, fee bails you out. In principle, however, I like the fee system.

     

    How are the clients reacting to it?

    The people who take their marketing seriously believe in the fee system in letter and spirit. The top notch companies like Unilever, Ford, Pepsi, etc, totally get this. I believe clients should pay us Cost + for service, and a factor of that for the value we are able to demonstrate.

     

    What qualities do you look for in a media buyer in today’s time?

    You must understand that in our organization we don’t just buy media. I would like to believe that our agencies are actually driving the marketing agenda, probably more than the creative agencies. Most of the creative agencies have allowed themselves to be dumbed down, most of them are only interpreting briefs in a TV commercial format. They are only driven by the tactical creative idea rather than a long term view of the brand. All these wonderful creative minds should spend a little time thinking brand stewardship. Out here, we want people who can think account planning and communications. People who can understand the brand, the consumer, and then have the ability to unlock all the media solutions. So the media person needs to understand content, activation, digital, conventional media, and then he has to see how all this comes together.

     

    Key challenges ahead for media agencies?

    The clichéd one of course is that the commissions we earn are not allowing us to invest in the best talent. But we have to all individually work ourselves, show value and then ask for stuff. The other challenge is in the digital space. The erstwhile DNA of the media companies excluded digital. I believe integrated media planning is the way to go. This is distinct from multimedia planning, which had the TV plan, print plan, radio plan, etc, all working in silos. But with the increasingly multi media environment, the key is integrated planning. And digital is allowing that seamlessness even more. We have embraced this some time back.

     

    And yet, the media buying business, after the unbundling, has got totally commoditized. Shashi Sinha said to me the media planner has become a zombie.

    I was the first guy to bring the AOR into the country. So you can blame me for the disintegration of the full service agency. (Laughs) I would say each of our agencies has its own planning way. Maxus has something called ‘Relationship Media’, MEC has got ‘Navigator’, and so on. Each of them talks the consumer journey. They talk much more about the communication challenge. I am actually finding the plans looking more different now than they were earlier. So I disagree with my dear friend Shashi Sinha. Maybe I am not cynical. The planner is alive and kicking. It’s in fact the most exciting time to be in the media because of the large amount of fragmentation and the large amount of media choices.

     

    You did a stint with television. Do you foresee threats to this medium in the near future?

    Yes. The problem with TV today is that it has become a media game of the value of the inventory. At the end of the day, there are only about four million commercial GRPs being broadcast every year at an all India level. And that’s growing at 2 or 3% per year. This is the market for TV eyeballs. So like it or not, you have to extract value out of this. Today, at last count, we have 500 or 600 channels, and it’s getting fragmented. If an Imagine TV dies, someone else will pick up ratings. And if someone else launches, there’s further fragmentation. So the problem is that the same money is chasing some eyeballs. Until the new ratings system comes up and there’s a tectonic shift, you are talking about a metastable equilibrium. Now if the value has to go up, either you have to deliver more reach, or you have to deliver some associated imagery or sponsorships or incremental value.

     

    When do you expect the shake-out to happen in television?

    We’ve been expecting a shake-out since 1996. I guess some people seem to be having deeper pockets. I am not a finance guy so I don’t know how it works. But I can’t imagine many of them are making money.

     

    Think the IPL is losing some of its sheen?

    No. The ratings this year were a tad higher than the last year. But for all practical purposes, have held on to last year’s levels. It has stabilized at about 5 rating points. In fact, this year was the best year primarily because of the games, which went down to the wire.

     

    And it’s a good investment for team owners?

    For them it’s going to be a slow burn. You have do it sensibly, like the KKR franchise does, and I think they make money. Whereas a large number of other people don’t make money. It’s about how you manage the entire franchise.

     

    There’s a perception that you guys are not passing on bulk rates you get from the media to your clients.

    We have something called the WPP Compliance. And we take it very, very seriously. So we are making sure that we do everything as per our contract with each client. In letter and spirit. We are definitely not holding back anything which is due to a client. We have a media owner invoice and it’s backed by an agency invoice. If the clients want to audit us, they are most welcome to do so. We are a global leader in this space doing global deals, we won’t mess around with something where there’s a breach of trust involved. We can’t afford that.

     

    Perhaps this was one of the reasons Reckitt Benckiser came up with the idea of agencies paying to pitch, and compensating them in case of a drop in ratings.

    They invited us to pitch and we asked them if they were being ridiculous. We turned them down. If somebody has an obscene point of view, I cannot subscribe to it.

     

    And yet, some agencies pitched for that account. Isn’t the industry united in these things?

    I thought we were united on that but obviously we weren’t. What do I say now?

     

    You’ve done many years in this business. Ever thought of starting out on your own?

    The thought has crossed my mind but I didn’t pursue it. I am not a very entrepreneurial guy. My philosophy is: Don’t fix it unless it’s broken.

     

    Does the lack of adequate talent in the media industry frustrate you? Is it a constant battle to find the right people?

    Yes, it is. But we have to be able to pay right to get the right talent. And for that we have to work our own internal financial structures. The level at which we work, there’s only so much we can afford to pay people at the entry level.

     

    Is there corruption in this business? There are allegations of planners taking money and other favours.

    One hears about these things from time to time. There is an opportunity for something like this, and clearly we have to plug it. This is where I believe organization culture is very important. If conversations in an organization involving integrity are strong, then the one or two people who entertain these thoughts will find themselves in a very uncomfortable situation.

     

    Have you ever fired people from your company because of this?

    Oh yes, I have.

     

    I saw a Youtube video of yours where you mention something about getting stressed out at work.

    I tend to be very animated and passionate, and I do get worked up. But I have been doing Yoga and stuff like that. And that’s helped. I have also started taking it a bit easier now, we have a good team. And at the end of the day, tension lene ka nahin, dene ka! (Laughs.)