Tag: Crisis management

  • Toolkit for Crisis Management in the age of Social Media

     

    The Indestructible Brand – Crisis Management in the Age of Social Media by Venke Sharma and Hushidar Kharas is scheduled to be released today (July 19) in Mumbai. Here we publish an extract from the book with permission from the publishers, Sage Response

     

    By Venke Sharma and Hushidar Kharas

     

    Venke Sharma
    Hushidar Kharas

    So the crisis squad has been created, and the CCO knows who to call when things go awry. The next step is to huddle and put together the crisis playbook, a concise yet comprehensive list of steps to be taken when a crisis hits. This is ideally done via a workshop where the stakeholders can disconnect from the day-to-day activity and focus on the task at hand. It is important that all stakeholders are open about the risks that arise in their piece of the business and are not defensive. There’s no place for turf wars in the crisis squad, and “this is my problem and I will handle it” is not an acceptable approach.

    It’s up to the CCO to drive the spirit of cooperation, perhaps through a series of teamwork exercises at the start of the session or by role plays that encourage people to think in detail about functions they are otherwise unfamiliar with. Getting an external facilitator for the session is also an option, as it allows reps to talk to a neutral body that sees issues from everyone’s perspective.

     

    Possible exercises to get everyone thinking collaboratively are as follows:

    1. Ask an R&D person to visualise managing the HR aspect of a crisis.

    2. Ask a PR person to identify places in the production, packaging, and distribution processes where a crisis may occur.

    3. Play a game where half the squad represents the environment (consumers, competition, partners, and government) and tries to cause crises for the brand,

    while the other half manages the fort and defends the brands reputation against the assault. The CCO or external facilitator can extend the game until the

    first team runs out of ideas or call an end when one team is clearly dominating.

     

    We have divided the playbook process into three steps:

    # Scenario Building: Identifying scenarios from which a crisis can arise for your brand.

    # Establishing Benchmarks: Setting up qualitative and quantitative benchmarks that differentiate between an issue and crisis and trigger subsequent predefined

    actions.

    # The Playbook: A detailed set of instructions and resources for the crisis squad (and for all employees) to be used once the benchmarks have been reached.

     

    Scenario Building

    The first step toward creating a crisis playbook is scenario building. Think of everything that can go wrong for your brand/organisation. Evaluate issues and crises that may have happened in the past to your organization or competition,or in your business environment. Run through every aspect of your value chain step by step, identifying vulnerabilities. It’s important to think like a consumer—make a list of the known negatives and the keywords that consumers tend to

    use while talking about them. Use the grid below, but feel free to fill in examples that are more relevant to your category.

     

    Establishing Benchmarks

    The next step is to set qualitative and quantitative benchmarks to distinguish between a consumer issue and a fullblown crisis. A degree of judgment will need to be exercised as well, but having numerical benchmarks makes it a loteasier to filter and avoid false alarms. These will vary drastically for different types of crises, for example, 1 negative mention about a product hygiene issue(spitting in a pizza) is enough to go into crisis mode, but it may take 50 or 100 mentions/hour of a known negative (network outage for a telecom or flight delays for an airline) to initiate action. Benchmarks need to be time-bound; velocity isa key component of a social crisis; things that pick up speed quickly are likely to blow out of proportion. It’s also important to see where the mentions are coming from. Identify key influencers in your category (celebrity food bloggers),consumer forums, and major news services and create a dashboard dedicated to them. It is possible to take this a step further and set up successive triggers for a worsening crisis. Each new level of negativity can spur a predefined action such as hiring an ambassador or launching a campaign.

     

    Building the Playbook

    So, now you have a clear idea of the various things that can go wrong. What next? How does this help you when a crisis hits? Follow the steps below to put together your crisis playbook. Feel free to add more information that you feel is relevant to your organization or industry, but avoid removing any of the elements shared below:

    • Log the names, email addresses, and phone numbers for each of the members of the crisis squad and a backup for each of them in case they’re unavailable.

    • Add similar contact details for each of the digital/ advertising/PR/CRM agencies.

    • Add contact details for the person/people with access to the brands social and digital assets (Facebook page, Twitter handle, LinkedIn profile, and website).

    # Identify the right organizational spokesperson for each kind of crisis (Owner: CCO)

    • Ideally, you should have not more than three spokespersons, possibly the CEO, chief financial officer (CFO), and chief operating officer (COO).Include contact details for each of them and a backup.

    • Conduct media training for each of them; focus on body language, dress code, and choice of vocabulary.

    • Create a code of conduct for these and other highly visible employees. During a crisis, especially one that impacts consumers or small traders, senior employees should not be seen having fun or displaying conspicuous wealth. Such actions are picked up as signs of arrogance or not caring. Most employees will have personal profiles and handles and may notice negative mentions about the organization. Their first instinct will be to get into the conversation and defend the company, but that’s rarely a good idea. Employees should not be used as mouthpieces during times of crises. At most, if they are directly tagged with questions, they can refer the tagger to the official statement released by the company spokesperson. All official responses should only be issued from the brand handle. It is important to remember that social media conversations are glaringly public and can be used in different contexts for or against the organisation.There is, however, an extremely important function that employees can perform to mitigate or assist during a crisis.

    Employees will sometimes pick up a negative mention that escapes your social listening practice, either due to privacy restrictions (Facebook) or incomplete query building. They should highlight these at once to the HR representative on the crisis squad. If they don’t get a response in two hours, they should escalate to the CCO. It is important that every employee knows that he/she should never hide an issue from leadership; it will eventually explode. Escalate, ring the alarm bells early, and get everyone into war mode as soon as possible.

     

    Reprinted with permission the publisher from

    The Indestructible Brand

    Crisis Management in the Age of Social Media

    By Venke Sharma and Hushidar Kharas

    Publisher: Sage Response

    Paperback, 172 pages

    Cover price: Rs 295

     

  • [PR] There’s nothing wrong in lobbying: Sharif Rangnekar

    Serving his second term as the President of PRCAI (Public Relations Consultants Association of India), Sharif Rangnekar, CEO & Director of Integral PR has over 20 years of experience in the fields of journalism, communication and publishing, having worked with organizations such as Penguin Books India, The Economic Times and The Pioneer. He attributes his knowledge and information gathering instincts to the experience he acquired working under senior journalists in the news business.

     

    In conversation with MxM India’s Shruti Pushkarna, Mr Rangnekar talks about his transition from a journalist to a communications professional, his views on lobbying and crisis management, on the negativity attached to public affairs, on the need for a united PR body and much more. Talking about social media, he felt that social media is just beginning to impact the PR business and there is a lot of unnecessary hype that is created around it. Excerpts:

     

    Q: Tell us a bit about your journey and work as the Director of Integral PR?

    A: The journey has been a little like the market, it’s had its ups and downs. One thing about PR is that if you stay connected with what’s happening around you, you constantly feel that you are learning something new. There’s always a newness attached to everything you do on a day to day basis because you are always dealing with the publics, you are always dealing with influencers such as the media, and the government.

     

    Q: Elaborate for us on the 360-degree approach of Integral PR and Focal Point Management.

    A: I think a lot of businesses we are seeing and a lot of change we are seeing is extremely new to India. What you are seeing today may already be old in the next two days, given the speed of technology and the impatience levels of a very young country. So in a scenario like that, your constant engagement with the different touch points that influence your business, makes focal point management – where we put the client in the centre and we look at all the constituencies around him that influence what he does, how he does it and how does he reach out to them ­- extremely important. So it’s a synchronized 360 degree approach where you are looking at government, communities, consumer groups, other pressure groups, chambers of commerce and the media. And we look at our communication outreach along all those parameters.

     

    Q: You have done extensive work in the area of public affairs management. How difficult you think it is for a communication professional to work in that area, given the systems in the country?

    A: I think there is a lot negativity attached to public affairs because people assume that public affairs is only government affairs but there is another element attached, which is advocacy. There is the other part of it where you are debating and discussing policy, you are discussing issues that are new to a nation. I don’t think public affairs is as difficult or as tedious as it is made out to be. I think there is a government out there, and there have been governments in the past who want to bring a certain amount of change, and in any democratic set-up there has to be a debate and there has to be a hearing of all the relevant voices. So in that sense, governments have made these efforts, things take longer than people would want them to but then that’s the nature of our democracy. I think problem arises when there isn’t transparency attached to the mandate that you are carrying out or if the benefits of a policy are limited to a very small group.

     

    Q: You started out as a journalist and moved into public relations later. How has the transition been for you?

    A: I have been pretty lucky in terms of the transition. I was part of a news and research firm when I moved out of mainstream journalism. My instinct for journalism hasn’t really changed, in the sense that my instinct for news and information hasn’t changed. I think that has helped me because I didn’t immediately take the first plunge into mainstream operational public relations but I had a period in between where I was consulting with Integral PR, so I got a better understanding of what a PR world does. And the training I had in journalism under some very senior journalists has helped me understand the importance of information and knowledge, which has become key to a lot of advice and counsel that one gives to a client.

     

    Q: Do you think PR can be more than mere press relations?

    A: It already is, and I think this impression of it being mere press relations comes from the press who only sees the PR agencies dishing out press releases or having press conferences or setting up one on one interviews. It’s the limited view that the media has of PR because that’s all they get to see, the rest of it is quite confidential. There is so much work that takes place in a PR agency, planning a brand, planning an advocacy drive, developing campaigns, doing marketing communications; there is so much of work that goes on behind the scenes including crisis communication. There is a lot more happening out there and I think if people need to know more about it, then the PR industry needs to talk a little bit more about it.

     

    Q: How critical do you think is crisis management to the communications business?

    A: I think it’s extremely critical. There are two parts of the business, one is building reputation and image, the other is protecting it. Crisis management is about protecting the image, it’s about protecting a business, its people, its operations, its investment. Crisis management is an extremely important part and, more so today, because there is a greater awareness level amongst the people, there are a lot of new issues out there. In a scenario like that, there is a lot of education that needs to take place.

    There are people being deprived of land, or people being moved out from places, there are people who are suddenly realizing that certain corporations may not be giving them what they are looking for, so they are taking to the streets and protesting, or going online and starting campaigns. So there are just so many situations that we are currently dealing with, and a lot of them are crisis related because it’s new to a business, it’s new to the external audience, it’s new to even the internal audience of an organization sometimes.

    So crisis management has become extremely important and if you are not aware, you don’t have that kind of experience, it’s going to be very difficult to give that kind of counsel or manage the situations for a client today.

     

    Q: How do you think social media is impacting the functioning of PR?

    A: I think social media is starting to impact and it’s not that it’s universally being adopted by the corporate world. I think what we need to understand is that social media at times is being drawn out of proportion in terms of its importance, because there is always an American influence there. That influence is coming from a society which is extremely wired up, a society which doesn’t engage that much with people. But we are dealing with India where there is so much of diversity, people behave differently, you still have very powerful mediums of communication which reach out to people whether it’s newspapers, or TV and more importantly, people still go out, people meet and people talk.

    So the need for the digital space is quite different and unique. Having said that, I think knowing what is happening out there, keeping your eyes on it is extremely important because still a large number of people are getting out there.

     

    Q: Coming back to Integral PR, what are the key areas of growth set for 2012?

    A: We are looking at advocacy, the digital space and definitely looking at the 360 degree approach, because we feel that there are more and more companies entering the Indian market or are going deep into the hinterland who will face different types of consumer groups, different types of consumption patterns, political environment, so a 360 approach is going to be extremely important for them when they want to do business in markets which they are pretty unfamiliar with.

     

    Q: What do you think of lobbying? Do you think past controversy has tainted the image of PR as an industry?

    A: There isn’t anything wrong in lobbying. It is used in a very negative sense and that might be because of the history that lobbying has had. Lobbying is influencing policy, today the media does it when they have debates, when they have knowledge platforms, when there are seminars and conferences held by chambers of commerce, that’s all forms of lobbying. Today a lot of corporate advertising that takes place is also part of lobbying.

    So I think there has to be a difference that people need to know and understand between fixing and influencing or creating a voice so that someone else can be heard on a policy. As far as the recent controversy is concerned, that did taint the image of the industry but I think the good thing of a lot of these kind of things that take place where the media is been bringing out issues about corruption and other related matters, is that it helps clean up the system.

     

    Q: What are your views on PR associations? Do you think a central body is critical in terms of representing the industry as a whole?

    A: It’s extremely important because the industry has to get together and address issues that the industry faces as a whole. This is not about business, it’s about industry at large. I think the association also needs to play a role in educating people, it has to play a role in giving a certain semblance of a structure to the industry, it has to play a role in benchmarking, so in that sense the association has to be there, to take these things out to the public, and also to reach out to the government because government is an active user of PR.

     

    Q: Advertising has a strong central body so it seems more united in that sense. But with PR where there are 3 to 4 bodies, it is not as united in that sense…what’s your view on that?

    A: I think there is only one PR industry association, it’s the PRCAI. You have another society which has to do with individuals working in the corporate sector, that’s more corporate communications, corporate affairs people, that’s very different from the consultancy business. So in that sense you do have two well-known bodies in this space. It does at times send out mixed messages but I think that’s why it’s important for the two to get together to not necessarily play as one but to have at least singular objectives out there. But I don’t think it’s creating a problem for the industry, just that at times people do get mixed up about who’s doing what but I don’t think that’s coming in the way of our objectives.

     

    Q: What are the critical areas that need attention in the PR industry today?

    A: I think benchmarking of standards of service, issues of integrity and most importantly it’s talent and the knowledge levels, I think those are two or three very key areas that most of our members are facing.

     

    Q: Where do you think ‘Brand India’ stands in today’s global scheme of things?

    A: Brand India is overstated. India growth story is not the China story where the government has taken the central role to bring change. Here change has come on through individual enterprises largely. So it’s not always been about public policy, and India the brand has suffered a bit over the last one year and half, assuming that there is a brand out there. There is this feeling that things don’t really move, there is a certain sense that you need a lot of patience and with other economies also crumbling at this point of time, people don’t necessarily have the same kind of patience, don’t have the same kind of funds, so in that sense the brand has suffered. But a fortunate thing that India has always had on its side is the fact that it’s a democracy, and that ultimately depending on how long you are willing to wait, things fall into place. People are beginning to understand that for a democracy like India which is extremely diverse, it requires that much more time for certain things to happen. So people are getting to know that and now they are making more informed decisions, more informed choices about doing business out here. So it’s a mixed situation right now, definitely the brand has taken a bit of a jolt in the last year and a half but that’s also because there have been no significant policy decisions for a long period of time.

     

    Q: Your word of advice for future PR managers…

    A: I think, just be informed. You have to love the joy of obtaining knowledge, being in the know and you have to be like a really good journalist. You need to have your information, you need to have more sources than one and you should have the ability to comprehend and express and you need to know tactfully how to manage people and work with people. Those are key to becoming a good PR executive, and more importantly, a good PR advisor.