Tag: ad duration

  • Ad cap effect: Rising customer satisfaction & ad rates

     

    By Ananya Saha

     

    Broadcasters have agreed to the toe the TRAI line on 10+2 minutes ad duration in a phased manner and fully with effect from October 1. Is it a good call? Will it impact the broadcast industry as the ad inventory comes down to almost half? What should be the broadcasters’ strategy to balance the revenue since it might take time for digitization benefits (subscription revenues) to shape up? MxMIndia asked industrywallahs what they think.

     

    PM Balakrishna, COO, Allied Media

    The regulation is certainly going to have an implication. There will be a huge change that the broadcast and media industry will have to make. The broadcast industry is skewed towards time bands, where prime time commands higher rates. With lack of ad space, the demand will see an increase. Price will become an issue. It is the medium that will start becoming a problem. At increased costs, the television medium will have to justify the cost to the clients. It is a preferred medium for many brands but with increased costs, they may start looking at other media options. It might create ripples.

     

    At the moment, brands and clients have not looked at it much. The industry is in the habit of not reacting till it lands on their head. But in the next one month, clients will start reacting. Going forward, a lot of advance booking will come into play. The move has been strategically placed around the festive time and hence may become chock-a-block. It will affect client and media agencies – we will have to plan much ahead.

     

    Punit Goenka, MD & CEO, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEE)

    Increasing rates – to keep pace with the increased reach of our media brands – is an on-going endeavour of the sales team. Now, in light of the TRAI directive, requiring us to reduce inventory which will enhance the overall viewing experience to a more engaged audience, the advertisers only stand to benefit multi-fold. So, with our advertisers getting a much better media proposition, the value for the same will also be at a premium. As such, our efforts to increase rates will only get further intensified. The extent of increase in rates will vary across genres and will be through a process of renegotiation of all contracts in a phased manner between July and October.

     

    Nina Elavia Jaipuria, EVP and Business head, Kids Cluster, Viacom 18 Media Pvt Ltd

    There are two implications of it: long-term and short-term. In the long term, it is good for all parties, including the advertisers, broadcasters, audience. It is a win-win situation in the long term, and it is important to keep that in mind when we look at the short-term implications. There is bound to a short-term pain for a long-term gain. The subscription revenues, to start showing results post-digitization, will have to wait. Ad revenues will fall. However, with limited inventory, the ad rates are bound to increase.

     

    The ad rates in kids category has not seen growth in a while. The only increase happens due to FCT or a new channel launch. Most of the growth has come from increased inventory, and it does not make sense since we tend to over-depend on it. With an increase in inventory, the ad rates do not go up. There, clearly, has been over-utilization by about 15-20 percent.

     

    We are looking at increasing ad rates by 25-30 percent. We have started working along with the clients and will comply with the deals and contracts. By the time October comes, we should be ready! However, this 10+2 ad cap assumes 100 percent usage of ad time, which might not be true especially in our category. So the ad rate increase will have to take care of it.

     

    Rahul Johri, SVP and General Manager – South Asia, Discovery Networks APAC

    Our core mission is to satisfy viewers with the highest quality and entertaining programming. We are equally committed to offer the maximum value to our clients who continue to appreciate Discovery’s networks’ efficient and effective inventory.

     

     

     

    Ashish Pherwani, Partner, Advisory Services, E&Y

    Basically, this regulation will have an impact on broadcasters. By reducing the available inventory, it will put pressure on ad revenues. Broadcasters will try to combat this in three ways: (a) reducing content cost (b) trying to increase ad rates and (c) trying to increase subscription income. Channels with a heavier skew towards prime-time advertisements will face a higher impact. What will be of interest to see is how advertisers react to the reduction in inventory available for prime-time shows.

     

    Shailesh Shah, Secretary General, Indian Broadcasting Foundation

    No one is being asked to, and no one is “toeing a line”. Every single broadcaster believes that advertising should be in line with the law enacted in the mid-1990s. There are no exceptions. Some believe this will happen naturally as consumers make choices; some believe it can be done in line with digitization. The zillion-dollar question has always been “by when”. None of the broadcasters are really ready for a fell swoop, however.

     

    Even though the law has been in existence for almost eight years (Advertising Code of the Cable Television Act), it never got enforced as the government probably felt a new industry needs to develop its roots before such a law can be enforced. The authority (aka government) apparently feels the roots have grown well and it is now time to enforce the law.

     

    Broadcasters formed a well-represented committee to find the least-resistant and least-harmful way to help make that happen. The transition it has worked out is best, under the circumstances.

     

    Will it hurt? Most certainly, in the short term it will be agony – to advertisers, to agencies and to broadcasters. On the flip side, it is an opportunity for the broadcasters to come together to ensure digitization is done completely and in a hurry so that the thus-far-elusive subscription revenue kicks in, alleviates the pain and, hopefully, makes it go away. Clearly, it will become difficult to survive if one is at the periphery of the industry or has not become relevant as yet. New entrants will find it difficult to get things going in the short term. Regional players will also face hardships. Over time, as alternative revenues come about, and the battle for lesser space intensifies, I believe the industry will find its new level.

     

    Advertising rates have always been addressed by market forces, and will most certainly continue to do so. Where the enforcement-related water-line settles is to be seen.

     

    The advertising inventory today is an average of just over 11 minutes per hour as measured from daily inventories. The inventory, where it matters, will come down, however, but much less than by half. In general, please understand that it has not been as bad as it is being made out to be.

     

    Here’s the irony. There are well over 60,000 local cable operators. No one in the Government has an estimate of more than 75 percent of these. There are close to a 1,000 MSOs. The Government knows about 60 percent of them. These distributors manage their own (mostly) local channels and, as if it were a cottage industry, are not regulated at all. It is estimated that there are well over 30,000 such television channels operated across the country and several of them produce and carry news too. In comparison, the broadcasters are licensed for just over 800 channels, operate just under 650 channels and quite a few are still reeling under the current economic circumstances.

     

    The broadcasters are the real Davids in all this and the distributors, who purport to catch a cold every time broadcasters sneeze, are the real Goliaths. I really have not understood what is being “regulated” as a result. The complex sagas of the world’s largest democracy are far more interesting than fictional dramas.

     

    To sum up, India needs to digitize at break-neck speed. The industry will hurt in the interim. The quintessential cultural undercurrent of the Indian populace and its businesses that says “this is my fate” will decide what really is the fate of the industry!

     

    Ashok Venkatramani, CEO, MCCS

    Eventually, it is a good thing – especially from the point of view of the consumer. However, the speed and abruptness with which it is being implemented is a serious cause for concern. It puts undue amount of pressure on a broadcaster who is yet to reap the benefits of digitization and is not sure how it will reflect on the revenues.

     

    In the long run, yes, it is good for everybody. It will put pressure on broadcasters like us to create much better content. And of course, it is healthy for the consumer.

     

    We are contemplating an ad rate increase, and will announce it very soon. An ad rate hike, when the regulation is being implemented abruptly, is inevitable.

     

    *Responses are in alphabetical order by last name

     

  • TRAI notifies duration of ads on TV channels

    By A Correspondent

     

    The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has notified the regulation “Standards of Quality of Service (Duration of Advertisements in Television Channels) (Amendment) Regulations, 2013. This regulation mandates the broadcasters to restrict the duration of advertisements in their channels to a maximum of 12 minutes in any given clock-hour as prescribed in the existing rules.

     

    In order to monitor and ensure compliance with these regulations, broadcasters are now also mandated to report the duration of advertisements carried in their channels to the Authority on quarterly basis in a proforma prescribed by the Authority.

     

    TRAI has studied the issue of duration of advertisements being carried in TV channels. The data obtained from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and that collected from the broadcasters, clearly established the general perception that most of the TV channels are in brazen breach of the existing rules on the subject, notified by the Central Government in the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994.

     

    The duration of advertisements being carried on TV channels is closely related to the quality of viewing experience of the consumers which is akin to the quality of service being offered by the service providers to the consumers.

     

    Also, according to the Regulation, every broadcaster shall, within fifteen days from the end of a quarter, submit to the Authority, in the format specified by it by order, the details of advertisements carried on its channel.

     

    The Authority has noted that the duration and format of advertisements, being carried in TV channels are generally, not in accordance with the provisions of the advertising code as prescribed in the CTNR, 1994. Therefore, with the primary objective of striking a balance between giving a consumer a good TV viewing experience and protecting the commercial interests of broadcasters, after following the due consultation process, TRAI notified the “Standards of Quality of Service (Duration of Advertisements in Television Channels) Regulations” dated 14th May 2012. These regulations, besides prescribing that the limit of advertisement duration should be adhered to on clock hour basis, also provided that (i) advertisements should be carried only during breaks in live sporting action (ii) time gap between consecutive advertisement sessions should be of minimum 30 minutes in case of movies and 15 minutes otherwise (iii) no part screen advertisements should be permitted etc.

     

    The regulations were challenged by some of the broadcasters in the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT). The broadcasters had challenged the said regulations, inter alia mainly on the following grounds: (a) regulation on advertising time and its corresponding effect on the broadcaster’s revenues would adversely affect the growth and competition in the broadcasting industry (b) Sports channels, by very nature of the business, stand on a different footing as compared to other genres because of the reasons such as periodic availability of content, limited shelf life and mandatory sharing with Prasar Bharati. Also, the content is obtained at huge cost and with very stringent conditions which strictly regulate how the events would be broadcast with specified timelines allotted to advertisements.

     

    In order to minimize other breaks during certain live sporting events, in which natural breaks either occur after relatively long periods or there are no natural breaks such as F1 races, part screen advertisements should be allowed (c) the “part screen” and “drop down” advertisements are integral forms of advertising and (d) statutory rules already exist under the Cable TV Act to regulate the format and duration of advertisements that may be carried on television channels and the regulations are beyond the purview of TRAI and in conflict with the provisions of rule 7 of the CTNR 1994.

     

    Meanwhile, the New Broadcasters Association (NBA) has expressed “deep shock and concern” on the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) notification and is appalled that by way of advertisement regulations, the TRAI has issued the most sweeping and intrusive “controls” not just “regulations” in relation to advertising that may be carried on TV channels. According to NBA, these regulations have been issued at a time when news channels are facing a most unfriendly business environment. Dependence on advertising remains absolute with over 90 percent of revenues coming from it. The NBA has urged the government to ensure that the said regulation is kept in abeyance till such time digitization is fully implemented in the country (with consequential benefits of no or low carriage fees and credible subscription revenue) and DAVP recommences advertising on news channels at rates which are fair and acceptable.

     

  • TRAI-ing time for TV with ad curbs

     

    By Rishi Vora

     

    The Indian television scene as we know it is set for a sea change, and not in a good way for everyone. While viewers may heave a sigh of relief, advertisers and agencies are already counting the declining shekels as the authorities’ latest move is likely to cause a major setback to the Rs 21,000 crore television industry.

     

    Keeping in mind consumer grievances about too many ads, too little content, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has proposed to limit ad duration on pay television channels and also a few other suggestions on sporting events and news coverage.

     

    The story of Indian TV’s growth is also the story of increased advertising – which is good for brands, broadcasters and media agencies. The consumer, however, tends to feel inundated with advertisements especially at prime time and during the most popular shows.

     

    Not that there are no existing norms, but with the recent proposal, TRAI has stepped up the pressure for a better viewer experience.

     

    The Proposal

    • No free-to-air channel shall carry advertisements that exceed 12 minutes. For pay channels, the limit shall be six minutes. Furthermore, the prescribed limits shall be enforced on a clock-hour basis as against being averaged for 24 hours.

    Also it is proposed that the 12-minutes of advertisement are not to be aired in more than four sessions in one hour which means continuous ad-free broadcast for at least 12 minutes.

    • No more than three ad breaks during a movie, with a minimum 30 minutes between ad breaks will be permitted.
    • During live sporting events, advertisements can only be carried during interruptions in the sporting action. TRAI has also put up a proposal to ban on part-screen & drop-down advertising, which means only full-screen ads are permitted.
    • TRAI has proposed that audio level of the advertisement should not be higher than the audio level of the programme.
    • News and current affairs channels shall not run more than two scrolls at the bottom of the screen carrying non-commercial content. These scrolls should not occupy over 10 per cent of the screen space.

     

     

    The general sense among key stakeholders of the industry is that it’s a drastic move to slice ad duration to such an extent – almost half of the current norm – for pay channels. It’s going to be tough for the pay channels as anyway they lose out on substantial monies on account of leakages in the subscription model. Added to this are other worries such as increase in ad rates, inventory issues which may crop up, impact on quality content etc.

    MxM India finds out what key stakeholders have to say.

     

    Mr Sunil Lulla, CEO, Times Global Broadcasting Co. Pvt Ltd said, “The industry standard today is 10 minutes plus 2. Most of us are around that on an average hour basis but given the pressure and high cost of this business, very often the industry has had to go beyond the earlier stipulation and I think this should be left to the forces of the industry to regulate, like we’ve done for content.”

     

    He further added, “Regulation must be industry-created and cannot be ministry or government-thrusted. We believe that self-regulation has worked for content; we believe that self-regulation will work for advertising and many other aspects, and that’s the best way to develop this industry.”

     

    According to Mr Ajay Kakar, Chief Marketing Officer – Financial Services, Aditya Birla Group, these guidelines, though framed keeping viewer experience in mind, are more likely to impact the industry negatively as they may lead to increase in ad rates. He explains that the lower ad revenue would put pressure on broadcasters to reduce costs, which will subsequently impact the quality of content. Mr Kakar feels that these guidelines if accepted by the industry could lead to a paradigm shift for broadcasters and advertisers.

     

    Mr Ashish Pherwani, Senior Manager, Media and Entertainment – Ernst & Young has a similar view. He says that 70-80 per cent of a pay TV channel’s revenue comes from advertising and if the current regime of 12 minutes per hour is to become six minutes per hour, rates are ‘unlikely’ to double to make up for the revenue dip, so cost of content will go down and therefore shows like Bigg Boss and KBC won’t be viable.

     

    “The TRAI note stresses that digitisation will get more subscription revenues for broadcasters but that’s not going to happen soon. It’s going to take some years! Given that most GECs and sports channels’ inventory is 100 per cent and sold out currently, ad rates will go through the roof if inventory is halved. Advertisers will reduce TV spends and go to other media or less expensive TV channels. Hence, overall a negative impact on the TV industry.”

     

    Mr Jehil Thakkar, Partner and head of Media and Entertainment, KPMG noted that the guidelines have been in existence, but it is the market that determines the volume. He further added that it is in the broadcasters’ interests that they keep a limit on advertising, noting that they are well aware of the perils of excessive advertising as consumers tend to move between channels to avoid long commercial breaks.

     

    Mr T Gangadhar, Managing Director – MEC India is all for a good viewer experience. “I’m not a big fan of regulations, but there needs to be a way to protect the consumer’s interest,” he maintains. “Pay channels are making money through subscription. But yes, that is not much, as a lot of that is lost in leakages that are so prevalent in the broadcast industry.”

     

    He further added, “Typically, in many countries, subscription and ad sales go hand in hand – so what they’re trying to achieve is that if you’re a pay channel, quite clearly you have a revenue model in subscription and therefore while you are entitled to advertising revenue as well, it can’t come at the expense of spoiling the viewer experience especially when the viewer is paying for that particular channel.”

     

    Mr Neelkamal Sharma, COO – Buying Madison Group advised, “I woul suggest that it should be done in two stages, maybe from 12 minutes to 10 and then to 8 minutes. The move to have a limit is good and is in the overall long-term interest of the TV industry, since it will reduce viewer irritation. But a decision like this should be taken in consultation with industry bodies like IBF, ISA and AAAI.”

     

    It will be interesting to see if these guidelines are passed as the industry clearly is not on the same page as the TRAI. Broadcasters and advertisers are expected to send their suggestions to the TRAI before March 27.

     

    Watch this space for updates, views and more analysis.

     

    Imaging: Rafiq, File photograph of Budget on a television set: Fotocorp