MxMIndia

Category: PR ETC

  • Building trust, instilling pride and making the experience of working enjoyable is not a difficult ask, it is neither easy, writes Amith Prabhu

    Amith Prabhu: The great PR place to work

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    I’m no spokesperson for any PR firm as some may want to believe. I’m a big believer though that PR firms must practice what they preach. Several PR firms advise their clients to participate in the Great Place To Work (GPTW) Survey and get listed as one.

     

    It was heartening to see that Edelman India was featured in the survey last year and MSL Group India was featured in the same this year. I wish an increasing number of PR firms participate in the same and do the right things to feature in that prestigious list. This column is about the three things that make a workplace great according to the survey organisers and you may add to this list.

     

    Every firm can ensure they get these basics in place and thereafter all it takes is to apply to be a GPTW. I’m hoping there are at least three firms that feature in next year’s list. So what are the three things that a company needs to get right? The three that GPTW mentions on their website are –

     

    a) Trust the people they work for

    b) Have Pride in what they do; and

    c) Enjoy the people they work with

     

    Let’s analyse what goes into each of these three. I have had the fortune of being associated with both the firms that have made it to this list. With Edelman, having spent two years in their Chicago office and with MSL Group first as a client in 2009 and currently as a consultant on special projects.

     

    There are many firms who do a lot of things right but then do not muster the courage to participate in this survey. They say people join companies but leave their managers or because of their managers. This most often happens because of the arrogance with which the leadership operates leading to mistrust and a disgruntled employee base.

     

    Working on a set of blue chip clients enables professionals to not only learn more and do more but also take pride in what they do. A firm that has great brands as clients ends up doing great work. This in turn gets into the portfolio of employees as things accomplished.

     

    Lastly, right hiring and managing attrition well leads to a good work atmosphere. If the environment we wok in sets a positive tone, it leads us to bring out the best in us. This in turn has the potential to create happy minds and hearts which all leads to a great work place.

     

    I think building trust, instilling pride and making the experience of working enjoyable is not a difficult ask, it is neither easy. It needs consistent leadership, a great product or service that one can offer customers or clients and the right hiring of a good mix of people. PR firms can certainly get this formula right. Hope this becomes a trend and we see more PR firms in the list because then we can tell our clients more confidently how to be on that list as well.

     

  • Just as PR firms are used by ad agencies to publicise their work, PR firms should use ad agencies to package their work better, writes Amith Prabhu

    Amith Prabhu: Whose Cannes Lion is it anyway?

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    My column last week was blank to express dissatisfaction that no Indian PR firm won a lion and that no PR firm won the Grand Prix. Some friends wrote to me stating that a PR firm had indeed won the Grand Prix and I told them that I had done my research before stating publicly that no PR firm had won the Grand Prix.

     

    First, some background from publicly available information. Only two firms based in India decided to send four and two entries respectively for four campaigns. Madison sent one entry in three categories and one in one. Perfect Relations sent one entry each in two categories. All the other 32 entries from India were from ad agencies. Some of them won Lions. I keep saying that PR firms are used by ad agencies to publicise their work, similarly PR firms should use ad agencies to package their work better.

     

    Coming to the second point. It is unfortunate that the Grand Prix went to an events/content agency based in LA called Creative Artists Agency. In India they have are better known as CAA/Kwan and run by Anirban Blah. A new rule demands that the entity that enters the award should name the PR firm that worked on the campaign. However, the Scarecrow campaign was out and out a creative campaign by Moonbot Studio and CAA.

     

    The world’s largest independent PR firm was fortunate to be present at the awards ceremony and claimed that the Grand Prix for PR was finally in PR land. Edelman was lucky that CAA who entered in this category gave it due credit. Many campaigns did not mention the name of the PR firm because creative agencies do not want to share the limelight. Edelman was luckier that folks from CAA or Moonbot Studio were not present to accept the award and they got to claim the trophy as their own.

     

    For more context, the Chipotle Scarecrow was created by film makers Brandon Oldenburg and Limbert Fabian. CAA stepped in and worked with them as the main force, but the messaging came from Chipotle. The production was done by Moonbot Studios. All this for an app, which was a game accompanied by the video.

     

    The PR firm came into the picture to help support earned media initiatives. Solely promoted through PR, starting with a USA Today exclusive and earned social media, the Scarecrow generated over 7 million views. I lived in the USA when this campaign was launched and personally, it did not make an impact on me though I love Chipotle. This column is not to belittle the PR firm. I have worked there. I have the highest respect for the company. But somewhere it does not feel that the Grand Prix has come to PR land yet. In fact Fleishman claimed that they were the first to win a Grand Prix for PR a couple of years ago. Even that is incorrect as the submission was by their sister company TBWA.

     

    Firstly, the PR firm did not conceptualize the campaign, they only amplified an existing initiative. Secondly, they entered several of their campaigns from offices in Shanghai and London and New York but this was not a campaign they entered and lastly, because for a student of PR there is nothing to learn from this campaign that was done uniquely or differently.

     

    This column is to wish Edelman which is the largest single firm in revenue better luck in 2015. May a campaign win next year, which is conceptualized and submitted as an entry by a PR firm. I hope that firm is Edelman because having worked in one of its largest offices I am convinced they have the potential. And then we can all say with pride the Grand Prix has truly come to PR land.

     

    It is weird that no one has written about this. I choose to because the question remains; as to whose Cannes Lion is it anyway?

     

  • Amith Prabhu on only six entries being entered by two PR firms in India at the Cannes Lions and no PR firm in India or abroad winning the Grand Prix.

    Amith Prabhu: Is a Cannes PR Lion within our reach?

    By Amith Prabhu

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    As a mark of dissatisfaction that only six entries went from two PR firms in India and that no PR firm in India or abroad won the Grand Prix this column remains blank today.

     

     

    However, the quiz is available to win yourself a book of your choice worth upto Rs 500 from amazon or flipkart – Who began his career in PR working on clients such as Quaker Oats and ContiCommodity in the late 70s? Type your answer in the comments section here with #MxMprQuiz

     

  • I will be delighted if an Indian firm wins a Lion at Cannels in the PR category but I will not be surprised if it does not, writes Amith Prabhu

    Amith Prabhu: The elusive Cannes Lion

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    India has had a representative on every Cannes Lion PR jury ever since the category was introduced in 2009. For the record, Prema Sagar, Nandita Lakshmanan, Veena Gidwani, Sunil Gautam, Dilip Cherian and Radhika Shapoorjee. Interestingly, three of the six jury members have had their roots in one PR firm, which also happens to be my alma mater.

     

    This column is not about them but about all of us – the public in Public Relations and how Indian PR firms has never won a single Lion in the five years of the category’s existence. What eludes us from the Lion and what can we do to make the Lion a possibility. I wrote about this last year and you can read the same here – http://www.mxmindia.com/2013/06/amith-prabhu-why-cant-our-pr-firms-win-pr-lions-at-cannes/

     

    As this column gets published on the June 16, the shortlist for the PR Lions will be out and a day later on June 17, the winners will be announced. I will be delighted if an Indian firm wins a Lion in this category but I will not be surprised if it does not. I do not even have data that tells me how many Indian firms participated.

     

    Is the PR Lion a big deal? I have always believed they are not but for those winning it say they certainly make a big difference. Then why this column you may ask – because it is the season of awards and it is important to remind ourselves that we need to bring out quality work that stands out.

     

    Well, while the Lions get announced during the week and India had its Elephants last week through the Kyoorius Awards I am thinking of launching India’s first weekly PR quiz that will be part of this column and give away a PoRcupine in the form of a book to one winner every week. The answer may be written in the comment section here or tweeted as a tag to me @amithpr with hashtag #MxMprQuiz

     

    The first question – In Spring 1982, Mark and Tom met a guy called Steve, who worked at a little American company creating programming languages for computers. Steve wanted Mark and Tom’s help to grow the business, so he introduced them to two of his colleagues. What PR firm was born out of this? Answer to win a book on PR worth upto Rs 500 of your choice from Amazon or Flipkart.

     

  • HR folk must wake up and get their act together by consulting employee engagement professionals, CSR specialists and corporate reputation experts, writes Amith Prabhu

    Amith Prabhu: HR in Public Relations needs to do the right things to build a better reputation

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    It’s June and that time of the year when in some companies appraisals are completed and in some appraisals are just beginning. This is also the time when people are actively looking out for greener pastures because they feel it is time to move on or because they are disgruntled at a nominal hike or are feeling the raw deal is not worthwhile. But most importantly this is the time HR is under immense stress because transitions are taking place.

     

    But this column is to let HR folks in PR firms realize that they need to act as enablers rather than play an obstructive role. They need to strike a balance between the junior most person and their handlers. While HR is not a role that needs to be charitable, it certainly needs to be friendly and honest, which in my opinion is not any longer in PR firms.

     

    Let me elaborate further with two examples and I will obviously use fictitious names of people and firms. Let’s take for instance Raju from Gadkari Public Relations – a reputed firm got a great offer from a rival company, Banerjee Public Relations. Now he has the right to freedom to move on but it would be unethical for him to try and take his team along. Whether or not he does that he has resigned at his existing organization and they have got a whiff of things to come so decide to ask Raju to go on leave until the end of their notice period and at the same time spread a rumour that Raju has been sacked, which is unfair to his reputation and in the long term not a good thing for the HR team’s reputation as well.

     

    In another example, let’s take Rani who has just resigned from Omar Public Relations and is serving her notice period. The HR team in her office and the management begins to treat her badly by giving her the cold shoulder and taunting her. What HR does not realize that Rani will grow in her career and end up as a client someday and give Omar Public Relations a tough time and this has happened time and again.

     

    One can go on and on about unsavory stories from the world of Public Relations talent management and have a solid collection of real life stories where HR has ruined its own reputation and that of the firm. Well, I hope HR wakes up and gets it act together by asking employee engagement professionals, CSR specialists and corporate reputation experts how to repair the damage they have done. May be, it’s time to do some PR for HR.

     

  • Can we coin a better term to kill the ambiguity the 'exclusivity' term has brought about, asks Amith Prabhu

    Amith Prabhu: The exclusivity of exclusives

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    One reason PR professionals are less respected is because of the abuse of the word ‘Exclusive’. How many of us have used this word incorrectly over the last decade? How can we change this trend by trying to do some things better?

     

    For the uninitiated, the term ‘Exclusive’ is used to denote something that is restricted to the person, group or area concerned. We have cleverly over the years manipulated the term to suit our greed for more media output or as commonly referred to as ‘coverage’. Can we coin a better term to kill the ambiguity this has brought about?

     

    Exclusive typically meant there was a transparent agreement that only the individual or group was exposed to a spokesperson during the time frame of an announcement. And the others would get exposed to it once the news was public from the outlet that had exclusive access. However, this changed as some media outlets which were not the leaders in their segment began to approach PR firms or the in-house corporate communications for exclusive access after the special treatment was offered to the media outlet of choice.

     

    This has led to an unpleasant situation where more than one media house and sometimes running into dozens get exclusive access to a spokesperson which they position as ‘Exclusive.’ The better term to use would be ‘Shared Exclusive’ or ‘One-on-One’.

     

    The question that can be debated is – if exclusives are a good idea? I would think they are not, from a long term. The only person who benefits is the journalist and his or her media outlet. If an organization chooses to rotate the exclusive arrangement with multiple media outlets they lose out in the mid-term as a media house that got an exclusive in June for a less important story in June would be left out for a bigger and better story in July.

     

    Exclusives work best when the organization ensures it is not shared and strikes a deal to get substantial coverage or space. But this alienates other media houses and journalists, often leading to a broken bridge that takes time to build. While I’m not writing this column to suggest if exclusives are good or bad I’m definitely rooting for the use of the correct term to avoid ultimately making a fool of the end consumer – who is the reader or viewer.

     

  • On the first anniversary of this column, Amith Prabhu lists his three wishes from the government in the sphere of communications

    Amith Prabhu: The year flew by and we have a brand new government

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    Fifty columns in 52 weeks is an interesting milestone for India’s only weekly column on Public Relations. I am glad I could be its steward and I hope I have been able to make a tiny difference to those of you who read this religiously every Monday. When Pradyuman Maheshwari (Editor-in-Chief of MxMIndia) invited me to write this column last April, I was sceptical about having enough to write on and took couple of months to agree.

     

    In the past one year, we have seen a lot happen in the Indian Public Relations community – a dedicated international award, an annual gathering of the fraternity and a number of high profile people and account movements. The year ahead seems to be as exciting as we have just seen the world’s largest event just conclude. Today all eyes are on New Delhi as a new government takes charge and this government gets Public Relations right from the word Go.

     

    Three things that stand out are the way the swearing-in has been pegged with an invitation and its acceptance by heads of state of neighbouring countries. Then the entire one week after the result has been managed fairly well in terms of keeping citizens in the loop on the PM-designates actions. The positive press that has been generated for a man who until recently was persona non grata to some is immense.

     

    In the midst of this, the Twitter controversy generated by the outgoing PMO was the last in a series of PR gaffes committed by the former communications advisor. The entire episode could have been avoided or handled better. It is unfortunate that PR handlers of the nation’s highest office are not aware of the basics of relationship management.

     

    Then there is the Congress party which throws away every opportunity to mend its ways and create goodwill. Starting with Rahul missing the farewell dinner to the Prime Minister on the eve of the election result, to not taking drastic steps of stepping down after the election debacle to bring in radical reform, to winking at someone during the concession speech.

     

    Missing the communications bandwagon is not an option anymore and the Congress can only reinvent itself by building block by block on the bedrock of transparency, accountability and crystal clear communications. On the other hand, BJP with a strong mandate to govern should bring in a new ray of hope based on the expectations it has set in running a fair and feisty government. On the first anniversary of this column, my three wishes from the government in the sphere of communications are as follows:

     

    To have a weekly address by the Prime Minister’s office and once a month, that address may be made by the Prime Minister himself. To ensure there is a quarterly report card of achievements and plans for the next three months are shared as well in the form of a power point. Lastly, to make sure freedom of speech is respected and right to freedom of every individual is protected.

     

    If you have other suggestions for the PMO and the Congress party to work their Public Relations programmes better, feel free to mention them in the comments here. Thanks again for the support over the past 12 months. Hope to hear from you on topics you will like for me to focus on in the forthcoming columns.

     

  • Amith Prabhu looks at how the three principal political players from the Public Relations point of view and what they did right or wrong and how they did it.

    Amith Prabhu: In the end Public Relations won!

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    This was an election like no other. It was slated to be a watershed and many had accepted a Narendra Modi wave and many hadn’t. I have to admit that I had not. As a Modi baiter I hoped he wouldn’t win and at least not win with the kind of landslide he has.

     

    Leaving politics aside I will focus on what I feel is the biggest winner in this elections which is my favourite subject: Public Relations. This election was fought by those who used Public Relations and those who did not. The result is that those who used it won.

     

    Let’s use at the three principal players and see what they did right or wrong and how they did it. We will start with the new kid on the block: the Aam Aadmi Party. They were an upstart no one had heard of 18 months ago. They messed up their stab at power in Delhi in 49 days but decided to go all out and gain national stature in the Lok Sabha elections. They put most of their eggs in one basket and this is the basket called Varanasi. They played with limited resources but capitalized well on social media mobilizing money and volunteers which has shown them results in the most unlikely of places – Punjab. What they did wrong and went against them, purely in PR terms was to not manage the exit in Delhi well, both in terms of communications and in terms of managing perceptions. But for a startup, three-four seats is a good one. Even BJP did not get more than two seats in 1984 on their debut.

     

    Let’s move to the Congress which got it all wrong and did not read the writing on the wall even as late as 25 weeks ago after the drubbing they received in the Assemble Polls. The fact that most of the union ministers have lost and in some cases come third or fourth should be an eye opener. They should have projected a collective leadership to counter the one man show from the opposition. They should have copied tools and tactics from other campaigns blatantly. They should have worked harder on repairing the tarnished reputation. For people like Ajay Maken, Priya Dutt or Sandeep Diskhit to lose shows that there was a rot deep within that needed to be fixed. The three names I mentioned were the ones who were driving traditional media and social media efforts. And if they themselves could not save their own seats as incumbents, what could one expect from the others.

     

    Let’s save the best for last – the BJP. Except for polarising which is a politically motivated move they did everything else right from the word go. They projected Narendra Modi has a no-nonsense, hardworking mass leader who means business. They assembled a formidable team of professionals to drive a presidential style campaign. They made the right amount of noises because they were in it to win it and nothing else. I am still not a fan of Modi and may never be one for a long time only because I have seen him from close quarters when I worked at APCO and he has streaks of ruthlessness, but when it comes to his marketing acumen and PR savviness one has to give it to him. He used every trick in the book and every tool at his disposal to make everything seem effortless.

     

    Now, all eyes will be on how he delivers on his promises. All I want is that India’s reputation in the eyes of fellow Indians and the entire world is not tarnished by acts of state sponsored or backed violence in the name of class and religion. The rest will follow. It was a well fought election but now turns out it was mostly one sided. I will write a separate blog on the non-PR aspects over the weekend on my personal website because this event is historic. For now, here’s wishing Prime Minister Narendra Modi (yes – I said it, never thought a day like that will come) the very best and hoping India remains strong and intact. He won an historic election but Public Relations won as well.

     

  • Some of the techniques used in the interview to Arnab Goswami last week were very clever like the man, notes Amith Prabhu adding that the BJP PM candidate's mind showed clarity but his body language showed discomfort

    Amith Prabhu: What corporate spokespersons can learn from the Narendra Modi interview on Times Now?

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    I wrote a column soon after the Rahul Gandhi interview three months ago – http://www.mxmindia.com/2014/02/amith-prabhu-what-corporate-spokespersons-can-learn-from-the-historic-rahul-gandhi-interview/ and to be fair I’m writing one in the aftermath of the Narendra Modi interview on Times Now this past week. These are observations that can be used to train corporate spokespersons. However one must realize that Modi has been led a public life for over 40 years and much of his acumen comes from the experiences he has gathered as a CM in the last 14 years.

     

    It is worth watching the interview in order to make sense of this column. Some of the techniques used in the interview were very clever like the man. For example, pretending to be a great listener came across strongly throughout but he gave it away umpteen times by cutting short the interviewer when he found the question uncomfortable.

     

    He showed his animosity towards the interviewer and the TV channel on several occasions. He kept his answers short and ensured he conveyed a sense of bluntness. In instances when he felt cornered he used smart one-liners or asked for explanations from the interviewer in order to proceed. All in all, his mind showed clarity but his body language showed discomfort. But the best part was that he chose not to walk away like he did the previous time he was on an English channel.

     

    Some of the smart things he did were to use talk about some of his actions in a matter of fact manner and earn some brownie points. Two examples of this was when he spoke of sending Sonia Gandhi flowers wishing her a speedy recovery when she was unwell or when he said he has never worked but it is his team that works so hard but he gets the credit that is due to them.

     

    So what are the five key takeaways for dealing with interviews better? Firstly, to control the interview in speech and spirit which he did with aplomb. Secondly, he tackled every question the way he wanted to and put the interviewer in his place at every given opportunity. Thirdly, he called a spade a spade without mincing words because he had told himself he had nothing to lose, Fourthly, he used random actions of the past to come across as a better person than he is and projected himself as larger than life. Lastly, he did not ramble but ensured his responses were blunt and to the point.

     

  • We need to take our offering to the next level, writes Amith Prabhu, adding: the key is to help clients to move out from the media relations space to new zones of content, CSR, conferences and consumer outreach

    Amith Prabhu: What’s new that PR folks can offer clients?

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    Time and again I get asked about my stint in the US. I have now volunteered to offer to meet young grads on and off campus periodically to share my experiences so that new perspectives are brought into the way we approach the profession in this part of the world. For those who may not be part of the groups I interact with, here are some thought starters!

     

    I wrote about it in one of my initial columns, while abroad – http://www.mxmindia.com/2013/07/amith-prabhu-5-reasons-why-pr-in-us-is-better-than-in-india/ – but now that I am back in India and have visited over 10 offices of various PR firms for sundry meetings and have been talking to friends in the business I realize we need to take our offering to the next level. The key is to help clients to move out from the media relations space to new zones of content, CSR, conferences and consumer outreach. Yes! None of these have been traditionally the forte of PR firms but it is time to change the game.

     

    I am going to touch upon each of these briefly so you can go to clients with new ideas in these spaces. Content has always been king but with the advent of social media, good and relevant content that is easy to grasp is key. Press releases are passé as people take brand news with a pinch of salt as the bluff on paid news has been called.

     

    CSR is the next big thing clients are increasingly latching onto. Not just because it is a good thing to do but because it is now mandated by law. Clients are looking for great ideas to help causes, support the community and create a niche that they can talk about and inspire their customers and staff with. CSR is also a great way to engage employees.

     

    Conferences are being churned out by event managers by the truckload. How many of these are credible? How does one pick out those that are worth partnering with? A smart PR campaign will include some interesting events to innovatively partner with and this is not just about speaking or sponsoring but more. Figuring out what is more is critical to adding value.

     

    Lastly, nothing stops the PR firm to go to a client with an idea that can be executed without mainstream media.  In today’s age of digital all one needs is a thorough understanding of the challenge and ways to address it. So there you are four ways beyond media to make an impact and more importantly to make PR count.

     

    Amith Prabhu is the co founder of PRAXIS and is currently building a firm exclusively to support the communication needs of Members of Parliament.

     

  • Future Prime Ministers should stop the practice of hiring editors and instead retain professional public relations specialists, writes Amith Prabhu

    Amith Prabhu: The Accidental Media Advisor

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    There may never be a book on the PM’s media advisor unless one of them chooses to write a biography. However, the recent book by Sanjaya Baru beckons to be in the spotlight because of how it has been positioned. It is outright a case of sour grapes by an accidental media advisor.

     

    Accidental because the practice of appointing Editors as media advisors is an outdated idea. A media advisor in the age of digital age which began at the same time UPA 1 came into existence should be one with an understanding of politics and digital communication. To have hired the editor of a business daily was a flawed idea and to not put an embargo on him spilling the beans during the lifetime of the protagonist was shortsightedness of the PMO.

     

    Having read excerpts of the book I wouldn’t think the content is fictitious. But the manner in which it is written clearly shows a bad falling out between employer and employee because employee wanted a bigger role which was not the way it was meant to be. A media advisor should not get into general policy making but help advice on reputation enhancement which the author tried doing and suggests the same in his book.

     

    I am building an outright case that future Prime Ministers and we will have a new one by this time next month should stop the practice of hiring editors and instead hire professional public relations specialists. The only thing an editor brings is his connections that would be used to block a negative story. In this day and age anything negative comes out faster through social media and through RTI and negative stories should not be stopped.

     

    A PR professional as media advisor would be better in three ways – he or she would have advised his clients on how to reach out to audiences and does it without fanfare or an ideological bias. He or she would have an understanding of digital communication and use it in a smarter way than has been done so far. And lastly, he would be loyal enough to respect non-disclosure agreements even if they were not signed because a PR professional worth his or her salt is instilled with ethics to not wash dirty linen in public.

     

    There will be a time in the near future when that will happen. As a start, an initiative is being conceptualized to create Communication Assistants to members of Parliament who will become a resource pool in the future for politicians and governments to hire. So there will be no accidental Prime Ministers but more importantly there will be no accidental media advisors.

     

  • For someone with over a decade in the profession, attending an international conference is worthwhile given the exposure to fellow professionals from across the world, writes Amith Prabhu

    Amith Prabhu: Four major international PR events not to miss in 2014

    By Amith Prabhu

     

    Several PR professionals keep asking me about how they can gain international exposure both in terms of work experience and networking. While the former does not have an easy answer, the latter is possible by saving right and making the investment to attend one or more of the many global events. I wrote about four Indian events to watch out for in a March column and here I am with my list of four that are taking place overseas.

     

    Flight tickets and stay will set you back by at least Rs 90,000 and another lakh may be set aside for event registration. For someone with over a decade in the profession this is a worthwhile investment because of the exposure to fellow professionals from around the world that it offers. While two are in Europe and two in North America you may pick the one that fits best.

     

    IABC World Conference, Canada – This year Toronto is hosting the annual event between June 8 and 11. With a schedule filled with seven tracks, more than 60 breakout sessions, plus five plenary sessions, the World Conference promises to help you reach the next stage of your career. http://wc.iabc.com/

     

    Cannes Festival, France – It claims to be the only truly global meeting place for professionals working in creative communications, from creatives and marketers to technologists and media specialists. Cannes Lions is where 12,000 people from 94 countries come together to be inspired by seven days of learning, networking and celebration between June 15 and 21. https://www.canneslions.com/attend/why_cannes/festival_at_a_glance/overview/

     

    World Public Relations Forum, Spain – Madrid will host this biennial event presented by the Global Alliance between September 21 and 23 which will be an opportunity to reflect on how to transform the profession, aligned with the changes experienced by organisations, with communication at the heart of the strategy. http://www.globalalliancepr.org/website/page/wprf-2014-madrid

     

    Global PR Summit, USA – The third edition of this Holmes Group event promises to be power packed and will be held in Miami as always between October 27 and 30. This has a good mix of global leaders, both from leading firms and from corporations. http://www.globalprsummit.com/

     

    If you would like to add others to this list tweet me at @amithpr or leave a comment here. I have been to the Miami event twice in a row and was a volunteer at the IABC world conference in Chicago. This year I’m thinking of heading to Spain.